Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Gesunde Pflanzen 3/2022

12.03.2022 | Original Article / Originalbeitrag

Determination of Susceptibility of Citrus and Stone Fruit Cultivars Against Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae in Turkey

verfasst von: Raziye Cetinkaya Yildiz, Ali Karatas, Sumer Horuz, Yesim Aysan

Erschienen in: Journal of Crop Health | Ausgabe 3/2022

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae, that can cause disease in citrus and stone fruit production areas, is a destructive plant pathogenic bacterial disease agent worldwide. While the pathogen causes citrus blast disease on citrus cultivars, it is known as bacterial cancer disease on stone fruits. Control of the disease is limited due to the lack of resistant cultivars through the world. In this study, susceptibility responses of 28 different citrus and stone fruit cultivars against Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae were determined. For this purpose, five Citrus sinensis, six Citrus reticulata, three Citrus limon, two Citrus paradisi, three Prunus persica nucipersica, three Prunus persica, three Prunus domestic and three Prunus armeniaca cultivars were used. In the experiments, disease ratios of citrus and stone fruit cultivars varied between 2.55–7.12% and between 3.39–51.01%, respectively. Among 28 tested cultivars, 25% of the cultivars were susceptible (cvs. Cara Cara, V. Midknight, Nova, Okitsu, Meyer, Riored and Early Fresh), 46.43% of the cultivars were moderately susceptible (cvs. Fukumoto, Lane late, Navelina, Robinson, W. Murcott, Clausellina Eureka, Flariba (N2-17), Gartella, Garofa (N2-92), Honey Blush, Flored and Black Amber), 10.71% were lightly susceptible (cvs. Ortanique, Black Beauty and Magador) and 17.86% were minimally susceptible (cvs. Lisbon, Henderson, Black Diamond, Colorado and Ninfa) to Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae. All tested citrus and stone fruit cultivars were classified between minimally susceptible and susceptible. The minimally susceptible citrus and stone fruit varieties should be preferred in newly planted orchards.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Aysan Y, Cinar O (1994) Susceptibility of some citrus to citrus blast in the Cukurova Region of Turkey. 9th Congress of the Mediterranean Phytopathological Union, Kusadasi, pp 315–316 Aysan Y, Cinar O (1994) Susceptibility of some citrus to citrus blast in the Cukurova Region of Turkey. 9th Congress of the Mediterranean Phytopathological Union, Kusadasi, pp 315–316
Zurück zum Zitat Cetinkaya Yildiz R, Horuz S, Karatas A, Aysan Y (2016) Identification and disease incidence of bacterial canker on stone fruits in the Eastern Mediterranean Region, Turkey. In: Proceedings of the II. International Workshop on Bacterial Diseases of Stone Fruits and Nuts. Acta Hortic 1149:21–24. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2016.1149.4CrossRef Cetinkaya Yildiz R, Horuz S, Karatas A, Aysan Y (2016) Identification and disease incidence of bacterial canker on stone fruits in the Eastern Mediterranean Region, Turkey. In: Proceedings of the II. International Workshop on Bacterial Diseases of Stone Fruits and Nuts. Acta Hortic 1149:21–24. https://​doi.​org/​10.​17660/​ActaHortic.​2016.​1149.​4CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Gasic K, Preece JE, Karp D (2016) Register of new fruit and nut cultivars list 48. HortScience 51(6):620–652CrossRef Gasic K, Preece JE, Karp D (2016) Register of new fruit and nut cultivars list 48. HortScience 51(6):620–652CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Gormez A, Sahin F (2012) Determination of pathogenic and non-pathogenic bacteria on stone fruits grown in Northeast Anatolia region of Turkey. Can J Plant Pathol 34:42–50CrossRef Gormez A, Sahin F (2012) Determination of pathogenic and non-pathogenic bacteria on stone fruits grown in Northeast Anatolia region of Turkey. Can J Plant Pathol 34:42–50CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Heynes AJ (1960) Bacterial canker of Apricot trees. South Afr J Agric Sci 3(3):449–457 Heynes AJ (1960) Bacterial canker of Apricot trees. South Afr J Agric Sci 3(3):449–457
Zurück zum Zitat Hinrichs-Berger J (2004) Epidemiology of Pseudomonas syringae pathovars associated with decline of plum trees in the southwest of Germany. J Phytopathol 152:153–160CrossRef Hinrichs-Berger J (2004) Epidemiology of Pseudomonas syringae pathovars associated with decline of plum trees in the southwest of Germany. J Phytopathol 152:153–160CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Karaca İ (1966) Systemic plant diseases. Ege University publications, vol 1. Ege University Press, Izmir Karaca İ (1966) Systemic plant diseases. Ege University publications, vol 1. Ege University Press, Izmir
