nach oben

Erschienen in:

2024 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

An Insight into Code Smell Detection Tool

verfasst von : Shrasti Mourya, Piyush Pratap Singh, V. B. Singh

Erschienen in: Reliability Engineering for Industrial Processes

Verlag: Springer Nature Switzerland

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

A code smell isn’t a bug and it won’t help your system operate exceptionally. It might simply make it more difficult for software engineers to comprehend and maintain project source code, resulting in extra maintenance expenses. Researchers have provided a variety of techniques and tools for extracting code smells throughout the last 20 years. Therefore, there is a need for comprehensive research that summarizes and compares the large range of existing tools. We present a complete catalogue of all known code smell detection tools in this paper. We found 112 tools as a result of our study, 52 of them available for download online. They also support a variety of programming languages including Java, JavaScript, C, C++, C#, Python, and others. We categorize different code smell detection tools in this study based on their type, availability, detection techniques, identified code smells, supported languages, and main features.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel Considering Multiplicative Noise in a Software Reliability Growth Model Using Stochastic Differential Equation Approach

Nächstes Kapitel A Study on the Efficiency of Divergence Measure in Fuzzy TOPSIS Algorithm for Multi-attribute Decision Making—A Case Study on University Selection for Admission

Sharma T, Spinellis D (2018) A survey on software smells. J Syst Softw 138:158–173CrossRef

Van Emden E, Moonen L (2002) Java quality assurance by detecting code smells. In: Ninth working conference on reverse engineering, Proceedings, pp 97–106. IEEE

Liu H, Ma Z, Shao W, Niu Z (2011) Schedule of bad smell detection and resolution: a new way to save effort. IEEE Trans Software Eng 38(1):220–235CrossRef

Fontana FA, Mariani E, Mornioli A, Sormani R, Tonello A (2011) An experience report on using code smells detection tools. In: 2011 IEEE fourth international conference on software testing, verification and validation workshops, pp 450–457. IEEE

Gerlitz T, Tran QM, Dziobek C (2015) Detection and handling of model smells for MATLAB/Simulink models. In: MASE@ MoDELS, pp 13–22

Kessentini M, Ouni A (2017) Detecting android smells using multi-objective genetic programming. In: 2017 IEEE/ACM 4th international conference on mobile software engineering and systems (MOBILESoft), pp 122–132. IEEE

Palomba F, Di Nucci D, Panichella A, Zaidman A, De Lucia A (2017) Lightweight detection of android-specific code smells: The adoctor project. In: 2017 IEEE 24th international conference on software analysis, evolution and reengineering (SANER), pp 487–491. IEEE

Singh S, Kaur S (2018) A systematic literature review: refactoring for disclosing code smells in object oriented software. Ain Shams Eng J 9(4):2129–2151CrossRef

Fernandes E, Oliveira J, Vale G, Paiva T, Figueiredo E (2016) A review-based comparative study of bad smell detection tools. In: Proceedings of the 20th International conference on evaluation and assessment in software engineering, pp 1–12

10.

Gupta A, Suri B, Kumar V, Misra S, Blažauskas T, Damaševičius R (2018) Software code smell prediction model using Shannon. Rényi and Tsallis entropies. Entropy 20(5):372CrossRef

11.

Tandon S, Kumar V, Singh VB (2022) An empirical analysis of code smells using CRITIC-TOPSIS method. In: 2022 12th international conference on cloud computing, data science & engineering (Confluence), pp 234–239. IEEE

12.

Tandon S, Kumar V, Singh VB (2022) Empirical evaluation of code smells in open-source software (OSS) using Best Worst Method (BWM) and TOPSIS approach. Int J Qual Reliab Manag 39(3):815–835CrossRef

13.

Gupta A, Gandhi R, Kumar V (2023) Investigating bad smells with feature selection and machine learning approaches. In: Kumar V, Pham H (eds) Predictive analytics in system reliability. Springer series in reliability engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05347-4_4

14.

Yamashita A, Moonen L (2013) To what extent can maintenance problems be predicted by code smell detection?–An empirical study. Inf Softw Technol 55(12):2223–2242CrossRef

15.

