nach oben

International Journal of Geosynthetics and Ground Engineering

Erschienen in:

01.02.2024 | Original Paper

Removal of Chromium from Contaminated Soil by Electrokinetic Remediation Combined with Adsorption by Anion Exchange Resin and Polarity Reversal

verfasst von: Xi-yin Liu, Yan-feng Zhuang

Erschienen in: International Journal of Geosynthetics and Ground Engineering | Ausgabe 1/2024

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Soil chromium pollution is a serious environmental problem in the world. The electrokinetic remediation (EKR) is an effective method to remediate heavy metal-contaminated soil. This study aimed to investigate the removal mechanism and the effect of electrolyte alkalization when used the conventional electrokinetic remediation and adsorption to remove Cr(VI) from the contaminated soil. Moreover, we attempted to eliminate the effect of electrolyte alkalization by polarity reversal method. The laboratory experiments include three parts: jar tests of 717 resin adsorption capacity, conventional EKR experiments (EK1–EK5), and polarity reversal experiments (C1–C11). The 717 exchange resin provided better adsorption performance for Cr(VI) in low pH condition. The Cr(VI) in soil was removed by functions of electromigration, adsorption, and reduction. The Cr(VI) removal efficiency reached 72.35%. Part of Cr(VI) was reduced to less toxic Cr(III) by citric acid and free electrons in soil. The electrolyte alkalization in the cathode was an important factor that hindering the EKR. The polarity reversal controlled the electrolyte pH below 7 during EKR. Moreover, the Cr(VI) removal efficiency was 69.20% by reversing polarity every 4 h, and it consumed less energy as compared to the conventional EKR. There were no hazardous materials were added or produced in EKR process. The EKR combined with adsorption is sustainable and can be used in situ.

Vorheriger Artikel An Experimental Investigation into the Use of Three-Stepped Gabion Walls for Coastal Protection Works Using Acoustic Doppler Velocimeter

Nächster Artikel Discontinuities-Driven Slope Stability Assessment and Mineralogical Studies Along Mughal Road, Jammu and Kashmir, India

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Rhaman MM, Karim MR, Hyder MKMZ, Ahmed Y, Nath RK (2020) Removal of chromium (VI) from effluent by a magnetic bioadsorbent based on jute stick powder and its adsorption isotherm, kinetics and regeneration study. Water Air Soil Pollut 231(4):164. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-020-04544-8CrossRefADS

Kowalski Z (1994) Treatment of chromic tannery wastes. J Hazard Mater 37(1):137–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3894(94)85042-9MathSciNetCrossRef

Jensen PE, Ottosen LM, Allard B (2012) Electrodialytic versus acid extraction of heavy metals from soil washing residue. Electrochim Acta 86:115–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2012.07.002CrossRef

Dhal B, Thatoi HN, Das NN, Pandey BD (2013) Chemical and microbial remediation of hexavalent chromium from contaminated soil and mining/metallurgical solid waste: a review. J Hazard Mater 250:272–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.01.048CrossRefPubMed

Yan YJ et al (2018) Application of iron-loaded activated carbon electrodes for electrokinetic remediation of chromium-contaminated soil in a three-dimensional electrode system. Sci Rep 8:8753. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-24138-zCrossRefADS

Ellis AS, Johnson TM, Bullen TD (2002) Chromium isotopes and the fate of hexavalent chromium in the environment. Science 295(5562):2060–2062. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1068368CrossRefPubMedADS

Chen WP et al (2018) Challenges and countermeasures of heavy metal pollution control in farmland soils in China. Acta PedologSin 55(2):261–272. https://doi.org/10.11766/trxb201711240485CrossRef

Zhou M, Xu J, Zhu S, Wang Y, Gao H (2018) Exchange electrode-electrokinetic remediation of Cr-contaminated soil using solar energy. Sep Purif Technol 190:297–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2017.09.006CrossRef

Garbisu C, Alkorta I, Llama MJ, Serra JL (1998) Aerobic chromate reduction by Bacillus subtilis. Biodegradation 9(2):133–141. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008358816529CrossRefPubMed

10.

Chen N, Xie T, Zhou X, Tan H (2015) Effect of in-situ chemical leaching technology on the treatment of heavy metal compound contaminated paddy soil in Hunan Province. J Anhui Agric Sci 43:247–249. https://doi.org/10.13989/j.cnki.0517-6611.2015.28.091CrossRef

11.

Yeung AT (2006) Fundamental aspects of prolonged electrokinetic flows in kaolinites. Geomech Geoeng Int J 1:13–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/17486020500528026CrossRef

12.

Yeung AT (2009) Electrochemical remediation technologies for polluted soils. In: Sediments and groundwater. Wiley, Hoboken, pp 65–94. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470523650

13.

Yeung AT, Gu YY (2011) A review on techniques to enhance electrochemical remediation of contaminated soil. J Hazard Mater 195:11–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.08.047CrossRefPubMed

14.

