nach oben

Erschienen in:

2024 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

21. Grundlagen zur automatisierten Baufortschrittsüberwachung mittels Deep Learning basierend auf Punktwolken und Bauinformationsmodellen

verfasst von : Jan Luca Fahrendholz, Sigrid Brell-Cokcan

Erschienen in: IoC - Internet of Construction

Verlag: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Zusammenfassung

In diesem Kapitel werden die theoretischen Grundlagen für die spätere Entwicklung und Umsetzung einer vollautomatischen, Deep Learning unterstützten Prozesskette beschrieben, die den Baufortschritt durch den Vergleich eines Bauinformationsmodells mit den Punktwolken der Baustelle ermitteln kann. Dazu werden digitale Baustellenabbildungen in Form von 3D-Punktwolken betrachtet und deren Eigenschaften beschrieben. Darüber hinaus werden die theoretischen Grundlagen zur Verarbeitung dieser Punktwolkenund deren Registrierung zum Soll-Ist-Vergleich erläutert. Weiterhin werden verschiedene Datenverarbeitungsmethoden diskutiert, die das Ziel haben, Bauelemente in den Punktwolken zu erkennen. Dabei werden sowohl numerische Methoden als auch Deep-Learning-Ansätze zur Datenanalyse und Klassifikation zusammengefasst und analysiert.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel Methoden zur Digitalisierung von Baustellenprozessen durch Punktwolken

Nächstes Kapitel Entwicklung und Umsetzung einer automatisierten Baufortschrittsüberwachung mittels Deep Learning basierend auf Punktwolken und Bauinformationsmodellen

Kirner L, Lublasser E, Brell-Cokcan S (2021) Internet of Construction: Research Methods for Practical Relevance in Construction. In Technology|Architecture + Design: vol 5, pp 146–152. https://doi.org/10.1080/24751448.2021.1967053

Braun A, Tuttas S, Borrmann A et al. (2020) Improving progress monitoring by fusing point clouds, semantic data and computer vision. Automation in Construction 116:103210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103210CrossRef

Becker R, Falk V, Hoenen S et al. (2018) BIM – Towards the entire lifecycle. Int J SDP 13:84–95. https://doi.org/10.2495/SDP-V13-N1-84-95CrossRef

Boje C, Guerriero A, Kubicki S et al. (2020) Towards a semantic Construction Digital Twin: Directions for future research. Automation in Construction 114:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103179CrossRef

Bergs T, Gierlings S, Auerbach T et al. (2021) The Concept of Digital Twin and Digital Shadow in Manufacturing. Procedia CIRP 101:81–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2021.02.010CrossRef

Braun A (2020) Automated BIM-based construction progress monitoring by processing and matching semantic and geometric data, Technische Universität München

Borrmann A, König M, Koch C et al. (2018) Building Information Modeling: Why? What? How? In: Building Information Modeling, pp 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92862-3_1

Yang B, Dong Z, Liang F et al. (2016) Automatic registration of large-scale urban scene point clouds based on semantic feature points. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 113:43–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2015.12.005CrossRef

Hesam Hamledari, Brenda McCabe, Shakiba Davari et al. (2017) Automated Schedule and Progress Updating of IFC-Based 4D BIMs. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering.https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000660

10.

Han K, Golparvar-Fard M (2017) Crowdsourcing BIM-guided collection of construction material library from site photologs. Vis in Eng 5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40327-017-0052-3

11.

Krämer M, Besenyői Z (2018) Towards Digitalization of Building Operations with BIM. IOP Conf Ser.: Mater Sci Eng 365:22067. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/365/2/022067

12.

Akanmu A, Anumba CJ (2015) Cyber-physical systems integration of building information models and the physical construction. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management 22:516–535. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-07-2014-0097CrossRef

13.

Srewil Y, Scherer RJ (2013) Effective Construction Process Monitoring and Control through a Collaborative Cyber-Physical Approach. In: Camarinha-Matos LM, Scherer RJ (eds) Collaborative Systems for Reindustrialization, vol 408. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 172–179

14.

Yuan X, Anumba CJ, Parfitt MK (2016) Cyber-physical systems for temporary structure monitoring. Automation in Construction 66:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2016.02.005CrossRef

15.

Braun A (2020) Automated BIM-based construction progress monitoring by processing and, Technische Universität München

16.

Brilakis I, Haas C (eds) (2019) Infrastructure Computer Vision. Elsevier

17.

Guo Y, Wang H, Hu Q et al. (2020) Deep Learning for 3D Point Clouds: A Survey. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 43:4338–4364. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2020.3005434CrossRef

18.

