1 Introduction
2 State of the art
3 Kinematics of gear skiving
Input | Output | ||
---|---|---|---|
Workpiece normal pressure angle | αn | Working transverse pressure angles | αwt,0(2) |
Workpiece normal module | mn | Working pitch circles | dw,0(2) |
Workpiece generating addendum modification coefficient | xE,2 | Working helix angles | βw,0(2) |
Tool addendum modification coefficient | x0 | Working cone angle (Effective tip relief angle) | θw (αea) |
Tool/Workpiece number of teeth | z0(2) | Effective cross-axis angle | ∑e |
Tool/Workpiece helix angle | β0(2) | Machine cross-axis angle | ∑ |
Tool cone angle | θ0 | Tool center point position | ex (y) (z) |
4 Tool profile and contact line
5 Contact angle dependence of natural twist errors
6 Case study on the main influencing variables of the contact angle in gear skiving
Workpiece data | |||||
Number of teeth | z2 | −103 | Normal pressure angle | αn | 17.5° |
Helix angle | β2 | 20.8° | Normal module | mn | 1.16 mm |
Tip diameter | da2 | 128.1 mm | Generating addendum modification coefficient | xE | −1.73 |
Root diameter | df2 | 134.5 mm | Tooth width | b2 | 25 mm |
Root form d | dFf2 | 134.1 mm | Tip form diameter | dFa2 | 128.54 mm |
Tool and process data | |||||
Number of teeth | z0 | 63 | Constructive tip clearance angle | αka | 0° |
Helix angle | β0 | 11.6° | Constructive tip rake angle | γka | −15° |
Working pitch d | dw0 | 76.63 mm | Stair angle | τ | 11.6° |
Cone angle | θ0 | 10° | Cross-axis angle | Σ | −12.5° |
7 Tool design for twist error minimization
8 Practical validation of tool design using a reference example
9 Adaptive process kinematics for twist error minimization
10 Practical validation of the adaptive process kinematics
Tool and process data | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Number of teeth | z0 | 73 | Constructive tip clearance angle | αka | 0° |
Helix angle | β0 | 0° | Constructive tip rake angle | γka | 0° |
Working pitch d | dw0 | 86.76 mm | Stair angle | τ | 0° |
Cone angle | θ0 | 10° | Cross-axis angle | Σ | −22.79° |