Skip to main content
Top

2024 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

11. Identification of Most Affected Impact Categories of Wastewater-Based Biogas Production and Use

Authors : Salma Chaouali, Leticia Sarmento dos Muchangos, Lisa Ito, Akihiro Tokai

Published in: EcoDesign for Sustainable Products, Services and Social Systems II

Publisher: Springer Nature Singapore

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

With the increasing deployment of renewable energy technologies, the current research tends to focus not only on ways to increase systems efficiencies but also on assessing the benefits of their use objectively, as much as the impact of their drawbacks on the environment. One of these technologies is biogas production that has been implemented and developed in many countries for a long time, while it is still starting in others. One of the factors that hinder the spread of this technology is greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions during the production and use of biogas from wastewater. Most of the existing studies consider the emissions from some processes but ignore biogas environmental impact. The diversity of the methods used to estimate emissions based on available resources and other factors also led to an important variation in the results making an overview of the state of the art of emissions from biogas from wastewater necessary for future research and practice. In this context, a systematic review was carried to identify and explain the existing research concerning the emissions from production and use of biogas from wastewater and the quantities of emissions and their impact on the environment. Scopus and Web of Science were chosen as paper search databases because of the amount and quality of papers they include and the wideness of the screening options. After several screening processes, 73 papers in English ranging from 2010 to 2021 were selected. Most of the experimental case studies were from Europe. There were reviews and theoretical studies from developing countries. Results show that most of the direct emissions (methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O)) result from the aerobic treatments of wastewater and anaerobic digester leakages, but those can be avoided in the case of regular maintenance. The most affected impact categories of the biogas deployment are human health, global warming, and climate change. The findings regarding this topic provide more awareness for engineers and system designers to conceive biogas systems with the least impact on the environment and give an insight into the importance of considering the options to mitigate GHG emissions in wastewater treatment plants equipped with biogas and energy generation for policy making in the countries who did not start implementing it yet.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
go back to reference Alayi R, Shamel A, Kasaeian A, Harasii H (2016) The role of biogas to sustainable development (aspects environmental, security and economic). Alayi R, Shamel A, Kasaeian A, Harasii H (2016) The role of biogas to sustainable development (aspects environmental, security and economic).
go back to reference Bahrs E, Angenendt E (2019) Status quo and perspectives of biogas production for energy and material utilization. GCB Bioenergy 11(1):9–20CrossRef Bahrs E, Angenendt E (2019) Status quo and perspectives of biogas production for energy and material utilization. GCB Bioenergy 11(1):9–20CrossRef
go back to reference Bani Shahabadi M, Yerushalmi L, Haghighat F (2010) Estimation of greenhouse gas generation in wastewater treatment plants - Model development and application. Chemosphere 78(9):1085–1092CrossRef Bani Shahabadi M, Yerushalmi L, Haghighat F (2010) Estimation of greenhouse gas generation in wastewater treatment plants - Model development and application. Chemosphere 78(9):1085–1092CrossRef
go back to reference Bekchanov M, Mondal MAH, de Alwis A, Mirzabaev A (2019) Why adoption is slow despite promising potential of biogas technology for improving energy security and mitigating climate change in Sri Lanka? Renew Sustain Energy Rev 105:378–390CrossRef Bekchanov M, Mondal MAH, de Alwis A, Mirzabaev A (2019) Why adoption is slow despite promising potential of biogas technology for improving energy security and mitigating climate change in Sri Lanka? Renew Sustain Energy Rev 105:378–390CrossRef
go back to reference Bhardwaj S (2017) A review: advantages and disadvantages of biogas. Int Res J Eng Technol 04(10):890–893 Bhardwaj S (2017) A review: advantages and disadvantages of biogas. Int Res J Eng Technol 04(10):890–893
go back to reference Blanco D, Collado S, Laca A, Díaz M (2016) Life cycle assessment of introducing an anaerobic digester in a municipal wastewater treatment plant in Spain. Water Sci Technol 73(4):835–842CrossRef Blanco D, Collado S, Laca A, Díaz M (2016) Life cycle assessment of introducing an anaerobic digester in a municipal wastewater treatment plant in Spain. Water Sci Technol 73(4):835–842CrossRef
go back to reference Briner RB, Denyer D (2012) Systematic review and evidence synthesis as a practice and scholarship tool, Oxford Handb. Evidence-Based Manag. Briner RB, Denyer D (2012) Systematic review and evidence synthesis as a practice and scholarship tool, Oxford Handb. Evidence-Based Manag.
