nach oben

Erschienen in:

2024 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Reliability Perspective of Software Models: An Overview

verfasst von : Ritu Gupta, Sudeep Kumar, Anu G. Aggarwal

Erschienen in: Reliability Engineering for Industrial Processes

Verlag: Springer Nature Switzerland

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

The production engineers and system designers have been interested in computer-based system reliability and performance measurements due to a wide range of applications emerging both in the military and industrial world. Software failures can happen even with the best quality of computer-based systems due to a variety of failure mechanisms, resulting in major consequences such as human life loss, significant economic losses etc. There are numerous models worked out for measuring the reliability value of software assuming a wide variety of failure dependencies and compatibility issues. This investigation deals with software reliability and modelling steps for developing software models. We present several important factors, failure implications, system reliability computation procedure, as well as strategies implemented at the software reliability engineering level and quote recent developments of software models. Without software fault tolerance, it is practically impossible to build a totally fault tolerant system. Software fault tolerance is the capacity of software to recover and detect from a fault that is occurring or has already occurred. We explore some fault tolerant techniques that use protective redundancy at the software level to ensure the system reliability. A thorough examination of reliability modelling will be beneficial for both researchers and practitioners studying reliability assessment of software systems.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel Exploring the Impact of Latent and Obscure Factors on Left-Censored Data: Bayesian Approaches and Case Study

Nächstes Kapitel Stress-Strength Modelling for a New Modified Lindley Distribution Under Progressively Censored Data

Ravishanker N, Liu Z, Ray BK (2008) NHPP models with Markov switching for software reliability. Comput Stat Data Anal 52(8):3988–3999MathSciNetCrossRef

Rani P, Mahapatra GS (2019) A novel approach of NPSO on dynamic weighted NHPP model for software reliability analysis with additional fault introduction parameter. Heliyon 5(7):e02082CrossRef

Shrivastava AK, Kumar V, Kapur PK, Singh O (2020) Software release and testing stop time decision with change point. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag 11:196–207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-020-00988-7CrossRef

Lin K, Chen Y (2021) Two new multi-phase reliability growth models from the perspective of time between failures and their applications. Chin J Aeronaut 34(5):341–349CrossRef

Saxena P, Singh N, Shrivastava AK, Kumar V (2021) Testing effort based SRGM and release decision under fuzzy environment. Int J Reliab Saf 15(3):123–140. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJRS.2021.123275CrossRef

Huang YS, Chiu KC, Chen WM (2022) A software reliability growth model for imperfect debugging. J Syst Softw 188:111267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2022.111267CrossRef

Bibyan R, Anand S, Aggarwal AG, Kaur G (2023) Multi-release software model based on testing coverage incorporating random effect (SDE). MethodsX 10:102076. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2023.102076CrossRef

Shatnawi O (2009) Discrete time NHPP models for software reliability growth phenomenon. Int Arab J Inf Technol 6(2):124–131MathSciNet

Aggarwal AG, Kapur PK, Nijhawan N (2018) A discrete SRGM for multi-release software system with faults of different severity. Int J Oper Res 32(2):156–168. Inderscience Publishers

10.

Kumaran AMJM, Ramasamy S (2020) A dynamically weighted discrete combination model for all releases of a software system. Microprocess Microsyst 79:103290CrossRef

11.

Goel AL, Okumoto K (1979) Time-dependent error-detection rate model for software reliability and other performance measures. IEEE Trans Reliab 28(3):206–211CrossRef

12.

Kapur PK, Garg RB (1990) Optimal software release policies for software reliability growth models under imperfect debugging. RAIRO-Oper Res 24(3):295–305CrossRef

13.

Yamada S, Tokuno K, Osaki S (1992) Imperfect debugging models with fault introduction rate for software reliability assessment. Int J Syst Sci 23(12):2241–2252

14.

Chang YP (2001) Estimation of parameters for nonhomogeneous poison process: software reliability with change-point model. Commun Stat Part B: Simul Comput 30(3):623–635CrossRef

15.

Yamada S, Ohtera H, Narihisa H (1986) Software reliability growth models with testing-effort. IEEE Trans Reliab 35(1):19–23CrossRef

16.

Chang YC, Liu CT (2009) A generalized JM model with applications to imperfect debugging in software reliability. Appl Math Model 33(9):3578–3588MathSciNetCrossRef

17.

Aktekin T, Caglar T (2013) Imperfect debugging in software reliability: a Bayesian approach. Eur J Oper Res 227(1):112–121MathSciNetCrossRef

18.

Li Q, Pham H (2017) NHPP software reliability model considering the uncertainty of operating environments with imperfect debugging and testing coverage. Appl Math Model 51:68–85MathSciNetCrossRef

19.

Kapur PK, Pham H, Anand S, Yadav K (2011) A unified approach for developing software reliability growth models in the presence of imperfect debugging and error generation. IEEE Trans Reliab 60(1):331–340CrossRef

20.

Roy P, Mahapatra GS, Dey KN (2014) An NHPP software reliability growth model with imperfect debugging and error generation. Int J Reliab Qual Saf Eng 21(02):1450008CrossRef

21.

