Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Moonlighting and overtime: A cross-country analysis

  • Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Labor Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

I investigate how contractual hours and overtime premiums affect the decision either to moonlight or to work overtime. By reducing the standard workweek, the government or labor unions can affect the likelihood that a worker faces an hour constraint. An underemployed worker can secure additional earnings by working either on a second job or overtime. I model this decision as a bivariate probit. To create variation in the overtime rates, data for nine OECD countries are pooled. I find that decreasing the standard hours of work increases the probability of moonlighting. The overtime premium has an ambiguous effect on the probability of moonlighting, but it has a negative effect on the probability of working overtime.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Averett, Susan. “Moonlighting: Multiple Motives and Gender Differences.” Applied Economics 33 (September 2001): 1341–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, Thomas and Klaus F. Zimmermann. “Overtime Work and Overtime Compensation in Germany.” Scottish Journal of Political Economy 46 (September 1999): 419–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, David N. F. and Robert A. Hart. “Overtime Working in an Unregulated Labour Market.” Bonn: IZA Discussion Paper Series No. 44 (June 1999).

  • Contensou, Francois and Radu Vranceanu. Working Time: Theory and Policy Implications. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. “Performances of the European Union Labour Market: Results of an Ad Hoc Labour Market Survey Covering Employers and Employees.” European Economy 3 (1995).

  • Eurostat. European Social Statistics—Labour Force 1999. Luxembourg: OPEC, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friesen, Jane. “Overtime Pay Regulation and Weekly Hours of Work in Canada.” Labour Economics 8 (May 2002): 691–720.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golden Lonnie and Helen Jorgenson. “Time after Time—Mandatory Overtime in U.S. Economy.” Washington DC: Economic Policy Institute, 2002, <http://www.epinet.org/briefingpapers/120/bpl20.pdf>.

  • Green, William H. Econometric Analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamermesh, Daniel S. and Stephen Trejo. “The Demand for Hours of Labor: Direct Evidence from California.” Review of Economics and Statistics 82 (February 2000): 38–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, Jennifer. “Has Work-Sharing Worked in Germany?” Quarterly Journal of Economics 114 (February 1999): 117–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimmel, Jean and Karen S. Conway. “Who Moonlights and Why? Evidence from the SIPP.” Industrial Relations 40 (January 2001): 89–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — and Lisa M. Powell. “Moonlighting Trends and Related Policy Issues in Canada and United States.” Canadian Public Policy 25 (June 1999): 207–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krishnan, Pramila. “The Economics of Moonlighting: A Double Self-Selection Model.” Review of Economics and Statistics 72 (November 1990): 361–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. Employment Outlook. Paris: OECD, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. Classifying Educational Programmes: Manual for ISCED-97 Implementation in OECD Countries. Paris: OECD, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. Economic Survey of France. Paris: OECD, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paxson, Christina and Nachum Sicherman. “The Dynamics of Dual Job Holding and Job Mobility.” Journal of Labor Economics 14 (July 1996): 357–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perlman Richard. “Observations on Overtime and Moonlighting.” Southern Economic Journal 33 (October 1966): 237–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Labor, Wage and Hour Division. “Defining and Delimiting the Exemptions for Executive, Administrative, Professional, Outside Sales, and Computer Employees: Final Rule.” Federal Register 69 (April 2004): 22121–274.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

I thank R.L. Oaxaca, R. Stratton, and M. Nelson for their valuable comments and help. Any errors are solely my responsibility.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Renna, F. Moonlighting and overtime: A cross-country analysis. J Labor Res 27, 575–591 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12122-006-1021-0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12122-006-1021-0

Keywords

Navigation