Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Weitere Formate
Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
ATZ-Fachkongress

Chassis.tech plus 2024


4 Kongresse in einer Veranstaltung

Treffen Sie in München die Fachleute von Chassis, Lenkung, Bremsen sowie Reifen/Räder.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Current Sustainable/Renewable Energy Reports
Erschienen in: Current Sustainable/Renewable Energy Reports 4/2023

22.09.2023

Intelligent Electrification as an Enabler of Clean Energy and Decarbonization

verfasst von: Mads R. Almassalkhi, Soumya Kundu

Erschienen in: Current Sustainable/Renewable Energy Reports | Ausgabe 4/2023

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Electrification efforts will change electric demand patterns, but must be made beneficial to the deployment of renewable generation. To ensure this, we need intelligent coordination of millions of resulting distributed energy resources (DERs). We provide an overview of challenges and opportunities associated with intelligent electrification as a means to enable decarbonization and clean energy.

Summary

Intelligent electrification can bring value to the grid and consumers, but depends on its implementation and cyber-physical coordination architecture to manage consumer quality of service (QoS), grid services, and grid reliability. We also review and discuss challenges with getting intelligent electrification efforts to scale.

Recent Findings

We find that many methods already exist for coordinating DERs to deliver valuable grid services, but that practical implementation barriers exist regarding feedback control, integrating grid data, and deploying intelligent electrification at scale. In addition, accurately characterizing and maximizing the available flexibility of a fleet of DERs is an open technical problem.
Vorheriger Artikel Exploring the Interaction Between Electricity Distribution Network Reconfiguration and Local Flexibility Markets
Nächster Artikel The EU Commission’s Proposal for Improving the Electricity Market Design: Treading Water, but not Drowning

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Fußnoten
1
Herein, we use the FERC Order No. 2222 definition of a DER [7], which is broad and includes BTM loads: “DERs are small-scale power generation or storage technologies (typically from 1 to 10,000 kW) that can provide an alternative to or an enhancement of the traditional electric power system. These can be located on an electric utility’s distribution system, a subsystem of the utility’s distribution system or behind a customer meter. They may include electric storage, intermittent generation, distributed generation, demand response, energy efficiency, thermal storage or electric vehicles and their charging equipment.”
 
2
It would be prudent to mention that utility-scale energy storage can generally deliver a wider variety of grid services than thermal peaker plants to support frequency and voltage stability, energy arbitrage, and black start capabilities. However, this manuscript will mainly focus on grid services related to active power and frequency control capabilities as their incentives are well-defined.
 
3
Note that the $/kW-year values provided for wholesale grid services are representative of price-taking, marginal values from [5, 19, 26, 36] within a 2030 and 2040 time-frame.
 
