Stela H. Seo
ABSTRACT
In designing and evaluating human-robot interactions and interfaces, researchers often use a simulated robot due to the high cost of robots and time required to program them. However, it is important to consider how interaction with a simulated robot differs from a real robot; that is, do simulated robots provide authentic interaction? We contribute to a growing body of work that explores this question and maps out simulated-versus-real differences, by explicitly investigating empathy: how people empathize with a physical or simulated robot when something bad happens to it. Our results suggest that people may empathize more with a physical robot than a simulated one, a finding that has important implications on the generalizability and applicability of simulated HRI work. Empathy is particularly relevant to social HRI and is integral to, for example, companion and care robots. Our contribution additionally includes an original and reproducible HRI experimental design to induce empathy toward robots in laboratory settings, and an experimentally validated empathy-measuring instrument from psychology for use with HRI.
Supplemental Material
- Astin, H.S. Assessment of empathic ability by neans of a situational test. Journal of Counseling Psychology 14, 1 (1967), 57--60.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Bainbridge, W.A., Hart, J.W., Kim, E.S., and Scassellati, B. The benefits of interactions with physically present robots over video-displayed agents. International Journal of Social Robotics 3, 1 (2010), 41--52.Google Scholar
- Baron-Cohen, S. and Wheelwright, S. The empathy quotient: an investigation of adults with Asperger syndrome or high functioning autism, and normal sex differences. Journal of autism and developmental disorders 34, 2 (2004), 163--75.Google Scholar
- Bartneck, C., Bleeker, T., Bun, J., Fens, P., and Riet, L. The influence of robot anthropomorphism on the feelings of embarrassment when interacting with robots. Paladyn 1, 2 (2010), 109--115.Google Scholar
- Bartneck, C., Reichenbach, J., and Breemen, A. Van. In your face, robot! The influence of a character's embodiment on how users perceive its emotional expressions. Proceedings of the Design and Emotion, (2004), 32--51.Google Scholar
- Bartneck, C., Verbunt, M., Mubin, O., and Al Mahmud, A. To kill a mockingbird robot. Proceeding of the ACM/IEEE international conference on Human-robot interaction HRI '07, ACM Press (2007), 81--87. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Batson, C.D., Polycarpou, M.P., Harmon-Jones, E., et al. Empathy and attitudes: can feeling for a member of a stigmatized group improve feelings toward the group? Journal of personality and social psychology 72, 1 (1997), 105--18.Google Scholar
- Batson, C.D., Sager, K., Garst, E., Kang, M., Rubchinsky, K., and Dawson, K. Is empathy-induced helping due to self-other merging? 73, 3 (1997), 495--509.Google Scholar
- Davis, M.H. Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of personality and social psychology 44, 1 (1983), 113--126.Google Scholar
- Davis, M.H. Empathy: A social psychological approach. Brown & Benchmark Publishers, 1994.Google Scholar
- Eisenberg, N., Fabes, R.A., Murphy, B., and Karbon, M. The relations of emotionality and regulation to dispositional and situational empathy-related responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 66, 4 (1994), 776--797.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Fischer, K., Lohan, K., and Foth, K. Levels of embodiment: linguistic analyses of factors influencing HRI. Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), (2012), 463--470. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Fridin, M. and Belokopytov, M. Embodied robot versus virtual agent: Involvement of preschool children in motor task performance. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 30, 6 (2014), 459--469.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Garreau, J. Bots on the ground. Washington Post, (2007), 1--6.Google Scholar
- Gonsior, B., Sosnowski, S., Mayer, C., et al. Improving aspects of empathy and subjective performance for HRI through mirroring facial expressions. 2011 RO-MAN, IEEE (2011), 350--356.Google Scholar
- Haker, H., Kawohl, W., Herwig, U., and Rössler, W. Mirror neuron activity during contagious yawning-an fMRI study. Brain imaging and behavior 7, 1 (2013), 28--34.Google Scholar
- Hoffmann, L. and Krämer, N.C. Investigating the effects of physical and virtual embodiment in task-oriented and conversational contexts. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 71, 7--8 (2013), 763--774. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Janssen, J.H. A three-component framework for empathic technologies to augment human interaction. Journal on Multimodal User Interfaces 6, 3--4 (2012), 143--161.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Kidd, C.D. and Breazeal, C. Comparison of social presence in robots and animated characters. Proceedings of human-computer interaction (HCI), 2005.Google Scholar
- Kidd, C.D. and Breazeal, C. Effect of a robot on user perceptions. 2004 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37566) 4, (2004), 3559--3564.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Lee, K.M., Jung, Y., Kim, J., and Kim, S.R. Are physically embodied social agents better than disembodied social agents?: The effects of physical embodiment, tactile interaction, and people's loneliness in human-robot interaction. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 64, 10 (2006), 962--973. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Leite, I., Pereira, A., Martinho, C., and Paiva, A. Are emotional robots more fun to play with? RO-MAN 2008 - The 17th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, IEEE (2008), 77--82.Google ScholarCross Ref
