nach oben

Economic Change and Restructuring

Erschienen in:

01.04.2024

Unraveling the interplay of financial inclusion, stability, and shadow banking in emerging markets

verfasst von: Mugabil Isayev

Erschienen in: Economic Change and Restructuring | Ausgabe 2/2024

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

This paper fills the momentous gap by explicitly investigating the interplay of financial inclusion, financial stability, and shadow banking in 11 emerging market economies (EMEs) from 2010 to 2021. Employing panel quantile regression approaches, including simultaneous bootstrapped quantile regression and generalized quantile regression, the results indicate that while financial inclusion has a negative impact on financial stability, its impact is less pronounced in countries with high stability. Moreover, shadow banking, whether broadly or narrowly defined, tends to weaken the negative effects of financial inclusion, particularly in EMEs with medium and high levels of financial stability. Finally, Dumitrescu–Hurlin's panel causality test confirms bidirectional causality between financial stability and financial inclusion, financial stability and shadow banking, as well as financial inclusion and shadow banking. These findings highlight the need for policymakers in EMEs to prudently adjust shadow banking regulations to maximize their positive impact on financial inclusion and stability while concurrently minimizing potential risks.

Vorheriger Artikel Green energy adoption in ASEAN+6 countries: policy and legal insights for sustainable development

Nächster Artikel Sustainable energy utility investment role in energy transformation progress: case of Mongolia

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Author calculations based on FSB (2022) database.

FSB provides annual shadow banking data only for the following EMEs: Argentina, Brazil, Chile, China, India, Indonesia, Mexico, Russia, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, and Turkey.

The availability of data conditions the size of the panel.

Depositors with commercial banks (per 1,000 adults) and borrowers from commercial banks (per 1,000 adults) in WDI has been excluded from PCA due to large number of missing observations.

Before running the PCA for FI index, Bartlett's test of sphericity and the Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin (KMO) measure of sampling adequacy are performed (see Table 3). The significance of Bartlett's test of sphericity (p < 0.05) and the value of KMO index (> 0.5) indicate that the factor analysis is suitable (Hair et al. 2006; Tabachnick et al. 2007).

Stata (version 15) commands “sqreg”, and “genqreg” are used for the estimation of SQR, and GQR respectively.

The Stata code “genqreg” does not permit the statistical determination of the instruments’ robustness while implementing the GQR methodology. Nevertheless, this paper follows Reed (2015), Bellemare et al. (2017) and Isayev et al. (2023) who show that lagged variables serve as good instruments to deal with endogeneity problems.

It is worth reminding that, in models that involve multiplicative interactions, researchers should avoid interpreting the individual components of the interaction terms as unconditional or average effects (Brambor et al. 2006). The only inference the traditional results table provides is whether FI significantly affects FS for the unique case where shadow banking assets equal zero. Nonetheless, this is not the case in real-world situations. Hence, in Table 5, and 6 the coefficients of FI, SBB, and SBN cannot be interpreted as unconditional or average effects. That’s why before investigating interactions, first baseline model is established as shown in Table 4, to see the separate impact of FI on FS.

Results are available upon request.

Acharya VV, Khandwala H, Öncü TS (2013) The growth of a shadow banking system in emerging markets: evidence from India. J Int Money Financ 39:207–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jimonfin.2013.06.024CrossRef

Adrian T, Jones B (2018) Shadow banking and market-based finance. International Monetary Fund. Retrieved from: https://ideas.repec.org/a/bfr/fisrev/2018222.html

Adrian T, Ashcraft AB (2016) Shadow banking: a review of the literature. Bank Crises Perspect New Palgrave Dict. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137553799_29CrossRef

Ahamed MM, Mallick SK (2019) Is financial inclusion good for bank stability? International evidence. J Econ Behav Organ 157:403–427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2017.07.027CrossRef

Ali M, Hashmi SH, Nazir MR, Bilal A, Nazir MI (2021) Does financial inclusion enhance economic growth? Empirical evidence from the IsDB member countries. Int J Financ Econ 26(4):5235–5258. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.2063CrossRef

Apostoaie CM, Bilan I (2020) Macro determinants of shadow banking in Central and Eastern European countries. Econ Res-Ekonomska Istraživanja 33(1):1146–1171. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2019.1633943CrossRef

Arora D, Kashiramka S (2023) What drives the growth of shadow banks? Evidence from emerging markets. Emerg Mark Rev 54:100993. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ememar.2022.100993CrossRef

Bellemare MF, Masaki T, Pepinsky TB (2017) Lagged explanatory variables and the estimation of causal effect. J Polit 79(3):949–963. https://doi.org/10.1086/690946CrossRef

Brambor T, Clark W, Golder M (2006) Understanding interaction models: improving empirical analyses. Political Anal 14(1):63–82CrossRef

Chernozhukov V, Hansen C (2005) An IV model of quantile treatment effects. Econometrica 73(1):245–261. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0262.2005.00570.xCrossRef

