Distribution & Access For Publication Downloads News About Us Contact Us
Paper Titles
A Comparative Experimental Study on Machining Performance of Aluminium against Advanced Diamond Coated Cutting Tool Inserts
p.298
Compressive Strength and Chloride Ion Permeability Test of Concrete Incorporating Fly Ash and GGBS with Diverse Water Binder Ratio
p.311
Improving the Performance of Structural Members by Incorporating Incinerated Bio-Medical Waste Ash in Reinforced Geopolymer Concrete
p.321
Structural Behaviour of Green Geopolymer Concrete Beams and Columns Made with Waste Wood Ash a Partial Substitution Binder
p.333
Flexural Behaviour of Reinforced Geopolymer Concrete Incorporated with Hazardous Heavy Metal Waste Ash and Glass Powder
p.345
A Comparative Investigation on Normal and High Strength Concrete Beams under Torsion
p.359
Modelling the Yield Stress of Fly-Ash Added Superplasticized Cement Paste at Different Temperatures Using Artificial Neural Network
p.366
Effective Utilization of Industrial and Agricultural Waste for Developing Sustainable Self-Compacting Concrete
p.376
Axial Compression Behaviour Analysis of Insulated Concrete Form (ICF) Wall Panel with Fibre Cement Board
p.387

Flexural Behaviour of Reinforced Geopolymer Concrete Incorporated with Hazardous Heavy Metal Waste Ash and Glass Powder

Article Preview

Abstract:

The flexural behavior of Incinerated Bio-Medical Waste Ash (IBWA) – Ground Granulated Blast Furnace Slag (GGBS) based Reinforced Geopolymer Concrete (RGPC) beams with Waste Glass Powder (WGP) as fine aggregate is explored in this research. The fine aggregate (M-Sand) is substituted by varying the waste glass powder as 0 percent, 5 percent, 10 percent, 15 percent, 20 percent, 25 percent, 30 percent, 35 percent, 40 percent, 45 percent, and 50 percent, and the mixture is cured under atmospheric curing. The impact of the WGP weight percentage on the flexural behavior of GPC beams is analyzed. The conduct of RGPC beams varies from that of ordinary Portland Concrete (OPC) beams, which is defined and examined. Deflection, ductility factor, flexural strength, and toughness index were measured as flexural properties for beams. In contrast to the reference beams, the RGPC beams containing 50% Waste Glass Powder as fine aggregate demonstrated a major increase in cracking resistance, serviceability, and ductility, according to the experimental finding. The RGPC beam without WGP ended in failure with a brittle manner whereas those beams with WGP encountered ductile failure. The RGPC beams' load ability improved by up to 50% as the weight percentage of WGP was enhanced.

You might also be interested in these eBooks
Advanced Materials and Manufacturing Engineering II View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volume 1048)

Pages:

345-358

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.1048.345

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

January 2022

Authors:

A. Suresh Kumar*, M. Muthukannan, A.D.K.B. Irene, K. Kumar Arun, A. Chithambar Ganesh

Keywords:

Ductility, GGBS, Incinerated Bio-Medical Waste Ash, Load-Deflection Behaviour, Reinforced Geopolymer Concrete, Toughness, Waste Glass Powder

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions:

Request Permissions

* - Corresponding Author

References

[1] T. Yang, H. Zhu, Z. Zhang, Influence of fly ash on the pore structure and shrinkage characteristics of metakaolin-based geopolymer pastes and mortars. Constr. Build. Mater. 153 (2017) 284-293.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.05.067

Google Scholar

[2] Anitha Rajor and Kunal, Biomedical Waste Incinerator Ash: A Review with Special Focus On Its Characterization, Utilization and Leachate Analysis,, International Journal of Geology, Earth and Environmental Sciences, 1 (1) (2011) 48-58.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.04.031

Google Scholar

[3] Shazim Ali Memon, Muhammad Ali Sheikh and Muhammad Bilal Paracha, Utilisation Of Hospital Waste Ash In Concrete, Mehran University Research Journal of Engineering & Technology, 32 (1) (2013).

Google Scholar

[4] Augustine U. Elinwa, Hospital Ash Waste-Ordinary Portland Cement Concrete, Science Research. 4 (3) (2016) 72-78.

