nach oben

Erschienen in:

2024 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

7. Attainable Game-Based-Artifacts—A Introspection of the Intersection of Fun and Function

verfasst von : Adam Palmquist, Izabella Jedel, Ole Goethe

Erschienen in: Universal Design in Video Games

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

In the last decade, the concepts “serious games” and “gamification”—ergo, game-based artifacts that harbor purposes that go beyond entertainment—have attracted increased public interest, acceptance, and adoption and have consequently undergone an exponential growth. Although with the growing prevalence and influence of these two game-based siblings in diverse areas such as sustainability, community engagement, corporate training, healthcare, governmental initiatives, and perhaps most consequential, formal education, it also becomes imperative to ensure that the “serious games” and “gamification” artifacts furnished experiences are attainable for its targeted audience. Simultaneously, these game-based concepts possess a multifaceted nature. Besides promoting an entertaining experience for the participants, they frequently encompass ideas that promote growth in participants’ task performance, positively encourage sustainable behaviors, and stimulate the acquisition of new skills or the refinement of previously mastered competencies. Such utilitarian objectives differentiate game-based artifacts from the design space of traditional video games, as they must align with distinctive design directives and constraints postulated by their intended context. This chapter will comprehensively analyze the enablers and barriers that can impact your creation of game-based artifacts. Furthermore, it examines the appropriateness of serious games and gamification across varied scenarios and outlines strategies for crafting universally designed, inclusive games that cater to a broad audience. We aim to provide you with essential directions and insights to help you navigate these factors more easily and confidently. By doing so, you will be better equipped to produce top-quality game-based artifacts that are engaging and entertaining but also impactful, and effective.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel Assessing the Attainability of Video Game Experiences

Nächstes Kapitel Universal Design in Extended Realities

In this chapter and Chap. 9 we diverge somewhat from the previously used terminology Player, as in serious game, gamification and exergame the participant does not necessary regard themselves as players when interacting with these technologies.

Adams, D. M., Mayer, R. E., MacNamara, A., Koenig, A., & Wainess, R. (2012). Narrative games for learning: Testing the discovery and narrative hypotheses. Journal of educational psychology, 104(1), 235.CrossRef

Appel, T., Gerjets, P., Hoffman, S., Moeller, K., Ninaus, M., Scharinger, C., Sevcenko, N., Wortha, F., & Kasneci, E. (2021). Cross-task and cross-participant classification of cognitive load in an emergency simulation game. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing.

Armstrong, M. B., Landers, R. N., & Collmus, A. B. (2016). Gamifying recruitment, selection, training, and performance management. In H. Gangadharbatla & D.Z. Davis (Eds.), Emerging research and Trends in gamification (Vol. I, pp. 140–165). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-8651-9.ch007

Arnab, S., & Clarke, S. (2017). Towards a trans-disciplinary methodology for a game-based intervention development process. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(2), 279–312. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12377CrossRef

Bacalja, A. (2022). A critical review of digital game literacies in the English classroom. L1-Educational Studies in Language and Literature, 1–28.

Baxter, R. J., Holderness, D. K., & Wood, D. A. (2017). The effects of gamification on corporate compliance training: A partial replication and field study of true office anti-corruption training programs. Journal of Forensic Accounting Research, 2(1), A20–A30. https://doi.org/10.2308/jfar-51725

Bittner, J. V., & Shipper, J. (2014). Motivational effects and age differences of gamification in product advertising. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 31(5), 391–400. https://doi.org/10.1108/jcm-04-2014-0945CrossRef

Bosch, N., D'Mello, S. K., Baker, R. S., Ocumpaugh, J., Shute, V., Ventura, M., Wang, L., & Zhao, W. (2016). Detecting student emotions in computer-enabled classrooms. International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 16, 4125–4129

Brooks, A. L., Brooks, E., & Sylla, C. (Eds.). (2019, October 24–26). Interactivity, game creation, design, learning, and innovation. 7th EAI International Conference, ArtsIT 2018, and 3rd EAI International Conference, DLI 2018, ICTCC 2018, Braga, Portugal, Proceedings, Vol. 265. Springer.

10.

Cairns, P., Power, C., Barlet, M., & Haynes, G. (2019). Future design of accessibility in games: A design vocabulary. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 131, 64–71.

11.

Carvalho, J. V., Pereira, R. H., & Rocha, A. (2018). Maturity models of education information systems and technologies: A systematic literature review. Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies, June, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.23919/CISTI.2018.8399339

12.

Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1991). Cognitive load theory and the format of instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 8(4), 293–332.CrossRef

13.