Culp CL, Neves AM (2017) Shadow banking, risk transfer, and financial stability. J Appl Corp Financ 29(4):45–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/jacf.12261CrossRef

Danisman GO, Tarazi A (2020) Financial inclusion and bank stability: evidence from Europe. Eur J Financ 26(18):1842–1855. https://doi.org/10.1080/1351847X.2020.1782958CrossRef

Driscoll JC, Kraay AC (1998) Consistent covariance matrix estimation with spatially dependent panel data. Rev Econ Stat 80(4):549–560. https://doi.org/10.1162/003465398557825CrossRef

Dumitrescu EI, Hurlin C (2012) Testing for Granger non-causality in heterogeneous panels. Econ Model 29(4):1450–1460CrossRef

Elliott D, Kroeber A, Qiao Y (2015) Shadow banking in China: a primer. Econ Stud Brook 3:1–7

Feghali K, Mora N, Nassif P (2021) Financial inclusion, bank market structure, and financial stability: international evidence. Q Rev Econ Finance 80:236–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.qref.2021.01.007CrossRef

Fratzscher M, König PJ, Lambert C (2016) Credit provision and banking stability after the Great Financial Crisis: the role of bank regulation and the quality of governance. J Int Money Financ 66:113–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jimonfin.2016.02.015CrossRef

FSB (2020) Global monitoring report on non-bank financial intermediation 2019. Financial Stability Board. Retrieved from: https://www.fsb.org/2020/01/global-monitoring-report-on-non-bank-financial-intermediation-2019/

FSB (2022) Global monitoring report on non-bank financial intermediation 2022. Financial Stability Board. Retrieved from: https://www.fsb.org/2022/12/global-monitoring-report-on-non-bank-financial-intermediation-2022/

Fung DW, Lee WY, Yeh JJ, Yuen FL (2020) Friend or foe: the divergent effects of FinTech on financial stability. Emerg Mark Rev 45:100727. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ememar.2020.100727CrossRef

Gebauer S, Mazelis F (2023) Macroprudential regulation and leakage to the shadow banking sector. Eur Econ Rev 154:104404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2023.104404CrossRef

Ha D, Nguyen Y (2023) Institutional quality’s influence on financial inclusion’ impact on bank stability. Cogent Econ Financ 11(1):2190212. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2023.2190212CrossRef

Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE, Tatham RL (2006) Multivariate data analysis. Uppersaddle River. Pearson Prentice Hall, Hoboken

Hannig A, Jansen S (2010) Financial inclusion and financial stability: Current policy issues. ADBI Working Paper No. 259. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1729122

Hodula M, Melecky A, Machacek M (2020) Off the radar: Factors behind the growth of shadow banking in Europe. Econ Syst 44(3):100808. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecosys.2020.100808CrossRef

Igan MD, Pinheiro M (2011) Credit growth and bank soundness: fast and furious? IMF working papers 2011/278. https://doi.org/10.5089/9781463925956.001

International Monetary Fund (2014) Chapter 2. Shadow Banking around the Globe: How Large, and How Risky? In Global Financial Stability Report, October 2014: Risk Taking, Liquidity, and Shadow Banking: Curbing Excess while Promoting Growth. https://doi.org/10.5089/9781498390811.082

Isayev M, Bektas E (2023) The nexus between commercial bank lending and shadow banking assets: do bank risks and profitability moderate? Evidence from emerging markets. Appl Econ Lett 30(9):1162–1167. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2022.2039364CrossRef

Isayev M, Irani F, Attarzadeh A (2023) Asymmetric effects of monetary policy on non-bank financial intermediation (NBFI) assets: a panel quantile regression approach. J Econ Stud. https://doi.org/10.1108/JES-01-2023-0024CrossRef

Istiak K, Serletis A (2020) Risk, uncertainty, and leverage. Econ Model 91:257–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2020.06.010CrossRef

Jiang H, Zhang J, Sun C (2020) How does capital buffer affect bank risk-taking? New evidence from China using quantile regression. China Econ Rev 60:101300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2019.04.008CrossRef

Johnston J, DiNardo J (1963) Econometric methods

Kim DW, Yu JS, Hassan MK (2018) Financial inclusion and economic growth in OIC countries. Res Int Bus Finan 43:1–14CrossRef

Koenker R, Bassett G Jr (1978) Regression quantiles. Econ J Econ Soc. https://doi.org/10.2307/1913643CrossRef

Koenker R, Bassett G Jr (1982) Robust tests for heteroscedasticity based on regression quantiles. Econ J Econ Soc. https://doi.org/10.2307/1912528CrossRef

Lambert C, Noth F, Schüwer U (2017) How do insured deposits affect bank risk? Evidence from the 2008 emergency economic stabilization act. J Financ Intermed 29:81–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfi.2015.07.001CrossRef

Lin B, Xu B (2018) Factors affecting CO2 emissions in China’s agriculture sector: a quantile regression. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 94:15–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.05.065CrossRef

