nach oben

Erschienen in:

2024 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

10. Double Bind or Political Advantage? The Negotiation of Womanhood in the Online Discourse of Female Right-Wing Populist Politicians

verfasst von : Katarina Pettersson, Inari Sakki

Erschienen in: Political Psychology Perspectives on Populism

Verlag: Springer Nature Switzerland

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Marine Le Pen and Riikka Purra are the front-figures of right-wing populist parties in France and Finland. Known for their patriarchal and anti-feminist agendas, these movements remain dominated by men. However, the number of women, including political leaders, in far right and populist movements is growing. Thus, there is a call for research that focuses specifically on female right-wing populist political leadership. This chapter aims to contribute to previous literature right-wing populism and political communication with a multimodal critical discursive psychological study of Marine Le Pen’s and Riikka Purra’s online political mobilisation. More specifically, in this chapter we investigate how the two populist far right leaders deploy identity management strategies in their online communication—official Twitter accounts and political blogs—to construct and negotiate their position as female and right-wing populist political leaders, and how they flexibly rework, negotiate and navigate between these positions to rhetorically appeal to diverse audiences. Our results show three distinct yet in many ways intertwined ways in which these politicians positioned themselves as (female) political leaders. The positions were (1) the strong leader for both men and women, (2) the protector of ‘our’ vulnerable women and (3) the protector of men. In line with previous research demonstrating the paramount importance of social media for the political campaigning and mobilization of populist movements, the present study contributes to the critical social and political psychological study of right-wing populism theoretically, by examining the ways in which gender and political leadership is negotiated in female right-wing populist leaders’ discourse; methodologically, through deploying the analytic tools of CDP in a fine-grained analysis of online political mobilization; and empirically, by providing a novel comparative contribution to research on female populism in Europe.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel Italian Populist Leaders and Their Followers on Facebook (2019–2022): Representational Fields and Empirical Evidence from a Psycho-Social Linguistic Perspective

Nächstes Kapitel Concluding Remarks

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

This study focuses on a timeframe preceding the name change of Twitter into X in July 2023; therefore, we here use the name ‘Twitter’ when referring to this platform.

Ahonen, S. (2017). Suomalaisuuden monet myytit: Kansallinen katse historian kirjoissa. Gaudeamus.

Akkerman, T. (2015). Gender and the radical right in Western Europe: A comparative analysis of policy agendas. Patterns of Prejudice, 49(1–2), 37–60.CrossRef

Amengay, A., Durovic, A., & Mayer, N. (2017). The impact of gender on the Marine Le Pen vote. Revue française de science politique, 67, 1067–1087. https://www.cairn-int.info/journal--2017-6-page-1067.htm

Augoustinos, M., & Every, D. (2007). The language of ‘race’ and prejudice: A discourse of denial, reason, and liberal-practical politics. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 26(2), 123–141. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X07300075CrossRef

Bast, J., Oschatz, C., & Renner, A. M. (2022). Successfully overcoming the “double bind”? A mixed-method analysis of the self-presentation of female right-wing populists on Instagram and the impact on voter attitudes. Political Communication, 39(3), 358–382. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2021.2007190

Baumer, E., Sueyoshi, M., & Tomlinson, B. (2011). Bloggers and readers blogging together: Collaborative co-creation of political blogs. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 20, 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-010-9132-9CrossRef

Burke, S., & Rowe, L. (2015). The Benefits of Using Discourse Analysis in Online Data. The Qualitative Methods in Psychology Section Bulletin, 19 (Spring 2015).

Chadwick, A. (2017). The hybrid media system: Politics and power. Oxford University Press.

Connell, R. W., & Messerschmidt, J. W. (2005). Hegemonic masculinity: Rethinking the concept. Gender & Society, 19(6), 829–859. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243205278639

Davies, B., & Harré, R. (1990). Positioning: The discursive production of selves. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 20(1), 43–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5914.1990.tb00174.xCrossRef

Dietze, G., & Roth, J. (Eds.). (2020). Right-wing populism and gender: European perspectives and beyond. transcript Verlag.

Donaghue, N. (2015). Who gets played by ‘the gender card’? A critical discourse analysis of coverage of Prime Minister Julia Gillard’s sexism and misogyny speech in the Australian print media. Australian Feminist Studies, 30(84), 161–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/08164649.2015.10381CrossRef

Edley, N. (2001). Analysing masculinity: Interpretative repertoires, ideological dilemmas and subject positions. In M. Wetherell, S. Taylor, & S. J. Yates (Eds.), Discourse as data: A guide for analysis (pp. 189–228). Sage.

Edwards, D., & Potter, J. (1992). Discursive psychology. Sage.