Qi CR, Su H, Kaichun M et al. (2017) PointNet: Deep Learning on Point Sets for 3D Classification and Segmentation. In: 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). IEEE, pp 77–85

19.

Qi CR, Yi L, Su H et al. (2017) PointNet++: Deep Hierarchical Feature Learning on Point Sets in a Metric Space

20.

Furlani KM, Pfeffer LE (2000) Automated Tracking of Structural Steel Members at the Construction Site. International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction

21.

Chin S, Yoon S, Choi C et al. (2008) RFID+4D CAD for Progress Management of Structural Steel Works in High-Rise Buildings. J Comput Civ Eng 22:74–89. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3801(2008)22:2(74)CrossRef

22.

Son H, Kim C, Kwon Cho Y (2017) Automated Schedule Updates Using As-Built Data and a 4D Building Information Model. J Manage Eng 33. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000528

23.

Dong P, Chen Q (2018) LiDAR remote sensing and applications. Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton FL

24.

Pučko Z, Šuman N, Rebolj D (2018) Automated continuous construction progress monitoring using multiple workplace real time 3D scans. Advanced Engineering Informatics 38:27–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2018.06.001CrossRef

25.

Puri N, Turkan Y (2020) Bridge construction progress monitoring using lidar and 4D design models. Automation in Construction 109:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2019.102961CrossRef

26.

Golparvar-Fard M, Peña-Mora F, Savarese S (2011) Integrated Sequential As-Built and As-Planned Representation with D4AR Tools in Support of Decision-Making Tasks in the AEC/FM Industry. J Constr Eng Manage 137:1099–1116. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000371CrossRef

27.

Omar T, Nehdi ML (2016) Data acquisition technologies for construction progress tracking. Automation in Construction 70:143–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2016.06.016CrossRef

28.

Boulch A, Le Saux B, Audebert N (2017) Unstructured Point Cloud Semantic Labeling Using Deep Segmentation Networks. The Eurographics Association

29.

Cheng L, Chen S, Liu X et al. (2018) Registration of Laser Scanning Point Clouds: A Review. Sensors (Basel) 18. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18051641

30.

Paffenholz J-A (2013) Effiziente Geo-Referenzierung von 3D Punktwolken

31.

Pan Y, Yang B, Liang F et al. (2018) Iterative Global Similarity Points : A robust coarse-to-fine integration solution for pairwise 3D point cloud registration

32.

Huang R, Ye Z, Boerner R et al. (2019) Fast Pairwise Coarse Registration Between Point Clouds Of Construction Sites Using 2D Projection Based Correlation. Int Arch Photogramm Remote Sens Spatial Inf Sci XLII-2/W13:1015–1020. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W13-1015-2019

33.

Kim C, Son H, Kim C (2013) Fully automated registration of 3D data to a 3D CAD model for project progress monitoring. Automation in Construction 35:587–594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2013.01.005CrossRef

34.

Bosché F (2010) Automated recognition of 3D CAD model objects in laser scans and calculation of as-built dimensions for dimensional compliance control in construction. Advanced Engineering Informatics 24:107–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2009.08.006CrossRef

35.

Díez Y, Roure F, Lladó X et al. (2015) A Qualitative Review on 3D Coarse Registration Methods. ACM Comput Surv 47:1–36. https://doi.org/10.1145/2692160CrossRef

36.

Al-Nuaimi A (2016) Methods of Point Cloud Alignment with Applications to 3D Indoor Mapping and Localization, Technische Universität München

37.

Yuan C, Yu X, Luo Z (2016) 3D point cloud matching based on principal component analysis and iterative closest point algorithm:404–408. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICALIP.2016.7846655

38.

Fischler MA, Bolles RC (1981) Random sample consensus. Commun ACM 24:381–395. https://doi.org/10.1145/358669.358692CrossRef

39.

Schnabel R, Wahl R, Klein R (2007) Efficient RANSAC for Point-Cloud Shape Detection. Computer Graphics Forum 26:214–226. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8659.2007.01016.xCrossRef

40.

Zeineldin RA, El-Fishawy NA (2017) A Survey of RANSAC enhancements for Plane Detection in 3D Point Clouds. Menoufia Journal of Electronic Engineering Research 26:519–537. https://doi.org/10.21608/mjeer.2017.63627

41.

Huber PJ, Ronchetti EM (2009) Robust statistics, 2. ed. Wiley series in probability and statistics. Wiley, Hoboken, N.J

42.

