Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
ATZ-Fachkongress

Chassis.tech plus 2024


4 Kongresse in einer Veranstaltung

Treffen Sie in München die Fachleute von Chassis, Lenkung, Bremsen sowie Reifen/Räder.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Die fünf Dimensionen sozialer Roboter Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2021 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

22. Roboter in der Therapie

Vom Demonstrationsobjekt zum Psychotherapeuten

verfasst von : Stefanie Baisch, Thorsten Kolling

Erschienen in: Soziale Roboter

Verlag: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Zusammenfassung

Bereits heute, aber dank des demografischen Wandels umso mehr in Zukunft, sind therapeutische Ressourcen begrenzt. Infolgedessen können nicht alle Menschen die physische, psychische oder kognitive Therapie erhalten, die sie benötigen, um trotz Beeinträchtigungen möglichst selbstständig am alltäglichen Leben teilnehmen zu können. Roboter könnten die Therapie quantitativ wie auch qualitativ verbessern und mehr Menschen Zugang zu einer Therapie ermöglichen. Im vorliegenden Beitrag werden die verschiedenen Rollen und Funktionen, die die Roboter in unterschiedlichen Therapiebereichen einnehmen können, sowie empirische Belege für Akzeptanz, Wirksamkeit und Einflussfaktoren vorgestellt, soweit vorhanden. Dabei zeigt sich, dass selbst in den besser untersuchten Populationen (Kinder mit Autismus-Spektrum-Störung, ältere Erwachsene mit und ohne Demenz) die Datenbasis sehr dünn ist und noch viele Fragen offenbleiben. Neben Potenzialen werden forschungs- wie auch praxisbezogene und ethische Problemfelder des Einsatzes sozialer Roboter im therapeutischen Bereich identifiziert.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Soziale Roboter im öffentlichen Raum
Nächstes Kapitel Roboter in der Pflege
Fußnoten
1
Bei dieser psychotherapeutischen Strategie soll durch Auflösen von Ambivalenzen Veränderungsmotivation erarbeitet oder gefestigt werden (z. B. Rollnick und Miller 1995).
 
