nach oben

Erschienen in:

2024 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Planning Sustainable and Resilient Cities: The Role of Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA)

verfasst von : Giulio Mondini, Vanessa Assumma, Marta Bottero, Caterina Caprioli, Giulia Datola, Federico Dell’Anna

Erschienen in: Science of Valuations

Verlag: Springer Nature Switzerland

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Before being implemented, urban plans must pass an impact assessment to verify the effective support of the program for the sustainable development of a territory from an environmental point of view. In this domain, the contribution of Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) in supporting sustainable and resilient planning processes is crucial. However, in urban and neighborhood contexts, where different forces and entities influence the decision-making process, it is essential to add social, economic and environmental aspects to the sustainability assessment. This chapter explores the role of several evaluation tools that can consider different and innovative assessment dimensions and issues related to the urban planning field. This analysis concerns the case of the revision of the Municipal Plan of the City of Turin to contribute to testing protocols for the sustainability of the Plan, tools to analyze and evaluate urban resilience, and procedures to estimate Ecosystem Services (ES). According to the point of view of the governance of urban transformations, the final result of this preliminary research concerns the illustration of the role of assessment tools to measure urban sustainability to respect the environment, promote public health and well-being of citizens, and enhance economic productivity.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel Teaching Appraisal: Remarks for Optimization

Nächstes Kapitel How to Cash in on Hydroelectric Power Generation? From the Property Tax on Bolted Systems to the Upheaval of Compensation for Civic Uses

https://ec.europa.eu/environment/pubs/pdf/factsheets/biodiversity2020/2020%20Biodiversity%20FactsheetEN.pdf.

https://ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/biodiversity/strategy/index_en.htm.

https://ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/biodiversity/policy/index_en.htm.

Simulsoil tool has been developed in the context of the research project Life SAM4CP coordinated by Politecnico di Torino (prof. Barbieri). More information are available on the project web site: http://www.sam4cp.eu/simulsoil/.

Assennato F, De Toni A, Di Leginio M, et al (2015) Azione B1—I servizi ecosistemici del suolo. Review

Assumma V, Bottero M, Mondini G, Zanetta E (2020) An analytic network process (ANP)-based approach for investigating alternative planning scenarios of mining activities in piedmont region

Bottero M, Mondini G (2009) Valutazione e sostenibilità. Piani, programmi, progetti. CELID, Torino

Brandon PS, Lombardi P (2011) Evaluating sustainable development in the built environment. Struct Surv 29:14–16. https://doi.org/10.1108/ss.2011.11029bae.008CrossRef

Brunetta G, Ceravolo R, Barbieri CA et al (2019) Territorial resilience: toward a proactive meaning for spatial planning. Sustain 11:1–17. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11082286CrossRef

Cancila E, Bosso A, Sabbadini I (2015) Il pagamento dei servizi ecosistemici, casi di studio. Ecoscienza 1:18–19

Cantarello E, Newton AC, Martin PA et al (2017) Quantifying resilience of multiple ecosystem services and biodiversity in a temperate forest landscape. Ecol Evol 7:9661–9675. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3491CrossRef

Cappai F, Forgues D, Glaus M (2018) The Integration of socio-economic indicators in the CASBEE-UD evaluation system: a case study. Urban Sci 2:28. https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci2010028CrossRef

Caprioli C, Bottero M, Mondini G (2020) Urban ecosystem services: a review of definitions and classifications for the identification of future research perspectives. In: 20th International conference on computational science and applications (ICCSA 2020)—July 1–4. Cagliari. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58814-4_23

10.

Caprioli C, Bottero M, Zanetta E, Mondini G (2021) Ecosystem services in land-use planning: an application for assessing transformation scenarios at the local scale. In: Bevilacqua C, et al. E (eds) NMP 2020, SIST 178. Springer Nature Switzerland AG, pp 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48279-4_124

11.

Carbonell J, Sánchez-Esguevillas A, Carro B (2017) From data analysis to storytelling in scenario building. a semiotic approach to purpose-dependent writing of stories. Futures 88:15–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2017.03.002CrossRef

12.

Carpenter SR, Mooney HA, Agard J et al (2009) Science for managing ecosystem services: beyond the millennium ecosystem assessment. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106:1305–1312. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0808772106CrossRef

13.

Città di Settimo Torinese (2017) Variante di Revisione Generale, Proposta Tecnica del Progetto Preliminare, Relazione Tecnica

14.

Città di Torino Piano Di Adattamento Del Pilota, 0–100

15.

Costanza R, Mitsch WJ, Day JW (2006) A new vision for New Orleans and the Mississippi delta: applying ecological economics and ecological engineering. Front Ecol Environ 4(9):465–472.

16.

