nach oben

Erschienen in:

2024 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

6. The Core States in the International Geostructure

verfasst von : Carlos Pulleiro Méndez, Germán Patiño Orozco

Erschienen in: National Power and International Geostructure

Verlag: Springer Nature Singapore

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

This chapter analyzes the main characteristics and foreign policy of core states according to their national power and geostructural position. Firstly, the world powers are the states better positioned in the geostructure in the last decades; however, since the 1990s, these states have started to lose, in relative terms, their international preponderance. Nevertheless, they are central states that possess the greatest economic-military, socio-institutional, and communicative-cultural power. Regarding international governance, world powers are members of the G-7, some of them are permanent members of the UN Security Council, and members of the most important international organizations such as IMF, World Bank, WTO, NATO, etc. In the end, world powers can be considered the directors of the international system. Middle powers are central states that have very high levels of socio-institutional power, but unlike world powers, middle powers possess a relatively smaller economic-military and communicative-cultural power. These countries traditionally promote international cooperation and peace, making them valuable allies to world powers in managing international governance. Unlike the declining world powers, middle powers are stagnant in their geostructural positioning, which means a relative loss of primacy compared to other emerging countries. Finally, semicore states are countries with significant levels of development and well-being, but they do not stand out for their economic-military or communicative-cultural power. Although they are developed states, they have never been labeled as "powers" except for a few exceptions. They are also strategic partners for international governance, distinguishing among two different types: states that have recently surpassed the semiperiphery to be incorporated into the core due to their geographical, political, or economic proximity to core powers; or they were middle powers but declined during a long period until occupying a more marginal place within the core of the international system.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel The National Power of Core States

Nächstes Kapitel The National Power of Semiperipheral States

Acharya, A. (2007). Singapore’s foreign policy: The search for regional order. World Scientific.CrossRef

Acharya, A. (2014). The end of American world order. Cambridge: Polity.

Agostinho, P. (2023). Portugal wants to play key role in EU-Africa relations. Retrieved from Euractiv: https://www.euractiv.com/section/politics/news/portugal-wants-to-play-key-role-in-eu-africa-relations/.

Al Jazeera and News Agencies. (2023). Iran’s Khamenei calls for boycott of Israel amid Gaza bombardment. Retrieved from Al Jazeera: https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2023/11/1/irans-khamenei-calls-upon-muslim-countries-to-boycott-israel-over-gaza-war.

Australian Government. (n.d). Republic of Korea (South Korea). Retrieved from Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade: https://www.dfat.gov.au/geo/republic-of-korea/republic-of-korea-country-brief.

Babones, S. (2005). The country-level income structure of the world-economy. Journal of World-Systems Research, 11(1), 29–55. https://doi.org/10.5195/jwsr.2005.392CrossRef

Baczynska, G. (2023). Billions in frozen funds for Hungary on table as EU seeks Ukraine support. Retrieved from Reuters: https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/billions-frozen-funds-hungary-table-eu-seeks-ukraine-support-2023-10-03/#:~:text=EU%20officials%20told%20Reuters%20that,for%20more%20detail%20on%20implementation.

Barre, R. (1962). El desarrollo económico. Fondo de Cultura Eonómica.

BBC News. (2022). UK faces decade of lost growth without action, says CBI. Retrieved from BBC: https://www.bbc.com/news/business-63851965.

Bremmer, I. (2021). The technopolar moment. How digital powers will reshape the global order. Foreign Affairs, 100(6), 112–128.

Carment, D., Macdonald, L., & Paltiel, J. (2022). Canada and great power competition: Canada among nations 2021. Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRef

Cooper, D. A. (2011). Challenging contemporary notions of middle power influence: implications of the proliferation security initiative for “Middle Power Theory”. Foreign Policy Analysis , 7(3), 317–336. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-8594.2011.00140.x

Chapnick, A. (1999). The middle power. Canadian Foreign Policy Journal, 7(2), 73–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/11926422.1999.9673212

Chase-Dunn, C., Kawano, Y., & Brewer, B. D. (2000). Trade globalization since 1795: Waves of integration in the world-system. American Sociological Review, 65(1), 77–95. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240006500105CrossRef

Ciesnik, S. (2023). Migration ‘used to mobilise voters’ ahead of elections in Slovakia and Poland. Retrieved from France 24: https://www.france24.com/en/europe/20230929-migration-used-to-mobilise-voters-ahead-of-elections-in-slovakia-and-poland.

Consulate General of Hungary L.A. (2023). Hungary and the world. Retrieved from Consulate General of Hungary Los Angeles: https://losangeles.mfa.gov.hu/eng/page/hungary-and-the-world.

Cox, R. (1996). Middlepowermanship, Japan, and future world order. In R. Cox & T. J. Sinclair (Eds.), Approaches to world order (pp. 241–274). Cambridge University Press.CrossRef

Dennison, S., & Franco, L. (2019). The instinctive multilateralist: Portugal and the politics of cooperation. Retrieved from European Council on Foreign Relations: https://ecfr.eu/wp-content/uploads/instinctive_multilateralist_portugal_politics_cooperation.pdf.

