Skip to main content

2024 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Redressal of Disputes Using Online Dispute Resolution—The Way Forward

verfasst von : Ayyappan Palanissamy, Hesham Magd, Kesavamoorthy

Erschienen in: Digital Governance & Security

Verlag: Springer Nature Switzerland

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

In the last few decades, technological advancements and innovation in the digital age have greatly contributed to the concept of online dispute resolution (ODR) being a viable option, which has seen rapid growth in both developed and developing countries. The ODR mechanism is highly prevalent in several countries in the world, to the benefit of society and the litigant public in the twenty-first century. ODR can be well described as the use of technology (Information and Communications Technology) in the Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) process. ADR mechanisms were enhanced by taking advantage of the digital advancements, providing access to speedier justice. In a majority of countries around the world, especially as evidenced in India, the court systems face numerous challenges in justice administration due to an extraordinary number and nature of claims, seeking appropriate redressal. In the electronic commerce environment, especially business to consumer international transactions happening in the online medium, which can be classified as cross-border transactions have exacerbated challenges concerning jurisdiction, unconscionable dispute resolution clauses, etc. This article presents a view on the developments of electronic virtual courts across the world due to COVID-19 with special consideration of its effects in India, the possibilities of developments of ODR in line with the recent setup of e-courts (virtual courts) and an urgent need of an advanced automated dispute resolution process to deal with e-commerce disputes through the use of the internet and by way of technological advancements.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Colin Rule. (2017). Designing a global online dispute resolution system: Lessons learned from eBay, 13 U. ST. THOMAS L.J. 354. Colin Rule. (2017). Designing a global online dispute resolution system: Lessons learned from eBay, 13 U. ST. THOMAS L.J. 354.
Zurück zum Zitat Cortés, P. (2011). Online dispute resolution for consumers in the European Union Routledge. Cortés, P. (2011). Online dispute resolution for consumers in the European Union Routledge.
Zurück zum Zitat Haloush, H. A., & Malkawi, B. H. (2008). Internet characteristics and online alternative dispute resolution. Harvard Negotiation Law Review, 13, 327–348. Haloush, H. A., & Malkawi, B. H. (2008). Internet characteristics and online alternative dispute resolution. Harvard Negotiation Law Review, 13, 327–348.
Zurück zum Zitat Hörnle, J. (2009). Cross-border internet dispute resolution. Cambridge University Press Hörnle, J. (2009). Cross-border internet dispute resolution. Cambridge University Press
Zurück zum Zitat Katsh, E. M., & Rifkin, J. (2001). Online dispute resolution: Resolving conflicts in cyberspace 3 jossey-bass. A Wiley Company. Katsh, E. M., & Rifkin, J. (2001). Online dispute resolution: Resolving conflicts in cyberspace 3 jossey-bass. A Wiley Company.
Zurück zum Zitat Kaufmann-Kohler, G., & Schultz, T. (2004). Online dispute resolution: Challenges for contemporary justice Kluwer Law International. Kaufmann-Kohler, G., & Schultz, T. (2004). Online dispute resolution: Challenges for contemporary justice Kluwer Law International.
Zurück zum Zitat Kwan, J. et al. (2019). The use of artificial intelligence in international arbitration: where are we right now? International Arbitration Law Review, 22(1), 19–26. Kwan, J. et al. (2019). The use of artificial intelligence in international arbitration: where are we right now? International Arbitration Law Review, 22(1), 19–26.
Zurück zum Zitat Lexis Middle East Weekly Alert. (2020). Issue 277, June 14, 2020. Lexis Middle East Weekly Alert. (2020). Issue 277, June 14, 2020.
Zurück zum Zitat Lodder, A. R., & Zeleznikow, J. (2010). Enhanced dispute resolution through the use of information technology, vol. 55. Cambridge University Press. Lodder, A. R., & Zeleznikow, J. (2010). Enhanced dispute resolution through the use of information technology, vol. 55. Cambridge University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Palanissamy, A., & Kesavamoorthy, R. (2019a). Consumer dispute resolution in cyberspace: recent trends and developments. In international conference on advances in business management and law, vol 2. ICABML. Palanissamy, A., & Kesavamoorthy, R. (2019a). Consumer dispute resolution in cyberspace: recent trends and developments. In international conference on advances in business management and law, vol 2. ICABML.
Zurück zum Zitat Palanissamy, A., & Kesavamoorthy. (2019b). Automated dispute resolution system (ADRS)—A proposed initial framework for digital justice in online consumer transactions in India. Procedia Computer Science, 165, 224–231. Palanissamy, A., & Kesavamoorthy. (2019b). Automated dispute resolution system (ADRS)—A proposed initial framework for digital justice in online consumer transactions in India. Procedia Computer Science, 165, 224–231.
Zurück zum Zitat Regulation (EU). (2013). No 524/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 May 2013 on online dispute resolution for consumer disputes and amending Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 and Directive 2009/22/EC (Regulation on consumer ODR). Regulation (EU). (2013). No 524/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 May 2013 on online dispute resolution for consumer disputes and amending Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 and Directive 2009/22/EC (Regulation on consumer ODR).
Zurück zum Zitat Tan, V. (2019). Online dispute resolution for small civil claims in Victoria: A new paradigm in civil justice. Deakin Law Review, 24, 101–138. Tan, V. (2019). Online dispute resolution for small civil claims in Victoria: A new paradigm in civil justice. Deakin Law Review, 24, 101–138.
Metadaten
Titel
Redressal of Disputes Using Online Dispute Resolution—The Way Forward
verfasst von
Ayyappan Palanissamy
Hesham Magd
Kesavamoorthy
Copyright-Jahr
2024
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-49302-7_8