Skip to main content

2024 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

ML-Enabled Systems Model Deployment and Monitoring: Status Quo and Problems

verfasst von : Eduardo Zimelewicz, Marcos Kalinowski, Daniel Mendez, Görkem Giray, Antonio Pedro Santos Alves, Niklas Lavesson, Kelly Azevedo, Hugo Villamizar, Tatiana Escovedo, Helio Lopes, Stefan Biffl, Juergen Musil, Michael Felderer, Stefan Wagner, Teresa Baldassarre, Tony Gorschek

Erschienen in: Software Quality as a Foundation for Security

Verlag: Springer Nature Switzerland

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

[Context] Systems that incorporate Machine Learning (ML) models, often referred to as ML-enabled systems, have become commonplace. However, empirical evidence on how ML-enabled systems are engineered in practice is still limited; this is especially true for activities surrounding ML model dissemination. [Goal] We investigate contemporary industrial practices and problems related to ML model dissemination, focusing on the model deployment and the monitoring ML life cycle phases. [Method] We conducted an international survey to gather practitioner insights on how ML-enabled systems are engineered. We gathered a total of 188 complete responses from 25 countries. We analyze the status quo and problems reported for the model deployment and monitoring phases. We analyzed contemporary practices using bootstrapping with confidence intervals and conducted qualitative analyses on the reported problems applying open and axial coding procedures. [Results] Practitioners perceive the model deployment and monitoring phases as relevant and difficult. With respect to model deployment, models are typically deployed as separate services, with limited adoption of MLOps principles. Reported problems include difficulties in designing the architecture of the infrastructure for production deployment and legacy application integration. Concerning model monitoring, many models in production are not monitored. The main monitored aspects are inputs, outputs, and decisions. Reported problems involve the absence of monitoring practices, the need to create custom monitoring tools, and the selection of suitable metrics. [Conclusion] Our results help provide a better understanding of the adopted practices and problems in practice and support guiding ML deployment and monitoring research in a problem-driven manner.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Nahar, N., Zhang, H., Lewis, G., Zhou, S., Kastner, C.: A meta-summary of challenges in building products with ml components - collecting experiences from 4758+ practitioners. In: 2023 IEEE/ACM 2nd International Conference on AI Engineering - Software Engineering for AI (CAIN), pp. 171–183. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, CA, USA, May 2023 Nahar, N., Zhang, H., Lewis, G., Zhou, S., Kastner, C.: A meta-summary of challenges in building products with ml components - collecting experiences from 4758+ practitioners. In: 2023 IEEE/ACM 2nd International Conference on AI Engineering - Software Engineering for AI (CAIN), pp. 171–183. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, CA, USA, May 2023
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Startech Up: Machine learning history: the complete timeline, September 2022 Startech Up: Machine learning history: the complete timeline, September 2022
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Paleyes, A., Urma, R.G., Lawrence, N.D.: Challenges in deploying machine learning: a survey of case studies. ACM Comput. Surv. 55(6) (2022) Paleyes, A., Urma, R.G., Lawrence, N.D.: Challenges in deploying machine learning: a survey of case studies. ACM Comput. Surv. 55(6) (2022)
4.
Zurück zum Zitat John, M.M., Olsson, H.H., Bosch, J.: Towards MLOps: a framework and maturity model. In: 2021 47th Euromicro Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications (SEAA), pp. 1–8 (2021) John, M.M., Olsson, H.H., Bosch, J.: Towards MLOps: a framework and maturity model. In: 2021 47th Euromicro Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications (SEAA), pp. 1–8 (2021)
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Lewis, G.A., Ozkaya, I., Xu, X.: Software architecture challenges for ml systems. In: 2021 IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance and Evolution (ICSME), pp. 634–638 (2021) Lewis, G.A., Ozkaya, I., Xu, X.: Software architecture challenges for ml systems. In: 2021 IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance and Evolution (ICSME), pp. 634–638 (2021)
6.
