Skip to main content

2024 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

3. Decision Analysis Techniques in Supply Risk Assessment

verfasst von : George A. Zsidisin, Barbara Gaudenzi, Roberta Pellegrino

Erschienen in: Strategic Sourcing

Verlag: Springer Nature Switzerland

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Supply risk assessment has become a priority on the agenda of supply chain managers and purchasing departments. Multifarious unforeseen supply chain vulnerabilities and disruptions that have affected organizations in the last decade have caused losses of hundreds of millions of dollars in industries ranging from pharmaceuticals and consumer goods to electronics and automotive. At the heart of all these issues, there is a common challenge, namely the lack of robust processes to manage supply chain risk as the world becomes more interconnected and complex. Effective tools that companies can use to model and manage supply chain risk exist, but are still limited. Borrowing risk assessment models from large companies without adapting to the specific context of the firm may be dangerous because the realities in which companies operate are different. Also, the business environment changes at a very fast rate, thus constantly posing new challenges in managing supply chains. Although there is not a one-fit-all solution to risk assessment, the objective of this chapter is to provide an overview of the main risk assessment tools, as well as their characterization in order to support decision-makers to better manage supply chain risk during the strategic sourcing process.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Ashrafi, M., Davoudpour, H., & Khodakarami, V. (2015). Risk assessment of wind turbines: Transition from pure mechanistic paradigm to modern complexity paradigm. Sustainable Energy Review, 51, 347–355.CrossRef Ashrafi, M., Davoudpour, H., & Khodakarami, V. (2015). Risk assessment of wind turbines: Transition from pure mechanistic paradigm to modern complexity paradigm. Sustainable Energy Review, 51, 347–355.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Badurdeen, F., Shuaib, M., Wijekoon, K., Brown, A., Faulkner, W., Amundson, J., Jawahir, I. S., Goldsby, T. J., Iyengar, D., & Boden, B. (2014). Quantitative modeling and analysis of supply chain risks using Bayesian theory. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 25(5), 631–654.CrossRef Badurdeen, F., Shuaib, M., Wijekoon, K., Brown, A., Faulkner, W., Amundson, J., Jawahir, I. S., Goldsby, T. J., Iyengar, D., & Boden, B. (2014). Quantitative modeling and analysis of supply chain risks using Bayesian theory. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 25(5), 631–654.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bhutta, K. S., & Huq, F. (2002). Supplier selection problem: A comparison of the total cost of ownership and analytic hierarchy process approaches. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 7(3), 126–135.CrossRef Bhutta, K. S., & Huq, F. (2002). Supplier selection problem: A comparison of the total cost of ownership and analytic hierarchy process approaches. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 7(3), 126–135.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Brad, S., Murar, M., & Brad, M. (2018). Design of smart connected manufacturing resources to enable changeability, reconfigurability and total-cost-of-ownership models in the factory-of-the-future. International Journal of Production Research, 56(6), 2269–2291.CrossRef Brad, S., Murar, M., & Brad, M. (2018). Design of smart connected manufacturing resources to enable changeability, reconfigurability and total-cost-of-ownership models in the factory-of-the-future. International Journal of Production Research, 56(6), 2269–2291.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Carli, R., Dotoli, M., & Pellegrino, R. (2018). Multi-criteria decision-making for sustainable metropolitan cities assessment. Journal of Environmental Management, 226, 46–61.CrossRef Carli, R., Dotoli, M., & Pellegrino, R. (2018). Multi-criteria decision-making for sustainable metropolitan cities assessment. Journal of Environmental Management, 226, 46–61.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Chi, T., Li, J., Trigeorgis, L. G., & Tsekrekos, A. E. (2019). Real options theory in international business. Journal of International Business Studies, 50(4), 525–553.CrossRef Chi, T., Li, J., Trigeorgis, L. G., & Tsekrekos, A. E. (2019). Real options theory in international business. Journal of International Business Studies, 50(4), 525–553.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Choudhary, N. A., Singh, S., Schoenherr, T., & Ramkumar, M. (2023). Risk assessment in supply chains: A state-of-the-art review of methodologies and their applications. Annals of Operations Research, 322(2), 565–607.CrossRef Choudhary, N. A., Singh, S., Schoenherr, T., & Ramkumar, M. (2023). Risk assessment in supply chains: A state-of-the-art review of methodologies and their applications. Annals of Operations Research, 322(2), 565–607.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Costantino, N., d’Amato, M., & Pellegrino, R. (2009). A real options and fuzzy Delphi-based approach for appraising the effect of an urban infrastructure on surrounding lands. Fuzzy Economic Review, 14(2), 3.CrossRef Costantino, N., d’Amato, M., & Pellegrino, R. (2009). A real options and fuzzy Delphi-based approach for appraising the effect of an urban infrastructure on surrounding lands. Fuzzy Economic Review, 14(2), 3.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Costantino, N., & Pellegrino, R. (2010). Choosing between single and multiple sourcing based on supplier default risk: A real options approach. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 16(1), 27–40.CrossRef Costantino, N., & Pellegrino, R. (2010). Choosing between single and multiple sourcing based on supplier default risk: A real options approach. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 16(1), 27–40.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Dalkey, N. C. (1969). The Delphi method: An experimental study of group opinion. The Rand Corporation. Dalkey, N. C. (1969). The Delphi method: An experimental study of group opinion. The Rand Corporation.
