nach oben

Erschienen in:

2024 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

2. Introduction to Life Cycle Assessment

verfasst von : Jeroen Guinée, Reinout Heijungs

Erschienen in: Sustainable Supply Chains

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

This chapter gives an overview of the mainstream method of life cycle assessment (LCA) on the basis of the generally accepted principles as laid down in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) series of standards on LCA. The first part is devoted to the key questions addressed by LCA and sketches the historical development toward that method. The second part provides an overview of the LCA method itself, while the third part discusses some examples of LCA applications. Finally, the fourth part discusses some of the future challenges to LCA including life cycle sustainability assessment (LCSA) and streamlined LCA techniques.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel Sustainable Supply Chains: Introduction

Nächstes Kapitel Carbon Footprinting in Supply Chains: Measurement, Reporting, and Disclosure

Adrianto LR, van der Hulst MK, Tokaya JP, Arvidsson R, Blanco Rocha CF, Caldeira C, Guillén-Gonsálbez G, Sala S, Steubing BRP, Buyle M, Kaddoura M, Navarre NH, Pedneault J, Pizzol M, Salieri B, van Harmelen T, Hauck M (2021) How can LCA include prospective elements to assess emerging technologies and system transitions? The 76th LCA discussion forum on life cycle assessment, 19 November 2020. Int J Life Cycle Assess 26(8):1541–1544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-021-01934-wCrossRef

Anex R, Lifset R (2014) Life cycle assessment–different models for different purposes. J Ind Ecol 18(3):321–323. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12157CrossRef

Arvidsson R, Tillman A-M, Sandén BA, Janssen M, Nordelöf A, Kushnir D, Molander S (2017) Environmental assessment of emerging technologies: recommendations for prospective LCA. J Ind Ecol 22(6):1286–1294. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12690CrossRef

Assies JA (1992) Introduction paper to SETAC-Europe workshop on environmental life cycle analysis of products. In: In life-cycle assessment, Proceedings of a SETAC-Europe workshop on Environmental Life Cycle Assessment of Products. SETAC-Europe, Brussels

Bach R, Mohtashami N, Hildebrand L (2019) Comparative overview on LCA software programs for application in the Façade design process. J Facade Des Eng 7(1):13–26. https://doi.org/10.7480/jfde.2019.1.2657CrossRef

Baitz M (2017) Attributional life cycle assessment. Chapter 3 in “goal and scope definition in life cycle assessment”. In: Curran MA (ed) LCA compendium–the complete world of life cycle assessment (Klöpffer W, Curran MA, series eds). Springer, Cham, pp 123–143. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-0855-3CrossRef

Bamber N, Turner I, Arulnathan V, Li Y, Ershadi SZ, Smart A, Pelletier N (2020) Comparing sources and analysis of uncertainty in consequential and attributional life cycle assessment: review of current practice and recommendations. Int J Life Cycle Assess 25:168–180. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-019-01663-1CrossRef

Basbagill JP, Flager F, Lepech M (2017) Measuring the impact of dynamic life cycle performance feedback on conceptual building design. J Clean Prod 164:726–735. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.231CrossRef

Baumann H, Tillman A-M (2004) The hitch hiker’s guide to LCA. Studentlitteratur, Lund

Baustert P, Benetto E (2017) Uncertainty analysis in agent-based modelling and consequential life cycle assessment coupled models: a critical review. J Clean Prod 156:378–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.193CrossRef

Benoît C, Mazijn B (2009) Guidelines for social life cycle assessment of products. UNEP/SETAC Life Cycle Initiative, Paris. https://www.lifecycleinitiative.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/2009%20-%20Guidelines%20for%20sLCA%20-%20EN.pdf

Birkved M, Heijungs R (2011) Simplified fate modelling in respect to ecotoxicological and human toxicological characterization of emissions of chemical compounds. Int J Life Cycle Assess 16(8):739–747. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-011-0281-yCrossRef

Blass V, Corbett CJ (2017) Same supply chain, different models: integrating perspectives from life cycle assessment and supply chain management. J Ind Ecol 22(1):18–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12550CrossRef

Boukherroub T, Bouchery Y, Corbett CJ, Fransoo JC, Tan T (2024) Carbon footprinting in supply chains: measurement, reporting and disclosure. In: Bouchery Y, Corbett CJ, Fransoo JC (eds) Sustainable supply chains: a research-based textbook on operations and strategy. Springer, Cham