Stewart CV (1999) Robust Parameter Estimation in Computer Vision. SIAM Rev 41:513–537. https://doi.org/10.1137/S0036144598345802MathSciNetCrossRef

43.

Zuliani M (2014) RANSAC for Dummies

44.

Li F, Stoddart D, Hitchens C (2017) Method to automatically register scattered point clouds based on principal pose estimation. Opt Eng 56:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1117/1.OE.56.4.044107CrossRef

45.

Cheng L, Tong L, Li M et al. (2013) Semi-Automatic Registration of Airborne and Terrestrial Laser Scanning Data Using Building Corner Matching with Boundaries as Reliability Check. Remote Sensing 5:6260–6283. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs5126260CrossRef

46.

Zhang K, Yan J, Chen S-C (2006) Automatic Construction of Building Footprints From Airborne LIDAR Data. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sensing 44:2523–2533. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2006.874137CrossRef

47.

Rusu RB, Blodow N, Beetz M (2009) Fast Point Feature Histograms (FPFH) for 3D registration:3212–3217. https://doi.org/10.1109/ROBOT.2009.5152473

48.

Johnson AE, Hebert M (1999) Using spin images for efficient object recognition in cluttered 3D scenes. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Machine Intell 21:433–449. https://doi.org/10.1109/34.765655CrossRef

49.

Barnea S, Filin Sagi (2007) Registration of Terrestrial Laser Scans Via Visual Image Features:32–37

50.

Chen H, Bhanu B (2004) 3D free-form object recognition in range images using local surface patches 3:136–139. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICPR.2004.1334487

51.

Zhong Y (2009) Intrinsic shape signatures: A shape descriptor for 3D object recognition:689–696. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCVW.2009.5457637

52.

Mian A, Bennamoun M, Owens R (2010) On the Repeatability and Quality of Keypoints for Local Feature-based 3D Object Retrieval from Cluttered Scenes. Int J Comput Vis 89:348–361. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11263-009-0296-zCrossRef

53.

Sun J, Ovsjanikov M, Guibas L (2009) A Concise and Provably Informative Multi-Scale Signature Based on Heat Diffusion. Computer Graphics Forum 28:1383–1392. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8659.2009.01515.xCrossRef

54.

Unnikrishnan R, Hebert M (2008) Multi-scale interest regions from unorganized point clouds:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPRW.2008.4563030

55.

Zaharescu A, Boyer E, Varanasi K et al. (2009) Surface feature detection and description with applications to mesh matching

56.

Sipiran I, Bustos B (2011) Harris 3D: a robust extension of the Harris operator for interest point detection on 3D meshes. Vis Comput 27:963–976. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00371-011-0610-yCrossRef

57.

Lowe DG (2004) Distinctive Image Features from Scale-Invariant Keypoints. Int J Comput Vis 60:91–110. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:VISI.0000029664.99615.94CrossRef

58.

Aiger D, Mitra NJ, Cohen-Or D (2008) 4-points congruent sets for robust pairwise surface registration. ACM Trans Graph 27:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1145/1360612.1360684CrossRef

59.

Corsini M, Dellepiane M, Ganovelli F et al. (2013) Fully Automatic Registration of Image Sets on Approximate Geometry. Int J Comput Vis 102:91–111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11263-012-0552-5CrossRef

60.

Theiler PW, Wegner JD, Schindler K (2014) Keypoint-based 4-Points Congruent Sets – Automated marker-less registration of laser scans. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 96:149–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2014.06.015CrossRef

61.

Mellado N, Aiger D, Mitra NJ (2014) Super 4PCS Fast Global Pointcloud Registration via Smart Indexing. Computer Graphics Forum 33:205–215. https://doi.org/10.1111/cgf.12446CrossRef

62.

Fan Y, Wang M, Geng N et al. (2018) A self-adaptive segmentation method for a point cloud. Vis Comput 34:659–673. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00371-017-1405-6CrossRef

63.

Habib A, Ghanma M, Morgan M et al. (2005) Photogrammetric and Lidar Data Registration Using Linear Features. photogramm eng remote sensing 71:699–707. https://doi.org/10.14358/pers.71.6.699

64.

Nagashima S, Aoki T, Higuchi T et al. (2006) A Subpixel Image Matching Technique Using Phase-Only Correlation:701–704. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISPACS.2006.364751

65.

Lazaridis G, Petrou M (2006) Image registration using the Walsh transform. IEEE Trans Image Process 15:2343–2357. https://doi.org/10.1109/tip.2006.877346.CrossRef

66.