Zurück zum Zitat John, M.M., Olsson, H.H., Bosch, J.: AI deployment architecture: multi-case study for key factor identification. In: 2020 27th Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference (APSEC), pp. 395–404 (2020) John, M.M., Olsson, H.H., Bosch, J.: AI deployment architecture: multi-case study for key factor identification. In: 2020 27th Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference (APSEC), pp. 395–404 (2020)
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Zaharia, M., et al.: Apache spark: a unified engine for big data processing. Commun. ACM 59(11), 56–65 (2016) Zaharia, M., et al.: Apache spark: a unified engine for big data processing. Commun. ACM 59(11), 56–65 (2016)
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Syafrudin, M., Alfian, G., Fitriyani, N.L., Rhee, J.: Performance analysis of IoT-based sensor, big data processing, and machine learning model for real-time monitoring system in automotive manufacturing. Sensors 18(9) (2018) Syafrudin, M., Alfian, G., Fitriyani, N.L., Rhee, J.: Performance analysis of IoT-based sensor, big data processing, and machine learning model for real-time monitoring system in automotive manufacturing. Sensors 18(9) (2018)
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Chahal, D., Ojha, R., Ramesh, M., Singhal, R.: Migrating large deep learning models to serverless architecture, pp. 111–116 (2020). Cited by: 14 Chahal, D., Ojha, R., Ramesh, M., Singhal, R.: Migrating large deep learning models to serverless architecture, pp. 111–116 (2020). Cited by: 14
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Nowrin, I., Khanam, F.: Importance of cloud deployment model and security issues of software as a service (SaaS) for cloud computing. In: 2019 International Conference on Applied Machine Learning (ICAML), pp. 183–186 (2019) Nowrin, I., Khanam, F.: Importance of cloud deployment model and security issues of software as a service (SaaS) for cloud computing. In: 2019 International Conference on Applied Machine Learning (ICAML), pp. 183–186 (2019)
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Mrozek, D., Koczur, A., Małysiak-Mrozek, B.: Fall detection in older adults with mobile IoT devices and machine learning in the cloud and on the edge. Inf. Sci. 537, 132–147 (2020). Cited by: 72. All Open Access, Hybrid Gold Open Access (2020) Mrozek, D., Koczur, A., Małysiak-Mrozek, B.: Fall detection in older adults with mobile IoT devices and machine learning in the cloud and on the edge. Inf. Sci. 537, 132–147 (2020). Cited by: 72. All Open Access, Hybrid Gold Open Access (2020)
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Abdelaziz, A., Elhoseny, M., Salama, A.S., Riad, A.: A machine learning model for improving healthcare services on cloud computing environment. Measurement 119, 117–128 (2018)CrossRef Abdelaziz, A., Elhoseny, M., Salama, A.S., Riad, A.: A machine learning model for improving healthcare services on cloud computing environment. Measurement 119, 117–128 (2018)CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Garg, S., Pundir, P., Rathee, G., Gupta, P., Garg, S., Ahlawat, S.: On continuous integration/continuous delivery for automated deployment of machine learning models using MLOps. In: 2021 IEEE Fourth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Knowledge Engineering (AIKE), pp. 25–28 (2021) Garg, S., Pundir, P., Rathee, G., Gupta, P., Garg, S., Ahlawat, S.: On continuous integration/continuous delivery for automated deployment of machine learning models using MLOps. In: 2021 IEEE Fourth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Knowledge Engineering (AIKE), pp. 25–28 (2021)
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Al-Doghman, F., Moustafa, N., Khalil, I., Sohrabi, N., Tari, Z., Zomaya, A.Y.: AI-enabled secure microservices in edge computing: opportunities and challenges. IEEE Trans. Serv. Comput. 16(2), 1485–1504 (2023)CrossRef Al-Doghman, F., Moustafa, N., Khalil, I., Sohrabi, N., Tari, Z., Zomaya, A.Y.: AI-enabled secure microservices in edge computing: opportunities and challenges. IEEE Trans. Serv. Comput. 16(2), 1485–1504 (2023)CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Paraskevoulakou, E., Kyriazis, D.: ML-FaaS: towards exploiting the serverless paradigm to facilitate machine learning functions as a service. IEEE Trans. Netw. Serv. Manag. 20, 2110–2123 (2023) Paraskevoulakou, E., Kyriazis, D.: ML-FaaS: towards exploiting the serverless paradigm to facilitate machine learning functions as a service. IEEE Trans. Netw. Serv. Manag. 20, 2110–2123 (2023)
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Kourouklidis, P., Kolovos, D., Noppen, J., Matragkas, N.: A model-driven engineering approach for monitoring machine learning models. In: 2021 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems Companion (MODELS-C), pp. 160–164 (2021) Kourouklidis, P., Kolovos, D., Noppen, J., Matragkas, N.: A model-driven engineering approach for monitoring machine learning models. In: 2021 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems Companion (MODELS-C), pp. 160–164 (2021)