Bovea MD, Ibáñez-Forés V, Gallardo A, Colomer-Mendoza FJ (2010) Environmental assessment of alternative municipal solid waste management strategies: a Spanish case study. Waste Manag 30(11):2383–2395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2010.03.001CrossRef

Brandão M, Clift R, Cowie A, Greenhalgh S (2014) The use of LCA in the support of robust (climate) policy-making: comment on “using attributional life cycle assessment to estimate climate-change mitigation …”. J Ind Ecol 18(3):461–463. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12152CrossRef

British Standards Institution (BSI) (2011) Specification for the assessment of the life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of goods and services. Publicly Available Specification PAS 2050:2011. London, UK

BUS (Bundesamt für Umweltschutz) (1984) Ökobilanzen von Packstoffen. Schriftenreihe Umweltschutz no. 24. Bern, Switzerland

Caduff M, Huijbregts MAJ, Althaus H-J, Koehler A, Hellweg S (2012) Wind power electricity: the bigger the turbine, the greener the electricity? Environ Sci Technol 46(9):4725–4733. https://doi.org/10.1021/es204108nCrossRef

Chevalier J-L, Le Téno J-F (1996) Life cycle analysis with ill-defined data and its application to building products. Int J Life Cycle Assess 1(2):90–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02978652CrossRef

Ciroth A, Burhan S (2021) Life cycle inventory data and databases. Chapter 6 “Life cycle inventory analysis”. In: Ciroth A, Arvidsson R (eds) LCA compendium–The complete world of life cycle assessment (Klöpffer W, Curran MA, series eds). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62270-1CrossRef

Copius Peereboom E, Kleijn R, Lemkowitz S, Lundie S (1999) Influence of inventory data sets on life-cycle assessment results: a case study on PVC. J Ind Ecol 2(3):109–130. https://doi.org/10.1162/jiec.1998.2.3.109CrossRef

Cox B, Mutel CL, Bauer C, Mendoza Beltran A, van Vuuren DP (2018) Uncertain environmental footprint of current and future battery electric vehicles. Environ Sci Technol 52(8):4989–4995. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b00261CrossRef

Cucurachi S, van der Giesen C, Guinée J (2018) Ex-ante LCA of emerging technologies. Proc CIRP 69:463–468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2017.11.005CrossRef

Curran MA (ed) (2012) Life cycle assessment handbook: a guide for environmentally sustainable products. Scrivener Publishing, Beverly

Dale B, Kim S (2014) Can the predictions of consequential life cycle assessment be tested in the real world? Comment on “using attributional life cycle assessment to estimate climate-change mitigation …”. J Ind Ecol 18(3):466–467. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12151CrossRef

Davis C, Nikolić I, Dijkema GPJ (2009) Integration of life cycle assessment into agent-based modeling–toward informed decisions on evolving infrastructure systems. J Ind Ecol 13(2):306–325. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-9290.2009.00122.xCrossRef

Ekvall T (2000) A market-based approach to allocation at open-loop recycling. Resour Conserv Recycl 29(1–2):93–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-3449(99)00057-9CrossRef

Ekvall T, Assefa G, Björklund A, Eriksson O, Finnveden G (2007) What life-cycle assessment does and does not do in assessments of waste management. Waste Manag 27(8):989–996. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2007.02.015CrossRef

Fargione J, Hill J, Tilman D, Polasky S, Hawthorne P (2008) Land clearing and the biofuel carbon debt. Science 319(5867):1235–1238. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1152747CrossRef

Fava JA, Jensen AA, Lindfors L-G, Pomper S, de Smet B, Warren J, Vigon B (1994) Life-cycle assessment data quality. A conceptual framework. SETAC, Pensacola, USA

Finkbeiner M, Schau EM, Lehmann A, Traverso M (2010) Towards life cycle sustainability assessment. Sustainability 2:3309–3322. https://doi.org/10.3390/su2103309CrossRef

Gao J, You F (2017) Design a sustainable supply chain under uncertainty using life cycle optimisation and stochastic programming. Chem Engineer Trans 61:151–156. https://doi.org/10.3303/CET1761023CrossRef

Gregory JR, Montalbo TM, Kirchain RE (2013) Analyzing uncertainty in a comparative life cycle assessment of hand drying systems. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18(8):1605–1617. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-013-0606-0CrossRef

Groen EA, Bokkers EAM, Heijungs R, de Boer IJM (2017) Methods for global sensitivity analysis in life cycle assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 22:1125–1137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-016-1217-3CrossRef