Trifu A, Marinescu R (2005) Diagnosing design problems in object oriented systems. In: 12th working conference on reverse engineering (WCRE’05), pp 10-pp. IEEE

16.

Schumacher J, Zazworka N, Shull F, Seaman C, Shaw M (2010) Building empirical support for automated code smell detection. In: Proceedings of the 2010 ACM-IEEE international symposium on empirical software engineering and measurement, pp 1–10

17.

Olbrich S, Cruzes DS, Basili V, Zazworka N (2009) The evolution and impact of code smells: a case study of two open source systems. In: 2009 3rd international symposium on empirical software engineering and measurement, pp 390–400. IEEE

18.

Fontana FA, Ferme V, Marino A, Walter B, Martenka P (2013) Investigating the impact of code smells on system’s quality: an empirical study on systems of different application domains. In: 2013 IEEE international conference on software maintenance, pp 260–269. IEEE

19.

Evans WS, Fraser CW, Ma F (2009) Clone detection via structural abstraction. Software Qual J 17(4):309–330CrossRef

20.

Yamashita A (2014) Assessing the capability of code smells to explain maintenance problems: an empirical study combining quantitative and qualitative data. Empir Softw Eng 19(4):1111–1143CrossRef

21.

Fontana FA, Mangiacavalli M, Pochiero D, Zanoni M (2015) On experimenting refactoring tools to remove code smells. In: Scientific workshop proceedings of the XP2015, pp 1–8

22.

Kamiya T, Kusumoto S, Inoue K (2002) CCFinder: a multilinguistic token-based code clone detection system for large scale source code. IEEE Trans Software Eng 28(7):654–670CrossRef

23.

Ochodek M, Hebig R, Meding W, Frost G, Staron M (2020) Recognizing lines of code violating company-specific coding guidelines using machine learning. Empir Softw Eng 25(1):220–265CrossRef

24.

Kaurr H, Maini R (2020) Function clone removal using refactoring techniques. Adv Math Scientific J 9(6):4001–4013CrossRef

25.

Tourwé T, Mens T (2003) Identifying refactoring opportunities using logic meta programming. In: Seventh European conference onsoftware maintenance and reengineering, 2003. Proceedings, pp 91–100. IEEE

26.

Basit HA, Jarzabek S (2009) A data mining approach for detecting higher-level clones in software. IEEE Trans Software Eng 35(4):497–514CrossRef

27.

Wahler V, Seipel D, Wolff J, Fischer G (2004) Clone detection in source code by frequent itemset techniques. In: Source code analysis and manipulation, fourth IEEE international workshop on, pp 128–135. IEEE

28.

Marinescu R (2004) Detection strategies: Metrics-based rules for detecting design flaws. In: 20th IEEE international conference on software maintenance, 2004. Proceedings, pp 350–359. IEEE

29.

Marinescu R, Ratiu D (2004) Quantifying the quality of object-oriented design: the factor-strategy model. In: 11th Working conference on reverse engineering, pp 192–201. IEEE

30.

Deissenboeck F, Pizka M, Seifert T (2005) Tool support for continuous quality assessment. In: 13th IEEE International workshop on software technology and engineering practice (STEP’05), pp 127–136. IEEE

31.

Ratzinger J, Fischer M, Gall H (2005) Evolens: Lens-view visualizations of evolution data. In: Eighth international workshop on principles of software evolution (IWPSE’05), pp 103–112. IEEE

32.

Kreimer J (2005) Adaptive detection of design flaws. Electron Notes Theoret Comput Sci 141(4):117–136CrossRef

33.

Eichberg M, Haupt M, Mezini M, Schafer T (2005) Comprehensive software understanding with SEXTANT. In 21st IEEE international conference on software maintenance (ICSM’05), pp 315–324. IEEE

34.

Basit HA, Jarzabek S (2005) Detecting higher-level similarity patterns in programs. ACM Sigsoft Softw Eng Notes 30(5):156–165CrossRef

35.

Slinger S (2005) Code smell detection in eclipse. Delft University of Technology

36.