Literatur
Ab Aziz A, Ahmad F, Yusof N, Ahmad FK, Mohd Yusof SA (2015) Designing a robot-assisted therapy for individuals with anxiety traits and states. In: Proceedings of the 2015 international symposium on agents, multi-agent systems and robotics (Putrayaja, Malaysia), S 98–103
Abdi J, Al-Hindawi A, Ng T, Vizcaychipi MP (2015) Scoping review on the use of socially assistive robot technology in elderly care. BMJ Open 8:e018815CrossRef
Avelino J, Simão H, Ribeiro R, Moreno P, Figueiredo R, Duarte N, Nunes R, Bernardino A, Čaić M, Mahr D, Odekerken-Schröder G (2018) Experiments with Vizzy as a coach for elderly exercise. Paper präsentiert bei 13th annual ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction (Chicago, USA)
Baisch S (2019) The relevance of user characteristics for the acceptance of social robots by elders. Dissertation. Universität Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main
Baisch S, Kolling T, Rühl S, Klein B, Pantel J, Oswald F, Knopf M (2018) Emotionale Roboter im Pflegekontext. Empirische Analyse des bisherigen Einsatzes und der Wirkungen von Paro und Pleo. Z Gerontol Geriatr 51:16–24CrossRef
Bandura A (1977) Social learning theory. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs
Begum M, Serna RW, Yanco HA (2016) Are robots ready to deliver autism interventions? A comprehensive review. Int J Soc Robot 8:157–181CrossRef
Bemelmans R, Gelderblom GJ, Jonker P, de Witte L (2015) Effectiveness of robot Paro in intramural psychogeriatric care: a multicenter quasi-experimental study. J Am Med Dir Assoc 16:946–950CrossRef
Breazeal C (2011) Social robots for health applications. In: Proceedings of the 2011 annual international conference of the IEEE engineering in medicine and biology society (Boston, USA), S 5368–5371
Broadbent E, Garrett J, Jepsen N, Ogilvie VL, Ahn HS, Robinson H, Peri K, Kerse N, Rouse P, Pillai A, MacDonald B (2018) Using robots at home to support patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: pilot randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res 20:e45CrossRef
Cabibihan JJ, Javed H, Ang M Jr, Aljunied SM (2013) Why robots? A survey on the roles and benefits of social robots in the therapy of children with autism. Int J Soc Robot 5:593–618CrossRef
Čaić M, Avelino J, Mahr D, Odekerken-Schröder G, Bernardino A (2020) Robotic versus human coaches for active aging: an automated social presence perspective. Int J Soc Robot 12:867–882CrossRef
Casas J, Senft E, Gutiérrez LF, Rincón-Rocancio M, Múnera M, Belpaeme T, Cifuentes CA (2020) Social assistive robots: assessing the impact of a training assistant robot in cardiac rehabilitation. Int J Soc Robot, online first.
Céspedes N, Múnera M, Gómez C, Cifuentes CA (2020) Social human-robot interaction for gait rehabilitation. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 28:1299–1307CrossRef
Chen SC, Jones C, Moyle W (2018) Social robots for depression in older adults: a systematic review. J Nurs Scholarsh 50:612–622CrossRef
Cifuentes CA, Pinto MJ, Cespédes M, Múnera N (2020) Social robots in therapy and care. Curr Robot Rep 1:59–74CrossRef
Cruz-Maya A, Tapus A (2016) Teaching nutrition and healthy eating by using multimedia with a Kompai robot: effects of stress and user’s personality. In: Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE-RAS 16th international conference on humanoid robots, S 644–649
Csíkszentmihályi M (2015) Flow. Das Geheimnis des Glücks, 18. Aufl. Klett-Cotta, Stuttgart
Dang THH, Tapus A (2015) Stress game: the role of motivational robotic assistance in reducing user’s task stress. Int J Soc Robot 7:227–240CrossRef
David D, Matu SA, David OA (2014) Robot-based psychotherapy: concepts development, state of the art, and new directions. Int J Cogn Ther 7:192–210CrossRef
David DO, Costescu CA, Matu S, Szentagotai A, Dobrean A (2018) Developing joint attention for children with autism in robot-enhanced therapy. Int J Soc Robot 10:595–605CrossRef
Dawe J, Sutherland C, Barco A, Broadbent E (2018) Can social robots help children in healthcare contexts? A scoping review. BMJ Paediatr Open:e000371
Devanne M, Nguyen SM, Remy-Neris O, Le Gals-Garnett B, Kermarrec G, Thepaut A (2018) A co-design approach for a rehabilitation robot coach for physical rehabilitation based on the error classification of motion errors. Proceedings of the second IEEE international conference on robotic computing (Laguna Hills, USA), S 352–357
Diehl JJ, Schmitt LM, Villano M, Crowell CR (2012) The clinical use of robots for individuals with autism spectrum disorders: a critical review. Res Autism Spectr Disord 6:249–262CrossRef
