Top

Published in:

2024 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

How Can Innovation Systems be Sustainable? An Approach for Organizations in Times of Crises, Alongside Economic and Information Technology Issues

Authors : Rafael Antunes Fidelis, Antonio Carlos dos Santos, Paulo Henrique de Souza Bermejo, Diogo Bernardino de Oliveira Lima Bezerra, Rafael Barreiros Porto

Published in: Information Systems

Publisher: Springer Nature Switzerland

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config

AI-assisted search

Off

Abstract

Although information technology is widely considered in innovation processes, environmental, social, and political issues are commonly neglected in times of crisis. This is especially unwelcome since these issues require scarce time and resources due to the instability and vulnerability of organizations in these times. When treated in terms of Innovation Systems (IS), these issues culminate in dedicated IS (DIS) to sustainability. This article presents the theoretical foundations of DIS through a Systematic Literature Review (RSL) based on the Templier and Paré protocol, which analyzed 44 studies. This study examines how DIS behaves to meet environmental, social, political, and economic aspects in crisis times. The results reveal a predominance of governmental institutions as protagonists in promoting IS in times of crisis. We also observed recurrent cooperation between different actors, demonstrating the importance of partnerships. Our study fosters discussion on the behavior of IS dedicated to sustainability in times of crisis and highlights the main elements of their functioning. Finally, this paper provides a research agenda for future studies.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

previous chapter Assessing Main Factors Adopted within the EU Harmonised Online Public Engagement (EU HOPE)

next chapter Tools Facilitating Remote Work in the Greek Business Reality and Their Contribution to the Perceived Proximity of the Remote Workers

Dahlke, J., Bogner, K., Becker, M., Schlaile, M.P., Pyka, A., Ebersberger, B.: Crisis-driven innovation and fundamental human needs: a typological framework of rapid-response COVID-19 innovations. Technol Forecast Soc Change 169, 120799 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120799CrossRef

Zartha Sossa, J.W., Lopez Montoya, O.H., Acosta Prado, J.C.: Determinants of a sustainable innovation system. Bus Strategy Environ. 30(2), 1345–1356 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2689

Zhu, B., Nguyen, M., Siri, N.S., Malik, A.: Towards a transformative model of circular economy for SMEs. J. Bus. Res. 144, 545–555 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.01.093

Pearson, C.M., Clair, J.A.: Reframing crisis management. Acad. Manag. Rev. 23(1), 59–76 (1998). https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1998.192960CrossRef

Oborn, E., Pilosof, N.P., Hinings, B., Zimlichman, E.: Institutional logics and innovation in times of crisis: telemedicine as digital ‘PPE.’ Inf. Organ. 31(1), 100340 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2021.100340CrossRef

Carlsson, B., Jacobsson, S., Holmen, M., Rickne, A.: Innovation systems: analytical and methodological issues. Res. Policy 31(2), 233–245 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00138-XCrossRef

Cassiolato, J.E., Pessoa de Matos, M.G., Lastres, H.M.M.: Innovation systems and development. Int. Develop. 566–581 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199671656.003.0034

Carlsson, B., Jacobsson, S.: In search of useful public policies—key lessons and issues for policy makers, 299–315 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-6133-0_11

Pyka, A.: Dedicated innovation systems to support the transformation towards sustainability: creating income opportunities and employment in the knowledge-based digital bioeconomy. J. Open Innov.: Technol. Market Complexity 3(4) (2017). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40852-017-0079-7

10.

Markard, J.: The life cycle of technological innovation systems. Technol. Forecast Soc. Change 153(July 2018), 119407 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.07.045

11.

Ghazinoory, S., Nasri, S., Ameri, F., Montazer, G.A., Shayan, A.: Why do we need ‘Problem-oriented Innovation System (PIS)’ for solving macro-level societal problems?,” Technol. Forecast Soc. Change 150(October 2018), 119749 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119749

12.

Hekkert, M.P., Suurs, R.A.A., Negro, S.O., Kuhlmann, S., Smits, R.E.H.M.: Functions of innovation systems: a new approach for analysing technological change. Technol. Forecast Soc. Change 74(4), 413–432 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2006.03.002CrossRef

13.