Zurück zum Zitat De Lima, F. A., & Seuring, S. (2023). A Delphi study examining risk and uncertainty management in circular supply chains. International Journal of Production Economics, 258, 108810.CrossRef De Lima, F. A., & Seuring, S. (2023). A Delphi study examining risk and uncertainty management in circular supply chains. International Journal of Production Economics, 258, 108810.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Diabat, A., Govindan, K., & Panicker, V. V. (2012). Supply chain risk management and its mitigation in a food industry. International Journal of Production Research, 50(11), 3039–3050. Diabat, A., Govindan, K., & Panicker, V. V. (2012). Supply chain risk management and its mitigation in a food industry. International Journal of Production Research, 50(11), 3039–3050.
Zurück zum Zitat DuHadway, S., Carnovale, S., & Hazen, B. (2019). Understanding risk management for intentional supply chain disruptions: Risk detection, risk mitigation, and risk recovery. Annals of Operations Research, 283, 179–198.CrossRef DuHadway, S., Carnovale, S., & Hazen, B. (2019). Understanding risk management for intentional supply chain disruptions: Risk detection, risk mitigation, and risk recovery. Annals of Operations Research, 283, 179–198.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ellram, L. M. (1993). Total cost of ownership: Elements and implementation. International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 29(3), 3–12.CrossRef Ellram, L. M. (1993). Total cost of ownership: Elements and implementation. International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 29(3), 3–12.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ellram, L. M. (1996). A structured method for applying purchasing cost management tools. International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 32(4), 11–19.CrossRef Ellram, L. M. (1996). A structured method for applying purchasing cost management tools. International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 32(4), 11–19.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Fan, Y., & Stevenson, M. (2018). A review of supply chain risk management: Definition, theory, and research agenda. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 48(3), 205–230.CrossRef Fan, Y., & Stevenson, M. (2018). A review of supply chain risk management: Definition, theory, and research agenda. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 48(3), 205–230.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Gaudenzi, B., & Borghesi, A. (2006). Managing risks in the supply chain using the AHP method. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 17(1), 114–136.CrossRef Gaudenzi, B., & Borghesi, A. (2006). Managing risks in the supply chain using the AHP method. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 17(1), 114–136.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Gaudenzi, B., Zsidisin, G. A., & Pellegrino, R. (2021). Measuring the financial effects of mitigating commodity price volatility in supply chains. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 26(1), 17–31.CrossRef Gaudenzi, B., Zsidisin, G. A., & Pellegrino, R. (2021). Measuring the financial effects of mitigating commodity price volatility in supply chains. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 26(1), 17–31.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ghadge, A., Fang, X., Dani, S., & Antony, J. (2017). Supply chain risk assessment approach for process quality risks. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 34(7), 940–954.CrossRef Ghadge, A., Fang, X., Dani, S., & Antony, J. (2017). Supply chain risk assessment approach for process quality risks. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 34(7), 940–954.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hampton, J. (2009). Fundamentals of enterprise risk management: How top companies assess risk, manage exposure, and seize opportunity. Amacom. Hampton, J. (2009). Fundamentals of enterprise risk management: How top companies assess risk, manage exposure, and seize opportunity. Amacom.