Literatur
1.
Jenkins JD, Luke M, Thernstrom S. Getting to zero carbon emissions in the electric power sector. Joule. 2018;2(12):2498–510.CrossRef
2.
Clarke L, Wei YM, Navarro ADLV, Garg A, Hahmann A, Khennas S, Azevedo I, Löschel A, Singh A, Steg L, Strbac G, Wada K (2022) Energy systems. In: Shukla P, Skea J, Slade R, Khourdajie AA, van Diemen R, McCollum D, Pathak M, Some S, Vyas P, Fradera R, Belkacemi M, Hasija A, Lisboa G, Luz S, Malley J (eds) Climate change 2022: mitigation of climate change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA, book section 6, 10.1017/9781009157926.008, https://​www.​ipcc.​ch/​report/​ar6/​wg3/​downloads/​report/​IPCC_​AR6_​WGIII_​Chapter06.​pdf.
3.
Creutzig F, Roy J, Devine-Wright P, Díaz-José J, Geels F, Grubler A, Maizi N, Masanet E, Mulugetta Y, Onyige C, Perkins P, Sanches-Pereira A, Weber E (2022) Demand, services and social aspects of mitigation. In: Shukla P, Skea J, Slade R, Khourdajie AA, van Diemen R, McCollum D, Pathak M, Some S, Vyas P, Fradera R, Belkacemi M, Hasija A, Lisboa G, Luz S, Malley J (eds) Climate change 2022: mitigation of climate change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA, book section 5, 10.1017/9781009157926.007, https://​www.​ipcc.​ch/​report/​ar6/​wg3/​downloads/​report/​IPCC_​AR6_​WGIII_​Chapter05.​pdf.
4.
Hledik R. The hidden battery. Brattle Group: Tech. rep; 2016.
5.
Hledik R, Faruqui A, Lee T, Hingham J. The national potential for load flexibility. Brattle Group: Tech. rep; 2019.
6.
Langevin J, Harris CB, Satre-Meloy A, Chandra-Putra H, Speake A, Present E, Adhikari R, Wilson EJ, Satchwell AJ. US building energy efficiency and flexibility as an electric grid resource. Joule. 2021;5(8):2102–28.CrossRef
7.
8.
Schweppe FC, Tabors RD, Kirtley JL, Outhred HR, Pickel FH, Cox AJ (1980) Homeostatic utility control. IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems PAS-99(3):1151–1163.
9.
Morgan MG, Talukdar SN. Electric power load management: some technical, economic, regulatory and social issues. Proceedings of the IEEE. 1979;67(2):241–312.CrossRef
10.
11.
12.
Nethercutt EJ. Demand flexibility within a performance-based regulatory framework. National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners, Washington, D.C.: Tech. rep; 2023.
13.
14.
15.
16.
Cole W, Frazier AW, Augustine C (2021) Cost projections for utility-scale battery storage: 2021 update. Renewable Energy.
17.
Cammardella N, Mathias J, Kiener M, Busic A, Meyn S (2018) Balancing California’s grid without batteries. In: IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, pp 7314–7321, publisher: IEEE.
18.
19.
Hledik R, Peters K. Real reliability: the value of virtual power. Brattle Group: Tech. rep; 2023.
20.
21.
22.
23.
FERC (2011) Demand response compensation in organized wholesale energy markets.
24.
FERC (2018) Electric storage participation in markets operated by regional transmission organizations and independent system operators.
25.
FERC (2020) Participation of distributed energy resource aggregations in markets operated by regional transmission organizations and independent system operators.
26.
27.
Lo H, Blumsack S, Hines P, Meyn S. Electricity rates for the zero marginal cost grid. The Electricity Journal. 2019;32(3):39–43.CrossRef
28.
Milovanoff A, Posen ID, MacLean HL. Electrification of light-duty vehicle fleet alone will not meet mitigation targets. Nature Climate Change. 2020;10(12):1102–7.CrossRef
29.
30.
31.
Kintner-Meyer M, Davis S, Sridhar S, Bhatnagar D, Mahserejian S, Ghosal M (2020) Electric vehicles at scale–phase I analysis: high EV adoption impacts on the western US power grid. Tech. Rep. PNNL-29894, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL).
32.
33.
34.
Kundu S, Hiskens IA. Nonlinear dynamics of hysteresis-based load controls. IFAC Proceedings Volumes. 2014;47(3):5419–25.CrossRef
35.
Nazir MS, Hiskens I. Analysis of synchronization in load ensembles. Electric Power Systems Research. 2021;190: 106779.CrossRef
36.
Bolun Xu, Dvorkin Y, Kirschen DS, Silva-Monroy CA, Watson JP (2016) A comparison of policies on the participation of storage in U.S. frequency regulation markets. In: 2016 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting (PESGM), IEEE, Boston, MA, USA, pp 1–5, 10.1109/PESGM.2016.7741531, http://​ieeexplore.​ieee.​org/​document/​7741531/​.
37.
Brahma S, Ossareh H, Almassalkhi MR (2022b) Statistical modeling and forecasting of automatic generation control signals. In: IREP Symposium - Bulk Power System Dynamics and Control.
38.
