Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 3/2020

03.04.2019 | Review Paper

Cross-price elasticities and their determinants: a meta-analysis and new empirical generalizations

verfasst von: Johannes Auer, Dominik Papies

Erschienen in: Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science | Ausgabe 3/2020

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

In recent decades, the competitive landscape in many markets (e.g., retailing) and the methods that researchers use to analyze these markets have changed heavily. This has resulted in updates of empirical generalizations in many areas. For cross-price elasticities, however, this update is pending. Hence, it is unclear how these changes have affected cross-price elasticities, a key measure of competitive interaction. To address this void, we conduct a meta-analysis of prior econometric estimates and consider a broad set of determinants that have not been analyzed before in the context of cross-price elasticities. Using 7,264 estimates from 115 studies, we identify six new main empirical generalizations. (1) The mean cross-price elasticity is .26 (median =.10), which is half the magnitude of the previous meta-analytic mean. (2) Cross-price elasticities have decreased over time, and (3) they decrease over the product life cycle. (4) High-stockpiling groceries have the highest cross-price elasticities. (5) Long-term cross-price elasticities are larger than short-term cross-price elasticities. (6) The asymmetric share effect only holds in high-share tiers. We derive implications based on these empirical generalizations.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Fußnoten
1
We use the term price changing brand to refer to the brand that changes its price (Horváth and Fok 2013 use the term “attacker brand”), and we refer to the brand that is affected by the rival’s price change as the demand changing brand (Horváth and Fok 2013 use the term “victim brand”). We opted for this more generic terminology because it encompasses both price increases as well as decreases of the price-changing brand, whereas attacker/victim tend to imply a competitive attack through a price reduction.
 
2
We use the abbreviation CPE to refer to cross-price elasticities, and ACPE to refer to the absolute cross-price effect, which we will formally define below.
 
3
We used the following keywords: cross price elasticity, cross price elasticities, cross price effect, cross price effects, cross-price.
 
4
The majority of papers that we obtained from SSRN are working papers that are later published in a journal that we cover. We were able to identify 1 otherwise unpublished working paper.
 
5
We analyze both cross-price elasticities between different brands and elasticities between SKUs of the same brand. As the majority of our elasticities is derived from competition between brands, we subsequently use the term brand elasticity.
 
6
In addition, we collected information on distribution, data source, and estimation method. These variables, however, caused collinearity problems in the estimation (high correlations and high variance inflation factors in auxiliary OLS regressions; Köhler et al. 2017). We therefore omitted these variables from further consideration.
 
7
We cannot exactly replicate their results because their analysis does not only rely on published studies but also includes additional, non-public data.
 
8
Constrained elasticities derived from, e.g., multinomial logit models are by construction not independent from each other. Therefore, we assessed the effect of the category mean own price elasticity and not the effect of the focal brand’s own price elasticity.
 
9
A 1% price change of a brand in a high price tier is larger in terms of dollars compared to a 1% change in a low price tier. This difference in dollars itself can lead to higher cross-price effects (Sethuraman et al. 1999).
 
10
We analyzed the variable Relative Price only as a moderating and not as a direct effect to make the results comparable to the findings by Sethuraman et al. (1999).
 
11
The “direct effect” in rows 1 and 2 of Table 5 is—because of the presence of the interaction—the effect of the base level of the market share tier, which is the low market share tier.
 
12
If we change the base of the interaction, the “direct effect” of Asymmetric Share (in high market share tier) is significant.
 