Horn B (1984) Extended Gaussian images. Proc IEEE 72:1671–1686. https://doi.org/10.1109/PROC.1984.13073

67.

Kang SB, Horn BKP (2014) Extended Gaussian Image (EGI):420–424. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63416-2_651

68.

Makadia A, Patterson AI, Daniilidis K (2006) Fully Automatic Registration of 3D Point Clouds. Fully Automatic Registration of 3D Point Clouds

69.

Sanchez J, Denis F, Checchin P et al. (2017) Global Registration of 3D LiDAR Point Clouds Based on Scene Features: Application to Structured Environments. Remote Sensing 9:1014. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs9101014CrossRef

70.

Bosché F (2012) Plane-based registration of construction laser scans with 3D/4D building models. Advanced Engineering Informatics 26:90–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2011.08.009CrossRef

71.

He Y, Liang B, Yang J et al. (2017) An Iterative Closest Points Algorithm for Registration of 3D Laser Scanner Point Clouds with Geometric Features. Sensors (Basel) 17. https://doi.org/10.3390/s17081862.

72.

Turkan Y, Bosche F, Haas CT et al. (2012) Automated progress tracking using 4D schedule and 3D sensing technologies. Automation in Construction 22:414–421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2011.10.003CrossRef

73.

Park S-Y, Subbarao M (2003) An accurate and fast point-to-plane registration technique. Pattern Recognition Letters 24:2967–2976. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8655(03)00157-0CrossRef

74.

Yamany SM, Farag AA (2002) Surface signatures: an orientation independent free-form surface representation scheme for the purpose of objects registration and matching. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Machine Intell 24:1105–1120. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2002.1023806CrossRef

75.

Sharp GC, Lee SW, Wehe DK (2002) ICP registration using invariant features. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Machine Intell 24:90–102. https://doi.org/10.1109/34.982886CrossRef

76.

Jiang J, Cheng J, Chen X (2009) Registration for 3-D point cloud using angular-invariant feature. Neurocomputing 72:3839–3844. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2009.05.013CrossRef

77.

Yang J, Cao Z, Zhang Q (2016) A fast and robust local descriptor for 3D point cloud registration. Information Sciences 346-347:163–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2016.01.095CrossRef

78.

Golyanik V, Ali SA, Stricker D (2016) Gravitational Approach for Point Set Registration:5802–5810. https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2016.625

79.

Liu Y, Kong D, Zhao D et al. (2018) A Point Cloud Registration Algorithm Based on Feature Extraction and Matching. Mathematical Problems in Engineering 2018:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/7352691CrossRef

80.

Huhnt W, Richter S, Enge F (2008) Modification management for construction processes. Tinshhua Sci Technol 13:185–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1007-0214(08)70147-0CrossRef

81.

Kim C, Son H, Kim C (2013) Automated construction progress measurement using a 4D building information model and 3D data. Automation in Construction 31:75–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2012.11.041CrossRef

82.

Maalek R, Lichti DD, Ruwanpura JY (2019) Automatic Recognition of Common Structural Elements from Point Clouds for Automated Progress Monitoring and Dimensional Quality Control in Reinforced Concrete Construction. Remote Sensing 11:1102. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11091102CrossRef

83.

Bosche F, Haas CT, Akinci B (2009) Automated Recognition of 3D CAD Objects in Site Laser Scans for Project 3D Status Visualization and Performance Control. J Comput Civ Eng 23:311–318. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3801(2009)23:6(311)CrossRef

84.

Bosché F, Guillemet A, Turkan Y et al. (2014) Tracking the Built Status of MEP Works: Assessing the Value of a Scan-vs-BIM System. J Comput Civ Eng 28. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000343

85.

Maalek R, Lichti DD, Walker R et al. (2019) Extraction of pipes and flanges from point clouds for automated verification of pre-fabricated modules in oil and gas refinery projects. Automation in Construction 103:150–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2019.03.013CrossRef

86.

Turkan Y, Bosché F, T. Haas C et al. (2014) Tracking of secondary and temporary objects in structural concrete work. Construction Innovation 14:145–167. https://doi.org/10.1108/CI-12-2012-0063

87.

Zhang C, Arditi D (2013) Automated progress control using laser scanning technology. Automation in Construction 36:108–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2013.08.012CrossRef

88.

Son H, Kim C (2010) 3D structural component recognition and modeling method using color and 3D data for construction progress monitoring. Automation in Construction 19:844–854. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2010.03.003CrossRef

89.

Tuttas S, Braun A, Borrmann A et al. (2015) Validation of BIM components by photogrammetric point clouds for construction site monitoring. ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci. II-3/W4:231–237. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprsannals-II-3-W4-231-2015

90.

