Skip to main content

2023 | Buch

Selected Cases from the Supreme People’s Court of the People’s Republic of China

Volume 4

herausgegeben von: China Applied Jurisprudence Institute

Verlag: Springer Nature Singapore

Buchreihe : Library of Selected Cases from the Chinese Court

insite
SUCHEN

Über dieses Buch

This book includes focal and vital cases tried by presiding justices, guiding cases from the Supreme People’s Court, and cases discussed at the Joint Meetings of Presiding Judges from various tribunals. This book is divided into three sections, including Cases by Justices, Guiding Cases, and Typical Cases, which will introduce readers to Chinese legal processes, legal methodology, and ideology in an intuitive, clear, and accurate manner. This book presents cases selected by the trial departments of the Supreme People’s Court of China from their concluded cases. In order to give full weight to the legal value and social function of cases from the Supreme People’s Court, and to achieve the goal of “serving the trial practices, serving economic and social development, serving legal education and legal scholarship, serving legal exchanges among Chinese and foreign legal communities, and serving the rule of law in China”, the China Applied Jurisprudence Institute, with the approval of the Supreme People’s Court, opts to publish Selected Cases from the Supreme People’s Court of the People’s Republic of China in both Chinese and English, for domestic and overseas distribution.

Inhaltsverzeichnis

Frontmatter

Cases at the Adjudication Committee

Frontmatter
Lianqi Development Co. Ltd. v. Shanghai Baoye Group Corp., Ltd. and Guangzhou Supervision Sakai Intellectual Intelligent Technology Co. Ltd. et al.
(Appeal Against Jurisdictional Objection in Dispute Over Infringement of Patent for Invention: Declaration of Non-infringement of Patent Rights and Jurisdiction for Declaratory Non-infringement Actions and Patent Infringement Actions Need to Take into Full Account the “Facilitation” Principles and the Leapfrog Appeal Mechanism)

Legal action directed at declaring whether the same patent or related patents constitutes non-infringement of patent rights and patent infringement action fall into the scope of separate litigation. In judicial practices, the jurisdiction over the above two types of cases should follow the basic rules and characteristics of judicial activities by adhering to the principle of facilitating the parties to initiate the litigation and facilitating the independent, fair and efficient exercise of judicial power by the people’s courts in accordance with the law, not all of whose jurisdiction may be transferred for joint trial.

Xiaomei Tang

Typical Cases

Frontmatter
Shanxi Coal International Energy Group Jincheng Co., Ltd. v. China CITIC Bank Co., Ltd. Xi’an Branch, Shaanxi Petroleum & Chemical Industrial Group Co., Ltd.
(Dispute Over Contract: The Real Legal Relationship Between the Buyer, the Seller and the Bank Shall be Deemed a Legal Relationship Involving Loan and Guarantee Contract in the Confirmed Warehouse Transaction Without Real Trade Background)

The transaction method agreed in the tripartite business cooperation agreement in this case is a typical confirmed warehouse transaction, which is a new mode of financial guarantee. A confirmed warehouse transaction is premised on the true purchase and sale relationship between the buyer and the seller.

Xuefeng Ren, Yuyi Liao
Xinjiang Longmei Nengyuan Co., Ltd. v. Zheng X
(Dispute Over Equity Transfer Contract: Contract Shall not  be Revoked due to Changed Circumstances When a Party Clearly Knows the Risks)

Administrative regulations prohibit mining in scenic areas, yet the party still entered into an equity transfer contract, in which the prospecting right could not be renewed in accordance with later issued policy.

Jing Zhao
Ping An Bank Co., Ltd., Beijing Branch, and Beijing Gold Exchange Co., Ltd. et al. v. Hainan Jinfenghuang Hotspring Resort Co., Ltd., Beijing Xinyupeng Mechanical & Electrical Engineering Co., Ltd. et al.
(Dispute Over Loan Contract: The Effect of Issuing a Blank Guarantee Contract Stamped with the Official Seal, and a Guarantor May be Exempted within the Scope of the Pledge Waived by Its Pledgee)

Where a party issues a blank guarantee contract stamped with its official seal to its creditor, such party is assumed to authorize the creditor to fill in relevant content, and such party is bound by the content stated in the guarantee contract, unless there is sufficient evidence to the contrary to refute the finding.

Xuemei Zhang
China Nonferrous Metal Industry’s Foreign Engineering and Construction Co., Ltd. v. Ningbo Branch of Hengfeng Bank Co., Ltd. and Ningbo Zhongrenhong Electronics Co., Ltd. and Ningbo Gangdi Trade Co., Ltd. et al. (Defendants in the First Instance)
(Dispute Over the Issuing of Letter of Credit and the Right of Recourse: A Debtor of a Negotiable Instrument Cannot Oppose the Pledgee of the Negotiable Instrument with His Own Defense Against the Pledgor)

The severance of right to defense of negotiable instruments intends to protect holder in due course and in good faith, when the pledgee took instruments for value and obtained the title of negotiable instruments legally and in good faith, the debtors shall not make the defenses against the pledgee based on the ground of defensing the pledgor.