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Schröder, T., Schulz, M.: Monitoring machine learning models: a categorization of challenges and methods. Data Sci. Manag. 5(3), 105–116 (2022)CrossRef Schröder, T., Schulz, M.: Monitoring machine learning models: a categorization of challenges and methods. Data Sci. Manag. 5(3), 105–116 (2022)CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Lunneborg, C.E.: Bootstrap inference for local populations. Ther. Innov. Regul. Sci. 35(4), 1327–1342 (2001) Lunneborg, C.E.: Bootstrap inference for local populations. Ther. Innov. Regul. Sci. 35(4), 1327–1342 (2001)
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Wagner, S., et al.: Status quo in requirements engineering: a theory and a global family of surveys. ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. 28(2) (2019) Wagner, S., et al.: Status quo in requirements engineering: a theory and a global family of surveys. ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. 28(2) (2019)
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Efron, B., Tibshirani, R.J.: An Introduction to the Bootstrap. Chapman & Hall/CRC (1993) Efron, B., Tibshirani, R.J.: An Introduction to the Bootstrap. Chapman & Hall/CRC (1993)
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Lei, S., Smith, M.: Evaluation of several nonparametric bootstrap methods to estimate confidence intervals for software metrics. IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 29(11), 996–1004 (2003)CrossRef Lei, S., Smith, M.: Evaluation of several nonparametric bootstrap methods to estimate confidence intervals for software metrics. IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 29(11), 996–1004 (2003)CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Stol, K.J., Ralph, P., Fitzgerald, B.: Grounded theory in software engineering research: a critical review and guidelines. In: Proceedings of the 38th International Conference on Software Engineering, pp. 120–131 (2016) Stol, K.J., Ralph, P., Fitzgerald, B.: Grounded theory in software engineering research: a critical review and guidelines. In: Proceedings of the 38th International Conference on Software Engineering, pp. 120–131 (2016)
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Kalinowski, M., Escovedo, T., Villamizar, H., Lopes, H.: Engenharia de Software para Ciência de Dados: Um guia de boas práticas com ênfase na construção de sistemas de Machine Learning em Python. Casa do Código (2023) Kalinowski, M., Escovedo, T., Villamizar, H., Lopes, H.: Engenharia de Software para Ciência de Dados: Um guia de boas práticas com ênfase na construção de sistemas de Machine Learning em Python. Casa do Código (2023)
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Amershi, S., et al.: Software engineering for machine learning: a case study. In: 2019 IEEE/ACM 41st International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering in Practice, pp. 291–300. IEEE (2019) Amershi, S., et al.: Software engineering for machine learning: a case study. In: 2019 IEEE/ACM 41st International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering in Practice, pp. 291–300. IEEE (2019)
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Schröer, C., Kruse, F., Gómez, J.M.: A systematic literature review on applying CRISP-DM process model. Procedia Comput. Sci. 181, 526–534 (2021)CrossRef Schröer, C., Kruse, F., Gómez, J.M.: A systematic literature review on applying CRISP-DM process model. Procedia Comput. Sci. 181, 526–534 (2021)CrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat GitLab: Get started with GitLab CI/CD, October 2023 GitLab: Get started with GitLab CI/CD, October 2023
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Azure DevOps: What is Azure DevOps? October 2022 Azure DevOps: What is Azure DevOps? October 2022
30.
Zurück zum Zitat BentoML: What is bentoml? October 2023 BentoML: What is bentoml? October 2023
31.
32.
Zurück zum Zitat AWS: Amazon SageMaker for MLOPs, October 2023 AWS: Amazon SageMaker for MLOPs, October 2023
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Kalinowski, M., Mendes, E., Travassos, G.H.: Automating and evaluating probabilistic cause-effect diagrams to improve defect causal analysis. In: Caivano, D., Oivo, M., Baldassarre, M.T., Visaggio, G. (eds.) PROFES 2011. LNCS, vol. 6759, pp. 232–246. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21843-9_19CrossRef Kalinowski, M., Mendes, E., Travassos, G.H.: Automating and evaluating probabilistic cause-effect diagrams to improve defect causal analysis. In: Caivano, D., Oivo, M., Baldassarre, M.T., Visaggio, G. (eds.) PROFES 2011. LNCS, vol. 6759, pp. 232–246. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​978-3-642-21843-9_​19CrossRef