Brahma S, A Khurram, Ossareh H, Almassalkhi M (2022a) Optimal frequency regulation using packetized energy management. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.
39.
40.
Zhou E, Mai T (2021) Electrification futures study: operational analysis of U.S. power systems with increased electrification and demand-side flexibility. Tech. Rep. NREL/TP-6A20-79094, NREL, https://​doi.​org/​10.​2172/​1785329.
41.
Alstone P, et al (2017) 2025 California demand response potential study - charting California’s demand response future. Tech. Rep. LBNL-2001113, LBNL.
42.
43.
44.
45.
Taft J (2016) Grid architecture 2. Tech. Rep. PNL-24044 2, PNNL.
46.
Kristov L, De Martini P, Taft JD. A tale of two visions: designing a decentralized transactive electric system. IEEE Power and Energy Magazine. 2016;14(3):63–9.CrossRef
47.
\(\bullet \) Taft J, Ogle J (2021) Grid architecture guidance specification for FAST-DERMS. Tech. Rep. PNNL-31172, PNNL. The PNNL report provides an updated and modern view on DER control architectures, including coordination, communication, and intelligence. Furthermore, it encompasses various transmission and distribution and aggregator interface considerations.
48.
Mathieu JL, Koch S, Callaway DS. State estimation and control of electric loads to manage real-time energy imbalance. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems. 2013;28(1):430–40.CrossRef
49.
Meyn SP, Barooah P, Busic A, Chen Y, Ehren J. Ancillary service to the grid using intelligent deferrable loads. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control. 2015;60(11):2847–62.MathSciNetCrossRef
50.
Tindemans SH, Trovato V, Strbac G. Decentralized control of thermostatic loads for flexible demand response. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology. 2015;23(5):1685–700.CrossRef
51.
Frolik J (2004) QoS control for random access wireless sensor networks. In: Proc. 2004 Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC04), Greenville, SC.
52.
Frolik J, Hines P (2012) Random access, electric vehicle charge management. In: 1st IEEE International Electric Vehicle Conference. (IEVC), Greenville.
53.
Zhang B, Baillieul J. Control and communication protocols based on packetized direct load control in smart building microgrids. Proceedings of the IEEE. 2016;104(4):837–57.CrossRef
54.
Espinosa LAD, Almassalkhi M. A packetized energy management macromodel with quality of service guarantees for demand-side resources. IEEE Trans Power Syst. 2020;35(5):3660–70.CrossRef
55.
Nandanoori SP, Kundu S, Vrabie D, Kalsi K, Lian J (2018) Prioritized threshold allocation for distributed frequency response. In: 2018 IEEE Conference on Control Technology and Applications (CCTA), IEEE, pp 237–244
56.
57.
Office of Cybersecurity, Energy Security, and Emergency Response (2022) Cybersecurity considerations for distributed energy resources on the U.S. electric grid. Tech. rep., U.S. Department of Energy.
58.
Ross SC, Vuylsteke G, Mathieu JL. Effects of load-based frequency regulation on distribution network operation. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems. 2019;34(2):1569–78.CrossRef
59.
60.
Molzahn D, Roald LA (2019) Grid-aware versus grid-agnostic distribution system control: a method for certifying engineering constraint satisfaction. In: Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.
61.
Almassalkhi M, Brahma S, Nazir N, Ossareh H, Racherla P, Kundu S, Nandanoori SP, Ramachandran T, Singhal A, Gayme D, Ji C, Mallada E, Shen Y, You P, Anand D. Hierarchical, grid-aware, and economically optimal coordination of distributed energy resources in realistic distribution systems. Energies. 2020;13(23):6399.CrossRef
62.
Blair B, Fitzgerald G, Dougherty C. The state of managed charging in 2021. Smart Electric Power Alliance, Washington, D.C.: Tech. rep; 2021.
63.
Khan A, Paudyal S, Almassalkhi M (2022) Performance evaluation of network-admissible demand dispatch in multi-phase distribution grids. In: IREP Symposium - Bulk Power System Dynamics and Control.
64.
65.
Jang S, Ozay N, Mathieu JL (2022) Data-driven estimation of probabilistic constraints for network-safe distributed energy resource control. In: 2022 58th Annual Allerton Conference on Communication, Control, and Computing (Allerton), IEEE, Monticello, IL, USA, pp 1–8, 10.1109/Allerton49937.2022.9929351, https://​ieeexplore.​ieee.​org/​document/​9929351/​.
66.
N Nazir, Almassalkhi M (2019) Convex inner approximation of the feeder hosting capacity limits on dispatchable demand. In: IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, Nice, France.
67.
68.
69.
N Nazir, Almassalkhi M (2022) Market mechanism to enable grid-aware dispatch of aggregators in radial distribution networks. In: IREP Symposium - Bulk Power System Dynamics and Control.
70.
\(\bullet \) Riaz S, Mancarella P (2021) Modelling and characterisation of flexibility from distributed energy resources. IEEE transactions on power systems 37(1):38–50. The paper takes an interesting systematic view of flexibility (power, duration, and responsiveness) from DERs and considers both flexibility at one time (static) and over a time horizon (dynamic). In addition, the paper considers a costs of (achieving) flexibility as much as flexibility itself, which represent an interesting coupling between available flexibility and any potential incentives to perform.
71.
72.
Bhattacharya A, Hansen J, Kalsi K, Lian J, Nandanoori SP, Reeve H, Adetola V, Lin F, Leichtman T, Gourisetti SN, et al. (2019) Incentive-based control and coordination of distributed energy resources. Tech. Rep. DOE-PNNL-28724, Pacific Northwest National Lab.(PNNL), Richland, WA (United States).
73.
74.
Chakraborty I, Nandanoori SP, Kundu S (2018) Virtual battery parameter identification using transfer learning based stacked autoencoder. In: 2018 17th IEEE International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications (ICMLA), IEEE, pp 1269–1274.
75.
Matar M, Mavalizadeh H, Brahma S, Almassalkhi MR, Wshah S. Learning the state-of-charge of heterogeneous fleets of distributed energy resources with temporal residual networks. Journal of Energy Storage. 2023;70: 107979.CrossRef
76.
Zhao L, Zhang W, Hao H, Kalsi K. A geometric approach to aggregate flexibility modeling of thermostatically controlled loads. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems. 2017;32(6):4721–31.CrossRef
77.
78.
79.
Nazir MS, Hiskens IA, Bernstein A, Dall’Anese E (2018) Inner approximation of Minkowski sums: a union-based approach and applications to aggregated energy resources. In: 2018 IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC), IEEE, pp 5708–5715.
80.
Cui B, Zamzam A, Bernstein A (2021) Network-cognizant time-coupled aggregate flexibility of distribution systems under uncertainties. In: 2021 American Control Conference (ACC), IEEE, pp 4178–4183.
81.
Chakraborty I, Nandanoori SP, Kundu S, Kalsi K (2020) Stochastic virtual battery modeling of uncertain electrical loads using variational autoencoder. In: 2020 American Control Conference (ACC), IEEE, pp 1305–1310.
82.
83.
84.
Chan K, Kim Y, Jo JY (2022) DER communication networks and their security issues. In: 2022 IEEE 12th Annual Computing and Communication Workshop and Conference (CCWC), IEEE, pp 0785–0790.
85.
Singh R, Hines PD, Howerter SE, Reilly JT (2022) Beyond DERMS: demonstration of automated grid services, mode transition, and resilience. Tech. rep., Argonne National Lab.(ANL), Argonne, IL (United States).
86.
87.
Wu D, Hao H, Fu T, Kalsi K (2018) Regional assessment of virtual battery potential from building loads. In: 2018 IEEE/PES Transmission and Distribution Conference and Exposition (T &D), IEEE, pp 1–5.
88.
89.
Mohan N, Robbins B, Raju S, Maiden Mueller D, Airineni MR, Guggilam S, Venkatraman D (2023) Electric power engineering - a national imperative! A Report on NSF-NAE Workshop. Tech. rep., University of Minnesota.
Metadaten
Titel
Intelligent Electrification as an Enabler of Clean Energy and Decarbonization
verfasst von
Mads R. Almassalkhi
Soumya Kundu
Publikationsdatum
22.09.2023
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
Current Sustainable/Renewable Energy Reports / Ausgabe 4/2023
Elektronische ISSN: 2196-3010
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40518-023-00228-z

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2023

Current Sustainable/Renewable Energy Reports 4/2023 Zur Ausgabe

ReviewPaper

The EU Commission’s Proposal for Improving the Electricity Market Design: Treading Water, but not Drowning

ReviewPaper

Firm Boundaries in Energy Markets: Should Heavy Users of Energy Vertically Integrate into Production?

ReviewPaper

Exploring the Interaction Between Electricity Distribution Network Reconfiguration and Local Flexibility Markets

ReviewPaper

Observations of an Evolving Grid: Resilience and Equity Performance Metrics

Review

Geophysical Constraints on Decarbonized Systems—Building Spatio-Temporal Uncertainties into Future Electricity Grid Planning

ReviewPaper

Social Dimensions of Offshore Wind Energy: a Review of Theories and Frameworks of Multi-criteria Decision-Making