Top

Published in:

2024 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

3. Design Implications and Processes for an Attainable Game Experience

Authors : Adam Palmquist, Izabella Jedel, Ole Goethe

Published in: Universal Design in Video Games

Publisher: Springer International Publishing

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config

AI-assisted search

Off

Abstract

This chapter examines the pivotal role of investigating the implications and practices that shape an attainable gaming experience (AGE) design, emphasizing the need for an in-depth understanding of interaction interface design and a comprehensive data collection strategy. The chapter explores informed design philosophies that are instrumental in how they manifest hedonic or utilitarian design intentions. Special focus is placed on achieving a balanced integration of these design philosophies to deliver universally appealing gaming experiences. Detailed guidelines and methodologies are provided for initiating design investigations specifically tailored for AGE-focused projects. This chapter argues that a robust approach concerning the data collection and analysis ensures high-quality interaction interface design and helps advance the principles of inclusivity and accessibility, thereby broadening the appeal and reach of video games to diverse player demographics.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

previous chapter The Attainable Game Experience Framework

next chapter Assistive Technologies for Attainable Gaming Experiences

Nevertheless, there exist voices that deviate from the excessively artistic emphasis of designing games. For example, Schell [39] offers a blended perspective, suggesting various ‘lenses’ through which the game design process can be viewed, accentuating that crafting games is a delicate blend of art and science.

Ampatzidou, C., & Gugerell, K. (2019). Participatory game prototyping – Balancing domain content and playability in a serious game design for the energy transition. CoDesign, 15(4), 345–360. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2018.1504084CrossRef

Bender, E. M., Gebru, T., McMillan-Major, A., & Shmitchell, S. (2021). On the dangers of stochastic parrots: Can language models be too big?

https://static-content.springer.com/image/chp%3A10.1007%2F978-3-031-30595-5_3/MediaObjects/505009_1_En_3_Figa_HTML.png

A digital icon of a macaw bird.

. In Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (pp. 610–623).

Bogost, I. (2007). Persuasive games: The expressive power of videogames. MIT Press.

Charles, D. K., & McDonough, S. (2015). A participatory design framework for the gamification of rehabilitation systems. In Recent advances on using virtual reality technologies for rehabilitation (pp. 2–9). Nova Science Publishers.

Crabtree, A., Rouncefield, M., & Tolmie, P. (2012). Doing design ethnography. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-2726-0

Daer, A. J. (2010). This is how we do it: A glimpse at Gamelab’s design process. E-Learning and Digital Media, 7(1), 108–119. https://doi.org/10.2304/elea.2010.7.1.108CrossRef

Engström, H. (2020). Game development research. University of Skövde.

Faulkner, S. L., & Trotter, S. P. (2017). Data saturation. The International Encyclopedia of Communication Research Methods, 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118901731.IECRM0060

Flanagan, M. (2009). Critical play: Radical game design. MIT press.

10.

Fullerton, T. (2019). Game design workshop: A playcentric approach to creating innovative games (4th edn). CRC Press.

11.

Garzotto, F. (2014). Interactive storytelling for children: A survey. International Journal of Arts and Technology, 7(1), 5–16.CrossRef

12.

Hennink, M., & Kaiser, B. N. (2022). Sample sizes for saturation in qualitative research: A systematic review of empirical tests. Social Science and medicine, 292, 114523.CrossRef

13.

Hevner, A. R., March, S. T., Park, J., & Ram, S. (2004). Design science in information systems research. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 28(1), 75–105. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148625CrossRef

14.

ISO 9241–210. (2010). Ergonomics of human-system interaction—Part 210: Human-centred design for interactive systems.

15.

Ismail, R. (2016). Nuclear throne: Performative game development in hindsight. GDC Vault. GDC Europe 2016, Cologne, Germany. Retrieved from http://www.gdcvault.com/play/1023774/-Nuclear-Throne-Performative-Game

16.

Ivarsson, J., & Lindwall, O. (2023). Suspicious minds: The problem of trust and conversational agents. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 1–27.

17.

Jacko, J. A. (Ed.). (2012). Human computer interaction handbook: Fundamentals, evolving technologies, and emerging applications.

18.

Jeremy, H. (2015). Subnautica feedback system. GDC Vault. Game Developers Conference, San Francisco, CA. Retrieved from http://www.gdcvault.com/play/1022284/Tech

19.

Karabinus, A., & Atherton, R. (2019). Communally designed deception: Participatory technical communication practices in an amateur game design community. Technical Communication, 66(3), 257–271.

20.

