skip to main content
10.1145/3450614.3461683acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesumapConference Proceedingsconference-collections
extended-abstract

Identifying users’ domain expertise from dialogues

Published:22 June 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

Nowadays, many companies are offering chatbots and voicebots to their customers. Despite much recent success in natural language processing and dialogue research, the communication between a human and a machine is still in its infancy. In this context, dialogue personalization could be a key to bridge some of the gap, making sense of users’ experiences, needs, interests and mental models when engaged in a conversation. On this line, we propose to automatically learn user’s features directly from the dialogue with the chatbot, in order to enable the adaptation of the response accordingly and thus improve the interaction with the user. In this paper, we focus on the user’s domain expertise and, assuming that expertise affects linguistic features of the language, we propose a vocabulary-centered model joint with a Deep Learning method for the automatic classification of the users expertise at word- and message-level. An experimentation over 5000 real messages taken from a telco commercial chatbot carried to high accuracy scores, demonstrating the feasibility of the proposed task and paving the way for novel user-aware applications.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

ferrod_etal.mp4

mp4

3.7 MB

References

  1. Timothy W Bickmore and Rosalind W Picard. 2005. Establishing and maintaining long-term human-computer relationships. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) 12, 2(2005), 293–327.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Henry Blanco and Francesco Ricci. 2013. Acquiring user profiles from implicit feedback in a conversational recommender system. In Proceedings of the 7th ACM conference on Recommender systems. 307–310.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Paulo Blikstein. 2011. Using learning analytics to assess students’ behavior in open-ended programming tasks. In Proceedings of the 1st international conference on learning analytics and knowledge. 110–116.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Piotr Bojanowski, Edouard Grave, Armand Joulin, and Tomas Mikolov. 2016. Enriching Word Vectors with Subword Information. arXiv preprint arXiv:1607.04606(2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Lyle E Bourne Jr, James A Kole, and Alice F Healy. 2014. Expertise: defined, described, explained. Frontiers in psychology 5 (2014), 186.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Peter Brusilovsky and Mark T Maybury. 2002. From adaptive hypermedia to the adaptive web. Commun. ACM 45, 5 (2002), 30–33.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Jindong Chen, Yizhou Hu, Jingping Liu, Yanghua Xiao, and Haiyun Jiang. 2019. Deep short text classification with knowledge powered attention. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 33. 6252–6259.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Yun-Nung Chen, Dilek Hakkani-Tür, Gökhan Tür, Jianfeng Gao, and Li Deng. 2016. End-to-end memory networks with knowledge carryover for multi-turn spoken language understanding.. In Interspeech. 3245–3249.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Albert T Corbett and John R Anderson. 1994. Knowledge tracing: Modeling the acquisition of procedural knowledge. User modeling and user-adapted interaction 4, 4 (1994), 253–278.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Mihai Dascalu, Erol-Valeriu Chioasca, and Stefan Trausan-Matu. 2008. ASAP-An Advanced System for Assessing Chat Participants. In International Conference on Artificial Intelligence: Methodology, Systems, and Applications. Springer, 58–68.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Michel C Desmarais and Ryan SJ d Baker. 2012. A review of recent advances in learner and skill modeling in intelligent learning environments. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 22, 1 (2012), 9–38.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Michel C Desmarais, Ameen Maluf, and Jiming Liu. 1995. User-expertise modeling with empirically derived probabilistic implication networks. User modeling and user-adapted interaction 5, 3 (1995), 283–315.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Paul J Feltovich and Robert R Hoffman. 1997. Expertise in context. AAAI Press Menlo Park, CA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Nikesh Garera and David Yarowsky. 2009. Modeling latent biographic attributes in conversational genres. In Proceedings of the Joint Conference of the 47th Annual Meeting of the ACL and the 4th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing of the AFNLP. 710–718.