Fontana FA, Zanoni M, Marino A, Mäntylä MV (2013) Code smell detection: Towards a machine learning-based approach. In: 2013 IEEE international conference on software maintenance, pp 396–399. IEEE

37.

Romano S, Scanniello G, Sartiani C, Risi M (2016) A graph-based approach to detect unreachable methods in java software. In Proceedings of the 31st Annual ACM symposium on applied computing, pp 1538–1541

38.

Roy CK, Cordy JR, Koschke R (2009) Comparison and evaluation of code clone detection techniques and tools: a qualitative approach. Sci Comput Program 74(7):470–495MathSciNetCrossRef

39.

Parnin C, Görg C, Nnadi O (2008) A catalogue of lightweight visualizations to support code smell inspection. In Proceedings of the 4th ACM symposium on software visualization, pp 77–86

40.

Sager T, Bernstein A, Pinzger M, Kiefer C (2006) Detecting similar Java classes using tree algorithms. In: Proceedings of the 2006 international workshop on Mining software repositories, pp 65–71

41.

Kirk D, Roper M, Wood M (2007) A heuristic-based approach to code-smell detection

42.

Lavazza L, Morasca S, Tosi D (2021) Comparing static analysis and code smells as defect predictors: an empirical study. In: IFIP international conference on open source systems, pp 1–15. Springer, Cham

43.

Fokaefs M, Tsantalis N, Chatzigeorgiou A (2007) Jdeodorant: Identification and removal of feature envy bad smells. In: 2007 IEEE international conference on software maintenance, pp 519–520. IEEE

44.

Jiang L, Misherghi G, Su Z, Glondu S (2007) Deckard: Scalable and accurate tree-based detection of code clones. In: 29th International conference on software engineering (ICSE’07), pp 96–105. IEEE

45.

Kiefer C, Bernstein A, Tappolet J (2007) Mining software repositories with isparol and a software ontology. In: Fourth international workshop on mining software repositories (MSR’07: ICSE Workshops 2007), pp 10–10. IEEE

46.

Duala-Ekoko E, Robillard MP (2007) Tracking code clones in evolving software. In: 29th International conference on software engineering (ICSE’07), pp 158–167. IEEE

47.

Bulychev P, Minea M (2008) Duplicate code detection using anti-unification. In: Proceedings of the spring/summer young researchers’ colloquium on software engineering (No. 2)

48.

Singh V, Snipes W, Kraft NA (2014) A framework for estimating interest on technical debt by monitoring developer activity related to code comprehension. In: 2014 Sixth international workshop on managing technical debt, pp 27–30. IEEE

49.

Lujan S, Pecorelli F, Palomba F, De Lucia A, Lenarduzzi V (2020) A preliminary study on the adequacy of static analysis warnings with respect to code smell prediction. In Proceedings of the 4th ACM SIGSOFT international workshop on machine-learning techniques for software-quality evaluation, pp 1–6

50.

Fu S, Shen B (2015) Code bad smell detection through evolutionary data mining. In: 2015 ACM/IEEE international symposium on empirical software engineering and measurement (ESEM), pp 1–9. IEEE

51.

Roperia N (2009) JSmell: a bad smell detection tool for java systems. California State University, Long Beach

52.

Juergens E, Deissenboeck F, Hummel B, Wagner S (2009) Do code clones matter?. In: 2009 IEEE 31st international conference on software engineering, pp 485–495. IEEE

53.

Yang L, Liu H, Niu Z (2009) Identifying fragments to be extracted from long methods. In: 2009 16th Asia-pacific software engineering conference, pp 43–49. IEEE

54.

Juergens E, Deissenboeck F, Hummel B (2009) Clonedetective-a workbench for clone detection research. In: 2009 IEEE 31st international conference on software engineering, p. 603–606. IEEE

55.

Boccuzzo S, Gall HC (2009) Automated comprehension tasks in software exploration. In: 2009 IEEE/ACM international conference on automated software engineering, pp 570–574. IEEE

56.

Higo Y, Kusumoto S (2009) Enhancing quality of code clone detection with program dependency graph. In 2009 16th Working conference on reverse engineering, pp 315–316. IEEE

57.

