nach oben

International Journal of Geosynthetics and Ground Engineering

Erschienen in:

01.10.2023 | Original Paper

Evaluation of Soil–Geometrically Modified Geogrid Interaction in Direct Shear Mode

verfasst von: Mahmood Reza Abdi, Alireza Tabarsa, Parastou Haghgouy

Erschienen in: International Journal of Geosynthetics and Ground Engineering | Ausgabe 5/2023

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Geogrids are widely used for soil reinforcement, justifying the necessity to comprehend their interaction with soil for safe and economic design of reinforced soil structures. As contribution of transverse rib resistance to soil–geogrid interaction in direct shear mode is very low, current research has been conducted to evaluate possible impact of modifying transverse member thickness (height) on interactions. Modified geogrids with three different transverse rib thicknesses perpendicular to load direction and different aperture sizes were generated by 3D printing technology and interactions at soil–geogrid interface investigated using large-scale direct shear apparatus. Poorly graded sand and normal pressures of 25, 50 and 75 kPa have been utilized in the investigation. Test results show maximum 22% improvement in overall shear strength at interface through greater transverse rib resistance mobilization using the modified geogrid with the thickest ribs (i.e. 6 mm). Enhancements showed to be directly related to the increase in rib thickness and inversely associated to aperture size. The highest and the lowest improvements in shear strengths at interface were correspondingly achieved by samples reinforced with 10 × 10 × 6 mm (length × width × rib thickness) and 40 × 40 × 2 mm geogrids.

Vorheriger Artikel Comparative Assessment of Single- and Double-Interface Shear Tests of MSW Landfill Liners Using Large Direct Shear Equipment

Nächster Artikel Improving Soft Clay Behavior with Alkali-Activated Waste Eggshell for Sustainable Ground Engineering

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Lopes ML (2002) Soil–geosynthetic interaction. In: Shukla SK (ed) geosynthetics and their applications. Telford Publishing, Thomas Telford Ltd, London

Abdi MR, Sadrnejad A, Arjomand MA (2009) Strength enhancement of clay by encapsulating geogrids in thin layers of sand. Geotext Geomembr 27(6):447–455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2009.06.001CrossRef

Moraci N, Gioffrè D (2006) A simple method to evaluate the pullout resistance of extruded geogrids embedded in a compacted granular soil. Geotext Geomembr 24(2):116–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2005.11.001CrossRef

Hsieh CW, Chen GH, Wu JH (2011) The shear behaviour obtained from the direct shear and pullout tests for different poor graded soil–geosynthetic systems. J Geoeng 6(1):15–26

Abdi MR, Arjomand MA (2011) Pullout tests conducted on clay reinforced with geogrid encapsulated in thin layers of sand. Geotext Geomembr 29(6):588–595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2011.04.004CrossRef

Abdi MR, Zandieh AR (2014) Experimental and numerical analysis of large scale pull out tests conducted on clays reinforced with geogrids encapsulated with coarse material. Geotext Geomembr 42(5):494–504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotex.2014.0mem7.008CrossRef

Chen C, McDowell GR, Thom NH (2014) Investigating geogrid-reinforced ballast: experimental pull-out tests and discrete element modelling. Soils Found 54(1):1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2013.12.001CrossRef

Ferreira FB, Vieira CS, Lopes ML, Carlos DM (2016) Experimental investigation on the pullout behaviour of geosynthetics embedded in a granite residual soil. Eur J Environ Civ Eng 20(9):1147–1180. https://doi.org/10.1080/19648189.2015.1090927CrossRef

Abdi MR, Mirzaeifar H (2017) Experimental and PIV evaluation of grain size and distribution on soil–geogrid interactions in pullout test. Soils Found 57(6):1045–1058. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2017.08.030CrossRef

10.

Mosallanezhad M, Sadat Taghavi SH, KhadivSarvestani M (2017) Large-scale pullout testing of a new ‘rooted’ geogrid. Int J Phys Model Geotech 17(3):195–203. https://doi.org/10.1680/jphmg.15.00029CrossRef

11.

Bathurst RJ, Ezzein FM (2015) Geogrid and soil displacement observations during pullout using a transparent granular soil. Geotech Test J 38(5):673–685. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ20140145CrossRef

12.

Altay G, Kayadelen C, Taşkıran T, Kaya YZ (2019) A laboratory study on pull-out resistance of geogrid in clay soil. Measurement 139:301–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2019.02.065CrossRef

13.

Abdi MR, Zandieh AR, Mirzaeifar H, Arjomand MA (2019) Influence of geogrid type and coarse grain size on pull out behaviour of clays reinforced with geogrids embedded in thin granular layers. Eur J Environ Civ Eng 25(12):2161–2180. https://doi.org/10.1080/19648189.2019.1619627CrossRef

14.

Vieira CS, Pereira P, Ferreira F, Lopes MDL (2020) Pullout behaviour of geogrids embedded in a recycled construction and demolition material. Effects of specimen size and displacement rate. Sustainability 12(9):3825. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12093825CrossRef

15.