DOI: 10.11648/j.sr.20160403.11

Google Scholar

[5] Feng-Yim, Ch, Ming-Yen, W, Comparison of the characteristics of bottom and fly ashes generated from various incineration processes, J. Hazard. Mater. 138 (2006) 594–603.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.05.099

Google Scholar

[6] Tang, P, Florea, M.V.A, Spiesz, P, Brouwers, H.J.H, Characteristics and application potential of municipal solid waste incineration (MSWI) bottom ashes from two waste-to-energy plants, Construction and Building Materials, 83 (2015) 77–94.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.02.033

Google Scholar

[7] Oehmig, W.N, Roessler, J.G, Zhang, J, Townsend, T.G, Effect of ferrous metal presence on lead leaching in municipal waste incineration bottom ashes, J. Hazard. Mater. 283 (2015) 500–506.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.09.040

Google Scholar

[8] A. Idris, K. Saed, Characteristics of slag produced from incinerated hospital waste, J. Hazard. Mater.93 (2003) 201–208.

DOI: 10.1016/s0304-3894(02)00010-9

Google Scholar

[9] L. Zhao, F.S. Zhang, Z. Hao, H. Wang, Levels of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in different type of hospital waste incinerator ashes, Sci. Total Environ. 397 (2008) 24–30.

DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2008.02.040

Google Scholar

[10] A. Akyildiz, E.T. Kose, A. Yildiz, Compressive strength and heavy metal leaching of concrete containing medical waste incineration ash, Constr. Build. Mater. 138 (2017) 326–332.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.02.017

Google Scholar

[11] Azni, S. Katayon, M. Ratnasamy, M.M.N.M. Johari, Stabilization and utilization of hospital waste as road and asphalt aggregate, J. Mater. Cycles Waste Manage.7 (2005) 33–37.

DOI: 10.1007/s10163-004-0123-0

Google Scholar

[12] A.Genazzini, R. Zerbino, A. Ronco, O. Batic, G. Giaccio, Hospital waste ashes in Portland cement mortars, Cem. Concr. Res.33 (2003) 1643–1650.

DOI: 10.1016/s0008-8846(03)00109-1

Google Scholar

[13] K. Tzanakos, A. Mimilidou, K. Anastasiadou, A. Stratakis, E. Gidarakos, Solidification/ stabilization of ash from medical waste incineration into geopolymers, Waste Manage.34 (2014) 1823–1828.

DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2014.03.021

Google Scholar

[14] Lombardi, F, Mangialardi, T, Piga, L, Sirini, P, Mechanical and leaching properties of cement solidified hospital solid waste incinerator fly ash. Waste Manag. 18 (1998) 99-106.

DOI: 10.1016/s0956-053x(98)00006-3

Google Scholar

[15] Mohajerani, A, et al, Practical recycling applications of crushed waste glass in construction materials: a review. Constr. Build. Mater. 156 (2017) 443-467.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.09.005

Google Scholar

[16] Leao, S, Bishop, I, Evans, D, Spatialetemporal model for demand and allocation of waste landfills in growing urban regions. Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. 28 (4) (2004) 353-385.

DOI: 10.1016/s0198-9715(03)00043-7

Google Scholar

[17] Loryuenyong, V, et al, Effects of recycled glass substitution on the physical and mechanical properties of clay bricks. Waste Manag. 29 (10) (2009) 2717-2721.

DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2009.05.015

Google Scholar

[18] Vijayakumar, G, Vishaliny, M.H, Govindarajulu, D, Studies on glass powder as partial replacement of cement in concrete production. Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Adv. Eng. 3 (2) (2013) 153-157.

Google Scholar

[19] Tho-In, T, et al, Compressive strength and microstructure analysis of Geopolymer paste using waste glass powder and fly ash. J. Clean. Prod. 172 (2018) 2892-2898.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.125

Google Scholar

[20] Shi, C, et al, New Cements for the 21st Century: the Pursuit of an Alternative to Portland Cement, 41 (7) (2011) 750-763.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2011.03.016

Google Scholar

[21] Bernal, S.A, et al, Effect of Binder Content on the Performance of Alkali- Activated Slag Concretes, 41 (1) (2011) 1-8.

Google Scholar

[22] Duxson, P, et al, The Role of Inorganic Polymer Technology in the Developmentof green Concrete,, 37 (12) (2007) 1590-1597.

Google Scholar

[23] Duxson, P, et al, Geopolymer Technology: the Current State of the Art, 42 (9) (2007) 2917-2933.