Telea A, Byelas H, Voinea L (2009) A framework for reverse engineering large C++ code bases. Electron Notes Theoret Comput Sci 233:143–159CrossRef

58.

Nödler J, Neukirchen H, Grabowski J (2009) A flexible framework for quality assurance of software artefacts with applications to java, uml, and ttcn-3 test specifications. In: 2009 International conference on software testing verification and validation, pp 101–110. IEEE

59.

Ganea G, Verebi I, Marinescu R (2017) Continuous quality assessment with inCode. Sci Comput Program 134:19–36CrossRef

60.

Moha N, Guéhéneuc YG, Duchien L, Le Meur AF (2009) Decor: a method for the specification and detection of code and design smells. IEEE Trans Software Eng 36(1):20–36CrossRef

61.

Murphy-Hill E, Black AP (2010) An interactive ambient visualization for code smells. In: Proceedings of the 5th international symposium on Software visualization, pp 5–14

62.

Carneiro GDF, Silva M, Mara L, Figueiredo E, Sant’Anna C, Garcia A, Mendonça M (2010) Identifying code smells with multiple concern views. In: 2010 Brazilian symposium on software engineering, pp 128–137. IEEE

63.

Li H, Thompson S (2010) Similar code detection and elimination for Erlang programs. In: International symposium on practical aspects of declarative languages, pp 104–118. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

64.

Fontana FA, Ferme V, Spinelli S (2012) Investigating the impact of code smells debt on quality code evaluation. In: 2012 third international workshop on managing technical debt (MTD), pp 15–22. IEEE

65.

Ferenc R (2010) Bug forecast: a method for automatic bug prediction. In: International conference on advanced software engineering and its applications, pp 283–295. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

66.

Peldzius S (2010) Automatic detection of possible refactorings. I:n Proceedings of the 16th international conference on information and software technologies (ICIST), pp 238–245

67.

Von Detten M, Meyer M, Travkin D (2010) Reverse engineering with the reclipse tool suite. In: Proceedings of the 32nd ACM/IEEE international conference on software engineering-Volume 2, pp 299–300

68.

Guo Y, Seaman C, Zazworka N, Shull F (2010) Domain-specific tailoring of code smells: an empirical study. In: Proceedings of the 32nd ACM/IEEE international conference on software engineering, Vol 2, pp 167–170

69.

Mathur N (2011) Java smell detector

70.

Sjøberg DI, Yamashita A, Anda BC, Mockus A, Dybå T (2012) Quantifying the effect of code smells on maintenance effort. IEEE Trans Software Eng 39(8):1144–1156CrossRef

71.

Cordy JR, Roy CK (2011) The NiCad clone detector. In: 2011 IEEE 19th international conference on program comprehension, pp 219–220. IEEE

72.

Feng C, Wang T, Liu J, Zhang Y, Xu K, Wang Y (2020) NiCad+: speeding the detecting process of nicad. In: 2020 IEEE international conference on service oriented systems engineering (SOSE), pp 103–110. IEEE

73.

Griffith I, Wahl S, Izurieta C (2011) TrueRefactor: an automated refactoring tool to improve legacy system and application comprehensibility. In: 24th international conference on computer applications in industry and engineering, ISCA 2011

74.

Stevens R, De Roover C, Noguera C, Kellens A, Jonckers V (2014) A logic foundation for a general-purpose history querying tool. Sci Comput Program 96:107–120CrossRef

75.

Kellens A, De Roover C, Noguera C, Stevens R, Jonckers V (2011) Reasoning over the evolution of source code using quantified regular path expressions. In: 2011 18th working conference on reverse engineering, pp 389–393. IEEE

76.

Arcelli Fontana F, Mäntylä MV, Zanoni M, Marino A (2016) Comparing and experimenting machine learning techniques for code smell detection. Empir Softw Eng 21(3):1143–1191CrossRef

77.

Simon F, Steinbruckner F, Lewerentz C (2001) Metrics based refactoring. In: Proceedings fifth European conference on software maintenance and reengineering, pp 30–38. IEEE

78.