Directorate General for Economic and Financial Affairs of the European Comission. (2002). Germany’s growth performance in the 1990’s. European Comission. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/publications/pages/publication1878_en.pdf.

European Union. (2023). A new EU agenda with Latin America and the Caribbean. Retrieved from European Union: https://www.eeas.europa.eu/eeas/new-eu-agenda-latin-america-and-caribbean_en.

Foot, R. & Walter, A. (2011). China, the United States, and global order. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Friedberg, A. L. (2011). A contest for supremacy: China, America and the struggle for mastery in Asia. New York: W.W. Norton.

Gilpin, R. (1981). War and change in world politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

González González, G. (1983). Incertidumbres de una potencia mediaregional: las nuevas dimensiones de la política exterior mexicana. In O. Pellicer (Ed.), La política exterior de México: desafíos en los ochenta (pp. 15–81). CIDE.

Government of Canada. (2023). Partnerships and organizations. Retrieved from https://www.international.gc.ca/world-monde/international_relations-relations_internationales/partnerships_organizations-partenariats_organisations.aspx?lang=eng.

Hoffmann, S. (2006). Chaos and violence. Rowman & Littlefield.

Holbraad, C. (1984). Middle powers in international politics. Macmillan Press.CrossRef

Hudson, V. M. (2005). Foreign policy analysis: Actor-specific theory and the ground of international relations. Foreign Policy Analysis, 1, 1–30.CrossRef

Hudson, V. M., & Day, B. S. (2020). Foreign policy analysis. Classic and contemporary theory. Rowman & Littlefield.

Ikenberry, J. (2018). The end of liberal international order. International Affairs, 94(1), 7–23.CrossRef

Jacinto, M. (2023). Assessing the stability of the core/periphery structure and mobility in the post-2008 global crisis era: A world-systems analysis of the international trade network. Journal of World-Systems Research, 29(2), 401–430. https://doi.org/10.5195/JWSR.2023.1148CrossRef

Jones, B. (2019). A not quite multipolar world. In J. G. McGann (Ed.), Think tanks, foreign policy and the emerging powers (pp. 61–78). Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRef

Kennedy, P. (1987). The rise and fall of great powers. New York: Random House.

Keohane, R. (2006). Lilliputians’ dilemmas: Small states in international politics. In C. Ingebritsen, I. Neumann, S. Gstöhl, & J. Beyer (Eds.), Small states in international relations: Diplomacy in World War II (pp. 55–76). University of Washington Press.

KOF Swiss Economic Institute. (2023). KOF globalisation index. Retrieved from https://kof.ethz.ch/en/forecasts-and-indicators/indicators/kof-globalisation-index.html.

Köllner, P. (2021). Australia and New Zealand recalibrate their China policies: Convergence and divergence. The Pacific Review, 34(3), 405–436. https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2019.1683598CrossRef

Layne, C. (2006). The unipolar ilusion revisited: The coming end of the United States' unipolar moment. International Security, 31(2), 7–41. https://doi.org/10.1162/isec.2006.31.2.7

Layne, C. (2009). The waning of U.S. hegemony, myth or reality? A review essay. International Security, 34(1), 147–172. https://doi.org/10.1162/isec.2009.34.1.147

Lee, J.-Y. (2020). The geopolitics of South Korea—China relations: Implications for U.S. policy in the Indo Pacific. Retrieved from RAND Corporation: https://www.rand.org/pubs/perspectives/PEA524-1.html.

Low, Y. (2023). Singapore-China ties up another level, a win-win for people on both sides. Retrieved 2023, from https://www.todayonline.com/world/singapore-china-win-pm-lee-2142676.

Lynn, H.-G. (2021). Japan-South Korea international relations. In S. Lim & N. J. Alsford (Eds.), Routledge handbook of contemporary South Korea (pp. 292–311). Routledge.CrossRef

Mahbubani, K. (2015). Can Singapore survive? Strait Times Press.

Ministry of Foreign Affairs. (2017). Transcript of remarks by minister for foreign affairs Dr. Vivian Balakrishnan at the MFA townhall. Retrieved agosto 23, 2023, from Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Singapore: https://www.mfa.gov.sg/Newsroom/Press-Statements-Transcripts-and-Photos/2017/07/Transcript-of-Remarks-by-Minister-for-Foreign-Affairs-Dr-Vivian-Balakrishnan-at-the-MFA-Townhall-on.

Ministry of Foreign and European Affairs of the Slovak Republic. (2022). EU common foreign and security policy. Retrieved from Ministry of Foreign and European Affairs of the Slovak Republic: https://www.mzv.sk/en/web/en/diplomacy/european-affairs.

Ministry of Trade and Industry. (2023). Economic survey of Singapore. Second quarter 2023. Singapore: Ministry of Trade and Industry. Retrieved from https://www.mti.gov.sg/Resources/Economic-Survey-of-Singapore/2023/Economic-Survey-of-Singapore-Second-Quarter-2023.