Williams, T.A., Gruber, D.A., Sutcliffe, K.M., Shepherd, D.A., Zhao, E.Y.: Organizational response to adversity: fusing crisis management and resilience research streams. Acad. Manag. Ann. 11(2), 733–769 (2017). https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2015.0134CrossRef

14.

Filho, W.L., Brandli, L.L., Salvia, A.L., Rayman-Bacchus, L., Platje, J.: COVID-19 and the UN sustainable development goals: threat to solidarity or an opportunity? Sustain. (Switz.) 12(13), 1–14 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12135343CrossRef

15.

Ranjbari, M., et al.: Three pillars of sustainability in the wake of COVID-19: a systematic review and future research agenda for sustainable development. J. Clean. Prod. 297, 126660 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126660CrossRef

16.

ONU, “United nations general assembly. Int. J. Marine Coastal Law 25(2), 271–287 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1163/157180910X12665776638740

17.

Hundscheid, L., Wurzinger, M., Gühnemann, A., Melcher, A.H., Stern, T.: Rethinking meat consumption – How institutional shifts affect the sustainable protein transition. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 31, 301–312 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2022.02.016CrossRef

18.

Ho, J.Y., Yoon, S.: Ambiguous roles of intermediaries in social entrepreneurship: the case of social innovation system in South Korea. Technol. Forecast Soc. Change 175 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121324

19.

Klerkx, L., Begemann, S.: Supporting food systems transformation: the what, why, who, where and how of mission-oriented agricultural innovation systems. Agric. Syst. 184, Sep (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2020.102901

20.

Nair, R., Viswanathan, P.K., Bastian, B.L.: Reprioritising sustainable development goals in the post-covid-19 global context: will a mandatory corporatesocial responsibility regime help? Adm. Sci. 11(4) (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci11040150

21.

Yin, X., Chen, J., Li, J.: Rural innovation system: revitalize the countryside for a sustainable development. J. Rural. Stud. 93, 471–478 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.10.014CrossRef

22.

Hernandez, R.R., Jordaan, S.M., Kaldunski, B., Kumar, N.: Aligning climate change and sustainable development goals with an innovation systems roadmap for renewable power. Front. Sustain. 1, 1–13 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3389/frsus.2020.583090CrossRef

23.

Kilkiş, Ş: Sustainability-oriented innovation system analyses of Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa, Turkey and Singapore. J. Clean. Prod. 130, 235–247 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.03.138CrossRef

24.

Davis, K.: How will extension contribute to the sustainable development goals? A global strategy and operational plan. J. Int. Agric. and Exten. Educ. 23(1), 7–13 (2016). https://doi.org/10.5191/jiaee.2016.23101CrossRef

25.

Forrester, J.W.: Counterintuitive behavior of social systems. Technol. Forecast Soc. Change 3(C), 1–22 (1971). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-1625(71)80001-X

26.

Schlaile, M.P., Urmetzer, S., Ehrenberger, M.B., Brewer, J.: Systems entrepreneurship: a conceptual substantiation of a novel entrepreneurial ‘species.’ Sustain. Sci. 16(3), 781–794 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-020-00850-6CrossRef

27.

28.

Pan, S.L., Zhang, S.: From fighting COVID-19 pandemic to tackling sustainable development goals: an opportunity for responsible information systems research. Int. J. Inf. Manage. 55(July), 102196 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102196

29.

Mangas-Vega, A., Dantas, T., Sánchez-Jara, J.M., Gómez-Díaz, R.: Systematic literature reviews in social sciences and humanities a case study. J. Inf. Technol. Res. 11(1), 1–17 (2018). https://doi.org/10.4018/JITR.2018010101CrossRef

30.

Denyer, D., Neely, A.: Introduction to special issue: innovation and productivity performance in the UK. Int. J. Manag. Rev. 5–6(3–4), 131–135 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-8545.2004.00100.xCrossRef

31.

Briner, R.B., Denyer, D.: Systematic review and evidence synthesis as a practice and scholarship tool. The Oxford Handbook of Evidence-Based Management, no. November 2015 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199763986.013.0007

32.

Compagnucci, L., Spigarelli, F.: The Third Mission of the university: a systematic literature review on potentials and constraints. Technol. Forecast Soc. Change 161(March), 120284 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120284

33.