López T, Winkler A (2019) Does financial inclusion mitigate credit boom-bust cycles? J Financ Stab 43:116–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfs.2019.06.001CrossRef

Mello M, Perrelli R (2003) Growth equations: a quantile regression exploration. Q Rev Econ Finance 43(4):643–667. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1062-9769(03)00043-7CrossRef

Morgan P, Pontines V (2014) Financial stability and financial inclusion. ADBI Working Paper 488. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2464018

Neaime S, Gaysset I (2018) Financial inclusion and stability in MENA: evidence from poverty and inequality. Financ Res Lett 24:230–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2017.09.007CrossRef

Nguyen TD, Du QLT (2022) The effect of financial inclusion on bank stability: evidence from ASEAN. Cogent Econ Financ 10(1):2040126. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2022.2040126CrossRef

Opoku EEO, Aluko OA (2021) Heterogeneous effects of industrialization on the environment: evidence from panel quantile regression. Struct Chang Econ Dyn 59:174–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2021.08.015CrossRef

Ozili PK (2021) Has financial inclusion made the financial sector riskier? J Financ Regul Compliance 29(3):237–255. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFRC-08-2020-0074CrossRef

Powell D (2020) Quantile treatment effects in the presence of covariates. Rev Econ Stat 102(5):994–1005. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest_a_00858CrossRef

Powell D (2022) Quantile regression with nonadditive fixed effects. Empir Econ 63(5):2675–2691. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-022-02216-6CrossRef

Pozsar Z (2013) Institutional cash pools and the Triffin dilemma of the US banking system. Financ Mark Inst Instrum 22(5):283–318. https://doi.org/10.1111/fmii.12013CrossRef

Reed WR (2015) On the practice of lagging variables to avoid simultaneity. Oxford Bull Econ Stat 77(6):897–905. https://doi.org/10.1111/obes.12088CrossRef

Saha M, Dutta KD (2021) Nexus of financial inclusion, competition, concentration, and financial stability: cross-country empirical evidence. Compet Rev Int Bus J 31(4):669–692. https://doi.org/10.1108/CR-12-2019-0136CrossRef

Saha M, Dutta KD (2022) Does governance quality matter in the nexus of inclusive finance and stability? China Finance Rev Int 13(1):121–139. https://doi.org/10.1108/CFRI-08-2021-0166CrossRef

Sahay MR, Cihak M, N’Diaye MP, Barajas MA, Mitra MS, Kyobe MA, Yousefi MR (2015) Financial inclusion: can it meet multiple macroeconomic goals? Int Monetary Fund. https://doi.org/10.5089/9781513585154006CrossRef

Stein JC (2010) Securitization, shadow banking & financial fragility. Daedalus 139(4):41–51CrossRef

Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS, Ullman JB (2007). Using multivariate statistics (Vol. 5): Pearson Boston

Uddin A, Chowdhury MAF, Sajib SD, Masih M (2020) Revisiting the impact of institutional quality on post-GFC bank risk-taking: Evidence from emerging countries. Emerg Mark Rev 42:100659. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ememar.2019.100659CrossRef

Uhde A, Heimeshoff U (2009) Consolidation in banking and financial stability in Europe: empirical evidence. J Bank Finance 33(7):1299–1311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2009.01.006CrossRef

Vo AT, Van LTH, Vo DH, McAleer M (2019) Financial inclusion and macroeconomic stability in emerging and frontier markets. Ann Financ Econ 14(02):1950008. https://doi.org/10.1142/S2010495219500088CrossRef

Wang W, Ning Z, Shu Y, Riti MKJ, Riti JS (2023) ICT interaction with trade, FDI, and financial inclusion on inclusive growth in top African nations ranked by ICT development. Telecommun Policy 47(4):102490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2023.102490CrossRef

Wooldridge JM (2015) Introductory econometrics: A modern approach. Cengage learning

Yu S, Hu X, Li L, Chen H (2020) Does the development of renewable energy promote carbon reduction? Evidence from Chinese provinces. J Environ Manage 268:110634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110634CrossRef

Titel: Unraveling the interplay of financial inclusion, stability, and shadow banking in emerging markets
verfasst von: Mugabil Isayev
Publikationsdatum: 01.04.2024
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Economic Change and Restructuring / Ausgabe 2/2024
Print ISSN: 1573-9414
Elektronische ISSN: 1574-0277
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10644-024-09657-2

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2024

Achieving environmental sustainability through renewable energy transition in the Next Eleven countries: the importance of establishing sound democratic governance

The intersection of China’s rural economy, renewable energy, and carbon neutrality

Does climate policy uncertainty matter for bank value?

Industrial productive efficiency nexus with energy poverty and energy transition in digital economy: findings of Chinese transport and energy development industries

Sustainable energy utility investment role in energy transformation progress: case of Mongolia

Does the political promotion incentive of state-owned enterprise executives facilitate green innovation?

Premium Partner