Zurück zum Zitat Heilala, J., Helin, K., & Montonen, J. (2006). Total cost of ownership analysis for modular final assembly systems. International Journal of Production Research, 44(18/19), 3967–3988.CrossRef Heilala, J., Helin, K., & Montonen, J. (2006). Total cost of ownership analysis for modular final assembly systems. International Journal of Production Research, 44(18/19), 3967–3988.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ho, W., Zheng, T., Yildiz, H., & Talluri, S. (2015). Supply chain risk management: A literature review. International Journal of Production Research, 53(16), 5031–5069. Ho, W., Zheng, T., Yildiz, H., & Talluri, S. (2015). Supply chain risk management: A literature review. International Journal of Production Research, 53(16), 5031–5069.
Zurück zum Zitat Hosseini, S., Ivanov, D., & Dolgui, A. (2020). Ripple effect modelling of supplier disruption: Integrated Markov chain and dynamic Bayesian Network approach. International Journal of Production Research, 58(11), 3284–3303.CrossRef Hosseini, S., Ivanov, D., & Dolgui, A. (2020). Ripple effect modelling of supplier disruption: Integrated Markov chain and dynamic Bayesian Network approach. International Journal of Production Research, 58(11), 3284–3303.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hsu, C. C., & Sandford, B. A. (2007). The Delphi technique: Making sense of consensus. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 12(10). Hsu, C. C., & Sandford, B. A. (2007). The Delphi technique: Making sense of consensus. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 12(10).
Zurück zum Zitat Jain, A. (2009). Including costs of supply chain risk in strategic sourcing decisions (Doctoral dissertation). Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Engineering Systems Division. Jain, A. (2009). Including costs of supply chain risk in strategic sourcing decisions (Doctoral dissertation). Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Engineering Systems Division.
Zurück zum Zitat Klir, G. J. (1995). Fuzzy sets and fuzzy logic: Theory and applications. Prentice Hall PTR. Klir, G. J. (1995). Fuzzy sets and fuzzy logic: Theory and applications. Prentice Hall PTR.
Zurück zum Zitat Kwak, D. W., Rodrigues, V. S., Mason, R., Pettit, S., & Beresford, A. (2018). Risk interaction identification in international supply chain logistics: Developing a holistic model. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 38(2), 372–389.CrossRef Kwak, D. W., Rodrigues, V. S., Mason, R., Pettit, S., & Beresford, A. (2018). Risk interaction identification in international supply chain logistics: Developing a holistic model. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 38(2), 372–389.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Liu, H. C., Liu, L., & Liu, N. (2013). Risk evaluation approaches in failure mode and effects analysis: A literature review. Expert Systems with Applications, 40(2), 828–838.CrossRef Liu, H. C., Liu, L., & Liu, N. (2013). Risk evaluation approaches in failure mode and effects analysis: A literature review. Expert Systems with Applications, 40(2), 828–838.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ojha, R., Ghadge, A., Tiwari, M. K., & Bititci, U. S. (2018). Bayesian Network modelling for supply chain risk propagation. International Journal of Production Research, 56(17), 5795–5819.CrossRef Ojha, R., Ghadge, A., Tiwari, M. K., & Bititci, U. S. (2018). Bayesian Network modelling for supply chain risk propagation. International Journal of Production Research, 56(17), 5795–5819.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Pellegrino, R., Costantino, N., & Tauro, D. (2019). Supply chain finance: A supply chain-oriented perspective to mitigate commodity risk and pricing volatility. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 25(2), 118–133.CrossRef Pellegrino, R., Costantino, N., & Tauro, D. (2019). Supply chain finance: A supply chain-oriented perspective to mitigate commodity risk and pricing volatility. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 25(2), 118–133.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Pellegrino, R., Gaudenzi, B., & Qazi, A. (2022). COVID-19 pandemic: Supply chain risk management by integrating Interpretive Structural Modeling and Bayesian belief network. IFAC-Papers Online, 55(10), 667–672.CrossRef Pellegrino, R., Gaudenzi, B., & Qazi, A. (2022). COVID-19 pandemic: Supply chain risk management by integrating Interpretive Structural Modeling and Bayesian belief network. IFAC-Papers Online, 55(10), 667–672.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Pellegrino, R., Gaudenzi, B., & Zsidisin, G. A. (2023). Mitigating foreign exchange risk exposure with supply chain flexibility: A real option analysis. Journal of Business Logistics, 45, e12338. Pellegrino, R., Gaudenzi, B., & Zsidisin, G. A. (2023). Mitigating foreign exchange risk exposure with supply chain flexibility: A real option analysis. Journal of Business Logistics, 45, e12338.