go back to reference Corominas L (2020) The application of life cycle assessment (LCA) to wastewater treatment: A best practice guide and critical review. Water Res 184:116058CrossRef Corominas L (2020) The application of life cycle assessment (LCA) to wastewater treatment: A best practice guide and critical review. Water Res 184:116058CrossRef
go back to reference Cozma P, Ghinea C, Mǎmǎligǎ I, Wukovits W, Friedl A, Gavrilescu M (2013) Environmental impact assessment of high pressure water scrubbing biogas upgrading technology. Clean Soil Air Water 41(9):917–927CrossRef Cozma P, Ghinea C, Mǎmǎligǎ I, Wukovits W, Friedl A, Gavrilescu M (2013) Environmental impact assessment of high pressure water scrubbing biogas upgrading technology. Clean Soil Air Water 41(9):917–927CrossRef
go back to reference Daelman MRJ, van Voorthuizen EM, van Dongen UGJM, Volcke EIP, van Loosdrecht MCM (2012) Methane emission during municipal wastewater treatment. Water Res. 46(11):3657–3670CrossRef Daelman MRJ, van Voorthuizen EM, van Dongen UGJM, Volcke EIP, van Loosdrecht MCM (2012) Methane emission during municipal wastewater treatment. Water Res. 46(11):3657–3670CrossRef
go back to reference Danny Harvey LD (2001) Climatic change, pp. 493–497 Danny Harvey LD (2001) Climatic change, pp. 493–497
go back to reference De Haas DW, Pepperell C, Foley J (2014) Perspectives on greenhouse gas emission estimates based on Australian wastewater treatment plant operating data. Water Sci Technol 69(3):451–463CrossRef De Haas DW, Pepperell C, Foley J (2014) Perspectives on greenhouse gas emission estimates based on Australian wastewater treatment plant operating data. Water Sci Technol 69(3):451–463CrossRef
go back to reference Delre A, Mønster J, Scheutz C (2017) Greenhouse gas emission quantification from wastewater treatment plants, using a tracer gas dispersion method. Sci Total Environ 605–606:258–268CrossRef Delre A, Mønster J, Scheutz C (2017) Greenhouse gas emission quantification from wastewater treatment plants, using a tracer gas dispersion method. Sci Total Environ 605–606:258–268CrossRef
go back to reference Delre A, Mønster J, Samuelsson J, Fredenslund AM, Scheutz C (2018) Emission quantification using the tracer gas dispersion method: The influence of instrument, tracer gas species and source simulation. Sci Total Environ 634:59–66CrossRef Delre A, Mønster J, Samuelsson J, Fredenslund AM, Scheutz C (2018) Emission quantification using the tracer gas dispersion method: The influence of instrument, tracer gas species and source simulation. Sci Total Environ 634:59–66CrossRef
go back to reference Demir O, Yapıcıoğlu P (2019) Investigation of GHG emission sources and reducing GHG emissions in a municipal wastewater treatment plant. Greenh Gases Sci Technol 9(5):948–964CrossRef Demir O, Yapıcıoğlu P (2019) Investigation of GHG emission sources and reducing GHG emissions in a municipal wastewater treatment plant. Greenh Gases Sci Technol 9(5):948–964CrossRef
go back to reference Doorn M (2019) W. Treatment, I. Guidelines, W. Irving, N. Greenhouse, and G. Inventories, 2019 Refinement to the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Chapter 6 wastewater treatment and discharge. Wastewater Treat Disch 5:7–65 Doorn M (2019) W. Treatment, I. Guidelines, W. Irving, N. Greenhouse, and G. Inventories, 2019 Refinement to the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Chapter 6 wastewater treatment and discharge. Wastewater Treat Disch 5:7–65
go back to reference Duan N, Khoshnevisan B, Lin C, Liu Z, Liu H (2020) Life cycle assessment of anaerobic digestion of pig manure coupled with different digestate treatment technologies. Environ Int 137:105522CrossRef Duan N, Khoshnevisan B, Lin C, Liu Z, Liu H (2020) Life cycle assessment of anaerobic digestion of pig manure coupled with different digestate treatment technologies. Environ Int 137:105522CrossRef
go back to reference E.B.Association (2017) EBA Statistical Report, Eur. Biogas Assoc. E.B.Association (2017) EBA Statistical Report, Eur. Biogas Assoc.
go back to reference European Commission (2014) European Research Area Facts and Figures 2014 SPAIN. European Commission (2014) European Research Area Facts and Figures 2014 SPAIN.
