Top

Published in:

2021 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

12. Einstellungen gegenüber sozialen Robotern

Eine Übersicht zu Forschungsmethoden und Forschungsergebnissen

Authors : Julia G. Stapels, Friederike Eyssel

Published in: Soziale Roboter

Publisher: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config

AI-assisted search

Off

Zusammenfassung

Einstellungen sind die Gedanken und Gefühle einer Person zu einem Einstellungsobjekt, z. B. einem sozialen Roboter. Einstellungen gegenüber Robotern haben kognitive, affektive und verhaltensbezogene Komponenten und können mithilfe von Selbstbeurteilungsmaßen, impliziten Maßen oder Beobachtungsmaßen gemessen werden. Ein Konflikt zwischen möglichen positiven und negativen Aspekten von Einstellungen führt bei potenziellen Nutzer*innen zu Ambivalenz gegenüber sozialen Robotern und zu fehlender Akzeptanz von Robotern im Alltag. Hierbei werden die Einstellungen gegenüber Robotern von den Eigenschaften des jeweiligen Roboters selbst sowie von individuellen und gesellschaftlichen Faktoren beeinflusst. Bezüglich der Verbesserung von Einstellungen gegenüber Robotern ist auf Basis der sozialpsychologischen Literatur anzunehmen, dass vor allem direkter Kontakt oder überzeugende Argumente solche Einstellungen langfristig verbessern können. Aktuelle Forschungsprojekte integrieren die vorhandenen Forschungsergebnisse, um Robotertechnologien gesellschaftlich nutzbar zu machen. Insgesamt sind soziale Roboter noch nicht in Privathaushalten akzeptiert und es ist mehr Forschung nötig, um die ambivalenten Einstellungen aufzulösen und Roboter zu eindeutig positiven Alltagsgefährten zu machen.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

previous chapter Humanoide, animaloide und dingliche Roboter

next chapter Artificial Companions der ersten Generation

Asimov I (1991) I, robot. Bantam Books, New York

Bartneck C, Yogeeswaran K, Ser QM, Woodward G, Sparrow R, Wang S, Eyssel F (2018) Robots and racism. In: Proceedings of the 2018 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, Chicago, S 196–204

Bellon J, Eyssel F, Gransche B, Nähr-Wagener S, Wullenkord R (2021) Theorie und Praxis soziosensitiver und sozioaktiver Systeme. Springer, Wiesbaden

Bendel O (2020) Der Einsatz von Servicerobotern bei Epidemien und Pandemien. In: HMD – Praxis der Wirtschaftsinformatik: 1–16. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1365/s40702-020-00669-w. Zugegriffen am 14.03.2021

Bernotat J, Eyssel F (2018) Can(’t) wait to have a robot at home? – Japanese and German users’ attitudes toward service robots in smart homes. In: 2018 27th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), Nanjing, S 15–22

Bernotat J, Eyssel F, Sachse J (2021) The (fe)male robot: how robot body shape impacts first impressions and trust towards robots. Int J Soc Robot 13(3):477–489

Bohner G, Wänke M (2002) Attitudes and attitude change. Psychology Press, Hove

Cacioppo JT, Petty RE (1982) The need for cognition. J Pers Soc Psychol 42(1):116–131

Chang W, Šabanović S (2015) Interaction expands function: social shaping of the therapeutic robot PARO in a nursing home. In: 10th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), Portland, S 343–350

Collins NL, Miller LC (1994) Self-disclosure and liking: a meta-analytic review. Psychol Bull 116(3):457CrossRef

Dang J, Liu L (2021) Robots are friends as well as foes: ambivalent attitudes toward mindful and mindless AI robots in the United States and China. Comput Hum Behav 115:106612CrossRef

Epley N, Waytz A, Cacioppo JT (2007) On seeing human: a three-factor theory of anthropomorphism. Psychol Rev 114(4):864CrossRef

European Commission and European Parliament, Brussels (2017) Eurobarometer 87.1 (2017). GESIS Data Archive

Eyssel F, Reich N (2013) Loneliness makes the heart grow fonder (of robots) – on the effects of loneliness on psychological anthropomorphism. In: 2013 8th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), Tokyo, S 121–122

Eyssel F, Wullenkord R, Nitsch V (2017) The role of self-disclosure in human-robot interaction. In: 2017 26th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), Lisbon, S 922–927