Chanias, S., & Hess, T. (2016). How digital are we? Maturity models for the assessment of a company’s status in the digital transformation. ePub Uni München. https://epub.ub.uni-muenchen.de/57622/

14.

Coe, R., Rauch, C. J., Kime, S., & Singleton, D. (2020). Great teaching toolkit: Evidence review.

15.

Cowley, B., Ravaja, N., & Heikura, T. (2013). Cardiovascular physiology predicts learning effects in a serious game activity. Computers & Education, 60(1), 299–309. ISSN 0361315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.07.014

16.

Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Beyond boredom and anxiety. Jossey-Bass.

17.

Dale, S. (2014). Gamification. Business Information Review, 31(2), 82–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266382114538350CrossRef

18.

Dao, T. T., Tannous, H., Pouletaut, P., Gamet, D., Istrate, D., & Tho, M. C. H. B. (2016). Interactive and connected rehabilitation systems for e-Health. IRBM, 37(5–6), 289–296.

19.

Deterding, S. (2015). The lens of intrinsic skill atoms: A method for gameful design. Human-Computer Interaction, 30(3–4), 294–335. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370024.2014.993471CrossRef

20.

Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R., & Nacke, L. (2011, September). From game design elements to gamefulness: Defining “gamification”. Proceedings of the 15th international academic MindTrek conference: Envisioning future media environments, pp. 9–15.

21.

Ding, Q., Stevenson, I. H., Wang, N., Li, W., Sun, Y., Wang, Q., Kording, K., & Wei, K. (2013). Motion games improve balance control in stroke survivors: A preliminary study based on the principle of constraint-induced movement therapy. Displays, 34(2), 125–131.CrossRef

22.

Engström, H., & Backlund, P. (2022). Serious games design knowledge: Experiences from a decade (+) of serious games development. EAI Endorsed Transactions on Serious Games, 6(1), 1–13.

23.

Engström, H. (2020). Game development research. University of Skövde.

24.

Feinberg, S., & Murphy, M. (2000). Applying cognitive load theory to the design of web-based instruction. 18th Annual Conference on Computer Documentation. IPCC SIGDOC 2000. Technology and Teamwork. Proceedings. IEEE Professional Communication Society International Professional Communication Conference an, pp. 353–360. IEEE.

25.

De Freitas, S., Rebolledo-Mendez, G., Liarokapis, F., Magoulas, G., & Poulovassilis, A. (2010). Learning as immersive experiences: Using the four-dimensional framework for designing and evaluating immersive learning experiences in a virtual world. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(1), 69–85.CrossRef

26.

Gay, G., & Ralston, M. (2021). Accessibility in serious game design (Vol. 24).

27.

Hamari, J., & Koivisto, J. (2015). Why do people use gamification ser- vices? International Journal of Information Management, 35(4), 419–431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2015.04.006CrossRef

28.

Hassan, L., Morschheuser, B., Alexan, N., & Hamari, J. (2018). First-hand experience of why gamification projects fail and what could be done about it. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 2186, 141–150.

29.

Helmefalk, M. (2019). An interdisciplinary perspective on gamification: Mechanics, psychological mediators and outcomes. International Journal of Serious Games, 6(1), 3–26. https://doi.org/10.17083/ijsg.v6i1.262

30.

Hollender, N., Hofmann, C., Deneke, M., & Schmitz, B. (2010). Integrating cognitive load theory and concepts of human–computer interaction. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(6), 1278–1288.CrossRef

31.

Hunicke, R., Leblanc, M., & Zubek, R. (2004). MDA: A formal approach to game design and game research. AAAI Workshop-Technical Report, WS-04-04, 1–5.

32.

Huotari, K., & Hamari, J. (2017). A definition for gamification: Anchoring gamification in the service marketing literature. Electronic Markets, 27(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-015-0212-z

33.

IGDA GASIG (2020). IGDA Game Accessibility SIG. Available at: https://igda-gasig.org/ (Accessed Febuary 14, 2024).

34.

Jedel, I., Palmquist, A., & Gillberg, D. (2021). A practical view of gamifying information systems for the future. International Journal of Gaming and Computer-Mediated Simulations (IJGCMS), 13(4), 1–13.

35.

Jedel, I., & Palmquist, A. (2021, April 28–30). Factors related to the use and perception of a gamified application for employee onboarding. In Human Interaction, Emerging Technologies and Future Applications IV: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Human Interaction and Emerging Technologies: Future Applications (IHIET–AI 2021) (pp. 653–661). Springer International Publishing.

36.

Kalyuga, S., & Plass, J. L. (2009). Evaluating and managing cognitive load in games. In Handbook of research on effective electronic gaming in education (pp. 719–737). IGI Global.