go back to reference Graneheim UH, Lindgren BM, Lundman B (2017) Methodological challenges in qualitative content analysis: A discussion paper. Nurse Educ Today 56:29–34CrossRef Graneheim UH, Lindgren BM, Lundman B (2017) Methodological challenges in qualitative content analysis: A discussion paper. Nurse Educ Today 56:29–34CrossRef
go back to reference Gülsen H, Yapicioglu P (2019) Greenhouse gas emission estimation for a UASB reactor in a dairy wastewater treatment plant. Int J Glob Warm 17(4):373–388CrossRef Gülsen H, Yapicioglu P (2019) Greenhouse gas emission estimation for a UASB reactor in a dairy wastewater treatment plant. Int J Glob Warm 17(4):373–388CrossRef
go back to reference Gustavsson DJI, Tumlin S (2013) Carbon footprints of Scandinavian wastewater treatment plants. Water Sci Technol 68(4):887–893CrossRef Gustavsson DJI, Tumlin S (2013) Carbon footprints of Scandinavian wastewater treatment plants. Water Sci Technol 68(4):887–893CrossRef
go back to reference Hijazi O, Munro S, Zerhusen B, Effenberger M (2016) Review of life cycle assessment for biogas production in Europe. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 54:1291–1300CrossRef Hijazi O, Munro S, Zerhusen B, Effenberger M (2016) Review of life cycle assessment for biogas production in Europe. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 54:1291–1300CrossRef
go back to reference Klöpffer W (1997) Life cycle assessment: from the beginning to the current state. Environ Sci Pollut Res 4(4):223–228CrossRef Klöpffer W (1997) Life cycle assessment: from the beginning to the current state. Environ Sci Pollut Res 4(4):223–228CrossRef
go back to reference Koutsou OP, Gatidou G, Stasinakis AS (2018) Domestic wastewater management in Greece: Greenhouse gas emissions estimation at country scale. J Clean Prod 188:851–859CrossRef Koutsou OP, Gatidou G, Stasinakis AS (2018) Domestic wastewater management in Greece: Greenhouse gas emissions estimation at country scale. J Clean Prod 188:851–859CrossRef
go back to reference Kuo J, Dow J (2017) Biogas production from anaerobic digestion of food waste and relevant air quality implications. J Air Waste Manag Assoc 67(9):1000–1011CrossRef Kuo J, Dow J (2017) Biogas production from anaerobic digestion of food waste and relevant air quality implications. J Air Waste Manag Assoc 67(9):1000–1011CrossRef
go back to reference Kvist T, Aryal N (2019) Methane loss from commercially operating biogas upgrading plants. Waste Manag. 87:295–300CrossRef Kvist T, Aryal N (2019) Methane loss from commercially operating biogas upgrading plants. Waste Manag. 87:295–300CrossRef
go back to reference Kyung D, Kim M, Chang J, Lee W (2015) Estimation of greenhouse gas emissions from a hybrid wastewater treatment plant. J Clean Prod 95:117–123CrossRef Kyung D, Kim M, Chang J, Lee W (2015) Estimation of greenhouse gas emissions from a hybrid wastewater treatment plant. J Clean Prod 95:117–123CrossRef
go back to reference Lamnatou C, Nicolaï R, Chemisana D, Cristofari C, Cancellieri D (2019) Biogas production by means of an anaerobic-digestion plant in France: LCA of greenhouse-gas emissions and other environmental indicators. Sci Total Environ 670:1226–1239CrossRef Lamnatou C, Nicolaï R, Chemisana D, Cristofari C, Cancellieri D (2019) Biogas production by means of an anaerobic-digestion plant in France: LCA of greenhouse-gas emissions and other environmental indicators. Sci Total Environ 670:1226–1239CrossRef
go back to reference Lobato LCS, Chernicharo CAL, Souza CL (2012) Estimates of methane loss and energy recovery potential in anaerobic reactors treating domestic wastewater. Water Sci Technol 66(12):2745–2753CrossRef Lobato LCS, Chernicharo CAL, Souza CL (2012) Estimates of methane loss and energy recovery potential in anaerobic reactors treating domestic wastewater. Water Sci Technol 66(12):2745–2753CrossRef
go back to reference Maktabifard M, Zaborowska E, Makinia J (2019) Evaluating the effect of different operational strategies on the carbon footprint of wastewater treatment plants – case studies from northern Poland. Water Sci Technol 79(11):2211–2220CrossRef Maktabifard M, Zaborowska E, Makinia J (2019) Evaluating the effect of different operational strategies on the carbon footprint of wastewater treatment plants – case studies from northern Poland. Water Sci Technol 79(11):2211–2220CrossRef