Pinto, A.C., de Andrade, J.B.: Fator de impacto de revistas científicas: qual o significado deste parâmetro? Quim. Nova 22(3), 448–453 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1590/s0100-40421999000300026CrossRef

34.

Garfield, E.: The meaning of the Impact Factor. Int. J. Clin. Health Psychol. 3(2), 363–369 (2003)

35.

Dixon-Woods, M., Agarwal, S., Jones, D., Young, B., Sutton, A.: Synthesising qualitative and quantitative evidence: a review of possible methods. J. Health Serv. Res. Policy 10(1), 45–53 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1258/1355819052801804CrossRef

36.

Denyer, D., Tranfield, D.: Producing a Systematic Review. The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Research Methods, pp. 671–689 (2009)

37.

Wesche, J.P., Negro, S.O., Dütschke, E., Raven, R.P.J.M., Hekkert, M.P.: Configurational innovation systems – Explaining the slow German heat transition. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 52, 99–113 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.12.015CrossRef

38.

Zabala-Iturriagagoitia, J.M., Porto Gómez, I., Aguirre Larracoechea, U.: Technological diversification: a matter of related or unrelated varieties?. Technol. Forecast Soc. Change 155 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.119997

39.

Garcés-Ayerbe, C., Cañón-de-Francia, J.: The relevance of complementarities in the study of the economic consequences of environmental proactivity: analysis of the moderating effect of innovation efforts. Ecol. Econ. 142, 21–30 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ECOLECON.2017.06.022CrossRef

40.

Kroll, H., Tagscherer, U.: Chinese regional innovation systems in times of crisis: the case of Guangdong. Asian J. Technol. Innov. 17(2), 101–128 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1080/19761597.2009.9668675CrossRef

41.

Komninos, N., Musyck, B., Reid, A.I.: Smart specialisation strategies in south Europe during crisis. Eur. J. Innov. Manag. 17(4), 448–471 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-11-2013-0118CrossRef

42.

Sampat, B.N., Shadlen, K.C.: The covid-19 innovation system. Health Aff. 40(3), 400–409 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2020.02097CrossRef

43.

Anderson, C.R., McLachlan, S.M.: Exiting, enduring and innovating: farm household adaptation to global zoonotic disease. Glob. Environ. Chang. 22(1), 82–93 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.GLOENVCHA.2011.11.008CrossRef

44.

Janssen, M., van der Voort, H.: Agile and adaptive governance in crisis response: lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic. Int. J. Inf. Manage. 55 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJINFOMGT.2020.102180

45.

Lennox, J., Reuge, N., Benavides, F.: UNICEF’s lessons learned from the education response to the COVID-19 crisis and reflections on the implications for education policy. Int. J. Educ. Dev. 85 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJEDUDEV.2021.102429

46.

Park, J., Chung, E.: Learning from past pandemic governance: early response and Public-Private Partnerships in testing of COVID-19 in South Korea. World Dev. 137 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.WORLDDEV.2020.105198

47.

Kuziemski, M., Misuraca, G.: AI governance in the public sector: three tales from the frontiers of automated decision-making in democratic settings. Telecomm. Policy 44(6) (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TELPOL.2020.101976

48.

Labunska, S., Gavkalova, N., Pylypenko, A., Prokopishyna, O.: Cognitive instruments of public management accountability for development of national innovation system|Viešojo valdymo atskaitomybės pažintiniai instrumentai kuriant nacionalinę inovacijų sistemą. Public Policy Adm. 19(3), 114–124 (2019). https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.ppaa.18.3.24727CrossRef

49.

Ghazinoory, S., Khosravi, M., Nasri, S.: A systems-based approach to analyze environmental issues: problem-oriented innovation system for water scarcity problem in Iran. J. Environ. Dev. 30(3), 291–316 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1177/10704965211019084CrossRef

50.

Huff, T.: Malaysia’s multimedia super corridor and its first crisis of confidence. Asian J Soc Sci 30(2), 248–270 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1163/156853102320405843CrossRef

51.

Papon, P.: Research institutions in France: between the Republic of science and the nation-state in crisis. Res. Policy 27(8), 771–780 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(98)00089-4CrossRef

52.

Ballantyne, P.: Accessing, sharing and communicating agricultural information for development: emerging trends and issues. Inf. Dev. 25(4), 260–271 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1177/0266666909351634CrossRef

53.