Falk, E. (2013). Clinton and the playing-the-gender-card metaphor in campaign news. Feminist Media Studies, 13(2), 192–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2012.678074CrossRef

Farris, S. (2017). In the name of women’s rights: The rise of femonationalism. Duke University Press.CrossRef

Geva, D. (2020). Daughter, mother, captain: Marine Le Pen, gender, and populism in the French National Front. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State and Society, 27(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxy039CrossRef

Givens, T. E. (2004). The radical right gender gap. Comparative Political Studies, 37(1), 30–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414003260124CrossRef

Goffman, E. (1979). Footing. Semiotica, 25, 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1979.25.1-2.1CrossRef

Hall, L. J., & Donaghue, N. (2012). ‘Nice girls don’t carry knives’: Constructions of ambition in media coverage of Australia’s first female prime minister. British Journal of Social Psychology, 52(4), 631–647. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.2012.02114.xCrossRef

Harp, D., Loke, J., & Bachmann, I. (2016). Hillary Clinton’s Benghazi hearing coverage: Political competence, authenticity, and the persistence of the double bind. Women’s Studies in Communication, 29(2), 193–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/07491409.2016.1171267CrossRef

Haslam, N., & Loughnan, S. (2014). Dehumanization and infrahumanization. Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 399–423. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115045CrossRef

Hughey, M. W. (2012). Black guys and white guise: The discursive construction of white masculinity. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 41(1), 95–124. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891241611431580

Jamieson, K. H. (1995). Beyond the Double Bind: Women and Leadership. Oxford University Press.

Jefferson, G. (1990). List construction as a task and resource. Interaction Competence, 63(92), 63–92.

Jensen, M. J. (2017). Social media and political campaigning: Changing terms of engagement? The International Journal of Press/Politics, 22(1), 23–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161216673196CrossRef

Jungherr, A. (2016). Twitter use in election campaigns: A systematic literature review. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 13(1), 72–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2015.1132401

Keskinen, S. (2013). Antifeminism and white identity politics: Political antagonisms in radical right-wing populist and anti-immigration rhetoric in Finland. Nordic Journal of Migration Research, 3(4), 225–232. https://doi.org/10.2478/njmr-2013-0015CrossRef

Kilby, L., & Lennon, H. (2021). When words are not enough: Combined textual and visual multimodal analysis as a critical discursive psychology undertaking. Methods in Psychology, 5, 100071. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.metip.2021.100071CrossRef

Kitschelt, H., & McGann, A. (1997). The radical right in Western Europe: A comparative analysis. The University of Michigan Press.

Kress, G. (2011). Multimodal discourse analysis. In J. P. Gee & M. Handford (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 35–50). Routledge.

Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2006). Reading images—The grammar of visual design. Routledge.CrossRef

Landes, J. B. (1988). Women and the public sphere in the age of the French Revolution. Cornell University Press.

Larsen, E., Manns, U., & Östman, A.-C. (2022). Gender-equality pioneering, or how three Nordic states celebrated 100 years of women’s suffrage. Scandinavian Journal of History, 47(5), 624–647. https://doi.org/10.1080/03468755.2021.2023035CrossRef

Lépinard, E. (2007). The contentious subject of feminism: Defining women in France from the second wave to parity. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 32(2), 375–403. https://doi.org/10.1086/508376

Liu, Y., & O'Halloran, K. (2009). Intersemiotic texture: Analyzing cohesive devices between language and images. Social Semiotics, 19(4), 367–388. https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330903361059

Mikecz, D. (2020). “Gender ideology” and Fidesz: Doomed mobilization weapon. Retrieved February 13, 2023, from http://4liberty.eu/gender-ideology-and-fidesz-doomed-mobilization-weapon/

Mudde, C. (2007). Populist radical right parties in Europe. Cambridge University Press.CrossRef

Norocel, O. C., Saresma, T., Lähdesmäki, T., & Ruotsalainen, M. (2020). Discursive constructions of white Nordic masculinities in right-wing populist media. Men and Masculinities, 23(3–4), 425–446. https://doi.org/10.1177/1097184X18780459CrossRef

O’Halloran, K. L. (2008). Systemic functional-multimodal discourse analysis (SF-MDA): Constructing ideational meaning using language and visual imagery. Visual Communication, 7(4), 443–475. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357208096210

Pérez Curiel, C. (2020). Trend towards extreme right-wing populism on Twitter: An analysis of the influence on leaders, media and users. Communication and Society, 33(2), 175–192. https://doi.org/10.15581/003.33.2.175-192

Pettersson, K., Payotte, S., & Sakki, I. (2023). Harsh punisher or loving mother? A critical discursive psychological analysis of Marine Le Pen’s presidential Twitter campaign. Ethnicities, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/14687968221148574

Pettersson, K., & Sakki, I. (2023). ‘You truly are the worst kind of racist!’: Argumentation and polarization in online discussions around gender and radical-right populism. British Journal of Social Psychology, 62, 119–135. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12557CrossRef

Pettersson, K., & Sakki, I. (2020). Analysing multimodal communication and persuasion in populist radical right political blogs. In M. Demasi, S. Burke, & C. Tileagă (Eds.), Political communication. Palgrave Studies in Discursive Psychology (pp. 175–203). Palgrave Macmillan.