37.

Kirschner, P., & Hendrick, C. (2020). How learning happens: Seminal works in educational psychology and what they mean in practice. Routledge.

38.

Koivisto, J., & Hamari, J. (2019). The rise of motivational information systems: A review of gamification research. International Journal of Information Management, 45, 191–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.10.013CrossRef

39.

Krath, J., Schürmann, L., & von Korflesch, F. (2021). Revealing the theoretical basis of gamification: A systematic review and analysis of theory in research on gamification, serious games and game-based learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106963

40.

Köse, D. B., Morschheuser, B., & Hamari, J. (2019). Is it a tool or a toy? How user’s conception of a system’s purpose affects their experience and use. International Journal of Information Management, 49, 461–474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.07.016CrossRef

41.

Landers, R. N. (2014). Developing a theory of gamified learning. Simulation & Gaming, 45(6), 752–768. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878114563660CrossRef

42.

Landers, R. N., & Landers, A. K. (2014). An empirical test of the theory of gamified learning: The effect of leaderboards on time-on-task and academic performance. Simulation & Gaming, 45(6), 769–785.CrossRef

43.

Larson, K. (2020). Serious games and gamification in the corporate training environment: A literature review. TechTrends, 64(2), 319–328. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-019-00446-7CrossRef

44.

Liu, D., Santhanam, R., & Webster, J. (2017). Toward meaningful engagement: A framework for design and research of gamified information systems 1. MIS Quarterly, 41(4), 1011–1034. https://doi.org/10.25300/misq/2017/41.4.01

45.

Mayer, R. E., & Johnson, C. I. (2010). Adding instructional features that promote learning in a game-like environment. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 42(3), 241–265.CrossRef

46.

Mayer, R. E. (2014). Cognitive theory of multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 43–71). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139547369.005

47.

Menezes, J., Gusmão, C., & Moura, H. (2019). Risk factors in software development projects: A systematic literature review. Software Quality Journal, 27(3), 1149–1174. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11219-018-9427-5CrossRef

48.

Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological review, 63(2), 81.CrossRef

49.

Mora, A., Riera, D., González, C., & Arnedo-Moreno, J. (2017). Gamification: A systematic review of design frameworks. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 29(3), 516–548. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-017-9150-4CrossRef

50.

Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. (2007). Interactive multimodal learning environments: Special issue on interactive learning environments: Contemporary issues and trends. Educational psychology review, 19, 309–326.CrossRef

51.

Morschheuser, B., Hassan, L., Werder, K., & Hamari, J. (2018). How to design gamification? A method for engineering gamified software. Information and Software Technology, 95, 219–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2017.10.015CrossRef

52.

Norman, D (1988). The psychology of everyday things. Basic Books.

53.

Paas, F., Renkl, A., & Sweller, J. (2003). Cognitive load theory and instructional design: Recent developments. Educational psychologist, 38(1), 1–4.CrossRef

54.

Palmquist, A. (2023). Design elements of conflict: A design study of a gamified smartphone application for employee onboarding. Technology, Knowledge, Learning, 28, 1133–1173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-023-09657-7CrossRef

55.

Palmquist, A. (2023). Stakeholders’ design preferences for instructional gamification. Behaviour & Information Technology. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2023.2255905CrossRef

56.

Palmquist, A. (2021). Lost in translation: A study of (mis)conceptions, (mis)communication and concerns when implementing gamification in corporate (re)training. Proceedings of the 54th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. https://doi.org/10.24251/hicss.2021.166

57.

Palmquist, A. (2023). Plug & play? Stakeholders’ co-meaning making of gamification implementations in workplace learning environments. Dissertation University of Gothenburg Department of Applied Information Technology

58.

Pendleton, A., & Okolica, J. (2019, November 27–29). Creating serious games with the game design matrix. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Games and Learning Alliance, Athens, Greece, pp. 530–539. Springer: Cham, Switzerland.

59.

Plass, J. L., Homer, B. D., & Kinzer, C. K. (2015). Foundations of game-based learning. Educational Psychologist, 50(4), 258–283. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2015.1122533CrossRef

60.

Reigeluth, C. M., Beatty, B. J., & Myers, R. D. (2016). Instructional-design theories and models (Vol. IV). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315795478

61.

Rosenshine, B. (2012). Principles of instruction: Research-based strategies that all teachers should know. American educator, 36(1), 12.

62.

Ryan, R. M., Rigby, C. S., & Przybylski, A. (2006). The motivational pull of video games: A self-determination theory approach. Motivation and Emotion, 30(4), 344–360.CrossRef

63.

Salen, K. (2007). Gaming literacies: A game design study in action. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 16(3), 301–322.