Braun A, Tuttas S, Borrmann A et al. (2015) A concept for automated construction progress monitoring using BIM-based geometric constraints and photogrammetric point clouds. Journal of Information Technology in Construction:68–79

91.

El-Omari S, Moselhi O (2008) Integrating 3D laser scanning and photogrammetry for progress measurement of construction work. Automation in Construction 18:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2008.05.006CrossRef

92.

Behnam A, Wickramasinghe DC, Ghaffar MAA et al. (2016) Automated progress monitoring system for linear infrastructure projects using satellite remote sensing. Automation in Construction 68:114–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2016.05.002CrossRef

93.

Bassier M, Vergauwen M, Poux F (2020) Point Cloud vs. Mesh Features for Building Interior Classification. Remote Sensing 12:2224. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12142224

94.

Lalonde J-F, Vandapel N, Huber DF et al. (2006) Natural terrain classification using three-dimensional ladar data for ground robot mobility. J Field Robotics 23:839–861. https://doi.org/10.1002/rob.20134CrossRef

95.

Nguyen DV, Kuhnert L, Schlemper J et al. (2010) Terrain classification based on structure for autonomous navigation in complex environments:163–168. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCE.2010.5670703

96.

Chai J, Chi H-L, Wang X et al. (2016) Automatic as-built modeling for concurrent progress tracking of plant construction based on laser scanning. Concurrent Engineering 24:369–380. https://doi.org/10.1177/1063293X16670449CrossRef

97.

Maalek R, Lichti DD, Ruwanpura JY (2018) Robust Segmentation of Planar and Linear Features of Terrestrial Laser Scanner Point Clouds Acquired from Construction Sites. Sensors (Basel) 18. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18030819

98.

Son H, Kim C (2017) Semantic as-built 3D modeling of structural elements of buildings based on local concavity and convexity. Advanced Engineering Informatics 34:114–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2017.10.001CrossRef

99.

Yulan G, Bennamoun M, Sohel F et al. (2014) 3D Object Recognition in Cluttered Scenes with Local Surface Features: A Survey. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Machine Intell 36:2270–2287. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2014.2316828CrossRef

100.

Weinmann M, Jutzi B, Hinz S et al. (2015) Semantic point cloud interpretation based on optimal neighborhoods, relevant features and efficient classifiers. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 105:286–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2015.01.016CrossRef

101.

Blomley R, Weinmann M, Leitloff J et al. (2014) Shape distribution features for point cloud analysis – a geometric histogram approach on multiple scales. ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci. II-3:9–16. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprsannals-II-3-9-2014

102.

Lin C-H, Chen J-Y, Su P-L et al. (2014) Eigen-feature analysis of weighted covariance matrices for LiDAR point cloud classification. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 94:70–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2014.04.016CrossRef

103.

Anand A, Koppula HS, Joachims T et al. (2011) Contextually Guided Semantic Labeling and Search for 3D Point Clouds. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1111.5358

104.

Dong W, Lan J, Liang S et al. (2017) Selection of LiDAR geometric features with adaptive neighborhood size for urban land cover classification. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation 60:99–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2017.04.003CrossRef

105.

Guo R, Hoiem D (2015) Labeling Complete Surfaces in Scene Understanding. Int J Comput Vis 112:172–187. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11263-014-0776-7MathSciNetCrossRef

106.

Husain F, Dellen L, Torras C (2014) Recognizing Point Clouds Using Conditional Random Fields:4257–4262. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICPR.2014.730

107.

Niemeyer J, Rottensteiner F, Soergel U (2012) CONDITIONAL RANDOM FIELDS FOR LIDAR POINT CLOUD CLASSIFICATION IN COMPLEX URBAN AREAS. ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci. I-3:263–268. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprsannals-I-3-263-2012

108.

Xiong X, Adan A, Akinci B et al. (2013) Automatic creation of semantically rich 3D building models from laser scanner data. Automation in Construction 31:325–337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2012.10.006CrossRef

109.

Arbeiter G, Fuchs S, Bormann R et al. (2012) Evaluation of 3D feature descriptors for classification of surface geometries in point clouds:1644–1650. https://doi.org/10.1109/IROS.2012.6385552

110.

Tombari F, Salti S, Di Stefano L (2010) Unique Signatures of Histograms for Local Surface Description:356–369. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15558-1_26

111.

Guo Y, Sohel F, Bennamoun M et al. (2013) Rotational Projection Statistics for 3D Local Surface Description and Object Recognition. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1304.3192

112.