Pettersson, K., & Sakki, I. (2017). ‘Pray for the fatherland!’ Discursive and digital strategies at play in nationalist political blogging. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 14(3), 315–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2017.1290177CrossRef

Potter, J. (1996). Representing reality: Discourse, rhetoric and social construction. Sage.

Rheindorf, M., & Wodak, R. (2019). ‘Austria First’ revisited: A diachronic cross-sectional analysis of the gender and body politics of the extreme right. Patterns of Prejudice, 53(3), 302–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/0031322X.2019.1595392CrossRef

Royce, T. D. (2007). Intersemiotic complementarity: A framework for multimodal discourse analysis. In T. Royce & W. Bowcher (Eds.), New directions in the analysis of multimodal discourse (pp. 63–100). Routledge.

Sager, M., & Mulinari, D. (2018). Safety for whom? Exploring femonationalism and care-racism in Sweden. Women’s Studies International Forum, 68, 149–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2017.12.002CrossRef

Sakki, I., & Martikainen, J. (2021). Mobilizing collective hatred through humour: Affective-discursive production and reception of populist rhetoric. British Journal of Social Psychology, 60(2), 610–634. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12419

Sakki, I., & Pettersson, K. (2016). Discursive constructions of otherness in populist radical right political blogs. European Journal of Social Psychology, 46(2), 156–170. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2142CrossRef

Saresma, T. (2018). Gender populism: Three cases of PS actors’ traditionalist anti-feminism. In U. Kovala, E. Palonen, M. Ruotsalainen, & T. Saresma (Eds.), Populism on the loose (pp. 177–200). University of Jyväskylä. Nykykulttuurin tutkimuskeskuksen julkaisuja, 122. http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-951-39-7401-5

Scott, J. W. (2004). French universalism in the nineties. Differences, 15(2), 32–53. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.fp.8200127CrossRef

Siim, B., & Mokre, M. (Eds.). (2012). Negotiating gender and diversity in an emergent European public sphere. Springer.

Snipes, A., & Mudde, C. (2020). “France’s (kinder, gentler) extremist”: Marine Le Pen, intersectionality, and media framing of female populist radical right leaders. Politics and Gender, 16(2), 438–470. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X19000370CrossRef

Sorrentino, J., & Augoustinos, M. (2016). ‘I don’t view myself as a woman politician, I view myself as a politician who’s a woman’: The discursive management of gender identity in political leadership. British Journal of Social Psychology, 55(3), 385–406. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12138CrossRef

Spina, S., & Cancila, J. (2013). Gender issues in the interactions of Italian politicians on Twitter: Identity, representation and flows of conversation. International Journal of Cross-Cultural Studies and Environmental Communication, 2(2), 147–157.

Stavrakakis, Y. (2018). Populism, anti-populism and democracy. Political Insight, 9(3), 33–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/2041905818796577CrossRef

Törnberg, P., Andersson, C., Lindgren, K., & Banisch, S. (2021). Modeling the emergence of affective polarization in the social media society. PLoS ONE, 16(10), e0258259. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0258259CrossRef

Vasantola, S. (2023). Rotia, kotimaa! Helsingin Sanomat. https://www.hs.fi/sunnuntai/art-2000009481266.html

Vinocur, N. (2017). Marine Le Pen’s Interrnet Army. Politico. https://www.politico.eu/article/marine-le-pens-internet-army-far-right-trolls-social-media/

Weeks, A., Meguid, B., Kittilson, M., & Coffé, H. (2022). When do Männerparteien elect women? Radical right populist parties and strategic descriptive representation. American Political Science Review, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055422000107

Wetherell, M. (1998). Positioning and interpretative repertoires: Conversation analysis and Post-Structuralism in dialogue. Discourse & Society, 9(3), 387–412. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926598009003005

Wodak, R. (2015). The politics of fear: What right-wing populist discourses mean. Sage.CrossRef

Worth, A., Augoustinos, M., & Hastle, B. (2016). “Playing the gender card”: Media representations of Julia Gillard’s sexism and misogyny speech. Feminism and Psychology, 26(1), 52–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353515605544CrossRef

Titel: Double Bind or Political Advantage? The Negotiation of Womanhood in the Online Discourse of Female Right-Wing Populist Politicians
verfasst von: Katarina Pettersson
Inari Sakki
Verlag: Springer Nature Switzerland
Buch: Political Psychology Perspectives on Populism
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-44072-4

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-031-44073-1

Copyright-Jahr: 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-44073-1_10