- McQuiggan, S., Robison, J., Robert Phillips, and Lester, J.C. Modeling parallel and reactive empathy in virtual agents: An inductive approach. Proceedings of the 7th international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems 1, (2008), 167--174. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Milgram, P., Takemura, H., Utsumi, A., and Kishino, F. Augmented reality: a class of displays on the reality-virtuality continuum. Telemanipulator and Telepresence Technologies, (1995), 282--292.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Pereira, A., Leite, I., Mascarenhas, S., Martinho, C., and Paiva, A. Using empathy to improve human-robot relationships. In M.H. Lamers and F.J. Verbeek, eds., HumanRobot Personal Relationships. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2011, 130--138.Google Scholar
- Pop, C.A., Simut, R.E., Pintea, S., et al. Social Robots vs. Computer display: Does the way social stories are delivered make a difference for their effectiveness on ASD children? Journal of Educational Computing Research 49, 3 (2013), 381--401.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Powers, A., Kiesler, S., Fussell, S., and Torrey, C. Comparing a computer agent with a humanoid robot. Proceeding of the ACM/IEEE international conference on Human-robot interaction - HRI '07, (2007), 145. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Reeves, B. and Nass, C. The Media Equation: How People Treat Computers, Television, and New Media Like Real People and Places. Cambridge University Press, New York, New York, USA, 1996. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Riek, L.D., Rabinowitch, T.-C., Chakrabarti, B., and Robinson, P. How anthropomorphism affects empathy toward robots. Proceedings of the 4th ACM/IEEE international conference on Human robot interaction - HRI '09, ACM Press (2009), 245. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Segura, E., Kriegel, M., Aylett, R., Deshmukh, A., and Cramer, H. How do you like me in this: User embodiment preferences for companion agents. In Y. Nakano, M. Neff, A. Paiva and M. Walker, eds., Intelligent Virtual Agents. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2012, 112--125. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Shinozawa, K., Naya, F., Yamato, J., and Kogure, K. Differences in effect of robot and screen agent recommendations on human decision-making. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 62, 2 (2005), 267--279. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Spreng, R.N., McKinnon, M.C., Mar, R. a, and Levine, B. The toronto empathy questionnaire: scale development and initial validation of a factor-analytic solution to multiple empathy measures. Journal of personality assessment 91, 1 (2009), 62--71.Google Scholar
- Stephan, W.G. and Finlay, K. The Role of Empathy in Improving Intergroup Relations. Journal of Social Issues 55, 4 (1999), 729--743.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Stueber, K. Empathy. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2013.Google Scholar
- Sung, J., Guo, L., Grinter, R., and Christensen, H. "My Roomba Is Rambo": Intimate home appliances. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2007.Google Scholar
- Takeuchi, J., Kushida, K., Nishimura, Y., et al. Comparison of a humanoid robot and an on-screen agent as presenters to audiences. 2006 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, (2006), 3964--3969.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Wada, K. and Shibata, T. Living with seal robots-Its sociopsychological and physiological influences on the elderly at a care house. IEEE Transactions on Robotics 23, 5 (2007), 972--980. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Wainer, J., Feil-seifer, D., Shell, D., and Mataric, M. The role of physical embodiment in human-robot interaction. ROMAN 2006 - The 15th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, IEEE (2006), 117--122.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Woods, S., Walters, M., and Dautenhahn, K. Comparing human robot interaction scenarios using live and video based methods: towards a novel methodological approach. 9th IEEE International Workshop on Advanced Motion Control, 2006., (2006), 750--755.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Wrobel, J., Wu, Y., Kerhervé, H., et al. Effect of agent embodiment on the elder user enjoyment of a game. ACHI 2013, The Sixth International Conference on Advances in Computer-Human Interactions, (2013), 162--167.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Poor Thing! Would You Feel Sorry for a Simulated Robot?: A comparison of empathy toward a physical and a simulated robot
Recommendations
Fake Empathy and Human-Robot Interaction HRI: A Preliminary Study
Empathy is a basic emotion trigger for human beings, especially while regulating social relationships and behaviour. The main challenge of this paper is study whether people's empathic reactions towards robots change depending on previous information ...
Feel Me If You Can: The Effect of Robot Types and Robot's Tactility Types on Users' Perception toward a Robot
HRI '17: Proceedings of the Companion of the 2017 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot InteractionIn order to investigate the effect of robot types and robot's tactility types on a users' perception toward the robot, we conducted a 2(robot types: autonomous robot vs. telepresence robot) x 2(tactility types: human-like vs. product-like) within-...
Empathic Robot for Group Learning: A Field Study
This work explores a group learning scenario with an autonomous empathic robot. We address two research questions: (1) Can an autonomous robot designed with empathic competencies foster collaborative learning in a group context? (2) Can an empathic ...
Comments