Zurück zum Zitat Pfohl, H. C., Gallus, P., & Thomas, D. (2011). Interpretive structural modeling of supply chain risks. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 41(9), 839–859.CrossRef Pfohl, H. C., Gallus, P., & Thomas, D. (2011). Interpretive structural modeling of supply chain risks. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 41(9), 839–859.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ponomarov, S. Y., & Holcomb, M. C. (2009). Understanding the concept of supply chain resilience. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 20(1), 124–143.CrossRef Ponomarov, S. Y., & Holcomb, M. C. (2009). Understanding the concept of supply chain resilience. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 20(1), 124–143.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Qazi, A., Dickson, A., Quigley, J., & Gaudenzi, B. (2018). Supply chain risk network management: A Bayesian belief network and expected utility based approach for managing supply chain risks. International Journal of Production Economics, 196, 24–42.CrossRef Qazi, A., Dickson, A., Quigley, J., & Gaudenzi, B. (2018). Supply chain risk network management: A Bayesian belief network and expected utility based approach for managing supply chain risks. International Journal of Production Economics, 196, 24–42.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Qazi, A., Simsekler, M. C. E., & Formaneck, S. (2023). Supply chain risk network value at risk assessment using Bayesian belief networks and Monte Carlo simulation. Annals of Operations Research, 322(1), 241–272.CrossRef Qazi, A., Simsekler, M. C. E., & Formaneck, S. (2023). Supply chain risk network value at risk assessment using Bayesian belief networks and Monte Carlo simulation. Annals of Operations Research, 322(1), 241–272.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Radivojević, G., & Gajović, V. (2014). Supply chain risk modeling by AHP and Fuzzy AHP methods. Journal of Risk Research, 17(3), 337–352.CrossRef Radivojević, G., & Gajović, V. (2014). Supply chain risk modeling by AHP and Fuzzy AHP methods. Journal of Risk Research, 17(3), 337–352.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Radu, L.-D. (2009). Qualitative, semi-quantitative and, quantitative methods for risk assessment: Case of the financial audit. Analele Stiintifice ale Universitatii ‘Alexandru Ioan Cuza’ din Iasi-Stiinte Economice, 56, 643–657. Radu, L.-D. (2009). Qualitative, semi-quantitative and, quantitative methods for risk assessment: Case of the financial audit. Analele Stiintifice ale Universitatii ‘Alexandru Ioan Cuza’ din Iasi-Stiinte Economice, 56, 643–657.
Zurück zum Zitat Ruiz-Benítez, R., López, C., & Real, J. C. (2018). The lean and resilient management of the supply chain and its impact on performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 203, 190–202.CrossRef Ruiz-Benítez, R., López, C., & Real, J. C. (2018). The lean and resilient management of the supply chain and its impact on performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 203, 190–202.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Saaty, T. L. (1980). The analytical hierarchy process. McGraw Hill. Saaty, T. L. (1980). The analytical hierarchy process. McGraw Hill.
Zurück zum Zitat Saaty, T. L. (2008). Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Service Sciences, 1(1), 83–98.CrossRef Saaty, T. L. (2008). Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Service Sciences, 1(1), 83–98.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Sage, A. P. (1977). Interpretive structural modeling: Methodology for large scale systems. McGraw Hill Higher Education. Sage, A. P. (1977). Interpretive structural modeling: Methodology for large scale systems. McGraw Hill Higher Education.
Zurück zum Zitat Schneider, H. (1996). Failure mode and effect analysis: FMEA from theory to execution. Technometrics, 38(1), 80–80.CrossRef Schneider, H. (1996). Failure mode and effect analysis: FMEA from theory to execution. Technometrics, 38(1), 80–80.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Schoenherr, T., Mena, C., Vakil, B., & Choi, T. Y. (2023). Creating resilient supply chains through a culture of measuring. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 29, 100824. Schoenherr, T., Mena, C., Vakil, B., & Choi, T. Y. (2023). Creating resilient supply chains through a culture of measuring. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 29, 100824.