Grotz S, Rubik F (1997) Bibliographie Produktbilanzen. Publication series of the Institut für ökologische Wirtschaftsforschung, Berlin, No. 92/97

Guillén-Gosálbez G, Grossmann I (2010) A global optimization strategy for the environmentally conscious design of chemical supply chains under uncertainty in the damage assessment model. Comput Chem Eng 34:42–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2009.09.003CrossRef

Guinée JB, Gorrée M, Heijungs R, Huppes G, Kleijn R, de Koning A, van Oers L, Wegener Sleeswijk A, Suh S, Udo de Haes HA, de Bruijn JA, van Duin R, Huijbregts MAJ (eds) (2002) Handbook on life cycle assessment: operational guide to the ISO standards. Eco-efficiency in industry and science, vol 7. Springer, Dordrecht

Guinée JB, Cucurachi S, Henriksson PJG, Heijungs R (2018) Digesting the alphabet soup of LCA. Int J Life Cycle Ass 23(7):1507–1511. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-018-1478-0CrossRef

Guinée JB, de Koning A, Heijungs R (2022) LCA-based absolute environmental sustainability assessment is also relative. J Ind Ecol (Early View) 26:673. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.13260CrossRef

Guinée JB, Heijungs R (2011) Life cycle sustainability analysis: framing questions to approaches. J Ind Ecol 15(5):656–658. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-9290.2011.00398.xCrossRef

Guinée JB, Heijungs R, Frischknecht R (2021) Multi-functionality in life cycle inventory analysis: approaches and solutions. Chapter 4 in “Life cycle inventory analysis”. In: Ciroth A, Arvidsson R (eds) LCA compendium–The complete world of life cycle assessment (Klöpffer W, Curran MA, series eds). Springer, Cham, pp 73–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62270-1CrossRef

Guinée JB, Heijungs R, Huppes G, Zamagni A, Masoni P, Buonamici R, Ekvall T, Rydberg T (2011) Life cycle assessment: past, present and future. Environ Sci Technol 45(1):90–96. https://doi.org/10.1021/es101316vCrossRef

Guinée JB, Heijungs R, Vijver MG, Peijnenburg WJGM (2017) Setting the stage for debating the roles of risk assessment and life-cycle assessment of engineered nanomaterials. Nat Nanotechnol 12:727–733. https://doi.org/10.1038/NNANO.2017.135CrossRef

Guinée JB, Udo de Haes HA, Huppes G (1993) Quantitative life cycle assessment of products 1: goal definition and inventory. J Clean Prod 1(1):3–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/0959-6526(93)90027-9CrossRef

Hauschild MZ, Ralph K, Rosenbaum RK, Olsen SI (2017) Life cycle assessment: theory and practice. Springer. https://nl1lib.org/book/5551162/26fe66

Hawkins TR, Singh B, Majeau-Bettez G, Strømman AH (2012) Comparative environmental life cycle assessment of conventional and electric vehicles. J Ind Ecol 17(1):53–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-9290.2012.00532.xCrossRef

Heijungs R (1996) Identification of key issues for further investigation in improving the reliability of life-cycle assessments. J Clean Prod 4(3–4):159–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-6526(96)00042-XCrossRef

Heijungs R, Guinée J, Kleijn R, Rovers V (2007) LCA methodology bias in normalization: causes, consequences, detection and remedies. Int J Life Cycle Assess 12(4):211–216. https://doi.org/10.1065/lca2006.07.260CrossRef

Heijungs R, Kleijn R (2001) Numerical approaches to life-cycle interpretation. Five examples. Int J Life Cycle Assess 6(3):141–148. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02978732CrossRef

Heijungs R, Suh S (2002) The computational structure of life cycle assessment. Kluwer Academic Publishers, DordrechtCrossRef

Henriksson PJG, Guinée JB, Heijungs R, de Koning A, Green DM (2013) A protocol for horizontal averaging of unit process data—including estimates for uncertainty. Int J Life Cycle Assess 19(2):429–436. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-013-0647-4CrossRef

Henriksson PJG, Heijungs R, Dao HM, Phan LT, de Snoo GR, Guinée JB (2015) Product carbon footprints and their uncertainties in comparative decision contexts. PLoS One 10(3):e0121221. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.012122CrossRef

