Abstract
The Double Jeopardy concept indicates that strong brands have many advantages over weak brands. However, strong brands might also have some disadvantages over weak brands, which were recently conceptualized as Negative Double Jeopardy (NDJ), on the Internet (Kucuk, 2008a). With the advent of the Internet, today's consumers started to re-brand corporate brand meanings on their websites, blogs or social networking spaces, as a part of rising online consumer power. However, previous NDJ and anti-branding studies predominantly focused on anti-brand websites rather than anti-brand blogs and social networking spaces. In addition, although previous studies revealed that there might be a negative link between the levels of consumer-organized anti-branding activities and corporate brand values, this link has not been studied extensively, specifically longitudinally – over an extended time period, such as last 4 years (2005–2009). Thus, this study revisits the NDJ phenomenon with newly developing anti-branding blogs, social networking sites as well anti-branding websites, and tests the validation of previous NDJ studies. In this context, the study is the first of its kind, discussing how such consumer-generated anti-branding activities changed in the last 4 years, with a set of longitudinal analyses in order to address some solutions for better functioning markets.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bickart, B. and Schindler, R.M. (2001) Internet forums as influential sources of consumer information. Journal of Interactive Marketing 15 (3): 31–40.
Ehrenberg, A., Goodhardt, G.J. and Barwise, P.T. (1990) Double Jeopardy revisited. Journal of Marketing 54 (3): 82–91.
Johnson, J.T. and Kaye, B.K. (2004) Wag the blog: How reliance on traditional media and the internet influence credibility perceptions of weblogs among blog users. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 81 (3): 622–642.
Krishnamurthy, S. and Kucuk, S.U. (2009) Anti-branding on the internet. Journal of Business Research 62 (11): 1119–1126.
Kucuk, S.U. (2008a) Negative Double Jeopardy: The role of anti-brand sites on the internet. Journal of Brand Management 15 (3): 209–222.
Kucuk, S.U. (2008b) Consumer exit, voice and ‘Power’ on the internet. Journal of Research for Consumers 15, http://www.jrconsumers.com/_data/page/5882/Exit-Voice-Power-academic2.pdf.
Kucuk, S.U. (2009) The evolution of market equalization on the internet. Journal of Research for Consumers 16, http://www.jrconsumers.com/academic_articles?f=37416.
Kucuk, S.U. and Krishnamurthy, S. (2007) An analysis of consumer power on the internet. Technovation 27 (1–2): 47–56.
Ogilvie, D.M. (1987) The undesired self: A neglected variable in personality research. Journal of Personality Social Psychology 52 (2): 379–385.
Oliver, L.R. (2006) Co-producers and co-participants in the satisfaction process: Mutually satisfying consumption. In: R.F. Lusch and S.L. Vargo (eds.) The Service Dominant Logic of Marketing: Dialog, Debate, and Directions. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe, pp. 118–127.
Thompson, J.C., Rindfleisch, A. and Arsel, Z. (2006) Emotional branding and the strategic value of the doppelganger brand image. Journal of Marketing 70 (1): 50–64.
Uncles, M., Ehrenberg, A. and Hammond, K. (1995) Patterns of buyer behavior: Regularities, models, and extensions. Marketing Science 14 (3): G71–G79.
Urban, G.L. (2004) The emerging era of customer advocacy. Sloan Management Review 45 (2): 77–82.
Vargo, S.L. and Lusch, R.F. (2004) Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. Journal of Marketing 68 (1): 1–17.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kucuk, S. Negative Double Jeopardy revisited: A longitudinal analysis. J Brand Manag 18, 150–158 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1057/bm.2010.27
Received:
Revised:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/bm.2010.27