Chun Yang, Jiaqin Wei, Tao Yang
Xinjiang Huacheng Anju Real Estate Development Co., Ltd. v. China Railway Construction Bridge Engineering Bureau Group Co., Ltd.
(Dispute Over Contract for Building of Construction Project: The Application of Good Faith Principle in Determining the Validity of a Contract)

The mechanism of invalid contract aims to prevent losses to the State, society and the interests of the third party due to performance of invalid contracts, so as to maintain the rule of law and public morality of a society.

Dian Luo, Ting Yang
LC Securities Co., Ltd. and Eastern Gold Jade Co., Ltd. v. Yunnan Xinglong Industry Co., Ltd. and Zhao X et al.
(Dispute Over a Suretyship Contract: The Scope of the Guarantor’s Liability Should be Limited to the Scope of the Principal Obligation)

As provided in Article 21 of the Guarantee Law of the People's Republic of China (repealed in 2021; hereinafter referred to as Guarantee Law), the scope of suretyship liability assumed by the surety shall firstly be subject·to the agreement under the suretyship contract.

Aizhen Zhang
Bank of Dalian Co., Ltd. v. Dalian Branch of China Railway Modern Logistics Technology Co., Ltd. and Jinzhou Zuoyuan Sugar Foods Co., Ltd. et al.
(Dispute Over Loan Contracts: Change of Possession Cannot Create a Chattel Pledge)

The pledge is created upon the delivery of the pledged property by the pledgor.

Weiming Ji
Sichuan Zhongding Construction Engineering Co., Ltd. v. Zhu X and Natural Resources Bureau of Wulan County
(Dispute Over Contract for Building of Construction Project: In a de Facto Juristic Relation, the Actual Builder May Claim Project Payments Directly from the Employer)

The actual builder shall rely on the contract and relevant facts when claiming project payments from the party accepting affiliation.

Jing Zhao
Fujian Tinghu Real Estate Group Co., Ltd. v. Natural Resources Bureau of Xianyou County
(Dispute Over a Contract for Transfer of State-Owned Construction Land Use Right: In Case of Breach of Contract Due to Objective Reasons, the Liquidated Damages Clause Shall be Applied Primarily to Cover the Loss)

Liquidated damages have the function of indemnifying the non-defaulting party against the loss arising out of the other party’s breach of contract, namely the indemnification function, and the function of urging the parties concerned to perform the contract in good faith, namely the punitive function.

Min Xia
Wang X v. Bazhou Sairui Machinery & Equipment Installation Co. Ltd, Cao X (A)
(Dispute Over Change of Registration: The Claim of a Resigned Legal Representative of a Company for Registration of the Changing of Legal Representative of the Company Should, Absent Other Remedies, be Accepted by the Court)

Where the rights and interests of the resigned legal representative of a company are infringed subsequent to his resignation by the company’s failure to timely register the change to that effect, the lawsuit filed by such resigned legal representative on the ground of the company’s failure to do so constitutes a civil dispute between equal subjects.

Xiaofei Liu, Junhong Zou, Ling Zhang
Peng X v. Chengdu Rural Commercial Bank Co., Ltd. Cuqiao Subbranch, Chen X, et al.
(Dispute Over Suretyship Contract: Impact on the Other Guarantors’ Liability of the Creditor’s Waiver in Mixed Security of the Collateral as Provided by the Debtor)

In terms of systematic legal interpretation, Articles 194(2) and 218 of the Property Law of the People’s Republic of China (repealed) shall, in the case of mixed security, be applied on the basis of Article 176.

Wei Si, Zhe Liu
Hubei YAS Commercial Chain Co., Ltd. v. Danyang Yongsheng Motor Transport Co., Ltd.
(Dispute Over Tort Liability: Criteria for the Determination of Erroneous Application for Property Preservation)

Whether the application for property preservation is erroneous should be grounded not simply on whether the applicant’s claim is supported by the court, but rather on whether the application meets the general requirements for tort liability, i.e., the presence of intent or gross negligence on the part of the applicant, the suffering of loss by the respondent and the existence of a causal relationship between the act of application and the subsequent loss sustained by the respondent.

Jingchuan Liu, Ge Wang, Shuang Liang
Jiang X, Chen X, et al. v. Lin X, Weng X(A), et al.
(Dispute Over Enforcement Objection: Determination on the Time When the Sealing-Up Ruling and the Notice of Assistance in Enforcement Take Effect)

The sealing-up of the disputed real estate becomes legally effective as of the date when the real estate registry signs for the civil ruling and the notice of assistance in enforcement.

Chun Yang, Jiaqin Wei, Ming Zhang
Huang X v. Xiamen Shuangrun Investment Management Co., Ltd., Fenghe (China) Co., Ltd. (The Third Party in the First Instance), Hui’an County Rural Credit Cooperative
(Outsider’s Objection to Enforcement: Legal Requirements for the Objection to the Enforcement by an Equity Assignee)

The legal requirements for the objection to enforcement by an equity assigneeupon the sealing-up of the equity by the court include the occurrences prior.