Khan SH, Bennamoun M, Sohel F et al. (2014) Geometry Driven Semantic Labeling of Indoor Scenes 8689:679–694. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10590-1_44

113.

Poux F, Billen R (2019) Voxel-based 3D Point Cloud Semantic Segmentation: Unsupervised Geometric and Relationship Featuring vs Deep Learning Methods. IJGI 8:213. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi8050213CrossRef

114.

Nguyen A, Le B (2013) 3D point cloud segmentation: A survey:225–230. https://doi.org/10.1109/RAM.2013.6758588

115.

Xiang B, Yao J, Lu X et al. (2018) Segmentation-based classification for 3D point clouds in the road environment. International Journal of Remote Sensing 39:6182–6212. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2018.1455235CrossRef

116.

Lin Y, Wang C, Cheng J et al. (2015) Line segment extraction for large scale unorganized point clouds. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 102:172–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2014.12.027CrossRef

117.

Vosselman G, Coenen M, Rottensteiner F (2017) Contextual segment-based classification of airborne laser scanner data. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 128:354–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2017.03.010CrossRef

118.

Grilli E, Menna F, Remondino F (2017) A REVIEW OF POINT CLOUDS SEGMENTATION AND CLASSIFICATION ALGORITHMS. Int Arch Photogramm Remote Sens Spatial Inf Sci XLII-2/W3:339–344. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W3-339-2017

119.

Weinmann M, Weinmann M, Mallet C et al. (2017) A Classification-Segmentation Framework for the Detection of Individual Trees in Dense MMS Point Cloud Data Acquired in Urban Areas. Remote Sensing 9:277. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs9030277CrossRef

120.

Shi W, Ahmed W, Li N et al. (2019) Semantic Geometric Modelling of Unstructured Indoor Point Cloud. IJGI 8:9. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi8010009CrossRef

121.

Ochmann S, Vock R, Klein R (2019) Automatic reconstruction of fully volumetric 3D building models from point clouds. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1907.00631

122.

Hong S, Jung J, Kim S et al. (2015) Semi-automated approach to indoor mapping for 3D as-built building information modeling. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 51:34–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2015.01.005CrossRef

123.

Pu S, Vosselman G (2009) Knowledge based reconstruction of building models from terrestrial laser scanning data. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 64:575–584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2009.04.001CrossRef

124.

Li L, Su F, Yang F et al. (2018) Reconstruction of Three-Dimensional (3D) Indoor Interiors with Multiple Stories via Comprehensive Segmentation. Remote Sensing 10:1281. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10081281CrossRef

125.

Díaz-Vilariño L, Conde B, Lagüela S et al. (2015) Automatic Detection and Segmentation of Columns in As-Built Buildings from Point Clouds. Remote Sensing 7:15651–15667. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs71115651CrossRef

126.

Steinwart I, Christmann A (2008) Support Vector Machines. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-77242-4CrossRef

127.

Himmelsbach M, Luettel T, Wuensche H-J (2009) Real-time object classification in 3D point clouds using point feature histograms:994–1000. https://doi.org/10.1109/IROS.2009.5354493

128.

Gordon C (2003) Combining Reality Capture Technologies for Construction Defect Detection: A Case Study

129.

Arman F, Aggarwal JK (1993) Model-based object recognition in dense-range images – a review. ACM Comput Surv 25:5–43. https://doi.org/10.1145/151254.151255CrossRef

130.

Wu I-C, Borrmann A, Beißert U et al. (2010) Bridge construction schedule generation with pattern-based construction methods and constraint-based simulation. Advanced Engineering Informatics 24:379–388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2010.07.002CrossRef

131.

Han KK, Golparvar-Fard M (2015) Appearance-based material classification for monitoring of operation-level construction progress using 4D BIM and site photologs. Automation in Construction 53:44–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2015.02.007CrossRef

132.

Han KK, Cline D, Golparvar-Fard M (2015) Formalized knowledge of construction sequencing for visual monitoring of work-in-progress via incomplete point clouds and low-LoD 4D BIMs. Advanced Engineering Informatics 29:889–901. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2015.10.006CrossRef

133.

Golparvar, Fard, Mani, Feniosky P-M (2007) Application of Visualization Techniques for Construction Progress Monitoring:216–223. https://doi.org/10.1061/40937(261)27

134.

Tang P, Huber D, Akinci B et al. (2010) Automatic reconstruction of as-built building information models from laser-scanned point clouds: A review of related techniques. Automation in Construction 19:829–843. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2010.06.007CrossRef

135.

