Skip to main content
Disciplines
Automotive Business IT + Informatics Construction + Real Estate Electrical Engineering + Electronics Energy + Sustainability Insurance + Risk Finance + Banking Management + Leadership Marketing + Sales Mechanical Engineering + Materials
Events
DE
EN
Books
Journals
Topic Page
Marketing
Start single access now
Access for companies
EXTENDED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Published in:
Issues and Prospects of Valuation Science Read chapter Read first chapter

2024 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

Cultural Landscapes as a Driver of Local Development. Collaborative Decision-Making Processes for the Promotion of Resilient Landscapes

Authors : Lucia Della Spina, Claudia Giorno

Published in: Science of Valuations

Publisher: Springer Nature Switzerland

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The paper presents a multi-methodological, hybrid, and adaptive evaluation approach to support the development of improvement strategies and identify alternative tourism routes for promoting resilient landscapes. The approach introduces a Multi-Stakeholder Spatial Decision Analysis (M-SSDA), which combines Multi-Stakeholder Decision Analysis (M-SDA) with GIS processing to facilitate interaction among the different stakeholders involved in establishing a common vision. The reliability of the decision-making process is increased by using multiple techniques. This is achieved through collaboration among local stakeholders, researchers, experts, private entities, and local government to identify the perceived values of the landscape. This collaboration aims to identify shared values that are essential for testing new approaches to resource management and identifying thematic  routes to promote sustainable tourism in the Sila National Park (Italy).