Fasola J, Matarić M (2013) Socially assistive robot exercise coach: motivating older adults to engage in physical exercise. In: Desai J, Dudek G, Khatib O, Kumar V (Hrsg) Experimental robotics, Springer tracts in advanced robotics, 88. Springer, Heidelberg, S 468–479
Fazekas G, Tavaszi I (2019) The future role of robots in neuro-rehabilitation. Expert Rev Neurother 19:471–473CrossRef
Fiske A, Henningsen P, Buyx A (2019) Your robot therapist will see you now: ethical implications of embodied artificial intelligence in psychiatry, psychology, and psychotherapy. J Med Internet Res 21:e13216CrossRef
Forbig P, Platz T (2020) Supporting the arm ability training of stroke patients by a social-humanoid robot. In: Ahram T, Taiar R, Gremeaux-Bader V, Aminian K (Hrsg) Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on human interaction and emerging technologies: future application (Lausanne, Schweiz). Springer, S 383–388
Fosch-Villaronga E, Albo-Canals J (2019) „I’ll take care of you,“ said the robot. Paladyn J Behav Robot 10:77–93
Gallego-Perez J, Lohse M, Evers V (2015) Improving psychological wellbeing with robots. Proceedings of the 24th IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication (Kobe, Japan), S 688–693
Georgiou T, Ross MK, Baillie L, Broz F (2019) Applying an HCI requirements gathering method to HRI. In: Proceedings of the ACM CHI 2019 conference on human factors in computing systems workshop on the challenges of working on social robots that collaborate with people (Glasgow, Großbritannien)
Geva N, Uzefovsky F, Levy-Tzedek S (2020) Touching the social robot PARO reduces pain perception and salivary oxytocin levels. Sci Rep 10:9814CrossRef
Görer B, Salah AA, Akın HL (2017) An autonomous robotic exercise tutor for elderly people. Auton Robot 41:657–678CrossRef
Guglielmelli E, Johnson M, Shibata T (2009) Guest editorial. Special issue on rehabilitation robotics: from bench to bedside to community care. IEEE Trans Robot 25:477–480CrossRef
Hammer S, Kirchner K, André E, Lugrin B (2017) Touch or talk? – comparing social robots and tablet PCs for an elderly assistant recommender system. Proceedings of the companion of the 2017 ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction (Wien, Österreich), S 129–130
Hansen ST, Rasmussen DM, Bak T (2012) Field study of a physical game for older adults based on an autonomous, mobile robot. In: International conference on collaboration technologies and systems (Denver, USA), S 125–130
Hung L, Liu C, Woldum E, Au-Yeung A, Berndt A, Wallsworth C, Horne N, Gregorio M, Mann M, Chaudhury H (2019) The benefits of and barriers to using a social robot PARO in care settings: a scoping review. BMC Geriatr 19:232CrossRef
Jøranson N, Pedersen I, Rokstad AM, Ihlebæk C (2016) Change in quality of life in older people with dementia participating in Paro-activity: a cluster-randomized controlled trial. J Adv Nurs 72:3020–3033CrossRef
Kanaoka T, Mutlu B (2015) Designing a motivational agent for behavior change in physical activity. In: Proceedings of the 33rd annual ACM conference extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems (Seoul, Korea), S 1445–1450
Kang HS, Makimoto K, Konno R, Koh IS (2019) Review of outcome measures in PARO robot intervention studies for dementia care. Geriatr Nurs 41:207–214CrossRef
Kidd CD, Breazeal C (2008) Robots at home: understanding long-term human-robot interaction. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems (Nizza, Frankreich), S 3230–3235
Kolling T, Haberstroh J, Kaspar R, Pantel J, Oswald F, Knopf M (2013) Evidence and deployment-based research into care for the elderly using emotional robots. Psychological, methodological and cross-cultural facets. GeroPsych 26:83–88CrossRef
Kolling T, Baisch S, Schall A, Selic S, Rühl S, Kim Z, Klein B, Pantel J, Oswald F, Knopf M (2016) What is emotional in emotional robotics? In: Tettegah S, Garcia Y (Hrsg) Emotions, technology, and health. Elsevier, Amsterdam, S 85–103CrossRef
Kubota A, Peterson EI, Rajendren V, Kress-Gazit H, Riek LD (2020) JESSIE: synthesizing social robot behaviors for personalized neurorehabilitation and beyond. In: Proceedings of the 2020 ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction (Cambridge, Großbritannien), S 121–129
Lau Y, Chee DG, Chow XP, Wong SH, Cheng LJ, Lau ST (2020) Humanoid robot-assisted interventions among children with diabetes: a systematic scoping review. Int J Nurs Stud 111:103749CrossRef
Lee MH, Siewiorek DP, Smailagic A, Bernardino A, Bermudez i Badia S (2020) Towards personalized interaction and corrective feedback of a socially assistive robot for post-stroke rehabilitation therapy. In: Proceedings of the 29th IEEE international conference on robot and human interactive communication (Neapel, Italien), S 1366–1373