Khomh F, Vaucher S, Guéhéneuc YG, Sahraoui H (2011) BDTEX: A GQM-based Bayesian approach for the detection of antipatterns. J Syst Softw 84(4):559–572CrossRef

79.

Mara L, Honorato G, Medeiros FD, Garcia A, Lucena C (2011) Hist-inspect: a tool for history-sensitive detection of code smells. In Proceedings of the tenth international conference on Aspect-oriented software development companion, pp 65–66

80.

Zibran MF, Roy CK (2011) Towards flexible code clone detection, management, and refactoring in IDE. In: Proceedings of the 5th international workshop on software clones, pp 75–76

81.

Gopalan R (2012) Automatic detection of code smells in Java source code (Doctoral dissertation, Dissertation for Honour Degree, The University of Western Australia)

82.

Alves P, Santana D, Figueiredo E (2012) ConcernReCS: finding code smells in software aspectization. In: 2012 34th international conference on software engineering (ICSE), pp 1463–1464. IEEE

83.

Wust J (2005) SDMetrics: the software design metrics tool for UML

84.

Tamrawi A, Nguyen HA, Nguyen HV, Nguyen TN (2012) SYMake: a build code analysis and refactoring tool for makefiles. In: 2012 Proceedings of the 27th IEEE/ACM international conference on automated software engineering, pp 366–369. IEEE

85.

Islam MR, Zibran MF, Nagpal A (2017) Security vulnerabilities in categories of clones and non-cloned code: an empirical study. In: 2017 ACM/IEEE international symposium on empirical software engineering and measurement (ESEM), pp 20–29. IEEE

86.

Macia I, Arcoverde R, Cirilo E, Garcia A, von Staa A (2012) Supporting the identification of architecturally-relevant code anomalies. ICSM12, 662–665

87.

Danphitsanuphan P, Suwantada T (2012) Code smell detecting tool and code smell-structure bug relationship. In: 2012 Spring congress on engineering and technology, pp 1–5. IEEE

88.

Raab F (2012) CodeSmellExplorer: tangible exploration of code smells and refactorings. In: 2012 IEEE symposium on visual languages and human-centric computing (VL/HCC), pp 261–262. IEEE

89.

Pessoa T, Monteiro MP, Bryton S (2012) An eclipse plugin to support code smells detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:1204.6492

90.

Nongpong K (2012) Integrating” Code Smells” Detection with refactoring tool support (Doctoral dissertation, The University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee)

91.

Rasool G, Arshad Z (2015) A review of code smell mining techniques. J Softw Evolut Process 27(11):867–895CrossRef

92.

Maiga A, Ali N, Bhattacharya N, Sabané A, Guéhéneuc YG, Antoniol G, Aïmeur E (2012) Support vector machines for anti-pattern detection. In: 2012 Proceedings of the 27th IEEE/ACM international conference on automated software engineering, pp 278–281. IEEE

93.

Liu H, Guo X, Shao W (2013) Monitor-based instant software refactoring. IEEE Trans Software Eng 39(8):1112–1126CrossRef

94.

Fard AM, Mesbah A (2013) Jsnose: detecting javascript code smells. In: 2013 IEEE 13th international working conference on source code analysis and manipulation (SCAM), pp 116–125. IEEE

95.

Kaur A, Raperia H (2013) Implementation and analysis of a refactoring tool for detecting code smells. Int J Comput Technol 6(1):242–247CrossRef

96.

Arnaoudova V, Di Penta M, Antoniol G, Guéhéneuc YG (2013) A new family of software anti-patterns: Linguistic anti-patterns. In: 2013 17th European conference on software maintenance and reengineering, pp 187–196. IEEE

97.

Vidal SA, Marcos C, Díaz-Pace JA (2016) An approach to prioritize code smells for refactoring. Autom Softw Eng 23(3):501–532CrossRef

98.

Sahin D, Kessentini M, Bechikh S, Deb K (2014) Code-smell detection as a bilevel problem. ACM Trans Softw Eng Methodol (TOSEM) 24(1):1–44CrossRef

99.

Hall T, Zhang M, Bowes D, Sun Y (2014) Some code smells have a significant but small effect on faults. ACM Trans Softw Eng Methodol (TOSEM) 23(4):1–39CrossRef

100.

