skip to main content
research-article
Public Access

Map-Matching Using Shortest Paths

Published:13 February 2020Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

We consider several variants of the map-matching problem, which seeks to find a path Q in graph G that has the smallest distance to a given trajectory P (which is likely not to be exactly on the graph). In a typical application setting, P models a noisy GPS trajectory from a person traveling on a road network, and the desired path Q should ideally correspond to the actual path in G that the person has traveled. Existing map-matching algorithms in the literature consider all possible paths in G as potential candidates for Q. We find solutions to the map-matching problem under different settings. In particular, we restrict the set of paths to shortest paths, or concatenations of shortest paths, in G. As a distance measure, we use the Fréchet distance, which is a suitable distance measure for curves since it takes the continuity of the curves into account.

References

  1. Mahmuda Ahmed and Carola Wenk. 2012. Constructing street networks from GPS trajectories. In Proceedings of the 20th Annual European Symposium on Algorithms. 60--71.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Helmut Alt, Alon Efrat, Günter Rote, and Carola Wenk. 2003. Matching planar maps. Journal of Algorithms 49 (2003), 262--283.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Helmut Alt and Michael Godau. 1995. Computing the Fréchet distance between two polygonal curves. International Journal of Computational Geometry 8 Applications 5 (1995), 75--91.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Theo A. Arentze and Harry J. P. Timmermans. 2004. A learning-based transportation oriented simulation system. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 38, 7 (2004), 613--633. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2002.10.001Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Michael Balmer, Kay Axhausen, and Kai Nagel. 2006. Agent-based demand-modeling framework for large-scale microsimulations. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 1985 (2006), 125--134. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3141/1985-14Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Sotiris Brakatsoulas, Dieter Pfoser, Randall Salas, and Carola Wenk. 2005. On map-matching vehicle tracking data. In Proceedings of the 31st Conference on Very Large Data Bases (VLDB’05). 853--864.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Erin W. Chambers, Brittany Terese Fasy, Yusu Wang, and Carola Wenk. 2018. Map-matching using shortest paths. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Interactive and Spatial Computing. 44--51.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Ron Dalumpines and Darren M. Scott. 2017. Determinants of route choice behavior: A comparison of shop versus work trips using the potential path area--gateway (PPAG) algorithm and path-size logit. Journal of Transport Geography 59 (2017), 59--68. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2017.01.003Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Maurice Fréchet. 1906. Sur quelques points du calcul fonctionnel. Rendiconti del Circolo Matematico di Palermo 22, 1 (1906), 1--74.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Amin Gheibi, Anil Maheshwari, and Jörg-Rüdiger Sack. 2016. Minimizing walking length in map matching. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Topics in Theoretical Computer Science. 105--120.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Mithilesh Jha, Samer Madanat, and Srinivas Peeta. 1998. Perception updating and day-to-day travel choice dynamics in traffic networks with information provision. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 6, 3 (1998), 189--212. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0968-090X(98)00015-1Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Antonio Lima, Rade Stanojevic, Dina Papagiannaki, Pablo Rodriguez, and Marta C. González. 2016. Understanding individual routing behaviour. Journal of the Royal Society Interface 13, 16 (2016), 20160021. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2016.0021Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Yin Lou, Chengyang Zhang, Yu Zheng, Xing Xie, Wei Wang, and Yan Huang. 2009. Map-matching for low-sampling-rate GPS trajectories. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM SIGSPATIAL International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems. 352--361.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. E. J. Manley, J. D. Addison, and T. Cheng. 2015. Shortest path or anchor-based route choice: A large-scale empirical analysis of minicab routing in London. Journal of Transport Geography 43 (2015), 123--139. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2015.01.006Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Paul Newson and John Krumm. 2009. Hidden Markov map matching through noise and sparseness. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM SIGSPATIAL International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems. 336--343.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Carlo Prato and Shlomo Bekhor. 2006. Applying branch-and-bound technique to route choice set generation. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 1985 (2006), 19--28. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3141/1985-03Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Piotr Szwed and Kamil Pekala. 2014. An incremental map-matching algorithm based on hidden Markov model. In Artificial Intelligence and Soft Computing. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 8468. Springer, 579--590.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Muhammad Reaz Uddin, Chinya Ravishankar, and Vassilis J. Tsotras. 2011. A system for discovering regions of interest from trajectory data. In Advances in Spatial and Temporal Databases. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 6849. Springer, 481--485.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Jing Yuan, Yu Zheng, Chengyang Zhang, Wenlei Xie, Xing Xie, and Yan Huang. 2010. T-Drive: Driving directions based on taxi trajectories. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM SIGSPATIAL International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems. 99--108.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Lei Zhang, David M. Levinson, and Shanjiang Zhu. 2008. Agent-based model of price competition, capacity choice, and product differentiation on congested networks. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 42, 3 (2008), 435--461.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Shanjiang Zhu and David Levinson. 2015. Do people use the shortest path? An empirical test of Wardrop’s first principle. PLoS ONE 10 (2015), 1--18. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0134322Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Map-Matching Using Shortest Paths

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      Full Access

      • Published in

        cover image ACM Transactions on Spatial Algorithms and Systems
        ACM Transactions on Spatial Algorithms and Systems  Volume 6, Issue 1
        March 2020
        139 pages
        ISSN:2374-0353
        EISSN:2374-0361
        DOI:10.1145/3375422
        Issue’s Table of Contents

        Copyright © 2020 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 13 February 2020
        • Accepted: 1 September 2019
        • Revised: 1 January 2019
        • Received: 1 December 2017
        Published in tsas Volume 6, Issue 1

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      HTML Format

      View this article in HTML Format .

      View HTML Format