go back to reference Meneses-Jácome A, Osorio-Molina A, Parra-Saldívar R, Gallego-Suárez D, Velásquez-Arredondo HI, Ruiz-Colorado AA (2015) LCA applied to elucidate opportunities for biogas from wastewaters in Colombia. Water Sci Technol 71(2):211–219CrossRef Meneses-Jácome A, Osorio-Molina A, Parra-Saldívar R, Gallego-Suárez D, Velásquez-Arredondo HI, Ruiz-Colorado AA (2015) LCA applied to elucidate opportunities for biogas from wastewaters in Colombia. Water Sci Technol 71(2):211–219CrossRef
go back to reference Mohtasham J (2015) Review Article-Renewable Energies. Energy Procedia 74:1289–1297CrossRef Mohtasham J (2015) Review Article-Renewable Energies. Energy Procedia 74:1289–1297CrossRef
go back to reference Nakamura M, Yuyama Y, Yamaoka M, Shimizu N (2014) Global warming impacts of the process to utilize digested slurry from methane fermentation as a fertilizer: case study of the Yamada Biomass Plant. Paddy Water Environ. 12(2):295–299CrossRef Nakamura M, Yuyama Y, Yamaoka M, Shimizu N (2014) Global warming impacts of the process to utilize digested slurry from methane fermentation as a fertilizer: case study of the Yamada Biomass Plant. Paddy Water Environ. 12(2):295–299CrossRef
go back to reference Nevzorova T, Kutcherov V (2019) Barriers to the wider implementation of biogas as a source of energy: A state-of-the-art review. Energy Strateg Rev 26:100414CrossRef Nevzorova T, Kutcherov V (2019) Barriers to the wider implementation of biogas as a source of energy: A state-of-the-art review. Energy Strateg Rev 26:100414CrossRef
go back to reference Osama Mohammed ESK (2019) Advantages and limitations of biogas technologies, 1–7, 1395. Osama Mohammed ESK (2019) Advantages and limitations of biogas technologies, 1–7, 1395.
go back to reference Paolini V, Petracchini F, Segreto M, Tomassetti L, Naja N, Cecinato A (2018) Environmental impact of biogas: A short review of current knowledge. J Environ Sci Heal Part A Toxic/Hazardous Subst Environ Eng 53(10):899–906 Paolini V, Petracchini F, Segreto M, Tomassetti L, Naja N, Cecinato A (2018) Environmental impact of biogas: A short review of current knowledge. J Environ Sci Heal Part A Toxic/Hazardous Subst Environ Eng 53(10):899–906
go back to reference Paredes MG, Güereca LP, Molina LT, Noyola A (2019) Methane emissions from anaerobic sludge digesters in Mexico: On-site determination vs. IPCC Tier 1 method. Sci Total Environ. 656:468–474CrossRef Paredes MG, Güereca LP, Molina LT, Noyola A (2019) Methane emissions from anaerobic sludge digesters in Mexico: On-site determination vs. IPCC Tier 1 method. Sci Total Environ. 656:468–474CrossRef
go back to reference Pertl A, Mostbauer P, Obersteiner G (2010) Climate balance of biogas upgrading systems. Waste Manag 30(1):92–99CrossRef Pertl A, Mostbauer P, Obersteiner G (2010) Climate balance of biogas upgrading systems. Waste Manag 30(1):92–99CrossRef
go back to reference Poeschl M, Ward S, Owende P (2012a) Environmental impacts of biogas deployment - Part I: life cycle inventory for evaluation of production process emissions to air. J Clean Prod 24:168–183CrossRef Poeschl M, Ward S, Owende P (2012a) Environmental impacts of biogas deployment - Part I: life cycle inventory for evaluation of production process emissions to air. J Clean Prod 24:168–183CrossRef
go back to reference Poeschl M, Ward S, Owende P (2012b) Environmental impacts of biogas deployment - Part II: life cycle assessment of multiple production and utilization pathways. J Clean Prod 24:184–201CrossRef Poeschl M, Ward S, Owende P (2012b) Environmental impacts of biogas deployment - Part II: life cycle assessment of multiple production and utilization pathways. J Clean Prod 24:184–201CrossRef
go back to reference Rafiee A, Khalilpour KR, Prest J, Skryabin I (2021) Biogas as an energy vector. Biomass Bioenergy 144:105935CrossRef Rafiee A, Khalilpour KR, Prest J, Skryabin I (2021) Biogas as an energy vector. Biomass Bioenergy 144:105935CrossRef