64.

Salvucci, D. D., & Taatgen, N. A. (2010). The multitasking mind. Oxford University Press.

65.

Seyderhelm, A. J., & Blackmore, K. L. (2023). How hard is it really? Assessing game-task difficulty through real-time measures of performance and cognitive load. Simulation & Gaming, 54(3), 294–321.

66.

Shahri, A., Hosseini, M., Phalp, K., Taylor, J., & Ali, R. (2019). How to engineer gamification: The consensus, the best practice and the grey areas. Journal of Organizational and End User Computing, 31(1), 39–60. https://doi.org/10.4018/JOEUC.2019010103CrossRef

67.

Smy, P. J., Donald, I., Scott-Brown, K., & Falconer, R. E. (2020). Digital training in the aeronautical industry: Measuring the usability of two mobile applications. Frontiers in Computer Science, 2, 22. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomp.2020.00022

68.

Squire, K. (2006). From content to context: Videogames as designed experience. Educational Researcher, 35(8), 19–29.CrossRef

69.

Staller, M. S., & Koerner, S. (2021). Beyond classical definition: The non-definition of gamification. SN Computer Science, 2(2), 88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42979-021-00472-4CrossRef

70.

Steinkuehler, C. (2006, November 23). Massively multiparticipant online games-based learning, M3-interdisciplinary aspects on digital media & education, workshop. Wein, Austria.

71.

Sweller, J., Ayres, P., Kalyuga, S., Sweller, J., Ayres, P., & Kalyuga, S. (2011). Measuring cognitive load. Cognitive Load Theory, 71–85.

72.

Tobias, S., Fletcher, J. D., & Wind, A. P. (2014). Game-based learning. In Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 485–503).

73.

Treiblmaier, H., Putz, L.-M., & Lowry, P. B. (2018). Research commentary: Setting a definition, context, and theory-based research agenda for the gamification of non-gaming applications. AIS Transactions on Human-Computer Interaction, 129–163. https://doi.org/10.17705/1thci.00107

74.

Van der Heijden, B., Burgers, M. J., Kaan, M., Lamberts, B. F., Migchelbrink, K., Van den Ouweland, R. C. P. M., & Meijer, T. (2020). Gamification in Dutch businesses: An explorative case study. SAGE Open, 10(4).

75.

Van der Heijden. (2004). User acceptance of hedonic information systems. MIS Quarterly, 28(4), 695. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148660

76.

Vanduhe, V. Z., Nat, M., & Hasan, H. F. (2020). Continuance intentions to use gamification for training in higher education: Integrating the technology acceptance model (TAM), social motivation, and task technology fit (TTF). IEEE Access, 8, 21473–21484. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2966179

77.

Waterfield, B., Beagan, B. B., & Weinberg, M. (2018). Disabled academics: A case study in Canadian universities. Disordery & Society, 33(3), 327–348.

78.

Weinstein, Y., Sumeracki, M., & Caviglioli, O. (2018). Understanding how we learn: A visual guide. Routledge.

79.

Zimmerman, E. (2008). Gaming literacy: Game design as a model for literacy in the twenty-first century. In The video game theory reader (Vol. 2, pp. 45–54). Routledge.

80.

Ávila-Pesántez, D., Rivera, L. A., & Alban, M. S. (2017). Approaches for serious game design: A systematic literature review. Computers in Education Journal, 8(3).

Titel: Attainable Game-Based-Artifacts—A Introspection of the Intersection of Fun and Function
verfasst von: Adam Palmquist
Izabella Jedel
Ole Goethe
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Buch: Universal Design in Video Games
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-30594-8

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-031-30595-5

Copyright-Jahr: 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-30595-5_7

Neuer Inhalt

Bildnachweise

VDI-Icon, Profil Icon, inhalt2, Springer Professional Modul/© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, Die Gewinner und Laudatoren des Sustainability Award in Automotive 2024/© Uli Regenscheit | ATZlive, Search Icon, Banner Hanser, Suresh Vittal/© Alteryx, Additiv gefertigte Teile/© Marina_Skoropadskaya | Getty Images | iStock, Warnschild "Land unter"/© Bluedesign / Fotolia, Zeitschrift Wissensmanagement Cover, PatentFit-Logo/© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ATZ-Webinar: Prototypenfreie Entwicklung durch Offline- und Driver-in-the-Loop-HiL-Tests /© (c) VI-grade, chassis.tech plus 2023/© [M] ATZlive / TÜV SÜD PRODUCT SERVICE GMBH, adäsion-Webinar-Matinee/© krystiannawrocki_ Getty Images

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Neuer Inhalt

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.