Ma L, Sacks R, Kattel U et al. (2018) 3D Object Classification Using Geometric Features and Pairwise Relationships. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering 33:152–164. https://doi.org/10.1111/mice.12336CrossRef

136.

Macher H, Landes T, Grussenmeyer P (2017) From Point Clouds to Building Information Models: 3D Semi-Automatic Reconstruction of Indoors of Existing Buildings. Applied Sciences 7:1030. https://doi.org/10.3390/app7101030CrossRef

137.

Dargan S, Kumar M, Ayyagari MR et al. (2020) A Survey of Deep Learning and Its Applications: A New Paradigm to Machine Learning. Arch Computat Methods Eng 27:1071–1092. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-019-09344-wMathSciNetCrossRef

138.

Ahmed E, Saint A, Shabayek AER et al. (2018) A survey on Deep Learning Advances on Different 3D Data Representations. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1808.01462

139.

Wu Z, Song S, Khosla A et al. (2015) 3D ShapeNets: A Deep Representation for Volumetric Shapes. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1406.5670

140.

Uy MA, Pham Q-H, Hua B-S et al. (2019) Revisiting Point Cloud Classification: A New Benchmark Dataset and Classification Model on Real-World Data. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1908.04616

141.

Chang AX, Funkhouser T, Guibas L et al. (2015) ShapeNet: An Information-Rich 3D Model Repository. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1512.03012

142.

Mo K, Zhu S, Chang AX et al. (2019) PartNet: A Large-Scale Benchmark for Fine-Grained and Hierarchical Part-Level 3D Object Understanding. 2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR):909–918. https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2019.00100

143.

Armeni I, Sener O, Zamir AR et al. (2016) 3D Semantic Parsing of Large-Scale Indoor Spaces. 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR):1534–1543. https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2016.170

144.

Dai A, Chang AX, Savva M et al. (2017) ScanNet: Richly-Annotated 3D Reconstructions of Indoor Scenes. 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR):2432–2443. https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2017.261

145.

Hackel T, Savinov N, Ladicky L et al. (2017) Semantic3D.net: A new Large-scale Point Cloud Classification Benchmark. Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1704.03847

146.

Song X, Wang P, Zhou D et al. (2019) ApolloCar3D: A Large 3D Car Instance Understanding Benchmark for Autonomous Driving. Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1811.12222

147.

Geiger A, Lenz P, Urtasun R (2012) Are we ready for autonomous driving? The KITTI vision benchmark suite. 2012 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition:3354–3361. https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2012.6248074

148.

Zhou J, Huang Y, Yu B (2015) Mapping Vegetation-Covered Urban Surfaces Using Seeded Region Growing in Visible-NIR Air Photos. IEEE J Sel Top Appl Earth Observations Remote Sensing 8:2212–2221. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2014.2362308CrossRef

149.

Han X-F, Laga H, Bennamoun M (2021) Image-Based 3D Object Reconstruction: State-of-the-Art and Trends in the Deep Learning Era. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Machine Intell 43:1578–1604. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2019.2954885CrossRef

150.

Elbaz G, Avraham T, Fischer A (2017) 3D Point Cloud Registration for Localization Using a Deep Neural Network Auto-Encoder. 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR):2472–2481. https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2017.265

151.

Zeng A, Yu K-T, Song S et al. (2017) Multi-view self-supervised deep learning for 6D pose estimation in the Amazon Picking Challenge. Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition:1386–1383. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRA.2017.7989165

152.

Ioannidou A, Chatzilari E, Nikolopoulos S et al. (2018) Deep Learning Advances in Computer Vision with 3D Data. ACM Comput Surv 50:1–38. https://doi.org/10.1145/3042064CrossRef

153.

Rahman MM, Tan Y, Xue J et al. (2019) Recent Advances in 3D Object Detection in the Era of Deep Neural Networks: A Survey. IEEE Trans Image Process. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIP.2019.2955239CrossRef

154.

Xie Y, Tian J, Zhu XX (2020) Linking Points With Labels in 3D: A Review of Point Cloud Semantic Segmentation. IEEE Geosci Remote Sens Mag 8:38–59. https://doi.org/10.1109/MGRS.2019.2937630CrossRef

155.

Han KK, Golparvar-Fard M (2017) Potential of big visual data and building information modeling for construction performance analytics: An exploratory study. Automation in Construction 73:184–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2016.11.004CrossRef

156.

Braun A, Borrmann A (2019) Combining inverse photogrammetry and BIM for automated labeling of construction site images for machine learning. Automation in Construction 106:102879. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2019.102879CrossRef

157.