Bauner, D.: International private and public reinforcing dependencies for the innovation of automotive emission control systems in Japan and USA. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 45(5), 375–388 (Jun.2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TRA.2010.12.008CrossRef

54.

Brooks, S., Loevinsohn, M.: Shaping agricultural innovation systems responsive to food insecurity and climate change. Nat. Resour. Forum. 35(3), 185–200 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-8947.2011.01396.xCrossRef

55.

O’Hara, S., Toussaint, E.C.: Food access in crisis: food security and COVID-19. Ecolog. Econ. 180 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ECOLECON.2020.106859

56.

Stern, N., Valero, A.: Research policy, Chris Freeman special issue innovation, growth and the transition to net-zero emissions. Res. Policy 50(9) (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RESPOL.2021.104293

57.

Prosser, L., Thomas Lane, E., Jones, R.: Collaboration for innovative routes to market: COVID-19 and the food system. Agric. Syst. 188 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AGSY.2020.103038

58.

Binder, S., et al.: African national public health institutes responses to COVID-19: innovations, systems changes, and challenges. Health Secur. 19(5), 498–507 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1089/hs.2021.0094CrossRef

59.

Balázs, K.: Innovation potential embodied in research organizations in Central and Eastern Europe. Soc. Stud. Sci. 25(4), 655–683 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1177/030631295025004004CrossRef

60.

Furlan, C., Mortarino, C.: Forecasting the impact of renewable energies in competition with non-renewable sources. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 81, 1879–1886 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RSER.2017.05.284CrossRef

61.

Palma, I.P., Toral, J.N., Vázquez, M.R. P., Fuentes, N.F., Hernández, F.G.: Historical changes in the process of agricultural development in Cuba. J. Clean Prod. 96, 77–84 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2013.11.078

62.

Qureshi, T.M., Ullah, K., Arentsen, M.J.: Factors responsible for solar PV adoption at household level: a case of Lahore, Pakistan. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 78, 754–763 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RSER.2017.04.020CrossRef

63.

Etzkowitz, H.: An innovation strategy to end the second great depression. Eur. Plan. Stud. 20(9), 1439–1453 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2012.709060CrossRef

64.

S. Ghazinoory, S. Nasri, F. Ameri, G. A. Montazer, and A. Shayan, “Why do we need ‘Problem-oriented Innovation System (PIS)’’ for solving macro-level societal problems?,’” Technol Forecast Soc Change, vol. 150, Jan. 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119749

65.

Knox, D., Castles, S.: Education with production-learning from the third world. Int. J. Educ. Dev. 2(1), 1–14 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1016/0738-0593(82)90062-1CrossRef

66.

Chung, S.: Innovation in Korea (2003).https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-008044198-6/50062-0

67.

Stern, N., Valero, A.: Innovation, growth and the transition to net-zero emissions. Res. Policy 50(9), 104293 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2021.104293CrossRef

68.

Taalbi, J.: Innovation in the long run: perspectives on technological transitions in Sweden 1908–2016. Environ. Innov. Soc. Transit 40, 222–248 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EIST.2021.07.003CrossRef

69.

Sharif, N.: Emergence and development of the National Innovation Systems concept. Res. Policy 35(5), 745–766 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.04.001CrossRef

70.

Trinugroho, I., Law, S.H., Lee, W.C., Wiwoho, J., Sergi, B.S.: Effect of financial development on innovation: roles of market institutions. Econ. Model 103 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ECONMOD.2021.105598

71.

Tulum, Ö., Lazonick, W.: Financialized corporations in a national innovation system: the U.S. Pharmaceutical Industry. Int. J. Polit. Econ. 47(3–4), 281–316 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/08911916.2018.1549842CrossRef

72.

Friz, K., Günther, J.: Innovation and economic crisis in transition economies. Eurasian Bus. Rev. 11(4), 537–563 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40821-021-00192-yCrossRef

73.

Kapetaniou, C., Samdanis, M., Lee, S.H.S.H.: Innovation policies of Cyprus during the global economic crisis: aligning financial institutions with National Innovation System. Technol. Forecast Soc. Change 133, 29–40 (2018)CrossRef

74.