Google Scholar

[24] Benhelal, E, et al, Global Strategies and Potentials to Curb CO2 Emissions in Cement Industry, 51 (2013) 142-161.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.10.049

Google Scholar

[25] Turner, L.K, Collins, F.G.J.C, B. Materials, Carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2-e) emissions: A comparison between geopolymer and OPC cement concrete, 43 (2013) 125-130.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.01.023

Google Scholar

[26] Kong, D.L, Sanjayan, J.G.J.C, Composites, C, Damage Behavior of Geopolymer Composites Exposed to Elevated Temperatures, 30 (10) (2008) 986-991.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2008.08.001

Google Scholar

[27] Fernandez-Jimenez, A, Palomo, A.J.M.D.C, Factors Affecting Early Compressive Strength of Alkali Activated Fly Ash (OPC-free) Concrete, 57 (287) (2007) 7-22.

DOI: 10.3989/mc.2007.v57.i287.53

Google Scholar

[28] Bakharev T, Resistance of geopolymer materials to acid attack. Cem Concr Res. 35 (2005) 658–670.

Google Scholar

[29] Ariffin MAM, Bhutta MAR, Hussin MW, Mohd Tahir M, Aziah N, Sulfuric acid resistance of blended ash geopolymer concrete. Constr Build Mater. 43 (2013) 80–86.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.01.018

Google Scholar

[30] Sarker PK, Bond strength of reinforcing steel embedded in fly ash-based Geopolymer concrete. Mater Struct. 44 (2010) 1021–1030.

DOI: 10.1617/s11527-010-9683-8

Google Scholar

[31] Castel A, Foster SJ, Bond strength between blended slag and Class F fly ash Geopolymer concrete with steel reinforcement. Cem Concr Res. 72 (2015) 48–53.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2015.02.016

Google Scholar

[32] Nath P, Sarker PK, Flexural strength and elastic modulus of ambient-cured blended low-calcium fly ash geopolymer concrete. Constr Build Mater. 130 (2017) 22–31.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.11.034

Google Scholar

[33] Sumajouw MDJ, Rangan BV. Low-calcium fly ash-based geopolymer concrete: reinforced beams and columns, research report GC. Perth(Australia): Curtin University of Technology; (2006).

Google Scholar

[34] Chang EH. Shear and bond behaviour of reinforced fly ash-based Geopolymer concrete beams. Curtin University of Technology; (2009). [PhD thesis].

Google Scholar

[35] Dattatreya JKRN, Sabitha D, Ambily PS, Nataraja MC, Flexural behaviour of reinforced Geopolymer concrete beams. Int J Civ Struct Eng. 2 (2011) 138–159.

Google Scholar

[36] Yost JR, Radlinska A, Ernst S, Salera M, Martignetti NJ, Structural behavior of alkali activated fly ash concrete. Part 2: structural testing and experimental findings. Mater Struct. 46 (2012) 449–462.

DOI: 10.1617/s11527-012-9985-0

Google Scholar

[37] Maranan GB, Manalo AC, Benmokrane B, Karunasena W, Mendis P, Evaluation of the flexural strength and serviceability of geopolymer concrete beams reinforced with glass-fibre-reinforced polymer (GFRP) bars. Eng Struct. 101 (2015) 529–541.

DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.08.003

Google Scholar

[38] Nguyen KT, Ahn N, Le TA, Lee K, Theoretical and experimental study on mechanical properties and flexural strength of fly ash-geopolymer concrete. Constr Build Mater. 106 (2016) 65–77.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.12.033

Google Scholar

[39] Visintin P, Mohamed Ali MS, Albitar M, Lucas W, Shear behaviour of Geopolymer concrete beams without stirrups. Constr Build Mater. 148 (2017) 10–21.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.05.010

Google Scholar

[40] Sumajouw DMJ, Hardjito D, Wallah SE, Rangan BV, Fly ash-based Geopolymer concrete: study of slender reinforced columns. J Mater Sci. 42 (2006) 3124–3130.

DOI: 10.1007/s10853-006-0523-8

Google Scholar

[41] Sarker PK, Analysis of geopolymer concrete columns. Mater Struct. 42 (2008) 715–724.

DOI: 10.1617/s11527-008-9415-5

Google Scholar

[42] Geopolymer Rahman MM. Concrete columns subjected to axial load and biaxial bending [Master]. Curtin University; (2013).