Namjoo AM, Soltani F, Toufigh V (2021) Effects of moisture on the mechanical behavior of sand–geogrid: an experimental investigation. Int J Geosynth Ground Eng 7(1):1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40891-020-00243-wCrossRef

16.

Derksen J, Ziegler M, Fuentes R (2021) Geogrid-soil interaction: a new conceptual model and testing apparatus. Geotext Geomembr 49(5):1393–1406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2021.05.011CrossRef

17.

Beyranvand A, Lajevardi SH, Ghazavi M, Mirhosseini SM (2021) Laboratory investigation of pullout behavior of strengthened geogrid with concrete pieces in fine sand. Innov Infrastruct Solut 6(4):1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-021-00575-0CrossRef

18.

Chang JY, Feng SJ (2021) Experimental study of the shear behaviour of a multilayer geosynthetic liner system. Geosynth Int 28(6):634–646. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgein.21.00020CrossRef

19.

Chen JF, Gu ZA, Rajesh S, Yu SB (2021) Pullout Behaviour of triaxial geogrid embedded in a transparent soil. Int J Geomech 21(3):04021003. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0001936CrossRef

20.

Abdi MR, Mirzaeifar H, Asgardun Y (2022) Novel soil-pegged geogrid (PG) interactions in pull-out loading conditions. Geotext Geomembr 50:764–788. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2022.04.001CrossRef

21.

Mirzaeifar H, Hatami K, Abdi MR (2022) Pullout testing and Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV) analysis of geogrid reinforcement embedded in granular drainage layers. Geotext Geomembr. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2022.06.008CrossRef

22.

Lee KM, Manjunath VR (2000) Soil–geotextile interface friction by direct shear tests. Can Geotech J 37(1):238–252. https://doi.org/10.1139/t99-124CrossRef

23.

Goodhue MJ, Edil TB, Benson CH (2001) Interaction of foundry sands with geosynthetics. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 127(4):353–362. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2001)127:4(353)CrossRef

24.

Mofiz SA, Taha MR, Sharker DC (2004) Mechanical stress-strain characteristics and model behavior of geosynthetic reinforced soil composites. In: 17th ASCE engineering mechanics conference, pp 23–31

25.

Abu-Farsakh M, Coronel J, Tao M (2007) Effect of soil moisture content and dry density on cohesive soil–geosynthetic interactions using large direct shear tests. J Mater Civ Eng 19(7):540–549. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2007)19:7(540)CrossRef

26.

Liu CN, Zornberg JG, Chen TC, Ho YH, Lin BH (2009) Behaviour of geogrid-sand interface in direct shear mode. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 135(12):1863. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000150CrossRef

27.

Basudhar PK (2010) Modeling of soil–woven geotextile interface behavior from direct shear test results. Geotext Geomembr 28(4):403–408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2009.12.005CrossRef

28.

Tuna SC, Altun S (2012) Mechanical behaviour of sand-geotextile interface. Sci Iran 19(4):1044–1051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scient.2012.06.009CrossRef

29.

Liu CN, Yang KH, Nguyen MD (2014) Behaviour of geogrid–reinforced sand and effect of reinforcement anchorage in large-scale plane strain compression. Geotext Geomembr 42(5):479–493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2014.07.007CrossRef

30.

Kim D, Ha S (2014) Effects of particle size on the shear behaviour of coarse grained soils reinforced with geogrid. Materials 7(2):963–979. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma7020963CrossRef

31.

Ferreira FB, Vieira CS, Lopes M (2015) Direct shear behaviour of residual soil–geosynthetic interfaces–influence of soil moisture content, soil density and geosynthetic type. Geosynth Int 22(3):257–272. https://doi.org/10.1680/gein.15.00011CrossRef

32.

Mosallanezhad M, Alfaro MC, Hataf N, Taghavi SS (2016) Performance of the new reinforcement system in the increase of shear strength of typical geogrid interface with soil. Geotext Geomembr 44(3):457–462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2015.07.005CrossRef

33.

Han B, Ling J, Shu X, Gong H, Huang B (2018) Laboratory investigation of particle size effects on the shear behaviour of aggregate-geogrid interface. Constr Build Mater 158:1015–1025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.10.045CrossRef

34.

Sweta K, Hussaini SKK (2018) Effect of shearing rate on the behaviour of geogrid-reinforced railroad ballast under direct shear conditions. Geotext Geomembr 46(3):251–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2017.12.001CrossRef

35.

Abdi MR, SafdariSehGonbad M (2019) Studying the effect of roughness on soil–geotextile interaction in direct shear test. J Eng Geo 12(5):1–30

36.

Makkar FM, Chandrakaran S, Sankar N (2019) Experimental investigation of response of different granular soil–3D geogrid interfaces using large-scale direct shear tests. J Mater Civ Eng 31(4):04019012. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002645CrossRef

37.