go back to reference Rasi S (2009) Biogas composition and upgrading to biomethane Saija Rasi Biogas Composition and Upgrading to Biomethane Rasi S (2009) Biogas composition and upgrading to biomethane Saija Rasi Biogas Composition and Upgrading to Biomethane
go back to reference Scheutz C, Fredenslund AM (2019) Total methane emission rates and losses from 23 biogas plants. Waste Manag. 97:38–46CrossRef Scheutz C, Fredenslund AM (2019) Total methane emission rates and losses from 23 biogas plants. Waste Manag. 97:38–46CrossRef
go back to reference Schmid C, Horschig T, Pfeiffer A, Szarka N, Thrän D (2019) Biogas upgrading: A review of national biomethane strategies and support policies in selected countries. Energies 12(19):3803CrossRef Schmid C, Horschig T, Pfeiffer A, Szarka N, Thrän D (2019) Biogas upgrading: A review of national biomethane strategies and support policies in selected countries. Energies 12(19):3803CrossRef
go back to reference Siegl S, Laaber M, Holubar P (2011) Green electricity from biomass, part I: environmental impacts of direct life cycle emissions. Waste Biomass Valorizat 2(3):267–284CrossRef Siegl S, Laaber M, Holubar P (2011) Green electricity from biomass, part I: environmental impacts of direct life cycle emissions. Waste Biomass Valorizat 2(3):267–284CrossRef
go back to reference Singh V, Phuleria HC, Chandel MK (2017) Estimation of greenhouse gas emissions from municipal wastewater treatment systems in India. Water Environ J 31(4):537–544CrossRef Singh V, Phuleria HC, Chandel MK (2017) Estimation of greenhouse gas emissions from municipal wastewater treatment systems in India. Water Environ J 31(4):537–544CrossRef
go back to reference Singh AD, Upadhyay A, Shrivastava S, Vivekanand V (2020) Life-cycle assessment of sewage sludge-based large-scale biogas plant. Bioresour Technol 309 Singh AD, Upadhyay A, Shrivastava S, Vivekanand V (2020) Life-cycle assessment of sewage sludge-based large-scale biogas plant. Bioresour Technol 309
go back to reference Surendra KC, Takara D, Hashimoto AG, Khanal SK (2014) Biogas as a sustainable energy source for developing countries: Opportunities and challenges. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 31:846–859CrossRef Surendra KC, Takara D, Hashimoto AG, Khanal SK (2014) Biogas as a sustainable energy source for developing countries: Opportunities and challenges. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 31:846–859CrossRef
go back to reference Szabó G (2014a) The carbon footprint of a biogas power plant. Environ Eng Manag J 13(11):2867–2874CrossRef Szabó G (2014a) The carbon footprint of a biogas power plant. Environ Eng Manag J 13(11):2867–2874CrossRef
go back to reference Szabó G (2014b) The environmental and economic aspects of a biogas power plant. Trans Ecol Environ 186:1743–3541 Szabó G (2014b) The environmental and economic aspects of a biogas power plant. Trans Ecol Environ 186:1743–3541
go back to reference Tauber J, Parravicini V, Svardal K, Krampe J (2019) Quantifying methane emissions from anaerobic digesters. Water Sci Technol 80(9):1654–1661CrossRef Tauber J, Parravicini V, Svardal K, Krampe J (2019) Quantifying methane emissions from anaerobic digesters. Water Sci Technol 80(9):1654–1661CrossRef
go back to reference Vasco-Correa J, Khanal S, Manandhar A, Shah A (2018) Anaerobic digestion for bioenergy production: Global status, environmental and techno-economic implications, and government policies. Bioresour Technol 247:1015–1026CrossRef Vasco-Correa J, Khanal S, Manandhar A, Shah A (2018) Anaerobic digestion for bioenergy production: Global status, environmental and techno-economic implications, and government policies. Bioresour Technol 247:1015–1026CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Identification of Most Affected Impact Categories of Wastewater-Based Biogas Production and Use
Authors
Salma Chaouali
Leticia Sarmento dos Muchangos
Lisa Ito
Akihiro Tokai
Copyright Year
2024
Publisher
Springer Nature Singapore
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-3897-1_11