Khaled, R., & Vasalou, A. (2014). Bridging serious games and participatory design. International Journal of Child- Computer Interaction, 2(2), 93–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2014.03.001CrossRef

21.

Lazar, J., Feng, J. H., & Hochheiser, H. (2017). Research methods in human-computer interaction. Morgan Kaufmann.

22.

Lin, D., Bezemer, C.-P., & Hassan, A. E. (2018). An empirical study of early access games on the steam platform. Empirical Software Engineering, 23(2), 771–799. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-017-9531-3CrossRef

23.

Marcus, G. (2022). Hoping for the best as AI Evolves. In Communications of the ACM (Vol. 66, No. 4). Association for Computing Machinery. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1145/3583078

24.

Metz, C. (2021). Who Is Making Sure the A.I. Machines Aren’t Racist? New York, The New York Times. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2021/03/15/technology/artificial-intelligence-google-bias.html. Accessed 27 September 2023.

25.

Müller, F. (2021). Design ethnography: Epistemology and methodology. Springer Nature.

26.

Nardi, B. (2010). My life as a night elf priest: An anthropological account of World of warcraft. University of Michigan Press.CrossRef

27.

Nelson, H. G., & Stolterman, E. (2014). The design way: Intentional change in an unpredictable World. MIT Press.

28.

Newton, I., in Turnbull H. W. & Royal Society (London). (1959). The correspondence of Isaac Newton. Cambridge University Press for the Royal Society.

29.

Norman, D. (1988). The psychology of everyday things. Basic Books.

30.

Norman, D. (2016). The design of everyday things (pp. 300–311). https://doi.org/10.15358/9783800648108-300

31.

Norman, D., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2017). The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research (5th ed.). Sage.

32.

Palmquist, A. (2023). Plug & Play? Stakeholders’ co-meaningmaking of gamification implementations in workplace learning environments (Dissertation University of Gothenburg Department of Applied Information Technology).

33.

Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Rothenberger, M. A., & Chatterjee, S. (2007). A design science research methodology for information systems research. Journal of Management Information Systems, 24(3), 45–77. https://doi.org/10.2753/mis0742-1222240302CrossRef

34.

Plowright, D. (2010). Using mixed methods: Frameworks for an integrated methodology. Using Mixed Methods, 1–224.

35.

Preece, J., Sharp, H., & Rogers, Y. (2015). Interaction design: Beyond human-computer interaction. John Wiley & Sons.

36.

Redström, J. (2017). Making design theory. MIT Press.CrossRef

37.

Reimer, C. (2017). Dialogic, data-driven design: UX and league of legends. In L. Potts & M. J. Salvo (Eds.), Rhetoric and experience architecture (pp. 241–257). Parlor Press.

38.

Salvador, T., Bell, G., & Anderson, K. (1999). Design ethnography. Design Management Review, 10(4), 35–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1948-7169.1999.tb00274.x

39.

Schell, J. (2019). The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, Third Edition (3rd ed.). A K Peters/CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/b22101

40.

Shin, J., & Odom, W. (2019). Collective wisdom. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1–14). https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300546

41.

Simonsen, J., & Robertson, T. (Eds.). (2012). Routledge international handbook of participatory design. Routledge.

42.

Spock, J. (2014). Bringing the community into the dev team: A look into open development. GDC Vault. GDC Next 2014, Los Angeles, CA. Retrieved from http://www.gdcvault.com/play/1021475/Bringing-the-Community-into-the

43.

Swink, S. (2008). Game feel: A game designer’s guide to virtual sensation. CRC Press.CrossRef

44.

Taffe, S. (2015). The hybrid designer/end-user: Revealing paradoxes in co-design. Design Studies, 40, 39–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2015.06.003CrossRef

45.

Thominet, L. (2021). Open video game development and participatory design. Technical Communication Quarterly, 30(4), 359–374. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572252.2020.1866679CrossRef

46.

Webster, J., & Watson, R. T. (2002). Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: Writing a literature review. MIS quarterly, xiii-xxiii.

47.

Zimmerman, J. (2014). Psyche and EROS: Rhetorics of secrecy and disclosure in game developer-fan relations. In J. deWinter, & R. M. Moeller (Eds.), Computer games and technical communication: Critical methods and applications at the intersection (pp. 141–156). Ashgate.

Title: Design Implications and Processes for an Attainable Game Experience
Authors: Adam Palmquist
Izabella Jedel
Ole Goethe
Publisher: Springer International Publishing
Book: Universal Design in Video Games
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-30594-8

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-031-30595-5

Copyright Year: 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-30595-5_3

Springer Professional

Abstract

Please log in to get access to your license.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"