Morales Ruvalcaba, D. (2019). Semi-core states: A new category for rethinking the structure of power. AUSTRAL: Brazilian Journal of Strategy & International Relations, 8(15), 131–158. https://doi.org/10.22456/2238-6912.86492.

Morales Ruvalcaba, D., & Rocha Valencia, A. (2022). Geoestructura de poder en el sistema político internacional: un enfoque trans-estructural. Geopolitica(s), 13(1). https://doi.org/10.5209/geop.72589.

Murphy, A., & Tucker, H. (2023). The global 2000. Retrieved from Forbes: https://www.forbes.com/lists/global2000/?sh=4c748cb45ac0.

Pérez, S. A., & Matsaganis, M. (2018). The political economy of austerity in Southern Europe. New Political Economy, 23(2), 192–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2017.1370445CrossRef

Portland Communications. (2019). The soft power 30: A global ranking of soft power 2019. Retrieved from https://softpower30.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/The-Soft-Power-30-Report-2019-1.pdf.

Portugal Ministry of Foreign Affairs. (2023). Diplomatic portal. Retrieved from República Portugguesa Foreign Affairs: https://portaldiplomatico.mne.gov.pt/en/foreign-policy/foreign-policy.

Pulleiro Méndez, C., Patiño Orozco, G., & Morales Ruvalcaba, D. (2021). All that is solid melts into COVID-19: Impacts of the pandemic on mondialisation and globalization. Relações Internacionais do Mundo Atual, 1(30), 26–50. https://doi.org/10.21902/Revrima.v1i30.5164.

Rabimov, S. (2022). https://www.forbes.com/sites/stephanrabimov/2022/04/18/kornit-fashion-week-elevates-israels-cultural-diplomacy/?sh=1add2b264bbd. Retrieved from Forbes: Kornit Fashion Week Elevates Israel’s Cultural Diplomacy.

Reuters. (2023). Foreign tourism to Portugal registers best-ever first half. Retrieved from https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/foreign-tourism-portugal-registers-best-ever-first-half-2023-08-14/.

Rocha, A., & Morales Ruvalcaba, D. E. (2010). Potencias medias y potencias regionales en el Sistema Político Internacional: Dos modelos teóricos. Geopolítica(s), 1(2), 251–279. Retrieved from https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/GEOP/article/view/36329/35196.

Rosas, M. C. (2002). Australia y Canadá: ¿Potencias medias o hegemonías frustradas? Una visión desde México. UNAM.

Schweller, R. L. (1997). New realist research on alliances: Refining, not refuting, Waltz’s balancing proposition. American Political Science Review, 91(4), 927–930. https://doi.org/10.2307/2952176CrossRef

Schweller, R. L., & Pu, X. (2011). After unipolarity: China's vision of international order in an era of U.S. decline. International Security, 36(1), 47–72. https://doi.org/10.1162/ISEC_a_00044

Shambaugh, D. (2013). China goes global: The partial power. New York: Columbia University Press.

Singer, J. (2021). The Abraham accords: Normalization agreements signed by Israel with the U.A.E., Bahrain, Sudan, and Morocco. International Legal Materials, 60(3), 448–463. https://doi.org/10.1017/ilm.2021.18.

Singh, B. (2023). Singapore in 2022: Resolving political succession amid growing geopolitical uncertainties. Asian Survey, 63(2), 347–354.CrossRef

Tamma, P. (2023). War in Israel imperils Europe’s fragile economic recovery. Retrieved from Politico: https://www.politico.eu/article/war-israel-imperils-fragile-economic-recovery/.

Tammen, R. L., Kugler, J., Lemke, D., Stam III, Allan C., Abdollahian, M., Alsharabati, C., Efird, B., & Organski, A. F. K. (2000). Power transitions: Strategies for the 21st century. New York: Chatham House.

Taylor, P. J., & Flint, C. (2002). Geografía política. Trama Editorial.

Tsubasa, S., & Loh, D. (2023). Singapore budget aims to cushion brutal inflation with subsidies. Nikkei Asia. February 14. Retrieved from https://asia.nikkei.com/Economy/Singapore-budget-aims-tocushion-brutal-inflation-with-subsidies.

UBS. (2023). Global wealth databook 2023: Leading perspectives to navigate the future. UBS. Retrieved from https://www.ubs.com/global/en/family-office-uhnw/reports/global-wealth-report-2023.html.

Webber, D. (2016). Declining power Europe: The evolution of the European Union’s world power in the early 21st century. ERIS – European Review of International Studies, 3(1), 31–52. https://doi.org/10.3224/eris.v3i1.3.

Wight, M. (2002). Power politics. Continuum/Royal Institute of Inter-national Affairs.

Titel: The Core States in the International Geostructure
verfasst von: Carlos Pulleiro Méndez
Germán Patiño Orozco
Verlag: Springer Nature Singapore
Buch: National Power and International Geostructure
Print ISBN: 978-981-9711-79-6

Electronic ISBN: 978-981-9711-80-2

Copyright-Jahr: 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-1180-2_6