Zurück zum Zitat Karman M (1971) Bitki koruma arastirmalarinda genel bilgiler, denemelerin kurulusu ve degerlendirme esaslari. Turkey: Bolge Zirai Mücadele Araştırma Enstitüsü Yayınları, Izmir (in Turkish) Karman M (1971) Bitki koruma arastirmalarinda genel bilgiler, denemelerin kurulusu ve degerlendirme esaslari. Turkey: Bolge Zirai Mücadele Araştırma Enstitüsü Yayınları, Izmir (in Turkish)
Zurück zum Zitat Mougou I, Bougalleb-M’hamdi N (2016) Differential susceptibility of citrus cultivars toward blast and black pit in Tunisia caused by Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae. Eur J Biotechnol Biosci 4:17–24 Mougou I, Bougalleb-M’hamdi N (2016) Differential susceptibility of citrus cultivars toward blast and black pit in Tunisia caused by Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae. Eur J Biotechnol Biosci 4:17–24
Zurück zum Zitat Salerno M (1985) Batteries (last and black pit). Inf Fitopatol 5:27–28 Salerno M (1985) Batteries (last and black pit). Inf Fitopatol 5:27–28
Zurück zum Zitat Salerno M, Cutuli G (1981) The management of fungal and bacterial diseases of citrus in İtaly. In: Proceedings of the International Society of Citriculture 1, pp 360–362 Salerno M, Cutuli G (1981) The management of fungal and bacterial diseases of citrus in İtaly. In: Proceedings of the International Society of Citriculture 1, pp 360–362
Zurück zum Zitat Salih H, Bilgin N, Goksedef MO, Yelboga K (1973) Preliminary studies on citrus blast (Pseudomonas syringae Van Hall.) in southern Anatolia. Bitki Koruma Bulteni 13(1):43–48 Salih H, Bilgin N, Goksedef MO, Yelboga K (1973) Preliminary studies on citrus blast (Pseudomonas syringae Van Hall.) in southern Anatolia. Bitki Koruma Bulteni 13(1):43–48
Zurück zum Zitat Schaad NW, Jones JB, Lacy GH (2001) Gram negative bacteria, pseudomonas. In: Laboratory guide for identification of plant pathogenic bacteria, 3rd edn. APS Press, St. Paul, pp 84–117 Schaad NW, Jones JB, Lacy GH (2001) Gram negative bacteria, pseudomonas. In: Laboratory guide for identification of plant pathogenic bacteria, 3rd edn. APS Press, St. Paul, pp 84–117
Zurück zum Zitat Smith CO, Fawcett HS (1930) A comparative study of the citrus blast bacterium and some other allied organisms. J Agric Res 41:233–246 Smith CO, Fawcett HS (1930) A comparative study of the citrus blast bacterium and some other allied organisms. J Agric Res 41:233–246
Zurück zum Zitat Sorensen KN, Kim KH, Takemoto JY (1998) PCR detection of Cyclic Lipodepsinonapeptide-production Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae and similarity of strains. Appl Environ Microbiol 64(1):226–230CrossRef Sorensen KN, Kim KH, Takemoto JY (1998) PCR detection of Cyclic Lipodepsinonapeptide-production Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae and similarity of strains. Appl Environ Microbiol 64(1):226–230CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Thompson SS, Janick J, Williams EB (1962) Evaluation of resistance to fire blight of pear. In: Advances in fruit breeding. Purdue University Press, West Lafayette, pp 38–70 Thompson SS, Janick J, Williams EB (1962) Evaluation of resistance to fire blight of pear. In: Advances in fruit breeding. Purdue University Press, West Lafayette, pp 38–70
Zurück zum Zitat Wenneker M, Janse JD, de Bruine A, Vink P, Pham K (2012) Bacterial canker of plum caused by pseudomonas syringae pathovars, as a serious threat for plum production in the Netherlands. J Plant Pathol 94(1. Supplement):11–13 Wenneker M, Janse JD, de Bruine A, Vink P, Pham K (2012) Bacterial canker of plum caused by pseudomonas syringae pathovars, as a serious threat for plum production in the Netherlands. J Plant Pathol 94(1. Supplement):11–13
Metadaten
Titel
Determination of Susceptibility of Citrus and Stone Fruit Cultivars Against Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae in Turkey
verfasst von
Raziye Cetinkaya Yildiz
Ali Karatas
Sumer Horuz
Yesim Aysan
Publikationsdatum
12.03.2022
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Journal of Crop Health / Ausgabe 3/2022
Print ISSN: 2948-264X
Elektronische ISSN: 2948-2658
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10343-022-00638-x

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2022

Gesunde Pflanzen 3/2022 Zur Ausgabe