Hertwich E (2014) Understanding the climate mitigation benefits of product systems: comment on “using attributional life cycle assessment to estimate climate-change mitigation …”. J Ind Ecol 18(3):464–465. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12150CrossRef

Hertwich EG, Gibon T, Bouman EA et al (2014) Integrated life-cycle assessment of electricity-supply scenarios confirms global environmental benefit of low-carbon technologies. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 112:6277–6282. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1312753111CrossRef

Hetherington AC, Borrion AL, Griffiths OG, McManus MC (2013) Use of LCA as a development tool within early research: challenges and issues across different sectors. Int J Life Cycle Assess 19:130–143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-013-0627-8CrossRef

Hoekstra AY (2024) Water footprint assessment in supply chains. In: Bouchery Y, Corbett CJ, Fransoo JC (eds) Sustainable supply chains: a research-based textbook on operations and strategy. Springer, Cham

Hoschorner E, Finnveden G (2003) Evaluation of two simplified life cycle assessment methods. Int J Life Cycle Assess 8(3):119–128. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02978456CrossRef

Huijbregts MAJ, Rombouts LJ, Hellweg S, Frischknecht R, Hendriks AJ, van de Meent D, Ragas AM, Reijnders L, Struijs J (2006) Is cumulative fossil energy demand a useful indicator for the environmental performance of products? Environ Sci Technol 40(3):641–648. https://doi.org/10.1021/es051689gCrossRef

Hunkeler D, Lichtenvort K, Rebitzer G (eds) (2008) Environmental life cycle costing. CRC Press, New York

Hunt RG, Boguski TK, Weitz K, Sharma A (1998) Case studies examining LCA streamlining techniques. Int J Life Cycle Assess 3(1):36–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02978450CrossRef

Igos E, Benetto E, Meyer R, Baustert P, Othoniel B (2019) How to treat uncertainties in life cycle assessment studies? Int J Life Cycle Assess 24:794–807. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-018-1477-1CrossRef

ILCD Handbook (2010) General guide for life cycle assessment—provisions and action steps. European Commission, JRC-IES, Ispra. http://lct.jrc.ec.europa.eu/pdfdirectory/ILCD-Handbook-General-guide-for-LCA-ROVISIONSonline-12March2010.pdf.

ISO International Standard 14040 (1996) Environmental management—life cycle assessment—principles and framework. International Organisation for Standardisation (ISO), Geneva

ISO International Standard 14040 (2006a) Environmental management—life cycle assessment—principles and framework. International Organisation for Standardisation (ISO), Geneva

ISO International Standard 14040 (2020a) Environmental Management—life cycle assessment—principles and framework. Amendment 1. International Organisation for Standardisation (ISO), Geneva

ISO International Standard 14041 (1998) Environmental management—life cycle assessment—goal and scope definition and Inventory analysis. International Organisation for Standardisation (ISO), Geneva

ISO International Standard 14042 (2000a) Environmental management—life cycle assessment—life cycle Impact assessment. International Organisation for Standardisation (ISO), Geneva

ISO International Standard 14043 (2000b) Environmental management—life cycle assessment—life cycle Interpretation. International Organisation for Standardisation (ISO), Geneva

ISO International Standard 14044 (2006b) Environmental management—life cycle assessment—requirements and guidelines. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva

ISO International Standard 14044 (2017) Environmental Management—life cycle assessment—requirements and guidelines. Amendment 1. International Organisation for Standardisation (ISO), Geneva

ISO International Standard 14044 (2020b) Environmental Management—life cycle assessment—requirements and guidelines. Amendment 2. International Organisation for Standardisation (ISO), Geneva

ISO International Standard 14067 (2012a) Greenhouse gases—carbon footprint of products—requirements and guidelines for quantification and communication. Geneva

ISO Technical Report 14047 (2003) Environmental management—life cycle impact assessment—examples of application of ISO 14042. International Organisation for Standardisation (ISO), Geneva

ISO Technical Report 14047 (2012b) Environmental management—life cycle assessment—illustrative examples on how to apply ISO 14044 to impact assessment situations. International organisation for standardisation (ISO), Geneva

ISO Technical Report 14049 (2000c) Environmental management—life cycle assessment—illustrative examples on how to apply ISO 14041—LCA—goal and scope definition and inventory analysis (draft). International Organisation for Standardisation (ISO), Geneva

ISO Technical Report 14049 (2012c) Environmental management—life cycle assessment—illustrative examples on how to apply ISO 14044 to goal and scope definition and inventory analysis. International Organisation for Standardisation (ISO), Geneva