Stacho J, Sulovska M, Slavik I (2020) Determining the shear strength properties of a soil–geogrid interface using a large-scale direct shear test apparatus. Period Polytech Civ Eng 64(4):989–998. https://doi.org/10.3311/PPci.15766CrossRef

38.

Liu FY, Ying MJ, Yuan GH, Wang J, Gao ZY, Ni JF (2021) Particle shape effects on the cyclic shear behaviour of the soil–geogrid interface. Geotext Geomembr 49(4):991–1003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2021.01.008CrossRef

39.

Wang J, Liu FY, Zheng QT, Cai YQ, Gou CF (2021) Effect of aperture ratio on the cyclic shear behaviour of aggregate–geogrid interfaces. Geosynth Int 28(2):158–173. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgein.20.00CrossRef

40.

Jewell RA, Millilgan GWE, Sarsby RW, Dubois D (1984) Interactions between soil and geogrids. In: Proceedings of the symposium of polymer grid reinforcement. Thomas Telford Limited, London, pp 19–29

41.

Horpibulsuk S, Niramitkornburee A (2010) Pullout resistance of bearing reinforcement embedded in sand. Soils Found 50(2):215–226. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf.50.215CrossRef

42.

Sadat Taghavi SH, Mosallanezhad M (2017) Experimental analysis of large-scale pullout tests conducted on polyester anchored geogrid reinforcement systems. Can Geotech J 54(5):621–630. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2016-0365CrossRef

43.

Abdi MR, SafdariSehGonbad M (2018) Enhancement of soil–geogrid interactions in direct shear mode using attached elements as anchors. Eur J Environ Civ Eng 24(8):1161–1179. https://doi.org/10.1080/19648189.2018.1454861CrossRef

44.

Abdi MR, Pour RamezanChafjiri MPR (2022) Appraisal of anchor arrangement and size On sand-geogrid interaction in direct shear. Geotech Geol Eng. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1104294/v1CrossRef

45.

Abdi MR, Hossienabadi A (2022) Optimizing micro-anchor attachment angle for maximum interaction at soil–geogrid interface in direct shear. Int J Geomech (in press)

46.

ASTM D422 (2007) Standard test method for particle-size analysis of soils. ASTM International, West Conshohocken

47.

ASTM D4253 (2016) Standard test methods for maximum index density and unit weight of soils using a vibratory table. ASTM International, West Conshohocken

48.

ASTM D4254 (2016) Standard test methods for minimum index density and unit weight of soils and calculation of relative density. ASTM International, West Conshohocken

49.

ASTM D2487 (2011) Standard practice for classification of soils for engineering purposes (unified soil classification system). ASTM International, West Conshohocken

50.

ASTM D3080 (2004) Standard test method for direct shear test of soils under consolidated drained conditions. ASTM International, West Conshohocken

51.

ASTM D5321 (2008) Standard test method for determining the coefficient of soil and geosynthetic or geosynthetic and geosynthetic friction by the direct shear method. ASTM International, West Conshohocken

52.

Alfaro MC, Pathak YP (2005) Dilatant stresses at the interface of granular fills and geogrid strip reinforcements. Geosynth Int 12(5):239–252. https://doi.org/10.1680/gein.2005.12.5.239CrossRef

53.

Alfaro MC, Hayashi S, Miura N, Watanabe K (1995) Pullout interaction mechanism of geogrid strip reinforcement. Geosynth Int 2(4):679–698. https://doi.org/10.1680/gein.2.0030CrossRef

54.

Tatlisoz N, Edil TB, Benson CH (1998) Interaction between reinforcing geosynthetics and soil–tire chip mixtures. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 124(11):1109–1119. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1998)124:11(1109)CrossRef

55.

Bergado DT, Chai JC, Abiera HO, Alfaro MC, Balasubramaniam AS (1993) Interaction between cohesive-frictional soil and various grid reinforcements. Geotext Geomembr 12(4):327–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/0266-1144(93)90008-CCrossRef

Titel: Evaluation of Soil–Geometrically Modified Geogrid Interaction in Direct Shear Mode
verfasst von: Mahmood Reza Abdi
Alireza Tabarsa
Parastou Haghgouy
Publikationsdatum: 01.10.2023
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in: International Journal of Geosynthetics and Ground Engineering / Ausgabe 5/2023
Print ISSN: 2199-9260
Elektronische ISSN: 2199-9279
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40891-023-00479-2

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2023

A Thermal Conductivity Model for Deformable and Unsaturated Soils to Assess the Thermal Behaviour of Energy Piles

Influence of Coir Fiber on the Strength and Permeability Characteristics of Bottom Ash- and Lime-Stabilized Laterite Soil

Improving Soft Clay Behavior with Alkali-Activated Waste Eggshell for Sustainable Ground Engineering

Numerical Analysis of Arching Behavior of Geosynthetic-Reinforced and DCM Column-Supported Embankment with Geosynthetic Characteristics

The Use of Scrap Tire Strips to Improve the Pullout Behavior of Geotextiles

Physical and Numerical Shaking Table Studies on Geocell-Reinforced Retaining Walls