Daily GC, Polasky S, Goldstein J et al (2009) Ecosystem services in decision making: time to deliver. Front Ecol Environ 7:21–28. https://doi.org/10.1890/080025CrossRef

17.

Desouza KC, Flanery TH (2013) Designing, planning, and managing resilient cities: a conceptual framework. Cities.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2013.06.003

18.

Elmqvist T, Andersson E, Frantzeskaki N et al (2019) Sustainability and resilience for transformation in the urban century. Nat Sustain 2:267–273. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0250-1CrossRef

19.

European Commission (2021) Recovery Plan “Next Generation EU.” https://ec.europa.eu/info/strategy/recovery-plan-europe_it#nextgenerationeu

20.

European Environment Agency (2011) Green infrastructure and territorial cohesion

21.

Forrester JW (1987) Lessons from system dynamics modeling. Syst Dyn Rev 3:136–149. https://doi.org/10.1002/sdr.4260030205CrossRef

22.

Gencer EA (2017) A handbook for local government leaders

23.

Geneletti D (2011) Reasons and options for integrating ecosystem services in strategic environmental assessment of spatial planning. Int J Biodivers Sci Ecosyst Serv Manag 7:143–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/21513732.2011.617711CrossRef

24.

Godschalk DR (2003) Urban hazard mitigation: creating resilient cities. Nat Hazards Rev. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)1527-6988(2003)4:3(136)CrossRef

25.

Gómez-Baggethun E, Barton DN (2013) Classifying and valuing ecosystem services for urban planning. Ecol Econ 86:235–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.08.019CrossRef

26.

Gómez-Baggethun E, de Groot R, Lomas PL, Montes C (2010) The history of ecosystem services in economic theory and practice: from early notions to markets and payment schemes. Ecol Econ 69:1209–1218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.007CrossRef

27.

Gu C, Ye X, Cao Q et al (2020) System dynamics modelling of urbanization under energy constraints in China. Sci Rep 10:9956. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-66125-3CrossRef

28.

Guan D, Gao W, Su W et al (2011) Modeling and dynamic assessment of urban economy-resource-environment system with a coupled system dynamics—geographic information system model. Ecol Indic. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.02.007CrossRef

29.

Holden M (2013) Sustainability indicator systems within urban governance: usability analysis of sustainability indicator systems as boundary objects. Ecol Indic 32:89–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ECOLIND.2013.03.007CrossRef

30.

Hubacek K, Kronenberg J (2013) Synthesizing different perspectives on the value of urban ecosystem services. Landsc Urban Plan 1:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.10.010CrossRef

31.

Japan Sustainable Building Consortium (2010) Comprehensive assessment system for built environment efficiency (CASBEE). Japan Sustain Build Consort

32.

Japan Sustainable Building Consortium (2014) CASBEE for urban development technical manual

33.

Kaur H, Garg P (2019) Urban sustainability assessment tools: a review. J Clean Prod 210:146–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.009

34.

Luederitz C, Brink E, Gralla F et al (2015) A review of urban ecosystem services: six key challenges for future research. Ecosyst Serv 14:98–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.05.001CrossRef

35.

Maas J, Verheij RA, Groenewegen PP et al (2006) Green space, urbanity, and health: how strong is the relation? J Epidemiol Community Health. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2005.043125

36.

Maes J, Zulian G, Günther S, et al (2019) Enhancing resilience of urban ecosystems through green infrastructure. Final Report. Luxembourg

37.

Malczewski J (2006) GIS-based multicriteria decision analysis: a survey of the literature. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 20:703–726. https://doi.org/10.1080/13658810600661508CrossRef

38.

Masnavi MR, Gharai F, Hajibandeh M (2018) Exploring urban resilience thinking for its application in urban planning: a review of literature. Int J Environ Sci Technol 16:567–582CrossRef

39.

Meerow S, Newell JP, Stults M (2016) Defining urban resilience: a review. Landsc Urban Plan 147:38–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011CrossRef

40.

Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) Living beyond our means: natural assets and human well-being statement from the board

41.

Miyazaki G, Kawakubo S, Murakami S, Ikaga T (2019) How can CASBEE contribute as a sustainability assessment tool to achieve the SDGs? IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci 294:012007. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/294/1/012007CrossRef

42.

Mouchet MA, Lamarque P, Martín-López B et al (2014) An interdisciplinary methodological guide for quantifying associations between ecosystem services. Glob Environ Chang 28:298–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.07.012CrossRef

43.

Napoli G, Bottero M, Ciulla G et al (2020) Supporting public decision process in buildings energy retrofitting operations: the application of a multiple criteria decision aiding model to a case study in Southern Italy. Sustain Cities Soc 60:102214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102214CrossRef

44.

