nach oben

Erschienen in:

2024 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

1. Substrate General Characteristics

verfasst von : Federico Moretta, Giulia Bozzano

Erschienen in: Mathematical and Statistical Approaches for Anaerobic Digestion Feedstock Optimization

Verlag: Springer Nature Switzerland

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

A key point in fermentative processes is the Feedstock composition. It can be divided into two categories: biomass as inoculum or fresh inflow to the process. The inoculum is essential for a stable and productive process, since, if well-tailored, it provides the right amount of microorganisms to run the process (Rajput and Sheikh in Sustain Environ Res 29(1):4, 2019; Yarberry et al. in Waste Manag 87:62-70, 2019). Consequently, setting up a proper biomass is a crucial factor in a productive scenario. It is then necessary to understand and look for its best characteristics for the purpose.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Nächstes Kapitel Database Introduction

Rajput AA, Sheikh Z (2019) Effect of inoculum type and organic loading on biogas production of sunflower meal and wheat straw. Sustain Environ Res 29(1):4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42834-019-0003-xCrossRef

Yarberry A, Lansing S, Luckarift H, Diltz R, Mulbry W, Yarwood S (2019) Effect of anaerobic digester inoculum preservation via lyophilization on methane recovery. Waste Manag 87:62–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2019.01.033CrossRef

Raj T, Chandrasekhar K, Naresh-Kumar A, Kim S-H (2022) Lignocellulosic biomass as renewable feedstock for biodegradable and recyclable plastics production: a sustainable approach. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 158:112130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2022.112130CrossRef

Ebrahimi M et al (2022) Effects of lignocellulosic biomass type on nutrient recovery and heavy metal removal from digested sludge by hydrothermal treatment. J Environ Manage 318:115524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115524CrossRef

Steffen R, Szolar O, Braun R (1998) Feedstocks for anaerobic digestion. Inst Agrobiotechnol Tulin Univ Agric Sci Vienna 14:1–29

Legner M, McMillen DR, Cvitkovitch DG (2019) Role of dilution rate and nutrient availability in the formation of microbial biofilms. Front Microbiol 10:916. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.00916CrossRef

Agawin NSR, Duarte CM, Agustí S (2000) Nutrient and temperature control of the contribution of picoplankton to phytoplankton biomass and production. Limnol Oceanogr 45(3):591–600. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2000.45.3.0591CrossRef

Tokuşoglu Ö, Unal MK (2003) Biomass nutrient profiles of three microalgae: spirulina platensis, chlorella vulgaris, and Isochrisis galbana. J Food Sci 68(4):1144–1148. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.2003.tb09615.xCrossRef

Michalik M, Wilczyńska-Michalik W (2012) Mineral and chemical composition of biomass ash. https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.4298.5603

10.

Gil A, Toledo M, Siles JA, Martín MA (2018) Multivariate analysis and biodegradability test to evaluate different organic wastes for biological treatments: anaerobic co-digestion and co-composting. Waste Manag 78:819–828. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2018.06.052CrossRef

11.

Xu F, Wang Z-W, Tang L, Li Y (2014) A mass diffusion-based interpretation of the effect of total solids content on solid-state anaerobic digestion of cellulosic biomass. Bioresour Technol 167:178–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.05.114CrossRef

12.

Ghimire A et al (2018) Effect of total solids content on biohydrogen production and lactic acid accumulation during dark fermentation of organic waste biomass. Bioresour Technol 248:180–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.07.062CrossRef

13.

Oosterkamp WJ (2014) Chapter 13: use of volatile solids from biomass for energy production. In: Gupta VK, Tuohy MG, Kubicek CP, Saddler J, Xu F (eds) Bioenergy research: advances and applications. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 203–217CrossRef

14.

Ahmadi-Pirlou M, Ebrahimi-Nik M, Khojastehpour M, Ebrahimi SH (2017) Mesophilic co-digestion of municipal solid waste and sewage sludge: effect of mixing ratio, total solids, and alkaline pretreatment. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 125:97–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2017.09.004CrossRef

15.

Jain S, Jain S, Wolf IT, Lee J, Tong YW (2015) A comprehensive review on operating parameters and different pretreatment methodologies for anaerobic digestion of municipal solid waste. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 52:142–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.07.091CrossRef

16.

Motte J-C et al (2013) Total solids content: a key parameter of metabolic pathways in dry anaerobic digestion. Biotechnol Biofuels 6(1):164. https://doi.org/10.1186/1754-6834-6-164CrossRef

17.

Meegoda JN, Li B, Patel K, Wang LB (2018) A review of the processes, parameters, and optimization of anaerobic digestion. Int J Environ Res Public Health 15(10):2224. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15102224CrossRef

18.

Siddique MNI, Wahid ZA (2018) Achievements and perspectives of anaerobic co-digestion: a review. J Clean Prod 194(1):359–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.155CrossRef

19.

Wang X, Yang G, Feng Y, Ren G, Han X (2012) Optimizing feeding composition and carbon-nitrogen ratios for improved methane yield during anaerobic co-digestion of dairy, chicken manure and wheat straw. Bioresour Technol 120:78–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2012.06.058CrossRef

20.

Dima AD, Pârvulescu OC, Mateescu C, Dobre T (2020) Optimization of substrate composition in anaerobic co-digestion of agricultural waste using central composite design. Biomass Bioenergy 138:8–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2020.105602CrossRef

21.

Wang M, Li W, Li P, Yan S, Zhang Y (2017) An alternative parameter to characterize biogas materials: available carbon-nitrogen ratio. Waste Manag 62:76–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2017.02.025CrossRef

22.