Festinger L (1964) Conflict, decision, and dissonance. Stanford University Press, Stanford

Franke N, Schreier M, Kaiser U (2010) The „I designed it myself “ effect in mass customization. Manag Sci 56(1):125–140

Freeman JB, Ambady N (2010) MouseTracker: software for studying real-time mental processing using a computer mouse-tracking method. Behav Res Methods 42(1):226–241CrossRef

Frennert S, Eftring H, Östlund B (2013) What older people expect of robots: a mixed methods approach. In: Herrmann G, Pearson MJ, Lenz A, Bremner P, Spiers A, Leonards U (Hrsg) Social robotics. ICSR 2013, Lecture notes in computer science, Bd 8239. Springer, Cham, S 19–29

Frennert S, Eftring H, Östlund B (2017) Case report: implications of doing research on socially assistive robots in real homes. Int J Soc Robot 9(3):401–415CrossRef

Goldacre B (2008) Bad science: quacks, hacks, and big pharma flacks. Emblem, Toronto

Gollwitzer M, Schmitt M (2009) Sozialpsychologie kompakt. Weinheim, Beltz

Greenwald AG, McGhee DE, Schwartz JL (1998) Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: the implicit association test. J Pers Soc Psychol 74(6):1464CrossRef

Hancock PA, Kessler TT, Kaplan AD, Brill JC, Szalma JL (2020) Evolving trust in robots: specification through sequential and comparative meta-analyses. Hum Factors 0018720820922080

van Harreveld F, Nohlen HU, Schneider IK (2015) The ABC of ambivalence: affective, behavioral, and cognitive consequences of attitudinal conflict. Adv Exp Soc Psychol 52:285–324CrossRef

Horstmann AC, Krämer NC (2019) Great expectations? Relation of previous experiences with social robots in real life or in the media and expectancies based on qualitative and quantitative assessment. Front Psychol 10:939CrossRef

Jøranson N, Pedersen I, Rokstad AMM, Ihlebaek C (2015) Effects on symptoms of agitation and depression in persons with dementia participating in robot-assisted activity: a cluster-randomized controlled trial. J Am Med Dir Assoc 16(10):867–873CrossRef

Kang HS, Makimoto K, Konno R, Koh IS (2019) Review of outcome measures in PARO robot intervention studies for dementia care. Geriatr Nurs 41(3):207–214CrossRef

Kaplan KJ (1972) On the ambivalence-indifference problem in attitude theory and measurement: a suggested modification of the semantic differential technique. Psychol Bull 77(5):361–372CrossRef

MacDorman KF, Vasudevan SK, Ho CC (2009) Does Japan really have robot mania? Comparing attitudes by implicit and explicit measures. AI Soc 23(4):485–510CrossRef

Manstead AS, Livingstone AG (2014) Forschungsmethoden in der Sozialpsychologie. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, S 29–64

Mathur MB, Reichling DB, Lunardini F, Geminiani A, Antonietti A, Ruijten PA, Aczel B (2020) Uncanny but not confusing: multisite study of perceptual category confusion in the uncanny valley. Comput Hum Behav 103:21–30CrossRef

Naneva S, Sarda GM, Webb TL, Prescott TJ (2020) A systematic review of attitudes, anxiety, acceptance, and trust towards social robots. Int J Soc Robot 12(6):1179–1201CrossRef

Nederhof AJ (1984) Visibility of response as a mediating factor in equity research. J Soc Psychol 122(2):211–215CrossRef

Neyer FJ, Felber J, Gebhardt C (2012) Entwicklung und Validierung einer Kurzskala zur Erfassung von Technikbereitschaft (technology commitment). Diagnostica 58:87–99

Nomura T, Kanda T, Suzuki T, Kato K (2004) Psychology in human-robot communication: an attempt through investigation of negative attitudes and anxiety toward robots. In: Proceedings of the 13th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN 2004), Kurashiki, S 35–40

Nomura T, Suzuki T, Kanda T, Kato K (2006) Measurement of anxiety toward robots. In: ROMAN 2006 – the 15th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, Hatfield, IEEE, S 372–377

Norris CJ, Larsen JT, Crawford LE, Cacioppo JT (2011) Better (or worse) for some than others: individual differences in the positivity offset and negativity bias. J Res Pers 45(1):100–111CrossRef