Wenkel S (2021) List of Open-Source Annotation Tools for Machine Learning Research

158.

Pang G, Neumann U (2016) 3D point cloud object detection with multi-view convolutional neural network. 2016 23rd International Conference on Pattern Recognition:585–590. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICPR.2016.7899697

159.

Badrinarayanan V, Kendall A, Cipolla R (2017) SegNet: A Deep Convolutional Encoder-Decoder Architecture for Image Segmentation. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Machine Intell 39:2481–2495. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2016.2644615CrossRef

160.

Ronneberger O, Fischer P, Brox T (2015) U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation. Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1505.04597

161.

He K, Gkioxari G, Dollar P et al. (2017) Mask R-CNN. 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision:2980–2988. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCV.2017.322

162.

Lawin FJ, Danelljan M, Tosteberg P et al. (2017) Deep Projective 3D Semantic Segmentation. Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1705.03428

163.

Chen X, Ma H, Wan J et al. (2017) Multi-view 3D Object Detection Network for Autonomous Driving. 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition:6526–6534. https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2017.691

164.

Shi S, Wang Z, Shi J et al. (2020) From Points to Parts: 3D Object Detection From Point Cloud With Part-Aware and Part-Aggregation Network. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Machine Intell 43:2647–2664. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2020.2977026MathSciNetCrossRef

165.

Soilán M, Lindenbergh R, Riveiro B et al. (2019) POINTNET FOR THE AUTOMATIC CLASSIFICATION OF AERIAL POINT CLOUDS. ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci. IV-2/W5:445–452. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-IV-2-W5-445-2019

166.

Choy CB, Xu D, Gwak J et al. (2016) 3D-R2N2: A Unified Approach for Single and Multi-view 3D Object Reconstruction. Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1604.00449

167.

Maturana D, Scherer S (2015) VoxNet: A 3D Convolutional Neural Network for real-time object recognition. 2015 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems:922–928. https://doi.org/10.1109/IROS.2015.7353481

168.

Qi CR, Su H, NieBner M et al. (2016) Volumetric and Multi-view CNNs for Object Classification on 3D Data. 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition:5648–5656. https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2016.609

169.

Riegler G, Ulusoy AO, Geiger A (2017) OctNet: Learning Deep 3D Representations at High Resolutions. 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition:6620–6629. https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2017.701

170.

Xu Y (2019) Reconstruction of building objects from point clouds of built environment and construction sites, Technische Universität München

171.

Çiçek Ö, Abdulkadir A, Lienkamp SS et al. (2016) 3D U-Net: Learning Dense Volumetric Segmentation from Sparse Annotation. Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1606.06650

172.

Liu Z, Tang H, Lin Y et al. (2019) Point-Voxel CNN for Efficient 3D Deep Learning. Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1907.03739

173.

Engelcke M, Rao D, Wang DZ et al. (2017) Vote3Deep: Fast object detection in 3D point clouds using efficient convolutional neural networks. 2017 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation:1355–1361. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRA.2017.7989161

174.

Tatarchenko M, Dosovitskiy A, Brox T (2017) Octree Generating Networks: Efficient Convolutional Architectures for High-resolution 3D Outputs. Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1703.09438

175.

Klokov R, Lempitsky V (2017) Escape from Cells: Deep Kd-Networks for the Recognition of 3D Point Cloud Models. 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision:863–872. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCV.2017.99

176.

Hua B-S, Tran M-K, Yeung S-K (2018) Pointwise Convolutional Neural Networks. 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition:984–993. https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2018.00109

177.

Wang Y, Sun Y, Liu Z et al. (2018) Dynamic Graph CNN for Learning on Point Clouds. Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1801.07829

178.

Park J, Cho YK (2020) Point Cloud Information Modeling: Deep Learning–Based Automated Information Modeling Framework for Point Cloud Data. J Constr Eng Manage 148. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0002227

179.

Varney N, Asari VK, Graehling Q (2020) DALES: A Large-scale Aerial LiDAR Data Set for Semantic Segmentation. Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2004.11985

Titel: Grundlagen zur automatisierten Baufortschrittsüberwachung mittels Deep Learning basierend auf Punktwolken und Bauinformationsmodellen
verfasst von: Jan Luca Fahrendholz
Sigrid Brell-Cokcan
Verlag: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden
Buch: IoC - Internet of Construction
Print ISBN: 978-3-658-42543-2

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-658-42544-9

Copyright-Jahr: 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-42544-9_21

Springer Professional

Zusammenfassung

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"