Google Scholar

[43] Albitar M, Mohamed Ali MS, Visintin P, Experimental study on fly ash and lead smelter slag-based geopolymer concrete columns. Constr Build Mater. 141 (2017) 104–112.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.03.014

Google Scholar

[44] Reinforced Concrete Design : in accordance with AS 3600-2009. Sydney, N.S.W: Cement & Concrete Aggregates Australia : Standards Australia; (2011).

Google Scholar

[45] Thomas RJ, Peethamparan S, Alkali-activated concrete: Engineering properties and stress–strain behavior. Constr Build Mater. 93 (2015) 49–56.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.04.039

Google Scholar

[46] Khan MZN, Hao Y, Hao H, Shaikh FUA, Mechanical properties of ambient cured high strength hybrid steel and synthetic fibers reinforced geopolymer composites. Cem Concr Compos. 85 (2018) 133–152.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2017.10.011

Google Scholar

[47] Pan Z, Sanjayan JG, Rangan BV, Fracture properties of geopolymer paste and concrete. Mag Concr Res. 63 (2011) 763–771.

DOI: 10.1680/macr.2011.63.10.763

Google Scholar

[48] Collins F, Sanjayan JG, Cracking tendency of alkali-activated slag concrete subjected to restrained shrinkage. Cem Concr Res. 30 (2000) 791–798.

DOI: 10.1016/s0008-8846(00)00243-x

Google Scholar

[49] Duran Atiş C, Bilim C, Çelik Ö, Karahan O, Influence of activator on the strength and drying shrinkage of alkali-activated slag mortar. Constr Build Mater. 23 (2009) 548–555.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2007.10.011

Google Scholar

[50] Ye H, Radlińska A, Shrinkage mechanisms of alkali-activated slag. Cem Concr Res, 88 (2016) 126–135.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2016.07.001

Google Scholar

[51] W.L. David, A.A. Andi, Durability assessment of alkali activated slag (AAS) concrete, Mater. Struct. 45 (2012) 1425–1437.

DOI: 10.1617/s11527-012-9842-1

Google Scholar

[52] Joseph, B, Mathew, G, Influence of Aggregate content on the Behaviour of Fly ash based Geopolymer Concrete, Scientia Iranica, 19 (5) (2012) 1188-1194.

DOI: 10.1016/j.scient.2012.07.006

Google Scholar

[53] Suresh Kumar A, Muthukannan M and Sri Krishna I, Optimization of Bio-Medical Waste Ash in GGBS based Geopolymer Concrete, IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng. (2020) 872.

DOI: 10.1088/1757-899x/872/1/012163

Google Scholar

[54] Chithambar Ganesh A and Muthukannan M, Experimental Study on the Behavior of Hybrid Fibre Reinforced Geopolymer Concrete under Ambient Curing Condition, IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng. (2019) 561.

DOI: 10.1088/1757-899x/561/1/012014

Google Scholar

[55] Chithambar Ganesh A and Muthukannan M, Investigation on the glass fiber reinforced Geopolymer concrete made of M-sand, IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng. (2019) 561.

DOI: 10.1088/1757-899x/561/1/012014

Google Scholar

[56] Arunkumar K, Muthukannan M, Dinesh Babu A, Hariharan A L and Muthuramalingam T, Effect on addition of Polypropylene fibers in wood ash-fly ash based geopolymer concrete, IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng. (2020), 872.

DOI: 10.1088/1757-899x/872/1/012162

Google Scholar

[57] Chithambar Ganesh A and Muthukannan M, Structural Performance of hybrid fiber Geopolymer concrete beams, IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng. (2020), 872.

DOI: 10.1088/1757-899x/872/1/012155

Google Scholar

[58] A. C. Ganesh, M. Muthukannan, A review of Recent Developments in Geopolymer Concrete, International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7 (4.5) (2018), 696-699.

DOI: 10.14419/ijet.v7i4.5.25061

Google Scholar

[59] A. C. Ganesh, M. Muthukannan, S. Aakassh, Prasad, B. Subramanaian, Energy Efficient Production of Geopolymer Bricks using Industrial waste, IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 872 (2020), 012154.

DOI: 10.1088/1757-899x/872/1/012154

Google Scholar

[60] A. C. Ganesh, M. Muthukannan, Development of High Performance Sustainable Optimized Fiber Concrete and Prediction of Compressive Strength, Journal of Cleaner Production, 124543, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124543.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124543

Google Scholar

Scientific.Net is a registered brand of Trans Tech Publications Ltd
© 2024 by Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved