Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Weitere Formate
Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
ATZ-Fachkongress

Chassis.tech plus 2024


4 Kongresse in einer Veranstaltung

Treffen Sie in München die Fachleute von Chassis, Lenkung, Bremsen sowie Reifen/Räder.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Current Sustainable/Renewable Energy Reports
Erschienen in: Current Sustainable/Renewable Energy Reports 4/2021

14.10.2021 | Energy Market (R Sioshansi and A Mousavian, Section Editors)

Data-Driven Modeling of Operating Characteristics of Hydroelectric Generating Units

verfasst von: Rachel Hunter-Rinderle, Ramteen Sioshansi

Erschienen in: Current Sustainable/Renewable Energy Reports | Ausgabe 4/2021

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Hydroelectric generation is a potential flexible electricity source that can ease the transition to a decarbonized energy economy. As such, using scarce hydroelectric generating resources efficiently is important. We examine approaches to represent the operating characteristics of hydroelectric resources.

Recent Findings

Many hydroelectric-plant owners use water tables or generic unit characteristics for operational planning. Such practice may be inefficient, as it does not account for unit-specific operating-characteristic changes or time-related impacts, e.g., plant degradation. We demonstrate a data-driven approach to modeling plant operations that is unit-specific and depends solely on observable and controllable variables.

Summary

Numerical results using historical data for four hydroelectric units illustrate the proposed methodology.
Vorheriger Artikel Electricity Markets and Power Supply Resilience: an Incisive Review
Nächster Artikel Interconnected and Complex Electric Power and Transportation Systems: a SWOT Analysis

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Literatur
1.
Burrow A, Newman AM, Bazilian M. Reservoir design and operation for the food-energy-water Nexus. Current Sustainable/Renewable Energy Reports 2019;6:71–89.CrossRef
2.
Avraam C, Zhang Y, Sankaranarayanan S, Zaitchik B, Moynihan E, Juturu P, Neff R, Siddiqui S. Optimization-based systems modeling for the food-energy-water nexus. Current Sustainable/Renewable Energy Reports 2021;8:4–16.CrossRef
3.
García-Morales MB, Dubus L. Forecasting precipitation for hydroelectric power management: how to exploit GCM’s seasonal ensemble forecasts. Int J Climatol 2007;27:1691–1705.CrossRef
4.
Boucher M-A, Ramos MH. Ensemble streamflow forecasts for hydropower systems. Handbook of hydrometeorological ensemble forecasting. In: Duan Q, Pappenberger F, Wood A, Cloke HL, and Schaake JC, editors. Berlin: Springer; 2019. p. 1289–1306.
5.
Singh VK, Singal SK. Operation of hydro power plants-a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2017;69:610–619.CrossRef
6.
Gfrerer H. Optimization of hydro energy storage plant problems by variational methods. Zeitschrift für Oper Res 1984;28:B87–B101.MathSciNetMATH
7.
Bauer W, Gfrerer H, Wacker H. Optimization strategies for hydro energy storage plants. Zeitschrift für Oper Res 1984;28:B103–B131.MathSciNetMATH
8.
Catalão J, Mariano SJPS, Mendes VMF, Ferreira LAFM. Scheduling of head-sensitive cascaded hydro systems: a nonlinear approach. IEEE Trans Power Syst 2009;24:337–346.CrossRef
9.
Pousinho HMI, Contreras J, Catalão JPS. Short-term optimal scheduling of a price-maker hydro producer in a pool-based day-ahead market. IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution 2012;6:1243–1251.CrossRef
10.
Philpott AB, Craddock M, Waterer H. Hydro-electric unit commitment subject to uncertain demand. Eur J Oper Res 2000;125:410–424.CrossRef
11.
Pérez-Díaz JI, Chazarra M, García-González J, Cavazzini G, Stoppato A. Trends and challenges in the operation of pumped-storage hydropower plants. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2015;44: 767–784.CrossRef
12.
Séguin S., Fleten S-E, Côté P., Pichler A, Audet C. Stochastic short-term hydropower planning with inflow scenario trees. Eur J Oper Res 2017;259:1156–1168.MathSciNetCrossRef
13.
Marchand A, Gendreau M, Blais M, Guidi J. Optimized operating rules for short-term hydropower planning in a stochastic environment. Comput Manag Sci 2019;16:501–519.MathSciNetCrossRef
14.
• Taktak R, D’Ambrosio C. An overview on mathematical programming approaches for the deterministic unit commitment problem in hydro valleys. Energy Systems 2017;8:57–79. Considers various assumptions that are used for simplifications of unit-commitment models with hydroelectric generators, including linearizations of penstock loss.CrossRef
15.
Piekutowski MR, Litwinowicz T, Frowd RJ. Optimal short-term scheduling for a large-scale cascaded hydro system. IEEE Trans Power Syst 1994;9:805–811.CrossRef
16.
Blom E, Söder L, Risberg D. Performance of multi-scenario equivalent hydropower models. Electr Power Syst Res 2020;187:106486.CrossRef
17.
Shawwash ZK, Siu TK, Russell SOD. The B.C. hydro short term hydro scheduling optimization model. IEEE Trans on Power Syst 2000;15:1125–1131.CrossRef
18.
Rajšl I, Ilak P, Delimar M, Krajcar S. Dispatch method for independently owned hydropower plants in the same river flow. Energies 2012;5:3674–3690.CrossRef
19.
Ikura Y, Gross G. Efficient large-scale hydro system scheduling with forced spill conditions. IEEE Trans Power Appar Syst 1984;PAS-103:3502–3520.CrossRef
20.
Diniz AL, Esteves PPI, Sagastizábal CA. A mathematical model for the efficiency curves of hydroelectric units. 2007 IEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting, Tampa, Florida; 2007. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers.
21.
•• Hidalgo IG, Fontane DG, Lopes JEG, Andrade JGP, de Angelis AF. Efficiency curves for hydroelectric generating units. J Water Resour Plan Manag 2014;140:86–91. Uses historical measured power, head level, and water flow to fit efficiency curves for hydroelectric generating units to determine performance characteristics.CrossRef
22.
Kong J, Skjelbred HI, Abgottspon H. Short-term hydro scheduling of a variable speed pumped storage hydropower plant considering head loss in a shared penstock. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 2019;240:082002.CrossRef
23.
Breton M, Hachem S, Hammadia A. Accounting for losses in the optimization of production of hydroplants. IEEE Trans Energy Convers 2004;19:346–351.CrossRef
24.
Streeter VL, Wylie EB. Fluid mechanics, seventh edition. New York: The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.; 1979.MATH
25.
Ruud PA. 2000. An introduction to classical econometric theory: Oxford University Press, New York.
Metadaten
Titel
Data-Driven Modeling of Operating Characteristics of Hydroelectric Generating Units
verfasst von
Rachel Hunter-Rinderle
Ramteen Sioshansi
Publikationsdatum
14.10.2021
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
Current Sustainable/Renewable Energy Reports / Ausgabe 4/2021
Elektronische ISSN: 2196-3010
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40518-021-00197-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2021

Current Sustainable/Renewable Energy Reports 4/2021 Zur Ausgabe

Deep Decarbonization: BECCS (P Patrizio and N Mac Dowell, Section Editors)

Decarbonising Industry via BECCS: Promising Sectors, Challenges, and Techno-economic Limits of Negative Emissions

Zero-Marginal-Cost Market Design (R Sioshansi and S Mousavian, Section Editors)

Do Renewables Drive Coal-Fired Generation Out of Electricity Markets?

Zero-Marginal-Cost Market Design (R Sioshansi and S Mousavian, Section Editors)

Integrating Distributed Energy Resources into the Independent System Operators’ Energy Market: a Review

Deep Decarbonization: BECCS (P Patrizio and N Mac Dowell, Section Editors)

The Potential of Power and Biomass-to-X Systems in the Decarbonization Challenge: a Critical Review

Energy Market (R Sioshansi and A Mousavian, Section Editors)

Electricity Markets and Power Supply Resilience: an Incisive Review

Regional Renewable Energy - Africa (D Arent and N Lee, Section Editors)

A Grid for all Seasons: Enhancing the Integration of Variable Solar and Wind Power in Electricity Systems Across Africa