Onnasch L, Roesler E (2019) Anthropomorphizing robots: the effect of framing in human-robot collaboration. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 63, No. 1. Sage, Los Angeles, S 1311–1315

Petrak B, Weitz K, Aslan I, André E (2019) Let me show you your new home: studying the effect of proxemic-awareness of robots on users’ first impressions. In: 2019 28th IEEE international conference on robot and human interactive communication (RO-MAN), New Delhi, S 1–7

Pettigrew TF, Tropp LR (2006) A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. J Pers Soc Psychol 90(5):751CrossRef

Petty RE, Cacioppo JT (1986) The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Communication and persuasion. Springer, New York, S 1–24

Priester JR, Petty RE (1996) The gradual threshold model of ambivalence: relating the positive and negative bases of attitudes to subjective ambivalence. J Pers Soc Psychol 71(3):431–449CrossRef

Reeves B, Nass C (1996) The media equation: how people treat computers, television, and new media like real people. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

Reich-Stiebert N, Eyssel F (2015) Learning with educational companion robots? Toward attitudes on education robots, predictors of attitudes, and application potentials for education robots. Int J Soc Robot 7(5):875–888CrossRef

Reich-Stiebert N, Eyssel F, Hohnemann C (2019) Involve the user! Changing attitudes toward robots by user participation in a robot prototyping process. Comput Hum Behav 91:290–296CrossRef

Rosenthal-von der Pütten AM, Krämer NC, Hoffmann L, Sobieraj S, Eimler SC (2013) An experimental study on emotional reactions towards a robot. Int J Soc Robot 5(1):17–34CrossRef

Sandoval EB, Mubin O, Obaid M (2014) Human robot interaction and fiction: a contradiction. In: International Conference on Social Robotics. Springer, Cham, S 54–63

Schneider IK, van Harreveld F, Rotteveel M, Topolinski S, van der Pligt J, Schwarz N, Koole SL (2015) The path of ambivalence: tracing the pull of opposing evaluations using mouse trajectories. Front Psychol 6:996

Stange S, Kopp S (2020) Effects of a social robot’s self-explanations on how humans understand and evaluate its behavior. In: Proceedings of the 2020 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, Cambridge, S 619–627

Stange S, Kopp S (2021) Effects of referring to robot vs. user needs in self-explanations of undesirable robot behavior. In: Companion of the 2021 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI’21 Companion), Boulder

Stapels JG, Eyssel F (2021) Let’s not be indifferent about robots: neutral ratings on bipolar measures mask ambivalence in attitudes towards robots. PLoS One 16(1):e0244697CrossRef

Weitz K, Hassan T, Schmid U, Garbas JU (2019a) Deep-learned faces of pain and emotions: elucidating the differences of facial expressions with the help of explainable AI methods. tm – Technisches Messen 86(7–8):404–412CrossRef

Weitz K, Schiller D, Schlagowski R, Huber T, André E (2019b) „Do you trust me?“ Increasing user-trust by integrating virtual agents in explainable AI interaction design. In: Proceedings of the 19th ACM International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents, Paris, S 7–9

Weitz K, Schiller D, Schlagowski R, Huber T, André E (2021) „Let me explain!“: Exploring the potential of virtual agents in explainable AI interaction design. J Multimodal User Interfaces 15:87–98

Wullenkord R, Eyssel F (2019) Imagine how to behave: the influence of imagined contact on human–robot interaction. Phil Trans R Soc 374:20180038CrossRef

Wullenkord R, Fraune MR, Eyssel F, Šabanović S (2016) Getting in touch: how imagined, actual, and physical contact affect evaluations of robots, In: 2016 25th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), New York, S 980–985

Złotowski J, Yogeeswaran K, Bartneck C (2017) Can we control it? Autonomous robots threaten human identity, uniqueness, safety, and resources. Int J Hum Comput Stud 100:48–54CrossRef

Title: Einstellungen gegenüber sozialen Robotern
Authors: Julia G. Stapels
Friederike Eyssel
Publisher: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden
Book: Soziale Roboter
Print ISBN: 978-3-658-31113-1

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-658-31114-8

Copyright Year: 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-31114-8_12

Springer Professional

Zusammenfassung

Please log in to get access to your license.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Premium Partner