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Mäkinen, S., Skogström, H., Laaksonen, E., Mikkonen, T.: Who needs MLOps: what data scientists seek to accomplish and how can MLOps help? In: 2021 IEEE/ACM 1st Workshop on AI Engineering - Software Engineering for AI (WAIN), pp. 109–112 (2021) Mäkinen, S., Skogström, H., Laaksonen, E., Mikkonen, T.: Who needs MLOps: what data scientists seek to accomplish and how can MLOps help? In: 2021 IEEE/ACM 1st Workshop on AI Engineering - Software Engineering for AI (WAIN), pp. 109–112 (2021)
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Ruf, P., Madan, M., Reich, C., Ould-Abdeslam, D.: Demystifying MLOps and presenting a recipe for the selection of open-source tools. Appl. Sci. 11(19) (2021) Ruf, P., Madan, M., Reich, C., Ould-Abdeslam, D.: Demystifying MLOps and presenting a recipe for the selection of open-source tools. Appl. Sci. 11(19) (2021)
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhou, Y., Yu, Y., Ding, B.: Towards MLOps: a case study of ML pipeline platform. In: 2020 International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Computer Engineering (ICAICE), pp. 494–500 (2020) Zhou, Y., Yu, Y., Ding, B.: Towards MLOps: a case study of ML pipeline platform. In: 2020 International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Computer Engineering (ICAICE), pp. 494–500 (2020)
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Algorithmia: 2020 state of enterprise machine learning. Technical report (2019) Algorithmia: 2020 state of enterprise machine learning. Technical report (2019)
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Siegel, E.: Models are rarely deployed: an industry-wide failure in machine learning leadership, January 2022 Siegel, E.: Models are rarely deployed: an industry-wide failure in machine learning leadership, January 2022
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Weiner, J.: Why AI/Data Science Projects Fail: How to Avoid Project Pitfalls. Claypool Publishers, Morgan (2021)CrossRef Weiner, J.: Why AI/Data Science Projects Fail: How to Avoid Project Pitfalls. Claypool Publishers, Morgan (2021)CrossRef
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Heymann, H., Kies, A.D., Frye, M., Schmitt, R.H., Boza, A.: Guideline for deployment of machine learning models for predictive quality in production. Procedia CIRP 107, 815–820 (2022). Leading Manufacturing Systems Transformation - Proceedings of the 55th CIRP Conference on Manufacturing Systems (2022) Heymann, H., Kies, A.D., Frye, M., Schmitt, R.H., Boza, A.: Guideline for deployment of machine learning models for predictive quality in production. Procedia CIRP 107, 815–820 (2022). Leading Manufacturing Systems Transformation - Proceedings of the 55th CIRP Conference on Manufacturing Systems (2022)
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Linaker, J., Sulaman, S.M., Höst, M., de Mello, R.M.: Guidelines for conducting surveys in software engineering v. 1.1. Lund University 50 (2015) Linaker, J., Sulaman, S.M., Höst, M., de Mello, R.M.: Guidelines for conducting surveys in software engineering v. 1.1. Lund University 50 (2015)
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Fernández, D.M., et al.: Naming the pain in requirements engineering: contemporary problems, causes, and effects in practice. Empir. Softw. Eng. 22, 2298–2338 (2017)CrossRef Fernández, D.M., et al.: Naming the pain in requirements engineering: contemporary problems, causes, and effects in practice. Empir. Softw. Eng. 22, 2298–2338 (2017)CrossRef
44.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim, M., Zimmermann, T., DeLine, R., Begel, A.: Data scientists in software teams: state of the art and challenges. IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 44(11), 1024–1038 (2017)CrossRef Kim, M., Zimmermann, T., DeLine, R., Begel, A.: Data scientists in software teams: state of the art and challenges. IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 44(11), 1024–1038 (2017)CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
ML-Enabled Systems Model Deployment and Monitoring: Status Quo and Problems
verfasst von
Eduardo Zimelewicz
Marcos Kalinowski
Daniel Mendez
Görkem Giray
Antonio Pedro Santos Alves
Niklas Lavesson
Kelly Azevedo
Hugo Villamizar
Tatiana Escovedo
Helio Lopes
Stefan Biffl
Juergen Musil
Michael Felderer
Stefan Wagner
Teresa Baldassarre
Tony Gorschek
Copyright-Jahr
2024
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-56281-5_7

Premium Partner