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Aggarwal, P., & Cha, T. (1998). Asymmetric price competition and store vs national brand choice. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 7(3), 244–253.CrossRef Aggarwal, P., & Cha, T. (1998). Asymmetric price competition and store vs national brand choice. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 7(3), 244–253.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ailawadi, K. L., Gedenk, K., & Neslin, S. A. (1999). Heterogeneity and purchase event feedback in choice models: An empirical analysis with implications for model building. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 16(3), 177–198.CrossRef Ailawadi, K. L., Gedenk, K., & Neslin, S. A. (1999). Heterogeneity and purchase event feedback in choice models: An empirical analysis with implications for model building. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 16(3), 177–198.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Albers, S., Mantrala, M. K., & Sridhar, S. (2010). Personal Selling Elasticities: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Marketing Research, 47(5), 840–853.CrossRef Albers, S., Mantrala, M. K., & Sridhar, S. (2010). Personal Selling Elasticities: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Marketing Research, 47(5), 840–853.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Allenby, G. M., & Rossi, P. E. (1991). Quality Perceptions and Asymmetric Switching Between Brands. Marketing Science, 10(3), 185–204.CrossRef Allenby, G. M., & Rossi, P. E. (1991). Quality Perceptions and Asymmetric Switching Between Brands. Marketing Science, 10(3), 185–204.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Assmus, G., Farley, J. U., & Lehmann, D. R. (1984). How Advertising Affects Sales: Meta-Analysis of Econometric Results. Journal of Marketing Research, 21(1), 65–74.CrossRef Assmus, G., Farley, J. U., & Lehmann, D. R. (1984). How Advertising Affects Sales: Meta-Analysis of Econometric Results. Journal of Marketing Research, 21(1), 65–74.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Barrena, R., & Sánchez, M. (2009). Using emotional benefits as a differentiation strategy in saturated markets. Psychology & Marketing, 26(11), 1002–1030.CrossRef Barrena, R., & Sánchez, M. (2009). Using emotional benefits as a differentiation strategy in saturated markets. Psychology & Marketing, 26(11), 1002–1030.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bijmolt, T. H. A., & Pieters, R. G. M. (2001). Meta-Analysis in Marketing when Studies Contain Multiple Measurements. Marketing Letters, 12(2), 157–169.CrossRef Bijmolt, T. H. A., & Pieters, R. G. M. (2001). Meta-Analysis in Marketing when Studies Contain Multiple Measurements. Marketing Letters, 12(2), 157–169.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bijmolt, T. H. A., Van Heerde, H. J., & Pieters, R. G. M. (2005). New Empirical Generalizations on the Determinants of Price Elasticity. Journal of Marketing Research, 42(2), 141–156.CrossRef Bijmolt, T. H. A., Van Heerde, H. J., & Pieters, R. G. M. (2005). New Empirical Generalizations on the Determinants of Price Elasticity. Journal of Marketing Research, 42(2), 141–156.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Blattberg, R. C., & Wisniewski, K. J. (1989). Price-Induced Patterns of Competition. Marketing Science, 8(4), 291–309.CrossRef Blattberg, R. C., & Wisniewski, K. J. (1989). Price-Induced Patterns of Competition. Marketing Science, 8(4), 291–309.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Blattberg, R. C., Briesch, R., & Fox, E. J. (1995). How Promotions Work. Marketing Science, 14(3 supplement), G122–G132.CrossRef Blattberg, R. C., Briesch, R., & Fox, E. J. (1995). How Promotions Work. Marketing Science, 14(3 supplement), G122–G132.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bronnenberg, B. J., & Wathieu, L. (1996). Asymmetric promotion effects and brand positioning. Marketing Science, 15(4), 379–394.CrossRef Bronnenberg, B. J., & Wathieu, L. (1996). Asymmetric promotion effects and brand positioning. Marketing Science, 15(4), 379–394.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Choi, B., & Ahluwalia, R. (2013). Determinants of brand switching: the role of consumer inferences, brand commitment, and perceived risk. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 43(5), 981–991.CrossRef Choi, B., & Ahluwalia, R. (2013). Determinants of brand switching: the role of consumer inferences, brand commitment, and perceived risk. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 43(5), 981–991.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Danaher, P. J., & Brodie, R. J. (2000). Understanding the Characteristics of Price Elasticities for Frequently Purchased Packaged Goods. Journal of Marketing Management, 16(8), 917–936.CrossRef Danaher, P. J., & Brodie, R. J. (2000). Understanding the Characteristics of Price Elasticities for Frequently Purchased Packaged Goods. Journal of Marketing Management, 16(8), 917–936.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Edeling, A., & Fischer, M. (2016). Marketing’s Impact on Firm Value: Generalizations from a Meta-Analysis. Journal of Marketing Research, 53(4), 515–534.CrossRef Edeling, A., & Fischer, M. (2016). Marketing’s Impact on Firm Value: Generalizations from a Meta-Analysis. Journal of Marketing Research, 53(4), 515–534.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Edeling, A., & Himme, A. (2018). When Does Market Share Matter? New Empirical Generalizations from a Meta-Analysis of the Market Share–Performance Relationship. Journal of Marketing, 82(3), 1–24.CrossRef Edeling, A., & Himme, A. (2018). When Does Market Share Matter? New Empirical Generalizations from a Meta-Analysis of the Market Share–Performance Relationship. Journal of Marketing, 82(3), 1–24.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Eisend, M. (2014). Shelf space elasticity: A meta-analysis. Journal of Retailing, 90(2), 168–181.CrossRef Eisend, M. (2014). Shelf space elasticity: A meta-analysis. Journal of Retailing, 90(2), 168–181.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Eisend, M. (2015). Have We Progressed Marketing Knowledge? A Meta-Meta-Analysis of Effect Sizes in Marketing Research. Journal of Marketing, 79(3), 23–40.CrossRef Eisend, M. (2015). Have We Progressed Marketing Knowledge? A Meta-Meta-Analysis of Effect Sizes in Marketing Research. Journal of Marketing, 79(3), 23–40.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Estelami, H., Lehmann, D. R., & Holden, A. C. (2001). Macro-economic determinants of consumer price knowledge: A meta-analysis of four decades of research. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 18(4), 341–355.CrossRef Estelami, H., Lehmann, D. R., & Holden, A. C. (2001). Macro-economic determinants of consumer price knowledge: A meta-analysis of four decades of research. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 18(4), 341–355.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Gelman, A., & Rubin, D. B. (1992). Inference from Iterative Simulation Using Multiple Sequences. Statistical Science, 7(4), 457–472.CrossRef Gelman, A., & Rubin, D. B. (1992). Inference from Iterative Simulation Using Multiple Sequences. Statistical Science, 7(4), 457–472.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Germann, F., Ebbes, P., & Grewal, R. (2015). The Chief Marketing Officer Matters! Journal of Marketing, 79(3), 1–22.CrossRef Germann, F., Ebbes, P., & Grewal, R. (2015). The Chief Marketing Officer Matters! Journal of Marketing, 79(3), 1–22.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Grewal, D., Puccinelli, N., & Monroe, K. B. (2018). Meta-analysis: integrating accumulated knowledge. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 46(1), 9–30.CrossRef Grewal, D., Puccinelli, N., & Monroe, K. B. (2018). Meta-analysis: integrating accumulated knowledge. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 46(1), 9–30.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hanssens, D. M. (2015). Empirical Generalizations about Marketing Impact (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Marketing Science Institute. Hanssens, D. M. (2015). Empirical Generalizations about Marketing Impact (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Marketing Science Institute.
Zurück zum Zitat Horváth, C., & Fok, D. (2013). Moderating Factors of Immediate, Gross, and Net Cross-Brand Effects of Price Promotions. Marketing Science, 32(1), 127–152.CrossRef Horváth, C., & Fok, D. (2013). Moderating Factors of Immediate, Gross, and Net Cross-Brand Effects of Price Promotions. Marketing Science, 32(1), 127–152.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ioannidis, J. P. A., & Trikalinos, T. A. (2005). Early extreme contradictory estimates may appear in published research: The Proteus phenomenon in molecular genetics research and randomized trials. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 58(6), 543–549.CrossRef Ioannidis, J. P. A., & Trikalinos, T. A. (2005). Early extreme contradictory estimates may appear in published research: The Proteus phenomenon in molecular genetics research and randomized trials. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 58(6), 543–549.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kacen, J. J., & Lee, J. A. (2002). The Influence of Culture on Consumer Impulsive Buying Behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 12(2), 163–176.CrossRef Kacen, J. J., & Lee, J. A. (2002). The Influence of Culture on Consumer Impulsive Buying Behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 12(2), 163–176.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kamakura, W. A., & Russell, G. J. (1989). A Probabilistic Choice Model for Market Segmentation and Elasticity Structure. Journal of Marketing Research, 26(4), 379–390.CrossRef Kamakura, W. A., & Russell, G. J. (1989). A Probabilistic Choice Model for Market Segmentation and Elasticity Structure. Journal of Marketing Research, 26(4), 379–390.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Keller, K. L., & Lehmann, D. R. (2006). Brands and Branding: Research Findings and Future Priorities. Marketing Science, 25(6), 740–759.CrossRef Keller, K. L., & Lehmann, D. R. (2006). Brands and Branding: Research Findings and Future Priorities. Marketing Science, 25(6), 740–759.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Köhler, C., Mantrala, M. K., Albers, S., & Kanuri, V. K. (2017). A Meta-Analysis of Marketing Communication Carryover Effects. Journal of Marketing Research, 54(6), 990–1008.CrossRef Köhler, C., Mantrala, M. K., Albers, S., & Kanuri, V. K. (2017). A Meta-Analysis of Marketing Communication Carryover Effects. Journal of Marketing Research, 54(6), 990–1008.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lehmann, D. R., McAlister, L., & Staelin, R. (2011). Sophistication in Research in Marketing. Journal of Marketing, 75(4), 155–165.CrossRef Lehmann, D. R., McAlister, L., & Staelin, R. (2011). Sophistication in Research in Marketing. Journal of Marketing, 75(4), 155–165.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Li, Y., & Ansari, A. (2014). A Bayesian Semiparametric Approach for Endogeneity and Heterogeneity in Choice Models. Management Science, 60(5), 1161–1179.CrossRef Li, Y., & Ansari, A. (2014). A Bayesian Semiparametric Approach for Endogeneity and Heterogeneity in Choice Models. Management Science, 60(5), 1161–1179.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Mela, C. F., Gupta, S., & Lehmann, D. R. (1997). The Long-Term Impact of Promotion and Advertising on Consumer Brand Choice. Journal of Marketing Research, 34(2), 248–261.CrossRef Mela, C. F., Gupta, S., & Lehmann, D. R. (1997). The Long-Term Impact of Promotion and Advertising on Consumer Brand Choice. Journal of Marketing Research, 34(2), 248–261.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Mela, C. F., Jedidi, K., & Bowman, D. (1998). The Long-Term Impact of Promotions on Consumer Stockpiling Behavior. Journal of Marketing Research, 35(2), 250–262.CrossRef Mela, C. F., Jedidi, K., & Bowman, D. (1998). The Long-Term Impact of Promotions on Consumer Stockpiling Behavior. Journal of Marketing Research, 35(2), 250–262.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Narasimhan, C., Neslin, S. A., & Sen, S. K. (1996). Promotional Elasticities and Category Characteristics. Journal of Marketing, 60(2), 17–30.CrossRef Narasimhan, C., Neslin, S. A., & Sen, S. K. (1996). Promotional Elasticities and Category Characteristics. Journal of Marketing, 60(2), 17–30.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Parker, P. M., & Neelamegham, R. (1997). Price Elasticity Dynamics over the Product Life Cycle: A Study of Consumer Durables. Marketing Letters, 8(2), 205–216.CrossRef Parker, P. M., & Neelamegham, R. (1997). Price Elasticity Dynamics over the Product Life Cycle: A Study of Consumer Durables. Marketing Letters, 8(2), 205–216.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Perreault, W. D., & Leigh, L. E. (1989). Reliability of Nominal Data Based on Qualitative Judgments. Journal of Marketing Research, 26(2), 135–148.CrossRef Perreault, W. D., & Leigh, L. E. (1989). Reliability of Nominal Data Based on Qualitative Judgments. Journal of Marketing Research, 26(2), 135–148.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Schooler, J. (2011). Unpublished results hide the decline effect. Nature, 470(7335), 437–438.CrossRef Schooler, J. (2011). Unpublished results hide the decline effect. Nature, 470(7335), 437–438.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Sethuraman, R. (1995). A meta-analysis of national brand and store brand cross-promotional price elasticities. Marketing Letters, 6(4), 275–286.CrossRef Sethuraman, R. (1995). A meta-analysis of national brand and store brand cross-promotional price elasticities. Marketing Letters, 6(4), 275–286.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Sethuraman, R., & Srinivasan, V. (2002). The Asymmetric Share Effect: An Empirical Generalization on Cross-Price Effects. Journal of Marketing Research, 39(3), 379–386.CrossRef Sethuraman, R., & Srinivasan, V. (2002). The Asymmetric Share Effect: An Empirical Generalization on Cross-Price Effects. Journal of Marketing Research, 39(3), 379–386.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Sethuraman, R., Srinivasan, V., & Kim, D. (1999). Asymmetric and Neighborhood Cross-Price Effects: Some Empirical Generalizations. Marketing Science, 18(1), 23–41.CrossRef Sethuraman, R., Srinivasan, V., & Kim, D. (1999). Asymmetric and Neighborhood Cross-Price Effects: Some Empirical Generalizations. Marketing Science, 18(1), 23–41.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Sethuraman, R., Tellis, G. J., & Briesch, R. A. (2011). How Well Does Advertising Work? Generalizations from Meta-Analysis of Brand Advertising Elasticities. Journal of Marketing Research, 48(3), 457–471.CrossRef Sethuraman, R., Tellis, G. J., & Briesch, R. A. (2011). How Well Does Advertising Work? Generalizations from Meta-Analysis of Brand Advertising Elasticities. Journal of Marketing Research, 48(3), 457–471.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Shocker, A. D., Bayus, B. L., & Kim, N. (2004). Product Complements and Substitutes in the Real World: The Relevance of “Other Products”. Journal of Marketing, 68(1), 28–40.CrossRef Shocker, A. D., Bayus, B. L., & Kim, N. (2004). Product Complements and Substitutes in the Real World: The Relevance of “Other Products”. Journal of Marketing, 68(1), 28–40.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Simon, H. (1979). Dynamics of Price Elasticity and Brand Life Cycles: An Empirical Study. Journal of Marketing Research, 16(4), 439–452.CrossRef Simon, H. (1979). Dynamics of Price Elasticity and Brand Life Cycles: An Empirical Study. Journal of Marketing Research, 16(4), 439–452.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Sivakumar, K., & Raj, S. P. (1997). Quality Tier Competition: How Price Change Influences Brand Choice and Category Choice. Journal of Marketing, 61(3), 71–84.CrossRef Sivakumar, K., & Raj, S. P. (1997). Quality Tier Competition: How Price Change Influences Brand Choice and Category Choice. Journal of Marketing, 61(3), 71–84.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Song, I. (2010). Item Aggregates and Price Elasticity. Seoul Journal of Business, 16(1), 45–63.CrossRef Song, I. (2010). Item Aggregates and Price Elasticity. Seoul Journal of Business, 16(1), 45–63.