Li J (2015) The benefit of being physically present: a survey of experimental works comparing copresent robots, telepresent robots, and virtual agents. Int J Hum Comput Stud 77:23–37CrossRef
Lo K, Stevenson M, Lockwood C (2019) The economic cost of robotic rehabilitation for adult stroke patients: a systematic review. JBI Database Syst Rev Implement Rep 17:520–547CrossRef
Mann JA, MacDonald BA, Kuo H, Li X, Broadbent E (2015) People respond better to robots than computer tablets delivering healthcare instructions. Comput Hum Behav 43:112–117CrossRef
Martín F, Agüero CE, Cañas JM, Valentí M, Martínez-Martín P (2013) Robotherapy with dementia patients. Int J Adv Robot Syst 10:1–7
Martinez-Martin E, Casorla M (2019) A socially assistive robot for elderly exercise promotion. IEEE Access 7:75515–75529CrossRef
Matarić M, Tapus A, Winstein C, Eriksson J (2009) Socially assistive robotics for stroke and mild TBI rehabilitation. Stud Health Technol Inform 145:249–262
Matarić MJ, Eriksson J, Feil-Seifer DJ, Winstein CJ (2007) Socially assistive robotics for post-stroke rehabilitation. J Neuroeng Rehabil 4:5–14CrossRef
Mead R, Wade E, Johnson P, St Clair A, Chen S, Matarić MJ (2010) An architecture for rehabilitation task practice in socially assistive human-robot interaction. In: Proceedings of the 19th international symposium in robot and human interactive communication (Viareggio, Italien), S 404–409
Misselhorn C, Pompe U, Stapleton M (2013) Ethical consideration regarding the use of social robots in fourth age. GeroPsych 26:121–133CrossRef
Moyle W, Jones CJ, Murfield JE, Thalib L, Beattie ER, Shum DK, O’Dwyer ST, Mervin MC, Drape BM (2017) Use of a robotic seal as a therapeutic tool to improve dementia symptoms: a cluster-randomized controlled trial. J Am Med Dir Assoc 18:766–773CrossRef
Murali P, O’Leary T, Shamekhi A, Bickmore T (2019) Health counseling by robots: Modalities for breastfeeding promotion. In: Proceedings of the 28th IEEE international conference on robot and human interactive communication, S 1–6
Narita S, Ohtani N, Waga C, Ohta M, Ishigooka J, Iwahashi K (2017) A pet-type robot artificial intelligence robot-assisted therapy for a patient with schizophrenia. Asia Pac Psychiatry 8(4):312–313
Nguyen SM, Tanguy P, Remi-Neris O (2016) Computational architecture of a robot coach for physical exercises in kinaesthetic rehabilitation. In: Proceedings of the 25th IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication (New York, USA), S 1–6
Okamura A, Matarić MJ, Christensen HI (2010) Medical and health-care robotics. IEEE Robot Autom Mag 17:26–37
Olaronke I, Oluwaseon O, Rhoda I (2017) State of the art: a study of human-robot interaction in healthcare. Int J Inf Eng Electron Bus 3:43–55
Patten R van, Keller AV, Maye JE, Jeste DV, Depp C, Riek LD, Twamley EW (2020) Home-based cognitively assistive robots: maximizing cognitive functioning and maintaining Independence in older adults without dementia. Clin Interv Aging 15:1129–1139
Pennazio V (2017) Social robotics to help children with autism in their interactions through imitation. Res Educ Media 9:10–16CrossRef
Pino O, Palestra G, Trevino R, De Carolis B (2020) The humanoid robot NAO as trainer in a memory program for elderly people with mild cognitive impairment. Int J Soc Robot 12:21–33CrossRef
Polak RF, Levy-Tsedek S (2020) A social robot for rehabilitation: expert clinicians and post-stroke patients’ evaluation following a long-term Intervention. In: Proceedings of the 2020 ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction (Cambridge, USA), S 151–160
Quassim HM, Wan Hassan WZ (2020) A review on upper limb rehabilitation robotics. Appl Sci 10:6976CrossRef
Rabbitt SM, Kazdin A, Scassellati B (2015) Integrating socially assistive robotics into mental healthcare interventions: applications and recommendations for expanded use. Clin Psychol Rev 35:35–46CrossRef
Recio DL, Segura LM, Segura EM, Waern A (2013) The NAO models for the elderly. In: Proceedings of the 8th ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction (Tokyo, Japan), S 187–188
Rimmer JH, Wang E, Smith D (2008) Barriers associated with exercise and community access for individuals with stroke. J Rehabil Res Dev 45:315–322CrossRef
Robinson NL, Cottier TV, Kavanagh DJ (2019) Psychosocial health interventions by social robots: systematic review of randomized controlled trials. J Med Internet Res 21:e13203CrossRef
Rollnick S, Miller WR (1995) What is motivational interviewing. Behav Cogn Psychother 23:325–334CrossRef
Ross MK, Broz F, Baillie L (2020) Informing the design of a robotic coach through systematic observations. In: Proceedings of the HRI ’20: companion of the 2020 ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction (Cambridge, Großbritannien) S 412–414