Li D et al (2012) Near-anode focusing phenomenon caused by the high anolyte concentration in the electrokinetic remediation of chromium (VI)-contaminated soil. J Hazardous Mater 229:282–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.05.107CrossRefADS

15.

Sawada A, Mori KI, Tanaka S, Fukushima M, Tatsumi K (2004) Removal of Cr (VI) from contaminated soil by electrokinetic remediation. Waste Manag 24:483–490. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0956-053X(03)00133-8CrossRefPubMed

16.

Liu ZT, Zhuang YF (2020) Electrokinetic transport and removal of lead contaminants from kaolin. Chin J Geotech Eng 42(7):1359–1366. https://doi.org/10.11779/CJGE202007020CrossRef

17.

Chen YX, Zhi D, Zhou YY et al (2021) Electrokinetic techniques, their enhancement techniques and composite techniques with other processes for persistent organic pollutants remediation in soil: a review. J Ind Eng Chem 97:163–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2021.03.009CrossRef

18.

Al-Hamdan AZ, Reddy KR (2008) Transport and speciation of heavy metals in soils during electrokinetic remediation: Influence of soil type and electric potential. Geotech Spec Publ 177:447–454. https://doi.org/10.1061/40970(309)56CrossRef

19.

Reddy KR, Parupudi US, Devulapalli SN (1997) Electrokinetic remediation of soils contaminated with electroplating wastes. Proc Am Power Conf 1:342–346

20.

Reddy KR, Parupudi US, Devulapalli SN, Xu CY (1997) Effects of soil composition on the removal of chromium by electrokinetics. J Hazard Mater 55(1–3):135–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3894(97)00020-4CrossRef

21.

Wu J, Zhang J, Xiao C (2016) Focus on factors affecting pH, flow of Cr and transformation between Cr(VI) and Cr(III) in the soil with different electrolytes. Electrochim Acta 211:652–662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2016.06.048CrossRef

22.

Puppala SK, Alshawabkeh AN, Acar YB, Gale RJ, Bricka M (1997) Enhanced electrokinetic remediation of high sorption capacity soil. J Hazard Mater 55(1–3):203–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3894(97)00011-3CrossRef

23.

Rodsand T, Acar YB, Breedveld G (1995) Electrokinetic extraction of lead from spiked Norwegian marine clay. Geotech Spec Publ 195(46):1518–1534

24.

Reed BE, Berg MT, Thompson JC, Hatfield JH (1995) Chemical conditioning of electrode reservoirs during electrokinetic soil flushing of Pb-contaminated silt loam. J Environ Eng 121:805–815. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(1995)121:11(805)CrossRef

25.

Reddy KR, Chinthamreddy S (2004) Enhanced electrokinetic remediation of heavy metals in glacial till soils using different electrolyte solutions. J Environ Eng 130(4):442–455. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2004)130:4(442)CrossRef

26.

Reddy KR, Chinthamreddy S (2003) Sequentially enhanced electrokinetic remediation of heavy metals in low buffering clayey soils. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 129(3):263–277. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2003)129:3(263)CrossRef

27.

Reddy KR, Danda S, Saichek RE (2004) Complicating factors of using ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid to enhance electrokinetic remediation of multiple heavy metals in clayey soils. J Environ Eng 130(11):1357–1366CrossRef

28.

Lee HH, Yang JW (2000) A new method to control electrolytes pH by circulation system in electrokinetic soil remediation. J Hazard Mater 77:227–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3894(00)00251-XCrossRefPubMed

29.

Lopez-Vizcaino R, Yustres A, Saez C et al (2017) Effect of polarity reversal on the enhanced electrokinetic remediation of 2,4-D-polluted soils: A numerical study. Electrochim Acta 258:414–422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2017.11.077CrossRef

30.

Fu RB, Wen DD, Xia XQ (2017) Electrokinetic remediation of chromium (Cr)-contaminated soil with citric acid (CA) and polyaspartic acid (PASP) as electrolytes. Chem Eng J 316:601–608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2017.01.092CrossRef

31.

Sillanpaa M, Oikari A (1996) Assessing the impact of complexation by EDTA and DTPA on heavy metal toxicity using microtox bioassay. Chemosphere 32:1485–1497. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-6535(96)00057-4CrossRefADS

32.

Dirilgen N (1998) Effects of pH and chelator EDTA on Cr toxicity and accumulation in Lemma minor. Chemosphere 37:771–783. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-6535(98)00080-0CrossRefADS

33.

Nortemann B (1999) Biodegradation of EDTA. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 51:751–759. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002530051458CrossRefPubMed

34.

Lestan D, Luo CL, Li XD (2008) The use of chelating agents in the remediation of metal-contaminated soils: a review. Environ Pollut 153:3–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2007.11.015CrossRefPubMed

35.

Gidudu B, Chirwa EMN (2020) The combined application of a high voltage, low electrode spacing, and biosurfactants enhances the bio-electrokinetic remediation of petroleum contaminated soil. J Clean Prod 276:122745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122745CrossRef

36.