ISO Technical Specification 14048 (2002) Environmental management—life cycle assessment—data documentation format. International Organisation for Standardisation (ISO), Geneva

Jolliet O, Saade-Sbeih M, Shaked S, Jolliet A, Crettaz P (2015) Environmental life cycle assessment. CRC Press, Boca Raton. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/oa-mono/10.1201/b19138/environmental-life-cycle-assessment-olivier-jolliet-myriam-saade-sbeih-shanna-shaked-alexandre-jolliet-pierre-crettazCrossRef

Karunaratne S, Dharmarathna D (2022) A review of comprehensiveness, user-friendliness, and contribution for sustainable design of whole building environmental life cycle assessment software tools. Build Environ 212:108784. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.108784CrossRef

Kennedy DJ, Montgomery DC, Quay BH (1996) Data quality. Int J Life Cycle Assess 1(4):199–207. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02978693CrossRef

Khoo HH, Eufrasio-Espinosa RM, Koh LSC, Sharratt PN, Isoni V (2019) Sustainability assessment of biorefinery production chains: a combined LCA-supply chain approach. J Clean Prod 235:1116–1137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.07.007CrossRef

Kicherer A, Schaltegger S, Tschochohei H, Ferreira Pozo B (2007) Eco-efficiency–combining life cycle assessment and life cycle costs via normalization. Int J Life Cycle Assess 12(7):537–543. https://doi.org/10.1065/lca2007.01.305CrossRef

Klöpffer W (2008) Life cycle sustainability assessment of products. Int J Life Cycle Assess 13(2):89–95. https://doi.org/10.1065/lca2008.02.376CrossRef

Klöpffer W, Grahl B (eds) (2014) Life cycle assessment (LCA): a guide to best practice. Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KgaA, Weinheim

Klöpffer W, Renner I (2007) Lebenszyklusbasierte Nachhaltigkeitsbewertung von Produkten. Technikfolgenabschätzung—Theorie und Praxis (TATuP) 16:32–38CrossRef

Kölsch D, Saling P, Kicherer A, Grosse-Sommer A, Schmidt I (2008) How to measure social impacts? A socio-eco-efficiency analysis by the SEEBALANCE® method. Int J Sustain Dev 11(1):1–23. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSD.2008.02038CrossRef

Liu Z, Qiu T, Chen B (2014) A study of the LCA based biofuel supply chain multi-objective optimization model with multi-conversion paths in China. Appl Energ 126:221–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.04.001CrossRef

Lo Piano S, Benini L (2022) A critical perspective on uncertainty appraisal and sensitivity analysis in life cycle assessment. J Ind Ecol (Early View). 26:763. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.13237CrossRef

Mahmood S, Hassan MF, Hemdi AR, Saman MZM (2018) Sustainability in the product design: a review of recent. Development based on LCA. Int. J Eng Technol 7(3.7):54–57. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i3.7.16208CrossRef

Matthews SH, Hendrickson C, Weber CL (2008) The importance of carbon footprint estimation boundaries. Environ Sci Technol 42(16):5839–5842. https://doi.org/10.1021/es703112wCrossRef

Maurice B, Frischknecht R, Coelho-Schwirtz V, Hungerbühler K (2000) Uncertainty analysis in life cycle inventory. Application to the production of electricity with French coal power plants. J Clean Prod 8(2):95–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-6526(99)00324-8CrossRef

Mendoza Beltran A, Cox B, Mutel C, van Vuuren DP, Font Vivanco D, Deetman S, Edelenbosch OY, Guinée JB, Tukker A (2018) When the background matters–using scenarios from integrated assessment models in prospective life cycle assessment. J Ind Ecol 24(1):64–79. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12825CrossRef

Mendoza BA, Prado V, Font Vivanco D, Henriksson PJG, Guinée JB, Heijungs R (2018) Quantified uncertainties in comparative life cycle assessment: what can be concluded? Environ Sci Technol 52(4):2152–2161. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b06365CrossRef

Michiels F, Geeraerd A (2020) How to decide and visualize whether uncertainty or variability is dominating in life cycle assessment results: a systematic review. Environ Model Softw 133:104841. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2020.104841CrossRef

Mota B, Gomes MI, Carvalho A, Barbosa-Povoa AP (2018) Sustainable supply chains: an integrated modeling approach under uncertainty. Omega 77:32–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2017.05.006CrossRef