Zurück zum Zitat Sharma, S. K., Srivastava, P. R., Kumar, A., Jindal, A., & Gupta, S. (2023). Supply chain vulnerability assessment for manufacturing industry. Annals of Operations Research, 326(2), 653–683.CrossRef Sharma, S. K., Srivastava, P. R., Kumar, A., Jindal, A., & Gupta, S. (2023). Supply chain vulnerability assessment for manufacturing industry. Annals of Operations Research, 326(2), 653–683.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Toktaş-Palut, P., Baylav, E., Teoman, S., & Altunbey, M. (2014). The impact of barriers and benefits of e-procurement on its adoption decision: An empirical analysis. International Journal of Production Economics, 158, 77–90. Toktaş-Palut, P., Baylav, E., Teoman, S., & Altunbey, M. (2014). The impact of barriers and benefits of e-procurement on its adoption decision: An empirical analysis. International Journal of Production Economics, 158, 77–90.
Zurück zum Zitat Tran, T. H., Dobrovnik, M., & Kummer, S. (2018). Supply chain risk assessment: A content analysis-based literature review. International Journal of Logistics Systems and Management, 31(4), 562–591.CrossRef Tran, T. H., Dobrovnik, M., & Kummer, S. (2018). Supply chain risk assessment: A content analysis-based literature review. International Journal of Logistics Systems and Management, 31(4), 562–591.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Trigeorgis, L., & Tsekrekos, A. E. (2018). Real options in operations research: A review. European Journal of Operational Research, 270(1), 1–24.CrossRef Trigeorgis, L., & Tsekrekos, A. E. (2018). Real options in operations research: A review. European Journal of Operational Research, 270(1), 1–24.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Tuni, A., Ijomah, W. L., Gutteridge, F., Mirpourian, M., Pfeifer, S., & Copani, G. (2023). Risk assessment for circular business models: A fuzzy Delphi study application for composite materials. Journal of Cleaner Production, 389, 135722.CrossRef Tuni, A., Ijomah, W. L., Gutteridge, F., Mirpourian, M., Pfeifer, S., & Copani, G. (2023). Risk assessment for circular business models: A fuzzy Delphi study application for composite materials. Journal of Cleaner Production, 389, 135722.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Vose, D. (1996). Quantitative risk analysis. A guide to Monte Carlo simulation modelling. Wiley. Vose, D. (1996). Quantitative risk analysis. A guide to Monte Carlo simulation modelling. Wiley.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang, X., Chan, H. K., Yee, R. W., & Diaz-Rainey, I. (2012). A two-stage fuzzy-AHP model for risk assessment of implementing green initiatives in the fashion supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics, 135(2), 595–606.CrossRef Wang, X., Chan, H. K., Yee, R. W., & Diaz-Rainey, I. (2012). A two-stage fuzzy-AHP model for risk assessment of implementing green initiatives in the fashion supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics, 135(2), 595–606.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Wu, W.-S., Yang, C.-F., Chang, J.-C., Chateau, P.-A., & Chang, Y.-C. (2015). Risk assessment by integrating interpretive structural modeling and Bayesian Network, case of offshore pipeline project. Reliability Engineering System Safety, 142, 515–524.CrossRef Wu, W.-S., Yang, C.-F., Chang, J.-C., Chateau, P.-A., & Chang, Y.-C. (2015). Risk assessment by integrating interpretive structural modeling and Bayesian Network, case of offshore pipeline project. Reliability Engineering System Safety, 142, 515–524.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Zhao, F., Dash Wu, D., Liang, L., & Dolgui, A. (2015). Cash flow risk in dual-channel supply chain. International Journal of Production Research, 53(12), 3678–3691.CrossRef Zhao, F., Dash Wu, D., Liang, L., & Dolgui, A. (2015). Cash flow risk in dual-channel supply chain. International Journal of Production Research, 53(12), 3678–3691.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Zsidisin, G. A., Ellram, L. M., Carter, J. R., & Cavinato, J. L. (2004). An analysis of supply risk assessment techniques. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 34(5), 397–413.CrossRef Zsidisin, G. A., Ellram, L. M., Carter, J. R., & Cavinato, J. L. (2004). An analysis of supply risk assessment techniques. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 34(5), 397–413.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Decision Analysis Techniques in Supply Risk Assessment
verfasst von
George A. Zsidisin
Barbara Gaudenzi
Roberta Pellegrino
Copyright-Jahr
2024
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-52592-6_3

Premium Partner