Sharif, N.: An examination of recent developments in Hong Kong’s innovation system: 1990 to the present. Sci. Public Policy 33(7), 505–518 (2006). https://doi.org/10.3152/147154306781778768CrossRef

75.

Yang, C.: Government policy change and evolution of regional innovation systems in China: evidence from strategic emerging industries in Shenzhen. Environ. Plan. C Gov. Policy 33(3), 661–682 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1068/C12162rCrossRef

76.

Knight, P.T., Routti, J.: E-Development and consensus formation in Finland. J. Knowl. Econ. 2(1), 117–144 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-010-0023-6CrossRef

77.

Květoň, V., Horák, P.: The effect of public R&D subsidies on firms’ competitiveness: regional and sectoral specifics in emerging innovation systems. Appl. Geogr. 94, 119–129 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.APGEOG.2018.03.015CrossRef

78.

Ranga, M.: Stimulating R&D and innovation to address Romania’s Economic Crisis: a bridge too far? Eur. Plan. Stud. 20(9), 1497–1523 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2012.709145CrossRef

79.

Rho, S., Lee, K., Kim, S.H.S.H.: Limited catch-up in China’s semiconductor industry: a sectoral innovation system perspective. Millennial Asia 6(2), 147–175 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1177/0976399615590514CrossRef

80.

Gkypali, A., Kokkinos, V., Bouras, C., Tsekouras, K.: Science parks and regional innovation performance in fiscal austerity era: Less is more? Small Bus. Econ. 47(2), 313–330 (2016)CrossRef

81.

Filippetti, A., Archibugi, D.: Innovation in times of crisis: national systems of innovation, structure, and demand. Res. Policy 40(2), 179–192 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RESPOL.2010.09.001CrossRef

82.

Khan, H.A.: Technology and economic development: the case of Taiwan. J. Contemp. China 13(40), 507–521 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1080/1067056042000213373CrossRef

83.

Kurniati, A., Rosskam, E., Afzal, M.M., Suryowinoto, T.B., Mukti, A.G.: Strengthening Indonesia’s health workforce through partnerships. Public Health 129(9), 1138–1149 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PUHE.2015.04.012CrossRef

84.

Etzkowitz, H., Ranga, M.: A trans-Keynesian vision of innovation for the contemporary economic crisis: ‘picking winners’ revisited. Sci. Public Policy 36(10), 799–808 (2009). https://doi.org/10.3152/030234209X481950CrossRef

85.

Greeson, J.K., Gyourko, J., Ortiz, A.J., Coleman, D., Cancel, S.: ‘One hundred and ninety-four got licensed by Monday’: application of design thinking for foster care innovation and transformation in Rhode Island. Child Youth Serv. Rev. 128 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CHILDYOUTH.2021.106166

86.

Sourdin, T., Li, B., McNamara, D.M.: Court innovations and access to justice in times of crisis. Health Policy Technol. 9(4), 447–453 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.HLPT.2020.08.020CrossRef

87.

Caniato, M., Carliez, D., Thulstrup, A.: Challenges and opportunities of new energy schemes for food security in humanitarian contexts: a selective review. Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess. 22, 208–219 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SETA.2017.02.006CrossRef

88.

Schlaile et al., M.P.: Innovation systems for transformations towards sustainability? Taking the normative dimension seriously. Sustain. (Switz.) 9(12) (2017). https://doi.org/10.3390/su9122253

89.

Urmetzer, S., Schlaile, M.P., Bogner, K.B., Mueller, M., Pyka, A.: Exploring the dedicated knowledge base of a transformation towards a sustainable bioeconomy. Sustain. (Switz.) 10(6), 16–20 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3390/su10061694CrossRef

90.

Bardin, L.: Análise de Conteúdo (2004)

Title: How Can Innovation Systems be Sustainable? An Approach for Organizations in Times of Crises, Alongside Economic and Information Technology Issues
Authors: Rafael Antunes Fidelis
Antonio Carlos dos Santos
Paulo Henrique de Souza Bermejo
Diogo Bernardino de Oliveira Lima Bezerra
Rafael Barreiros Porto
Publisher: Springer Nature Switzerland
Book: Information Systems
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-56480-2

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-031-56481-9

Copyright Year: 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-56481-9_17

Springer Professional

Abstract

Please log in to get access to your license.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Premium Partner