Weng CH, Lin YT, Lin TY, Kao CM (2007) Enhancement of electrokinetic remediation of hyper-Cr(VI) contaminated clay by zero-valent iron. J Hazard Mater 149:292–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.03.076CrossRefPubMed

37.

Wang LS, Huang LH (2019) Application of a multi-electrode system with polyaniline auxiliary electrodes for electrokinetic remediation of chromium-contaminated soil. Sep Purif Technol 224:106–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2019.05.019CrossRef

38.

He JY, He CQ (2018) Comparative study of remediation of Cr(VI)-contaminated soil using electrokinetics combined with bioremediation. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:17682–17689. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-1741-8CrossRef

39.

Wang YX et al (2019) Application of Polypyrrole flexible electrode for electrokinetic remediation. Chem Eng J 373:131–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2019.05.016CrossRef

40.

Reddy KR, Chinthamreddy S (1999) Electrokinetic remediation of heavy metal-contaminated soils under reducing environments. Waste Manage 19(4):269–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0956-053X(99)00085-9CrossRef

41.

Song W, Gao B, Xu X, Wang F, Xue N, Sun S et al (2016) Adsorption of nitrate from aqueous solution by magnetic amine-crosslinked biopolymer based corn stalk and its chemical regeneration property. J Hazard Mater 304:280–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.10.073CrossRefPubMed

42.

Boulakradeche MO, Akretche DE, Cameselle C, Hamidi N (2015) Enhanced electrokinetic remediation of hydrophobic organics contaminated soils by the combination of non-ionic and ionic surfactants. Electrochim Acta 174:1057–1066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2015.06.091CrossRef

43.

Zhu S, Han D, Zhou M, Liu Y (2016) Ammonia enhanced electrokinetics coupled with bamboo charcoal adsorption for remediation of fluorine-contaminated kaolin clay. Electrochim Acta 198:241–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2016.03.033CrossRef

44.

Claudio C (2015) Enhancement of electro-osmotic flow during the electro-kinetic treatment of a contaminated soil. Electrochim Acta 181:31–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2015.02.191CrossRef

45.

Yan YJ, Ling Z, Shu W, Huang T, Crane R (2023) Chromium removal from contaminated soil using a novel FeOx/granular activated carbon-based three-dimensional electrokinetic system. Chem Eng J 455:140613. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2022.140613CrossRef

46.

Cervantes C, Campos-Garcia J, Devars S, Gutierrez-Corona F, Loza-Tavera H, Torres-Guzman JC, Moreno-Sanchez R (2001) Interactions of chromium with microorganisms and plants. FEMS Microbiol Rev 25:335–347. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-6445(01)00057-2CrossRefPubMed

47.

Chinthamreddy S, Reddy KR (1999) Oxidation and mobility of trivalent chromium in manganese-enriched clays during electrokinetic remediation. Soil Sediment Contamin 8(2):197–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/10588339991339306CrossRef

48.

Na C, Lan Y, Bo W, Mao J (2013) Reduction of Cr (VI) by organic acids in the presence of Al (III). J Hazardous Mater 260:150–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.05.010CrossRef

49.

Xu Z, Bai S, Liang J, Zhou L, Lan Y (2013) Photocatalytic reduction of Cr(VI) by citric and oxalic acids over biogenetic jarosite. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl 33:2192–2196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2013.01.040CrossRefPubMed

50.

Ying L, Cheng C, Jing Z, Lan Y (2015) Catalytic role of Cu(II) in the reduction of Cr(VI) by citric acid under an irradiation of simulated solar light. Chemosphere 127:87–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.01.014CrossRefADS

51.

Fang Y, Yang K, Zhang Y, Peng C, Robledo-Cabrera A (2021) Highly surface activated carbon to remove Cr(VI) from aqueous solution with adsorbent recycling. Environ Res 197:111151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2021.111151CrossRefPubMed

Titel: Removal of Chromium from Contaminated Soil by Electrokinetic Remediation Combined with Adsorption by Anion Exchange Resin and Polarity Reversal
verfasst von: Xi-yin Liu
Yan-feng Zhuang
Publikationsdatum: 01.02.2024
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in: International Journal of Geosynthetics and Ground Engineering / Ausgabe 1/2024
Print ISSN: 2199-9260
Elektronische ISSN: 2199-9279
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40891-023-00509-z

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2024

Experimental Investigation for Failure Mechanism and Bearing Capacity of Strip Footing on Soil Reinforced with Geotextile Following the Shukla's Wraparound Reinforcement Technique

Influence of Fiber Reinforcement on the Ultrasonic P-Wave Velocity and Unconfined Compressive Strength of Cemented Clay

Estimating Deformation of Geogrid-Reinforced Soil Structures Using Hybrid LSSVR Analysis

Acknowledgement of Reviewers for 2023

An Experimental Investigation into the Use of Three-Stepped Gabion Walls for Coastal Protection Works Using Acoustic Doppler Velocimeter

Drained Shear Response of Cement-Stabilized Recycled Asphalt Pavement–Lateritic Soil Blends