Scassellati B (2007) How social robots will help us to diagnose, treat, and understand autism. In: Thrun S, Brooks R, Durrant-Whyte H (Hrsg) Robotics research, Springer tracts in advanced robotics, 28. Springer, S 552–563CrossRef
Scassellati B, Admoni H, Matari´c M (2012) Robots for Use in Autism Research. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 14:75–294
Scassellati B, Boccanfuso L, Huang CM, Mademtzi M, Qin M, Salomons N, Ventola P, Shic F (2018) Improving social skills in children with ASD using a long-term, in-home social robot. Sci Robot 3:eaat7544CrossRef
Schneider S, Görlich M, Kummert F (2017) A framework for designing socially assistive robot interactions. Cogn Syst Res 43:301–312CrossRef
Scoglio AA, Reilly ED, Gorman JA, Drebing CE (2019) Use of social robots in mental health and well-being research: systematic review. J Med Internet Res 21:e13322CrossRef
Sefidgar YS, MacLean KE, Yohanan S, Van der Loos M, Croft EA, Garland EJ (2015) Design and evaluation of a touch-centered calming interaction with a social robot. IEEE Trans Affect Comput 7:108–121
Shamsuddin S, Yussof H, Ismailb LI, Mohamed S, Hanapiahc FA, Zaharid NI (2012) Humanoid robot NAO interacting with autistic children of moderately impaired intelligence to augment communication skills. Procedia Eng 41:1533–1538CrossRef
Shi D, Zhang W, Ding X (2019) A review on lower limb rehabilitation exoskeleton robots. Chin J Mech Eng 32:74–85CrossRef
Swift-Spong K, Short E, Wade E, Matarić MJ (2015) Effects of comparative feedback from a socially assistive robot on self-efficacy in post-stroke rehabilitation. In: Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE international conference on rehabilitation robotics (Singapur), S 764–769
Tapus A, Tapus C, Matarić MJ (2009a) The role of physical embodiment of a therapist robot for individuals with cognitive impairments. In: Proceedings of the 18th IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication (Toyama, Japan), S 203–203
Tapus A, Tapus C, Matarić MJ (2009b) The use of socially assistive robots in the design of intelligent cognitive therapies for people with dementia. In: Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE international conference on rehabilitation robotics, S 924–929
Thodberg K, Sørensen LU, Videbech PB, Poulsen PH, Houbak B, Damgaard V, Keseler I, Edwards D, Christensen JW (2016) Behavioral responses of nursing home residents to visits from a person with a dog, a robot, seal or a toy cat. Anthrozoös 29:107–121CrossRef
Valentí Soler M, Agüera-Ortiz L, Olazarán Rodríguez J, Mendoza Rebolledo C, Pérez Muñoz A, Rodríguez Pérez I, Osa Ruiz E, Barrios Sánchez A, Herrero Cano V, Carrasco Chillón L, Felipe Ruiz S, López Alvarez J, León Salas B, Cañas Plaza JM, Martín Rico F, Abella Dago G, Martínez Martín P (2015) Social robots in advanced dementia. Front Aging Neurosci 7:133CrossRef
Vogan A, Anajjar F, Gochoo M, Khalid S (2019) Robots, AI, and cognitive training in an era of massage-related cognitive decline: a systematic review. IEEE Access 8:18284–18304CrossRef
Wainer J, Feil-Seifer DJ, Shell DA, Matarić MJ (2007) Embodiment and human-robot interaction: a task-based perspective. In: Proceedings of the 16th IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication (Jeju, Korea), S 872–877
Werner F, Krainer D, Oberzaucher J, Werner K (2013) Evaluation of the acceptance of a social assistive robot for physical training support together with older users and domain experts. In: Assistive Technology Research Series Nr. 33: Assistive Technology Research Series, S 137–142
Wingerden E van, Barakova E, Lourens T, Sterkenburg PS (2020) Robot-mediated therapy to reduce worrying in persons with visual and intellectual disabilities. J Appl Res Intellect Disabil 34:229–238
Winkle K, Caleb-Solly P, Turton A, Bremner P (2018) Social robots for engagement in rehabilitative therapies: design implications from a study with therapists. In: Proceedings of the 2018 ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction (Chicago, USA), S 289–297
Yakub F, Khudzari AZ, Mori Y (2014) Recent trends for practical rehabilitation robotics, current challenges and the future. Int J Rehabil Res 37:9–21CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Roboter in der Therapie
verfasst von
Stefanie Baisch
Thorsten Kolling
Copyright-Jahr
2021
Buch
Soziale Roboter

Print ISBN: 978-3-658-31113-1

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-658-31114-8

Copyright-Jahr: 2021

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-31114-8_22

Premium Partner

    Bildnachweise