Abstract
Baumeister asks what a grand theory of motivation might look like, and he identifies the key problems, challenges, and opportunities that need to be considered in its pursuit. I address four of these challenges—how to define motivation, whether motivation is a state or a trait, the primacy of motivation in psychology, and the necessity to not only manage motivational conflict but also to vitalize motivational assets. I focus primarily, however, on the key obstacle that prevents a grand theory—our non-shared assumptions about the nature and dynamics of motivation. I suggest we capitalize on new advances in statistics, methodology, and technology to test what used to be untestable assumptions about motivation. Shared assumptions are necessary for a coherent science, and only a coherent science is capable of constructing a general theory.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baumeister, R. F. (2016). Toward a general theory of motivation: Problems, challenges, opportunities, and the big picture. Motivation and Emotion, 40, 1–10.
Bernard, L. (2016). The action-trait theory of motivation: A commentary on Roy F. Baumeister’s 2014 presidential address to the Society for the Study of Motivation. Motivation and Emotion, 40, 22–26.
Bindra, D. (1974). A motivational view of learning, performance, and behavior modification. Psychological Review, 81, 199–213.
Bolles, R. C. (1980). Some functionalistic thoughts about regulation. In T. W. Toates & T. W. Halliday (Eds.), Analysis of motivational processes (pp. 63–75). New York: Academic Press.
Cheon, S. H., Reeve, J., & Moon, I. S. (2012). Experimentally based, longitudinally designed, teacher-focused intervention to help physical education teachers be more autonomy supportive toward their students. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 34, 365–396.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum.
Dunning, D. (2016). Systems approach to the treatment of motivation in human action: Three notes. Motivation and Emotion, 40, 27–30.
Ekman, P., & Davidson, R. J. (1994). The nature of emotion: Fundamental questions. New York: Oxford University Press.
Hidi, S., & Renninger, A. K. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41, 111–127.
Hull, C. L. (1943). Principles of behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Jenkins, S. R. (1987). Need for achievement and women’s careers over 14 years: Evidence for occupational structural effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 922–932.
Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux.
Kruglanski, A. W., Chernikova, M., & Jasko, K. (2016). Aspects of motivation: Reflections on Roy Baumeister’s essay. Motivation and Emotion, 40, 11–15.
Lee, W., & Reeve, J. (2013). Self-determined, but not non-self-determined, motivation predicts activations in the anterior insular cortex: An fMRI study of personal agency. Social, Cognitive, and Affective Neuroscience, 8, 538–545.
Reeve, J., & Cheon, H. S. (2014). An intervention-based program of research on teachers’ motivating styles. In S. Karabenick & T. Urdan’s (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement, vol. 18 (pp. 297–343). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing.
Russell, J. A., & Barrett, L. F. (1999). Core affect, prototypical emotional episodes, and other things called emotion: Dissecting the elephant. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 805–819.
Sheldon, K. M., Arndt, J., & Houser-Marko, L. (2003). In search of the organismic valuing process: The human tendency to move towards beneficial goal choices. Journal of Personality, 71, 835–869.
Tomkins, S. S. (1970). Affect as the primary motivational system. In M. B. Arnold (Ed.), Feelings and emotions (pp. 101–110). New York: Academic Press.
White, R. W. (1959). Motivation reconsidered: The concept of competence. Psychological Review, 66, 297–333.
Wright, R. A. (2016). Motivation theory essentials: Understanding motives and their conversion into effortful goal pursuit. Motivation and Emotion, 40, 16–21.
Wright, J. S., & Panksepp, J. (2012). An evolutionary framework to understand foraging, wanting, and desire: The neuropsychology of the SEEKING system. Neuropsychoanalysis, 14, 5–39.
Yang, K.-S. (2003). Beyond Maslow’s culture-bound linear theory: A preliminary statement of the double-Y model of basic human needs. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 49, 175–255.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Reeve, J. A grand theory of motivation: Why not?. Motiv Emot 40, 31–35 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-015-9538-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-015-9538-2