Myllyviita T, Holma A, Antikainen R, Lähtinen K, Leskinen P (2012) Assessing environmental impacts of biomass production chains–application of life cycle assessment (LCA) and multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA). J Clean Prod 29-30:238–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.01.019CrossRef

Negri V, Galán-Martín Á, Pozo C, Fajardy M, Reiner DM, Mac Dowell N, Guillén-Gosálbez G (2021) Life cycle optimization of BECCS supply chains in the European Union. Appl Energ 298:117252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.117252CrossRef

Norris GA (2001) The requirement for congruence in normalization. Int J LCA 6(2):85–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02977843CrossRef

Olangunju BD, Olanrewaju OA (2020) Comparison of life cycle assessment tools in cement production. S Afr J Ind Eng 31(4):70–83. https://doi.org/10.7166/31-4-2317CrossRef

Padey P, Girard R, le Boulch D, Blanc I (2013) From LCAs to simplified models: a generic methodology applied to wind power electricity. Environ Sci Technol 47(3):1231–1238. https://doi.org/10.1021/es303435eCrossRef

Pesonen H-L, Horn S (2013) Evaluating the sustainability SWOT as a streamlined tool for life cycle sustainability assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18(9):1780–1792. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-012-0456-1CrossRef

Piccinno F, Hischier R, Seeger S, Som C (2016) From laboratory to industrial scale: a scale-up framework for chemical processes in life cycle assessment studies. J Clean Prod 135:1085–1097. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.164CrossRef

Plevin RJ, Delucchi MA, Creutzig F (2014a) Using attributional life cycle assessment to estimate climate-change mitigation benefits misleads policy makers. J Ind Ecol 18(1):73–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12074CrossRef

Plevin RJ, Delucchi MA, Creutzig F (2014b) Response to comments on “using attributional life cycle assessment to estimate climate-change mitigation …”. J Ind Ecol 18(3):468–470. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12153CrossRef

Plevin RJ, Delucchi MA, Creutzig F (2014c) Response to “on the uncanny capabilities of consequential LCA” by Sangwon Suh and Yi Yang (Int J life cycle assess, doi:10.1007/s11367-014-0739-9). Int J Life Cycle Assess 19(8):1559–1560. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-014-0766-6CrossRef

Pozo C, Ruíz-Femenia R, Caballero J, Guillén-Gosálbez G, Jiménez L (2012) On the use of principal component analysis for reducing the number of environmental objectives in multi-objective optimization: application to the design of chemical supply chains. Chem Eng Sci 69:146–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2011.10.018CrossRef

Prox M, Curran MA (2017) Consequential life cycle assessment. Chapter 4 in “goal and scope definition in life cycle assessment”. In: Curran MA (ed) LCA compendium—the complete world of life cycle assessment (Klöpffer W, Curran MA, series eds). Springer, Cham, pp 145–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-0855-3CrossRef

Ramadhan NJ, Wan YK, Ng RTL, Ng DKS, Hassim MH, Aviso KB, Tan RR (2014) Life cycle optimisation (LCO) of product systems with consideration of occupational fatalities. Process Saf Environ Prot 92:390–405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2014.04.003CrossRef

Schmidt JH (2010) Comparative life cycle assessment of rapeseed oil and palm oil. Int J Life Cycle Assess 15(2):183–197. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-009-0142-0CrossRef

Spielmann M, Scholz RW, Tietje O, De HP (2005) Scenario modelling in prospective LCA of transport systems application of formative scenario analysis. Int J Life Cycle Assess 10:325–335. https://doi.org/10.1065/lca2004.10.188CrossRef

Stehfest E, van Vuuren D, Kram T, Bouwman L, Alkemade R, Bakkenes M, Biemans H, Bouwman A, den Elzen M, Janse J, Lucas P, van Minnen J, Muller C, Prins A (2014) Integrated assessment of global environmental change with IMAGE 3.0–model description and policy applications. The Hague: PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency

Suh S, Yang Y (2014) On the uncanny capabilities of consequential LCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 19(6):1179–1184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-014-0739-9CrossRef

Thonemann N, Schulte A, Maga D (2020) How to conduct prospective life cycle assessment for emerging technologies? A systematic review and methodological guidance. Sustainability 12:1192. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12031192CrossRef