Nguyen BK, Altan H (2011) Comparative review of five sustainable rating systems. Procedia Eng 21:376–386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2011.11.2029CrossRef

45.

Odum E (2007) Fundamentos de Ecologia

46.

Orova M, Reith A (2019) Multiscalarity in international sustainable assessment systems: a qualitative comparison of LEED, CASBEE, BREEAM, DGNB and ESTIDAMA on building, neighbourhood and city scale. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci 290:012056. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/290/1/012056CrossRef

47.

Parlamento Italiano (2008) Decreto Legislativo 16 gennaio 2008, n. 4. Ulteriori disposizioni correttive ed integrative del decreto legislativo 3 aprile 2006, n. 152, recante norme in materia ambientale. Gazz. Uff. della Repubb. Ital

48.

Pascual U, Muradian R, Brander L et al (2012) The economics of valuing ecosystem services and biodiversity. In: The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity: ecological and economic foundations

49.

Redford KH, Adams WM (2009) Payment for ecosystem services and the challenge of saving nature: editorial. Conserv Biol 23:785–787. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01271.x

50.

Regione Piemonte (1977) Legge regionale 5 dicembre 1977, n. 56. Tutela ed uso del suolo

51.

Regione Piemonte (1998) Regional Law 14th December 1998, no. 40. Disposizioni concernenti la compatibilità ambientale e le procedure di valutazione

52.

Sharifi A, Yamagata Y (2014) Resilient urban planning: major principles and criteria. In: Energy procedia

53.

Sharifi A, Yamagata Y (2014) Major principles and criteria for development of an urban resilience assessment index. In: ICUE 2014

54.

Sharifi A, Yamagata Y (2018) Resilience-oriented urban planning. In: Lecture notes in energy, pp 3–27

55.

Sharifi A, Yamagata Y (2016) Principles and criteria for assessing urban energy resilience: a literature review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 60:1654–677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.03.028

56.

Sharp R, Chaplin-Kramer R, Wood S, et al (2018) InVEST user’s Guide

57.

Sistema Nazionale per la Protezione dell’Ambiente (2019) Rapporto Consumo di suolo, dinamiche territoriali e servizi ecosistemici

58.

Swanson J (2002) Business dynamics—systems thinking and modeling for a complex world. J Oper Res Soc 53:472–473. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601336CrossRef

59.

Tacconi L (2012) Redefining payments for environmental services. Ecol Econ 73:29–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.09.028CrossRef

60.

Tan Y, Jiao L, Shuai C, Shen L (2018) A system dynamics model for simulating urban sustainability performance: a China case study. J Clean Prod.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.154

61.

TEEB (The Economics of Ecosystems & Biodiversity) (2011) TEEB manual for cities: ecosystem services in urban management. Econ Ecosyst Biodivers

62.

TEEB (The Economics of Ecosystems & Biodiversity) (2010) Mainstreaming the economics of nature : a synsthesis of the approach, conclusions and recommendations of TEEB

63.

Tetlow MF, Hanusch M (2012) Strategic environmental assessment: the state of the art. Impact Assess Proj Apprais 30:15–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2012.666400CrossRef

64.

Turcu C (2013) Re-thinking sustainability indicators: local perspectives of urban sustainability 56:695–719. https://doi.org/10.1080/096405682012698984

65.

Tyler S, Moench M (2012) A framework for urban climate resilience. Clim Dev

66.

Tzoulas K, Korpela K, Venn S, et al (2007) Promoting ecosystem and human health in urban areas using Green Infrastructure: a literature review. Landsc Urban Plan 81: 167–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.02.001

67.

UNISDR (2012) How to make cities more resilient

68.

United Nations (2017) The sustainable development goals report. United Nations Publ. https://doi.org/10.18356/3405d09f-en

69.

United Nations (2016) New Urban Agenda Habitat III: Summary

70.

United Nations (2015) Transforming our world: the 2030 agenda for sustainable development united nations united nations transforming our world: the 2030 agenda for sustainable development. A/RES/70/1. United Nations

71.

Vaništa Lazarević E, Keković Z, Antonić B (2018) In search of the principles of resilient urban design: Implementability of the principles in the case of the cities in Serbia. Energy Build.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.11.005

72.

Wong SC, Abe N (2014) Stakeholders’ perspectives of a building environmental assessment method: The case of CASBEE. Build Environ 82:502–516. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BUILDENV.2014.09.007CrossRef

Titel: Planning Sustainable and Resilient Cities: The Role of Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA)
verfasst von: Giulio Mondini
Vanessa Assumma
Marta Bottero
Caterina Caprioli
Giulia Datola
Federico Dell’Anna
Verlag: Springer Nature Switzerland
Buch: Science of Valuations
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-53708-0

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-031-53709-7

Copyright-Jahr: 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-53709-7_14

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"