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. SK Garrett, Barrett S Caldwell, EC Harris, and MC Gonzalez. 2009. Six dimensions of expertise: a more comprehensive definition of cognitive expertise for team coordination. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science 10, 2 (2009), 93–105.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Yasmín Hernández, Carlos Acevedo Peña, and Alicia Martínez. 2018. Model for personality detection based on text analysis. In Mexican International Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Springer, 207–217.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Zhiheng Huang, Wei Xu, and Kai Yu. 2015. Bidirectional LSTM-CRF Models for Sequence Tagging. CoRR abs/1508.01991(2015). arxiv:1508.01991http://arxiv.org/abs/1508.01991Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Dietmar Jannach, Ahtsham Manzoor, Wanling Cai, and Li Chen. 2020. A Survey on Conversational Recommender Systems. arXiv preprint arXiv:2004.00646(2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Chaitanya K Joshi, Fei Mi, and Boi Faltings. 2017. Personalization in goal-oriented dialog. arXiv preprint arXiv:1706.07503(2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. A. Kobsa, J. Koenemann, and W. Pohl. 2001. Personalized hypermedia presentation techniques for improving online customer relationship. Knowl. Eng. Rev. 16(2)(2001), 111–155.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. François Mairesse, Marilyn A Walker, Matthias R Mehl, and Roger K Moore. 2007. Using linguistic cues for the automatic recognition of personality in conversation and text. Journal of artificial intelligence research 30 (2007), 457–500.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Lorraine McGinty and James Reilly. 2011. On the evolution of critiquing recommenders. In Recommender Systems Handbook. Springer, 419–453.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Danielle S McNamara, Scott A Crossley, and Philip M McCarthy. 2010. Linguistic features of writing quality. Written communication 27, 1 (2010), 57–86.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Sein Minn, Michel C Desmarais, Feida Zhu, Jing Xiao, and Jianzong Wang. 2019. Dynamic student classiffication on memory networks for knowledge tracing. In Pacific-Asia Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. Springer, 163–174.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Kaixiang Mo, Shuangyin Li, Yu Zhang, Jiajun Li, and Qiang Yang. 2016. Personalizing a dialogue system with transfer reinforcement learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1610.02891(2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Lin Qiu, Han Lin, Jonathan Ramsay, and Fang Yang. 2012. You are what you tweet: Personality expression and perception on Twitter. Journal of research in personality 46, 6 (2012), 710–718.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Mehul Smriti Raje and Aakarsh Singh. 2016. Personality detection by analysis of twitter profiles. In International Conference on Soft Computing and Pattern Recognition. Springer, 667–675.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Kent P Vaubel and Charles F Gettys. 1990. Inferring user expertise for adaptive interfaces. Human-Computer Interaction 5, 1 (1990), 95–117.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Yashen Wang, He-Yan Huang, Chong Feng, Qiang Zhou, Jiahui Gu, and Xiong Gao. 2016. Cse: Conceptual sentence embeddings based on attention model. In Proceedings of the 54th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 505–515.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Yonas Woldemariam, Henrik Björklund, and Suna Bensch. 2017. Predicting User Competence from Linguistic Data. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Natural Language Processing (ICON-2017). 476–484.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Marcelo Worsley and Paulo Blikstein. 2011. What’s an Expert? Using Learning Analytics to Identify Emergent Markers of Expertise through Automated Speech, Sentiment and Sketch Analysis.. In EDM. 235–240.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Saizheng Zhang, Emily Dinan, Jack Urbanek, Arthur Szlam, Douwe Kiela, and Jason Weston. 2018. Personalizing dialogue agents: I have a dog, do you have pets too?arXiv preprint arXiv:1801.07243(2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Conferences
    UMAP '21: Adjunct Proceedings of the 29th ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization
    June 2021
    431 pages
    ISBN:9781450383677
    DOI:10.1145/3450614

    Copyright © 2021 Owner/Author

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 22 June 2021

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • extended-abstract
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate162of633submissions,26%

    Upcoming Conference

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format