Skip to main content
Log in

The European Commission's Green Paper on European Contract Law

  • Published:
Journal of Consumer Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In July 2001 the European Commission published a Communication to the Council and the European Parliament, its so-called "Green Paper" on European Contract Law (COM (2001) 398). This document seeks feedback on the options sketched by the Commission for future European Community action in the contract law field.

The present note, which incorporates as an Appendix the text of the Green Paper itself, is designed to explain the background to the Commission's intervention (the first section, pp. 339–350 below), to provide a brief commentary on the content of the Green Paper (the second section, pp. 350–356) and then to assess the constitutional implications of a proposed advance towards a European Contract Law (the third section, pp. 356–371). It is argued that the debate about the creation of a European contract law is properly seen not merely as a matter of cultural feasibility and of commercial desirability, but that in addition assessment of the EC's potential contribution is heavily conditioned by increasing constitutional anxieties about the EC's legitimate role in the field of market regulation. The Green Paper avoids explicit treatment of the constitutional dimension of European contract law, yet, it is argued in this note, this is in fact unavoidable in the wake of the European Court's seminal judgment of October 2000 in the so-called "Tobacco Advertising" case in which it for the first time invalidated a measure of harmonisation of laws on the basis that an insufficient connection with the process of market-building had been shown by the European Community's legislature. This demands that the constitutional validity of legislative proposals in the field of contract law be examined with care, for the EC, an entity created by an international Treaty, has been endowed with no general competence as lawmaker in this or any other field, even though past legislative practice may have tended to obscure this constitutionally fundamental principle.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Alpa, G. (2000). European Community resolutions and the codification of private law. European Review of Private Law, 8, 321–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basedow, J. (1998). The renascence of uniform law: European contract law and its components. Legal Studies, 18, 121–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basedow, J. (2001). Codification of private law in the EU: The making of a hybrid. European Review of Private Law, 9, 35–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beale, H. (1995). Legislative control of fairness: The Directive on Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts. In: J. Beatson & D. Friedmann (Eds.), Good faith and fault in contract law, pp. 231–262. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, T. (1996). Law reform in the EC and its limits. Yearbook of European Law, 16, 243–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campana, M.-J. (2000). Vers un langage juridique commun en Europe? European Review of Private Law, 8, 33–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, H. (1994). Good faith in European contract law. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 14, 229–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, H. (1999). Regulating contracts. Oxfor Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, H. (2000). Formalism and efficiency. European Review of Private Law, 8, 11–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dashwood, A. (1998). States in the European Union. European Law Review, 23, 201–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Burca, G. (1999). Reappraising subsidiarity's significance after Amsterdam. Harvard: Harvard Law School. Jean Monnet Working Papers 7/99 (available via http://www.law.harvard.edu/Programs/JeanMonnet).

    Google Scholar 

  • Grundmann, S. (1998). Europäisches Schuldvertragsrecht. Berlin: de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grundmann, S., Kerber W., & Weatherill, S. (forthcoming). Party autonomy and the role of information in the Internal Market. Berlin: de Gruyter.

  • Hartkamp, A., Hesselink, M., Hondius, E., Joustra, C., & du Perron, E. (1998). Towards a European Civil Code. Second Edition. The Hague: Kluwer Law International

    Google Scholar 

  • Hervey, T. (2001). Up in smoke? Community (anti-)tobacco law and policy? European Law Review, 26, 101–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heusel, W. (1999). New European contract law and consumer protection. Trier: Europäische Rechtsakademie Trier/Bundesanzeiger Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howells, G., & Wilhelmsson, T. (1997). EC consumer law. Aldershot: Dartmouth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joerges, C. (1997). The impact of European integration on private law: Reductionist perceptions, true conflicts and a new constitutionalist perspective. European Law Journal, 3, 378–406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lando, O., & Beale, H. (2000). Principles of European contract law, Parts 1 and 2. The Hague: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Legrand, P. (1996). European legal systems are not converging. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 45, 52–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Legrand, P. (1997). Against a European Civil Code. Modern Law Review, 60, 44–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Micklitz, H.-W. (1996). Rechtseinheit oder Rechtsvielfalt in Europa? Rolle und Funktion des Verbraucherrechts in der EG und den MOE-Staaten. Baden-Baden: Nomos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Micklitz, H.-W. (2000). Principles of social justice in European private law. Yearboof European Law, 19, 167–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollack, M. (1994). Creeping competence: The expanding agenda of the European Community. Journal of Public Policy, 14, 95–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reich, N. (1996). Europäisches Verbraucherrecht. Nomos: Baden-Baden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rekaiti, P., & Van den Bergh, R. (2000). Cooling-off periods in the consumer laws of the EC Member States: A comparative law and economics approach. Journal of Consumer Policy,23, 371–407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulte-Noelke, H., & Schulze, R. (1999). Europäische Rechtsangleichung und nationale Privatrechte. Baden-Baden: Nomos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steindorff, E. (1996). EG-Vertrag und Privatrecht. Baden-Baden: Nomos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steindorff, E. (1999). Annotation of Case C-104/96. Common Market Law Review, 36, 191–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuyck, J. (1997). Patterns of justice in the European Constitutional Charter: Minimum harmonisation in the field of consumer law. In: L. Krämer, H.-W. Micklitz, & K. Tonner(Eds.), Law and diffuse interests in the European legal order, pp. 279–289. Baden-Baden: Nomos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuyck, J. (2000). European consumer law after the Treaty of Amsterdam: Consumer policy in or beyond the Internal Market? Common Market Law Review, 37,367–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teubner, G. (1998). Legal irritants: Good faith in British law or how unifying law ends up in new divergences. Modern Law Review, 61, 11–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Timmermans, C. (1997). How can one improve the quality of Community legislation? Common Market Law Review, 34, 1229–1257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Timmermans, C. (1999). Subsidiarity and transparency. Fordham International Law Journal, 22, S106–S118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van den Bergh, R. (1998). Subsidiarity as an economic demarcation principle and emergence of European private law. Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, 5, 129–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Hoecke, M., & Ost, F. (2000). The harmonisation of European private law. Oxford: Hart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vranken, M. (1997). Fundamentals of European civil law. London: Blackstone.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, A. (2000). Legal transplants and European private law.Maastricht: Ius Commune Research School. Ius Commune Lectures on European Private Law 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weatherill, S. (1994). The role of the informed consumer in European Community law and policy. Consumer Law Journal, 2, 49–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weatherill, S. (1997). EC consumer law and policy. Harlow: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weatherill, S. (1999). Consumer policy. In: P. Craig & G. de Burca (Eds.), The evolution of EU law, pp. 693–720. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weatherill, S. (2000). New strategies for managing the EC's Internal Market. In: M. Freeman (Ed.), Current legal problems, Vol. 53, pp. 595–620. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weatherill, S., & Beaumont, P. (1999). EC law. Third edition. London: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weatherill, S., & Micklitz, H.-W. (1993). Consumer policy in the European Community: Before and after Maastricht. Journal of Consumer Policy, 16, 285–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker, S. (2001a). Judicial review in public law and in contract law; the example of student rules. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 21, 193–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker, S. (2001b). Judicial interventionism and consumer contracts. Law Quarterly Review, 117, 215–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker, S., & Zimmermann, R. (2000). Good faith in European contract law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeno-Zencovich, V. (1998). The European Civil Code, European legal traditions and neo-positivism. European Review of Private Law, 4, 349–362.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Weatherill, S. The European Commission's Green Paper on European Contract Law. Journal of Consumer Policy 24, 339–398 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013933627662

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013933627662

Keywords

Navigation