Verma V, Anand S, Kapur PK, Aggarwal AG (2022) Unified framework to assess software reliability and determine optimal release time in presence of fault reduction factor, error generation and fault removal efficiency. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag. Springer India. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-022-01653-x

22.

Pham H, Zhang X (2003) NHPP software reliability and cost models with testing coverage. Eur J Oper Res 145(2):443–454CrossRef

23.

Kapur PK, Goswami DN, Bardhan A, Singh O (2008) Flexible software reliability growth model with testing effort dependent learning process. Appl Math Model 32(7):1298–1307CrossRef

24.

Jin C, Jin SW (2016) Parameter optimization of software reliability growth model with S-shaped testing-effort function using improved swarm intelligent optimization. Appl Soft Comput J 40:283–291CrossRef

25.

Arora R, Aggarwal A (2020) Testing effort based software reliability assessment incorporating FRF and change point. Yugosl J Oper Res 30(3):273–288CrossRef

26.

Huang CY, Hung TY (2010) Software reliability analysis and assessment using queueing models with multiple change-points. Comput Math Appl 60(7):2015–2030. Elsevier Ltd.

27.

Aggarwal AG, Dhaka V, Nijhawan N (2017) Reliability analysis for multi-release open-source software systems with change point and exponentiated Weibull fault reduction factor. Life Cycle Reliab Saf Eng 6(1):3–14. Springer Singapore

28.

Ke S, Huang C (2020) Software reliability prediction and management: a multiple change-point model approach. Qual Reliab Eng Int 36(5):1678–1707CrossRef

29.

Kumar V, Mathur P, Sahni R, Anand M (2016) Two-dimensional multi-release software reliability modeling for fault detection and fault correction processes. Int J Reliab Qual Saf Eng 23(03):1640002CrossRef

30.

Aggarwal AG, Gandhi N, Verma V, Tandon A (2019) Multi-release software reliability growth assessment: an approach incorporating fault reduction factor and imperfect debugging. Int J Math Oper Res 15(4):446–463MathSciNetCrossRef

31.

Kumar V, Sahni R (2020) Dynamic testing resource allocation modeling for multi-release software using optimal control theory and genetic algorithm. Int J Qual Reliab Manag 37(6/7):1049–1069. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQRM-09-2019-0296CrossRef

32.

Aggarwal AG, Kumar S, Gupta R (2023) Multi-release software reliability assessment: testing coverage-based approach. Int J Math Oper Res 24(4):583–594CrossRef

33.

Kapur PK, Garg RB (1991) Optimum release policy for an inflection s-shaped software reliability growth model. Microelectron Reliab 31(1):39–41CrossRef

34.

Jain M, Gupta R (2011) Optimal release policy of module-based software. Qual Technol Quant Manag 8(2):147–165CrossRef

35.

Aggarwal AG, Jaggi CK, Nijhawan N (2017) Optimal release policy for multi-release software system. Int J Oper Res Inf Syst 8(3):21–38CrossRef

36.

Liu P, Wang G, Su P (2021) Optimal replacement strategies for warranty products with multiple failure modes after warranty expiry. Comput Ind Eng 153(December 2020):107040. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2020.107040

37.

Randell B (1975) System structure for software fault tolerance. IEEE Trans Softw Eng SE-1(2):220–232. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSE.1975.6312842

38.

Elmendorf WR (1972) Fault-tolerant programming. In: Proceedings of the FTCS-2, Newton, MA, pp 79–83

39.

Berman O, Kumar UD (1999) Optimization models for recovery block schemes. Eur J Oper Res 115(2):368–379CrossRef

40.

Abulnaja OA (2005) Component-based recovery block technique. AIML 5(2):1–5

41.

Reghenzani F, Guo Z, Fornaciari W (2023) Software fault tolerance in real-time systems: identifying the future research questions. ACM Comput Surv, 1–29https://doi.org/10.1145/3589950

42.

Eckhardt DE, Lee LD (1988) Fundamental differences in the reliability of N-modular redundancy and N-version programming. J Syst Softw 8(4):313–318CrossRef

43.

Gupta R, Jain M (2020) Reliability of N-version programming software with testing effort. Int J Reliab Saf 14(4):229–251CrossRef

44.

Subasi N, Guner U, Ustoglu I (2021) N-version programming approach with implicit safety guarantee for complex dynamic system stabilization applications. Meas Control 54(3–4):269–278CrossRef

45.

Serban A, Visser J (2022). Adapting software architectures to machine learning challenges. In: IEEE international conference on software analysis, evolution and reengineering (SANER), Honolulu, HI, USA, pp 152–163. https://doi.org/10.1109/SANER53432.2022.00029

Titel: Reliability Perspective of Software Models: An Overview
verfasst von: Ritu Gupta
Sudeep Kumar
Anu G. Aggarwal
Verlag: Springer Nature Switzerland
Buch: Reliability Engineering for Industrial Processes
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-55047-8

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-031-55048-5

Copyright-Jahr: 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-55048-5_20

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Premium Partner