Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
MTZ-Fachkongress

Antriebe und Energiesysteme von morgen


Austausch von Automobil- und Energiewirtschaft

Am 14./15. Mai geht es in Chemnitz um die Mobilitätswende durch Elektro- und Wasserstofffahrzeuge.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Enterprise Operational Analysis Using DEMO and the Enterprise Operating System Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2015 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

On the Role of Complexity for Guiding Enterprise Transformations

verfasst von : Jannis Beese, Stephan Aier, Robert Winter

Erschienen in: Advances in Enterprise Engineering IX

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

While there is a general agreement on the need for tools, which guide the evolution of complex organizational systems, and while there already exists a wealth of tools and approaches for the measurement and management of complexity, it seems that in practice these approaches often fail to achieve the desired impact during transformation processes. Based on focus group data and based on related literature, we analyze the factors that hinder current complexity management systems from guiding enterprise transformations and contribute a set of design principles, which address these factors. In particular, it is important to be aware of the context, to use a consistent ontology, to pay attention to visualization and to raise awareness and support.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel A Case Study of Business Process Simulation in the Context of Enterprise Engineering
Nächstes Kapitel On the Explanatory Capabilities of Enterprise Modeling Approaches
Literatur
1.
Miller, D.: Environmental fit versus internal fit. Organ. Sci. 3, 159–178 (1992)CrossRef
2.
Vessey, I., Ward, K.: The dynamics of sustainable IS alignment: the case for IS adaptivity. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 14, 283–311 (2013)
3.
Dooley, K.J., Van de Ven, A.H.: Explaining complex organizational dynamics. Organ. Sci. 10, 358–372 (1999)CrossRef
4.
Heywood, S., Spungin, J., Turnbull, D.: Cracking the complexity code. McKinsey Q. 2, 85–95 (2007)
5.
Shane, J.S., Strong, K.C., Gransberg, D.D.: Project Management Strategies for Complex Projects. (2014)
6.
Tanaka, H.: Toward project and program management paradigm in the space of complexity: a case study of mega and complex oil and gas development and infrastructure projects. Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci. 119, 65–74 (2014)CrossRef
7.
Nan, N.: Capturing bottom-up information technology use processes: a complex adaptive systems model. MIS Q. 35(2), 505–532 (2011)
8.
Gharajedaghi, J.: Systems Thinking: Managing Chaos and Complexity: A Platform for Designing Business Architecture. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2011)
9.
Pellissier, R.: A proposed frame of reference for complexity management as opposed to the established linear management strategies. Int. J. Organ. Innov. 5, 6–67 (2012)
10.
Cooke-Davies, T., Cicmil, S., Crawford, L., Richardson, K.: We’re not in kansas anymore, toto: mapping the strange landscape of complexity theory, and its relationship to project management. Proj. Manag. J. 38, 50–61 (2007)
11.
Dewar, R., Hage, J.: Size, technology, complexity, and structural differentiation: toward a theoretical synthesis. Adm. Sci. Q. 23, 111–136 (1978)CrossRef
12.
Edmonds, B.: What is complexity? - the philosophy of complexity per se with application to some examples in evolution. In: Heylighen, F., Aerts, D. (eds.) The Evolution of Complexity. Kluwer, Dordrecht (1995)
13.
Shalizi, P.C.R.: Methods and techniques of complex systems science: an overview. In: Deisboeck, T.S., Kresh, J.Y. (eds.) Complex Systems Science in Biomedicine, pp. 33–114. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRef
14.
Bosch-Rekveldt, M., Jongkind, Y., Mooi, H., Bakker, H., Verbraeck, A.: Grasping project complexity in large engineering projects: the TOE (technical, organizational and environmental) framework. Int. J. Proj. Manage 29, 728–739 (2011)CrossRef
15.
Geraldi, J., Maylor, H., Williams, T.: Now, let’s make it really complex (complicated) a systematic review of the complexities of projects. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manage. 31, 966–990 (2011)CrossRef
16.
Weidong, L.: Complexity of information systems development projects: conceptualization and measurement development. J. Manage. Inf. Syst. 22, 45–83 (2005)CrossRef
17.
Ashmos, D.P., Duchon, D., McDaniel, Jr., R.R.: Organizational responses to complexity: the effect on organizational performance. J. OrgChange Mgmt 13, 577–595 (2000)CrossRef
18.
Remington, K., Pollack, J.: Tools for Complex Projects. Gower Publishing Ltd., Hampshire (2007)
19.
Whitty, S.J., Maylor, H.: And then came complex project management. Presented at the 21st IPMA World Congress on Project Management (2007)
20.
Whitty, S.J., Maylor, H.: And then came Complex Project Management (revised). Int. J. Proj. Manage 27, 304–310 (2009)CrossRef
21.
Geraldi, J.G.: What complexity assessments can tell us about projects: dialogue between conception and perception. Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag. 21, 665–678 (2009)CrossRef
22.
23.
Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Rothenberger, M., Chatterjee, S.: A design science research methodology for information systems research. J. Manage. Inf. Syst. 24, 45–77 (2007)CrossRef
24.
Fischer, C., Gregor, S., Aier, S.: Forms of discovery for design knowledge. In: ECIS 2012 Proceedings (2012)
25.
Gregor, S., Hevner, A.R.: Positioning and presenting design science research for maximum impact. MIS Q. 37, 337–356 (2013)
26.
Schlindwein, S.L., Ison, R.: Human knowing and perceived complexity: implications for systems practice. Emergence: Complex. Organ. 6, 27–32 (2004)
27.
Ison, R., Schlindwein, S.L.: History repeats itself: current traps in complexity practice from a systems perspective. Presented at the 12th Australia New Zealand Systems Society (2006)
28.
Benbya, H., McKelvey, B.: Toward a complexity theory of information systems development. Info Technol People 19, 12–34 (2006)CrossRef
29.
Berry, B.J.L., Kiel, L.D., Elliott, E.: Adaptive agents, intelligence, and emergent human organization: capturing complexity through agent-based modeling. PNAS 99, 7187–7188 (2002)CrossRef
30.
Pombinho, J., Aveiro, D., Tribolet, J.: Value-oriented specification of service systems: modeling the contribution perspective of enterprise networks. Int. J. Inf. Syst. Serv. Sect. 7, 60 (2015)CrossRef
31.
Winter, R.: Construction of situational information systems management methods. Int. J. Inf. Syst. Model. Des. 3, 67–85 (2012)CrossRef
32.
Snowden, D.J., Boone, M.E.: A leader’s framework for decision making. Harv. Bus. Rev. 85(11), 68 (2007)
33.
Brown, S.L., Eisenhardt, K.M.: Competing on the Edge: Strategy as Structured Chaos. Harvard Business Press, Boston (1998)
34.
Yayavaram, S., Chen, W.-R.: Changes in firm knowledge couplings and firm innovation performance: the moderating role of technological complexity. Strat. Mgmt. J. 36, 377–396 (2015)CrossRef
35.
Hevner, A., Chatterjee, S.: Design science research in information systems. In: Hevner, A., Chatterjee, S. (eds.) Design Research in Information Systems, pp. 9–22. Springer, US (2010)CrossRef
36.
Tremblay, M.C., Hevner, A.R., Berndt, D.J.: The use of focus groups in design science research. In: Hevner, A.R., Chatterjee, S. (eds.) Design Research in Information Systems, pp. 121–143. Springer, US (2010)CrossRef
37.
Siegel + Gale: Global Brand Simplicity Index 2014. Siegel + Gale (2014)
38.
Aier, S., Fischer, C., Winter, R.: Construction and evaluation of a meta-model for enterprise architecture design principles. In: Wirtschaftsinformatik, p. 51 (2011)
39.
TOGAF Version 9.1. The Open Group (2011)
40.
Hoogervorst, J.: Enterprise architecture: enabling integration, agility and change. Int. J. Coop. Info. Syst. 13, 213–233 (2004)CrossRef
41.
Venable, J., Pries-Heje, J., Baskerville, R.: A comprehensive framework for evaluation in design science research. In: Peffers, K., Rothenberger, M., Kuechler, B. (eds.) DESRIST 2012. LNCS, vol. 7286, pp. 423–438. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)
42.
Al-Gahtani, S.S., King, M.: Attitudes, satisfaction and usage: Factors contributing to each in the acceptance of information technology. Behav. Inf. Technol. 18, 277–297 (1999)CrossRef
43.
Harrison, D.A., Klein, K.J.: What’s the difference? diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations. Acad. Manag. Rev. 32, 1199–1228 (2007)CrossRef
44.
Levinthal, D.A., Warglien, M.: Landscape design: designing for local action in complex worlds. Organ. Sci. 10, 342–357 (1999)CrossRef
45.
Hoogervorst, J., van der Flier, H., Koopman, P.: Implicit communication in organisations: The impact of culture, structure and management practices on employee behaviour. J. Manag. Psychol. 19, 288–311 (2004)CrossRef
46.
Kurtz, C.F., Snowden, D.J.: The new dynamics of strategy: Sense-making in a complex and complicated world. IBM Syst. J. 42, 462–483 (2003)CrossRef
47.
Lichtenstein, B., Uhl-Bien, M., Marion, R., Seers, A., Orton, J., Schreiber, C.: Complexity leadership theory: an interactive perspective on leading in complex adaptive systems. Management Department Faculty Publications. (2006)
48.
Uhl-Bien, M., Marion, R., McKelvey, B.: Complexity Leadership Theory: Shifting leadership from the industrial age to the knowledge era. Leadersh. Q. 18, 298–318 (2007)CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
On the Role of Complexity for Guiding Enterprise Transformations
verfasst von
Jannis Beese
Stephan Aier
Robert Winter
Copyright-Jahr
2015
Buch
Advances in Enterprise Engineering IX

Print ISBN: 978-3-319-19296-3

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-19297-0

Copyright-Jahr: 2015

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19297-0_8

Premium Partner

    Bildnachweise