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now
previous chapter Weighting Procedures and Environmental Sustainability Assessment: An Experiment Based on an Urban Regeneration Programme in Northern Italy
next chapter Industrial Heritage, Adaptive Reuse and Sustainable Redevelopment Scenarios: Including Local Communities’ Multiple Values in the Decision-Making Process
Literature
1.
Ackoff RL (2010) Systems thinking for curious managers. Triarchy Press
2.
Adekola O, Mitchell G (2011) The Niger Delta Wetlands: threats to ecosystem services, their importance to dependent communities and possible management measures. Int J Biodivers Sci Ecosyst Serv & Manag 7:50–68CrossRef
3.
Bánáthy BH (2000) Guided evolution of society: a systems view (contemporary systems thinking). Springer, BerlinCrossRef
4.
Bocanet A, Ponsiglione C (2012) Balancing exploration and exploitation in complex environments. Vine 42:15–35CrossRef
5.
Calabrò F, Della Spina L (2020) Il patrimonio culturale come driver di sviluppo economico per territori ‘fragili e vulnerabili’, LaborEst, n. 21/2020 - ISSN online 2421-3187
6.
7.
Cassatella C, Peano A (2011) Landscape indicators: assessing and monitoring landscape quality. Springer
8.
Cerreta M, Panaro S (2017) From perceived values to shared values: a multi-stakeholder spatial decision analysis (M-SSDA) for resilient landscapes. Sustainability 9(7):1113CrossRef
9.
Checkland P, Poulter J (2006) Learning for action. Wiley, Chichester, UK
10.
11.
Cressie NAC, Wikle CK (2011) Statistics for spatio-temporal data. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, USA
12.
D’Auria A (2009) Urban and rural areas: creative strategies to compete. Sustain City Creat: Promot Creat Urban Initiat BDC 9:771–783
13.
Daniel TC, Muhar A, Arnberger A, Aznar O, Boyd JW, Chan KMA, Costanza R, Elmqvist T, Flint CG, Gobster PH, Gret-Regamey A, Rebecca L, Muhar S, Penker M, Ribe RG, Schauppenleher T, Sikor T, Soloviy I, Spiernburg M, Taczanowska K, Tam J, von der Dunk A (2012) Contributions of cultural services to the ecosystem services agenda. PNAS 109(23):8812–8819CrossRef
14.
Daw T, Brown K, Rosendo S, Pomeroy R (2011) Applying the ecosystem services concept to poverty alleviation: the need to disaggregate human well-being. Environ Conserv 38:370–379CrossRef
15.
De Groot R, Alkemade R, Braat L, Hein L, Willemen L (2010) Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision-making. Ecol Complex 7:260–272CrossRef
16.
De Groot R, Ramakrishnan, PS, Berg AVD, Kulenthran T, Muller S, Pitt D, Wascher D (2005) Cultural and amenity services. In: Findings of the condition and trends working group of the millennium ecosystem assessment, ecosystems and human well- being: current state and trends. Millennium ecosystem assessment series, vol 1. Island Press, Washington, D.C., pp 455–476
17.
Della Spina L (2017) Integrated evaluation and multi-methodological approaches for the enhancement of the cultural landscape. In: Gervasi O et al (eds) Computational science and its applications – ICCSA 2017. ICCSA 2017. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 10404. Springer, Cham. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​978-3-319-62392-4_​35
18.
Della Spina L (2018) The integrated evaluation as a driving tool for cultural-heritage enhancement strategies. In: Bisello A. et al (eds) Smart and sustainable planning for cities and regions. Results of SSPCR 2017. Green energy and technology. Springer, pp 1–11. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​978-3-319-75774-2_​40, ISSN: 1865-3537
19.
20.
Della Spina L (2019) Scenarios for a sustainable valorisation of cultural landscape as driver of local development. In: Calabrò F, Della Spina L, Bevilacqua C (eds) New metropolitan perspectives. ISHT 2018. Smart innovation, systems and technologies, vol 100. Springer, Cham. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​978-3-319-92099-3_​14
21.
22.
Della Spina L (2021) Strategic planning and decision making: a case study for the integrated management of cultural heritage assets in Southern Italy. In: Bevilacqua C, Calabrò F, Della Spina L (eds) New metropolitan perspectives. NMP 2020. Smart innovation, systems and technologies, vol 178. Springer, Cham. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​978-3-030-48279-4_​104
23.
24.
25.
Della Spina L, Giorno C, Galati Casmiro R (2019) Bottom-up processes for culture-led urban regeneration scenarios. In: Misra S. et al. (eds) Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2019. ICCSA 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 11622. Springer, Cham. In: Misra et al. (Eds.): ICCSA 2019, LNCS 11622, pp. 93–107, 2019. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​978-3-030-24305-0_​8
26.
Della Spina L, Giorno C, Galati Casmiro R (2020) An integrated decision support system to define the best scenario for the adaptive sustainable re-use of cultural heritage in Southern Italy. In: Bevilacqua C, Calabrò F, Della Spina L (eds) New metropolitan perspectives. NMP 2020. Smart innovation, systems and technologies, vol 177. Springer, Cham. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​978-3-030-52869-0_​22
27.
Della Spina L, Rugolo A (2021) A multicriteria decision aid process for urban regeneration process of abandoned industrial areas. In: Bevilacqua C, Calabrò F, Della Spina L (eds) New metropolitan perspectives. NMP 2020. Smart innovation, systems and technologies, vol 178. Springer, Cham. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​978-3-030-48279-4_​99