Valdivia S, Backes JG, Traverso M, Sonnemann G, Cucurachi S, Guinée JB, Schaubroeck T, Finkbeiner M, Leroy-Parmentier N, Ugaya C, Peña C, Zamagni A, Inaba A, Amaral M, Berger M, Dvarioniene J, Vakhitova T, Benoit-Norris C, Prox M, Foolmaun R, Goedkoop M (2021) Principles for the application of life cycle sustainability assessment–position paper of the life cycle initiative. Int J Life Cycle Ass 26(9):1900–1905. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-021-01958-2CrossRef

Van der Giesen C, Cucurachi S, Guinée J, Kramer GJ, Tukker A (2020) A critical view on the current application of LCA for new technologies and recommendations for improved practice. J Clean Prod 259:120904. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120904CrossRef

Van der Giesen C, Kleijn R, Kramer GJ (2014) Energy and climate impacts of producing synthetic hydrocarbon fuels from CO2. Environ Sci Technol 48(12):7111–7121. https://doi.org/10.1021/es500191gCrossRef

Vercalsteren A, Spirinckx C, Geerken T (2010) Life cycle assessment and eco-efficiency analysis of drinking cups used at public events. Int J Life Cycle Assess 15(2):221–230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-009-0143-zCrossRef

Villares M, Işıldar A, van der Giesen C, Guinée J (2017) Does ex ante application enhance the usefulness of LCA? A case study on bioleaching of e-waste for metal recovery. Int J Life Cycle Ass 22(10):1618–1633. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-017-1270-6CrossRef

Walser T, Demou E, Lang DJ et al (2011) Prospective environmental life cycle assessment of nanosilver T-shirts. Environ Sci Technol 45:4570–4578. https://doi.org/10.1021/es2001248CrossRef

Wardenaar T, van Ruijven T, Beltran AM, Vad K, Guinée J, Heijungs R (2012) Differences between LCA for analysis and LCA for policy: a case study on the consequences of allocation choices in bio-energy policies. Int J Life Cycle Assess 17(8):1059–1067. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-012-0431-xCrossRef

Wei W, Larrey-Lassalle P, Faure T, Dumoulin N, Roux P, Mathias JD (2015) How to conduct a proper sensitivity analysis in life cycle assessment: taking into account correlations within LCI data and interactions within the LCA calculation model. Environ Sci Technol 49(1):377–385. https://doi.org/10.1021/es502128kCrossRef

Weidema B (2000) Avoiding co-product allocation in life-cycle assessment. J Ind Ecol 4(3):11–33. https://doi.org/10.1162/108819800300106366CrossRef

Weidema B, Wesnæs M (1996) Data quality management for life cycle inventories–an example of using data quality indicators. J Clean Prod 4(3):167–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-6526(96)00043-1CrossRef

Weidema BP (2003) Market information in life cycle assessment. Environmental project no. 863. Danish Environmental Protection Agency. Copenhagen

Weidema BP, Ekvall T, Heijungs R (2009) Guidelines for application of deepened and broadened LCA. Technical Report of CALCAS project. https://lca-net.com/publications/show/guidelines-applications-deepened-broadened-lca/

Wenzel H, Hauschild M, Alting L (1997) Methodology, tools and case studies in product development, vol 1, Environmental assessment of products. Chapman & Hall, London

Wernet G, Bauer C, Steubing B et al (2006) The ecoinvent database version 3 (part I). Overview and methodology. Int J Life Cycle Assess 21:1218–1230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-016-1087-8

Zamagni A, Buttol P, Porta PL, Buonamici R, Masoni P, Guinée JB, Heijungs R, Ekvall T, Bersani R, Bieńkowska A, Pretato U (2008). Critical review of the current research needs and limitations related to ISO-LCA practice. Deliverable 7 of the CALCAS project. https://www.leidenuniv.nl/cml/ssp/publications/calcas_report_d7.pdf

Zamagni A, Guinée J, Heijungs R, Masoni P, Raggi A (2012) Lights and shadows in consequential LCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 17(7):904–918. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-012-0423-xCrossRef

Zanghelini GM, Cherubini E, Soares SR (2018) How multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) is aiding life cycle assessment (LCA) in results interpretation. J Clean Prod 172:609–622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.230CrossRef

Titel: Introduction to Life Cycle Assessment
verfasst von: Jeroen Guinée
Reinout Heijungs
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Buch: Sustainable Supply Chains
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-45564-3

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-031-45565-0

Copyright-Jahr: 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-45565-0_2

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Premium Partner