Turner BL (2010) Variation in pH optima of hydrolytic enzyme activities in tropical rain forest soils. Appl Environ Microbiol 76(19):6485–6493. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00560-10CrossRef

23.

Sarkar O, Rova U, Christakopoulos P, Matsakas L (2021) Influence of initial uncontrolled pH on acidogenic fermentation of brewery spent grains to biohydrogen and volatile fatty acids production: Optimization and scale-up. Bioresour Technol 319:124233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2020.124233CrossRef

24.

Zhang B, Zhang LL, Zhang SC, Shi HZ, Cai WM (2005) The influence of pH on hydrolysis and acidogenesis of kitchen wastes in two-phase anaerobic digestion. Environ Technol 26(3):329–339. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593332608618563CrossRef

25.

Tang J, Wang XC, Hu Y, Zhang Y, Li Y (2017) Effect of pH on lactic acid production from acidogenic fermentation of food waste with different types of inocula. Bioresour Technol 224:544–552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.11.111CrossRef

26.

Cheah Y-K, Vidal-Antich C, Dosta J, Mata-Álvarez J (2019) Volatile fatty acid production from mesophilic acidogenic fermentation of organic fraction of municipal solid waste and food waste under acidic and alkaline pH. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(35):35509–35522. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-05394-6CrossRef

27.

Marquart KA et al (2019) Influence of pH on the balance between methanogenesis and iron reduction. Geobiology 17(2):185–198. https://doi.org/10.1111/gbi.12320CrossRef

28.

Kainthola J, Kalamdhad AS, Goud VV (2020) Optimization of process parameters for accelerated methane yield from anaerobic co-digestion of rice straw and food waste. Renew Energy 149:1352–1359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.10.124CrossRef

29.

Labatut RA, Pronto JL (2018) Chapter 4: sustainable waste-to-energy technologies: anaerobic digestion. In: Trabold TA, Babbitt CW (eds) Sustainable food waste-to-energy systems. Academic Press, New York, pp 47–67CrossRef

30.

Li D et al (2015) Effects of feedstock ratio and organic loading rate on the anaerobic mesophilic co-digestion of rice straw and cow manure. Bioresour Technol 189:319–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2015.04.033CrossRef

31.

Jabeen M, Zeshan S, Yousaf S, Haider MR, Malik RN (2015) High-solids anaerobic co-digestion of food waste and rice husk at different organic loading rates. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 102:149–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2015.03.023CrossRef

32.

Labatut RA, Angenent LT, Scott NR (2011) Biochemical methane potential and biodegradability of complex organic substrates. Bioresour Technol 102(3):2255–2264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.10.035CrossRef

33.

Nielfa A, Cano R, Fdz-Polanco M (2015) Theoretical methane production generated by the co-digestion of organic fraction municipal solid waste and biological sludge. Biotechnol Rep 5(1):14–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.btre.2014.10.005CrossRef

34.

Aboudi K, Álvarez-Gallego CJ, Romero-García LI (2017) Influence of total solids concentration on the anaerobic co-digestion of sugar beet by-products and livestock manures. Sci Total Environ 586:438–445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.01.178CrossRef

35.

Varsha SSV, Soomro AF, Baig ZT, Vuppaladadiyam AK, Murugavelh S, Antunes E (2020) Methane production from anaerobic mono- and co-digestion of kitchen waste and sewage sludge: synergy study on cumulative methane production and biodegradability. Biomass Convers Biorefinery 12:3911–3919. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-020-00884-xCrossRef

36.

Li Y, Zhang R, Liu G, Chen C, He Y, Liu X (2013) Comparison of methane production potential, biodegradability, and kinetics of different organic substrates. Bioresour Technol 149:565–569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2013.09.063CrossRef

37.

Triolo JM, Sommer SG, Møller HB, Weisbjerg MR, Jiang XY (2011) A new algorithm to characterize biodegradability of biomass during anaerobic digestion: influence of lignin concentration on methane production potential. Bioresour Technol 102(20):9395–9402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2011.07.026CrossRef

38.

Sawyerr N, Trois C, Workneh T (2019) Identification and characterization of potential feedstock for biogas production in South Africa. J Ecol Eng 20(6):103–116. https://doi.org/10.12911/22998993/108652CrossRef

39.

Buswell AM, Mueller HF (1952) Mechanism of methane fermentation. Ind Eng Chem 44(3):550–552. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie50507a033CrossRef

40.

Angelidaki I, Sanders W (2004) Assessment of the anaerobic biodegradability of macropollutants. Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol 3(2):117–129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11157-004-2502-3CrossRef

41.

Hidalgo D, Martín-Marroquín JM (2015) Biochemical methane potential of livestock and agri-food waste streams in the Castilla y León Region (Spain). Food Res Int 73:226–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2014.12.044CrossRef

42.

Raposo F et al (2011) Biochemical methane potential (BMP) of solid organic substrates: evaluation of anaerobic biodegradability using data from an international interlaboratory study. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 86(8):1088–1098. https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.2622CrossRef

43.

Ohemeng-Ntiamoah J, Datta T (2019) Perspectives on variabilities in biomethane potential test parameters and outcomes: a review of studies published between 2007 and 2018. Sci Total Environ 664:1052–1062. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.088CrossRef

Titel: Substrate General Characteristics
verfasst von: Federico Moretta
Giulia Bozzano
Verlag: Springer Nature Switzerland
Buch: Mathematical and Statistical Approaches for Anaerobic Digestion Feedstock Optimization
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-56459-8

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-031-56460-4

Copyright-Jahr: 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-56460-4_1

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"