28.
Della Spina L, Viglianisi A (2021) Hybrid evaluation approaches for cultural landscape: the case of “Riviera dei Gelsomini” area in Italy. In: Bevilacqua C, Calabrò F, Della Spina L (eds) New metropolitan perspectives. NMP 2020. Smart innovation, systems and technologies, vol 178. Springer, Cham. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​978-3-030-48279-4_​12
29.
30.
European Commission Information Society and Media (2009) Living labs for user-driven open innovation; an overview of the living labs methodology, activities, and achievements. Unit F4 New Infrastructure Paradigms and Experimental Facilities; Office for Official Publications of the European Communities: Luxembourg
31.
Fagerholm N, Käyhkö N, Ndumbaro F, Khamis M (2012) Community stakeholders’ knowledge in landscape assessment – mapping indicators for landscape services. Ecol Indic 18:421–433
32.
Funtowicz SO, Martinez-Alier J, Munda G, Ravetz J (2002) Multicriteria-based environmental policy. In: Abaza H, Baranzini A (eds) Implementing sustainable development. UNEP/Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK, pp 53–77
33.
Fusco Girard L (2014) The role of cultural urban landscape towards a new urban economics: new structural assets for increasing economic productivity through hybrid processes. Hous Policies Urban Econ 1:3–27
34.
Fusco Girard L (2011) Multidimensional evaluation processes to manage creative, resilient and sustainable city. Aestimum 59:123–139
35.
Girardet H (2010) Regenerative cities. World Future Council and HafenCity University, Hamburg
36.
Goddard C (2011) Semantic analysis: a practical introduction. Oxford University Press, USA
37.
Goosen M, Langers F (2000) Assessing quality of rural areas in the Netherlands: finding the most important indicators for recreation. Landsc Urban Plan 46(4):241–251CrossRef
38.
39.
40.
41.
Irvine K, O’Brien L, Ravenscroft N, Cooper N, Everard M, Fazey I, Reed M, Kenter JO (2016) Ecosystem services and the idea of shared values. Ecosyst Serv 21:184–193CrossRef
42.
Jackson M (2003) Systems thinking: creating holisms for managers. Wiley, Chichester, UK
43.
Kashyap V, Sivadas E (2012) An exploratory examination of shared values in channel relationships. J Bus Res 65:586–593CrossRef
44.
Kaymaz IC (2012) Landscape perception. Landsc Plan 251–276
45.
Kenter JO, Hyde T, Christie M, Fazey I (2011) The importance of deliberation in valuing ecosystem services in developing countries—evidence from the Solomon Islands. Glob Environ Chang 21:505–521CrossRef
46.
Kenter JO, Reed MS, Irvine KN, O'Brien L, Brady E, Bryce R, Watson V (2014) Shared, plural and cultural values of ecosystems. UK national ecosystem assessment follow-on work package report 6
47.
Martín-López B, Gómez-Baggethun E, Lomas PL, Montes C (2009) Effects of spatial and temporal scales on cultural services valuation. J Environ Manag 90:1050–1059CrossRef
48.
Milcu A, Hanspach J, Abson D, Fischer J (2013) Cultural ecosystem services: a literature review and prospects for future research. Ecol Soc 18(3):44CrossRef
49.
Munda G (1995) Multicriteria evaluation in a fuzzy environment. Theory and applications in ecological economics. Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg, The Netherlands
50.
Murgante B, Danese M (2011) Urban versus rural: the decrease of agricultural areas and the development of urban zones analyzed with spatial statistics. Int J Agric Environ Inf Syst (IJAEIS) 2:16–28CrossRef
51.
Ostrom E (2006) Governare i Beni Collettivi. Marsilio, Venezia, Italy
52.
Sacco PL, Zamagni S (2006) Teoria Economica e Relazioni Interpersonali. Il Mulino: Bologna, Italy
53.
Smith J (2013) Cultural landscape theory and practice. Moving from observation to experience. In: Albert MT, Bernecker R, Rudolff B (eds) Understanding heritage. Perspectives in heritage studies. Heritage studies, vol 1. Gruyter GmbH, Berlin, Germany, pp. 49–66
54.
55.
Sutton RK (2013) Ecology of scale in visual landscape assessments. In: Landscape architecture program: faculty scholarly and creative activity; University of Nebraska-Lincoln: Lincolin, NE, USA, p 17
56.
57.
UNESCO (2011) Historic urban landscape recommendations. Paris
58.
59.
Van den Brink A, Bruns D, Tobi H, Bell S (2017) Research in landscape architecture: methods and methodology. Routledge, New York, NY, USA
60.
Van Kamp I, Leidelmeijer K, Marsman G, De Hollander A (2003) Urban environmental quality and human well-being. Towards a conceptual framework and demarcation of concepts: a literature study. Landsc Urban Plan 65(1–2):5–18
61.
Veenhoven R (2007) Subjective measures of well-being. Human well-being: concept and measurement. Palgrave Macmillan UK, London, pp 214–239CrossRef
62.
Vizzari M (2011) Spatial modelling of potential landscape quality. Appl Geogr 31:108–118CrossRef
63.
Wilson K, Morren GEB Jr (1990) Systems approaches for improvement in agriculture and resource management. Macmillan Publishing Company, New York
Metadata
Title
Cultural Landscapes as a Driver of Local Development. Collaborative Decision-Making Processes for the Promotion of Resilient Landscapes
Authors
Lucia Della Spina
Claudia Giorno
Copyright Year
2024
Book
Science of Valuations

Print ISBN: 978-3-031-53708-0

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-031-53709-7

Copyright Year: 2024

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-53709-7_23