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Srinivasan, S., Popkowski Leszczyc, P. T. L., & Bass, F. M. (2000). Market share response and competitive interaction: The impact of temporary, evolving and structural changes in prices. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 17(4), 281–305.CrossRef Srinivasan, S., Popkowski Leszczyc, P. T. L., & Bass, F. M. (2000). Market share response and competitive interaction: The impact of temporary, evolving and structural changes in prices. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 17(4), 281–305.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Steenkamp, J.-B. E. M., Nijs, V. R., Hanssens, D. M., & Dekimpe, M. G. (2005). Competitive Reactions to Advertising and Promotion Attacks. Marketing Science, 24(1), 35–54.CrossRef Steenkamp, J.-B. E. M., Nijs, V. R., Hanssens, D. M., & Dekimpe, M. G. (2005). Competitive Reactions to Advertising and Promotion Attacks. Marketing Science, 24(1), 35–54.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Steenkamp, J.-B. E., Van Heerde, H. J., & Geyskens, I. (2010). What Makes Consumers Willing to Pay a Price Premium for National Brands over Private Labels? Journal of Marketing Research, 47(6), 1011–1024.CrossRef Steenkamp, J.-B. E., Van Heerde, H. J., & Geyskens, I. (2010). What Makes Consumers Willing to Pay a Price Premium for National Brands over Private Labels? Journal of Marketing Research, 47(6), 1011–1024.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Tellis, G. J. (1988). The Price Elasticity of Selective Demand: A Meta-Analysis of Econometric Models of Sales. Journal of Marketing Research, 25(4), 331–341.CrossRef Tellis, G. J. (1988). The Price Elasticity of Selective Demand: A Meta-Analysis of Econometric Models of Sales. Journal of Marketing Research, 25(4), 331–341.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat van Heerde, H. J., Leeflang, P. S. H., & Wittink, D. R. (2000). The Estimation of Pre- and Postpromotion Dips with Store-Level Scanner Data. Journal of Marketing Research, 37(3), 383–395.CrossRef van Heerde, H. J., Leeflang, P. S. H., & Wittink, D. R. (2000). The Estimation of Pre- and Postpromotion Dips with Store-Level Scanner Data. Journal of Marketing Research, 37(3), 383–395.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat van Heerde, H. J., Gupta, S., & Wittink, D. R. (2003). Is 75% of the Sales Promotion Bump Due to Brand Switching? No, Only 33% Is. Journal of Marketing Research, 40(4), 481–491. van Heerde, H. J., Gupta, S., & Wittink, D. R. (2003). Is 75% of the Sales Promotion Bump Due to Brand Switching? No, Only 33% Is. Journal of Marketing Research, 40(4), 481–491.
Zurück zum Zitat Villas-Boas, J. M., & Winer, R. S. (1999). Endogeneity in Brand Choice Models. Management Science, 45(10), 1324–1338.CrossRef Villas-Boas, J. M., & Winer, R. S. (1999). Endogeneity in Brand Choice Models. Management Science, 45(10), 1324–1338.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Völckner, F., & Sattler, H. (2006). Drivers of Brand Extension Success. Journal of Marketing, 70(2), 18–34.CrossRef Völckner, F., & Sattler, H. (2006). Drivers of Brand Extension Success. Journal of Marketing, 70(2), 18–34.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Wakefield, K. L., & Inman, J. J. (2003). Situational price sensitivity: the role of consumption occasion, social context and income. Journal of Retailing, 79(4), 199–212.CrossRef Wakefield, K. L., & Inman, J. J. (2003). Situational price sensitivity: the role of consumption occasion, social context and income. Journal of Retailing, 79(4), 199–212.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Cross-price elasticities and their determinants: a meta-analysis and new empirical generalizations
verfasst von
Johannes Auer
Dominik Papies
Publikationsdatum
03.04.2019
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science / Ausgabe 3/2020
Print ISSN: 0092-0703
Elektronische ISSN: 1552-7824
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-019-00642-0

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2020

Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 3/2020 Zur Ausgabe