Medeiros F (2014) An approach to safely evolve program families in c. In: Proceedings of the companion publication of the 2014 ACM SIGPLAN conference on systems, programming, and applications: software for humanity, pp 25–27

101.

Chaudron MR, Katumba B, Ran X (2014) Automated prioritization of metrics-based design flaws in UML class diagrams. In: 2014 40th EUROMICRO conference on software engineering and advanced applications, pp 369–376. IEEE

102.

Grigera J, Garrido A, Rivero JM (2014) A tool for detecting bad usability smells automatically. In: International conference on web engineering, pp 490–493. Springer, Cham

103.

Arcelli F, Rolla M, Zanoni M (2014) VCS-analyzer for software evolution empirical analysis. In: Proceedings of the 8th ACM/IEEE international symposium on empirical software engineering and measurement, pp 1–1

104.

Sharma VS, Anwer S (2014) Performance antipatterns: detection and evaluation of their effects in the cloud. In: 2014 IEEE international conference on services computing, pp 758–765. IEEE

105.

Mahajan G, Bharti M (2014) Implementing a 3-way approach of clone detection and removal using pc detector tool. In: 2014 IEEE international advance computing conference (IACC), pp 1435–1441. IEEE

106.

Singh S, Kaur R (2014) Clone detection in UML class models using class metrics. ACM SIGSOFT Softw Eng Notes 39(3):1–3

107.

Romano S, Scanniello G (2018) Exploring the use of rapid type analysis for detecting the dead method smell in java code. In: 2018 44th Euromicro conference on software engineering and advanced applications (SEAA), pp 167–174. IEEE

108.

Hecht G, Rouvoy R, Moha N, Duchien L (2015) Detecting antipatterns in android apps. In: 2015 2nd ACM international conference on mobile software engineering and systems, pp 148–149. IEEE

109.

Liu X, Zhang C (2017) DT: a detection tool to automatically detect code smell in software project. In: 2016 4th International conference on machinery, materials and information technology applications, pp 681–684. Atlantis Press

110.

Velioğlu S, Selçuk YE (2017) An automated code smell and anti-pattern detection approach. In: 2017 IEEE 15th international conference on software engineering research, management and applications (SERA), pp 271–275. IEEE

111.

Fontana FA, Pigazzini I, Roveda R, Zanoni M (2016) Automatic detection of instability architectural smells. In: 2016 IEEE international conference on software maintenance and evolution (ICSME), pp 433–437. IEEE

112.

Peldszus S, Kulcsár G, Lochau M, Schulze S (2016) Continuous detection of design flaws in evolving object-oriented programs using incremental multi-pattern matching. In: 2016 31st IEEE/ACM international conference on automated software engineering (ASE), pp 578–589. IEEE

113.

Sajnani H, Saini V, Svajlenko J, Roy CK, Lopes CV (2016) Sourcerercc: Scaling code clone detection to big-code. In: Proceedings of the 38th international conference on software engineering, pp 1157–1168

114.

Chen B, Jiang ZM (2017) Characterizing and detecting anti-patterns in the logging code. In: 2017 IEEE/ACM 39th international conference on software engineering (ICSE), pp 71–81. IEEE

115.

Sousa BL, Souza PP, Fernandes EM, Ferreira KA, Bigonha MA (2017) FindSmells: flexible composition of bad smell detection strategies. In: 2017 IEEE/ACM 25th international conference on program comprehension (ICPC), pp 360–363. IEEE

116.

Prokić S, Grujić KG, Luburić N, Slivka J, Kovačević A, Vidaković D, Sladić G (2021) Clean code and design educational tool. In: 2021 44th international convention on information, communication and electronic technology (MIPRO), pp 1601–1606. IEEE

Titel: An Insight into Code Smell Detection Tool
verfasst von: Shrasti Mourya
Piyush Pratap Singh
V. B. Singh
Verlag: Springer Nature Switzerland
Buch: Reliability Engineering for Industrial Processes
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-55047-8

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-031-55048-5

Copyright-Jahr: 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-55048-5_17

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Premium Partner