Min Xia
Guilin Zhangtai Group Co., Ltd., Guangxi Lichengdong Investment Co., Ltd. et al.
(Enforcement Review of the Ruling on Dispute over Recovery of Financial Distressed Debt: Identification of Interest in Cases of Enforcement Against Dispute over Recovery of Financial Distressed Debt)

The Summary of the Work Symposium of the Supreme People’s Court on the Adjudication of Cases Involving Transfer of Financial Distressed Debts is a set of special rules established for processing cases involving transfer of financial distressed debts during a specific period of time and in specific fields, and therefore, the scope of application of such rules should be taken into consideration when they are applied, and in cases involving the transfer of ordinary financial distressed debts that are beyond the applicable scope of such rules, the accrual of interest should not be terminated after such transfer is completed.

Guohui Xiang, Xin Ye
Zhou X v. Xiamen Baixiang Shouli E-business Co., Ltd.
(Dispute Over Online Shopping Contract: Determination of the Adjustment Benchmark of Agreed Punitive Liquidated Damages)

In the event that a consumer claims for the agreed punitive damages based on the contract concluded between the consumer and the merchant, or based on the promise of the merchant, and that such punitive damages agreed on are excessively high, the merchant may then apply to the competent people’s court or arbitration institution for an appropriate reduction thereof in accordance with Article 114 of the Contract Law.

Chun Yang, Jiaqin Wei, Fu Chen
Yunnan Copper Company Co., Ltd. v. Kunming Wanbao Jiyuan Biotechnology Co., Ltd. Yunnan Zhongheng Innovation Investment Company Co., Ltd.
(Dispute Over Sales Contract: Identification of the Nature and Validity of the Closed Circular Sales Contracts)

In closed-loop circular purchase & sale transactions among three or more enterprises, a party to such transactions often engage in practices in which the same goods are purchased at a high price and sold at a lower price later within a specific period of time, while all bills and other documents related to such purchase and sale are drawn, issued and received in the same way as in normal transactions, but the goods fail to be traded. Such an abnormal trading pattern is obviously contrary to the operational purposes and business common sense of profit-making legal persons.

Lan Ma, Yingyue Mao
Zhongkong Guorong New Energy Development Co., Ltd. v. Fuzhou Dade Industry Co., Ltd.
(Dispute Over Sales Contract: Determination and Application of Deposit-Related Penalty Rules for Partial Performance of Contracts)

In judicial practice, the criterion for determining whether the parties to a contract have fully performed the contract is whether the purpose(s) of the contract have been achieved. In the event that a party to the contract rescinds the contract due to delay in performance or breach of contract by the other party thereto, and therefore the purpose(s) of the contract cannot be achieved, then the deposit-related penalty rules shall apply.

Genhui Xia
Zhongrong Hengsheng Wood Industry Co., Ltd. (Beijing) v. Crosplus Home Furnishings (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. and Nanjing Mengyang Furniture Shop
(Dispute Over Copyright Infringement: Factors Contributing to Copyright Protection of Works of Applied Art)

Works of applied art protected by copyright law must be artistic, which is determined by the nature of the applied art itself. Applied artwork is artwork with practical use, lack of artistry does not constitute artwork, let alone applied artwork, but only practical goods, and the copyright law protects the artistry of applied artwork rather than practicality.

Rong Li
JDB (China) Drinks Co., Ltd. v. Guangzhou Wanglaoji Health Industry Co., Ltd.
(Dispute Over False Advertising: Determination of False Advertising)

The determination of whether an act constitutes false advertising under Article 9(1) of the Anti-Unfair Competition Law of the People’s Republic of China (1993) shall be founded on whether the public is likely to be misled on the basis of such factors as daily life experience, the attention paid by the general public, the fact that a misunderstanding has occurred, the actual situation of the audience being advertised and whether the goodwill of others has been improperly appropriated.

Xiaohong Qian, Jiayin Cao
Shandong Bittel Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. v. Jiangsu Zhongxun Digital Electronics Co., Ltd.
(Dispute Over Liability for Damages Out of Party’s Bad Faith or Malice in Intellectual Property Litigation: Criteria for Judging the Subjective Fault in Disputes over Damages out of Party’s Bad Faith or Malice in Intellectual Property Litigation)

In disputes over damages out of the party’s bad faith or malice in intellectual property litigation, whether parties to the litigation harbor any actual malice or bad faith to launch an action for damages in intellectual property litigation is to be adjudged from such factors as the party’s basis of rights and its ability to recognize such basis of rights, as well as the party’s purpose in bringing the infringement action.

Shu Tong
LACOSTE v. Cartelo Crocodile Pte. Ltd. and Trademark Review and Adjudication Board of the State Administration for Industry and Commerce of the People’s Republic of China
(Dispute Over Trademark Administration: The Impact of Offshore Trademark Co-existence Agreements on the Determination of Trademark Similarity)

The disputed trademark shall be registered in accordance with the provisions of the Trademark Law (Rev. 2019) and its judicial interpretation. Anyone who claimed that the disputed trademark shall not be registered on the basis of graphic marks registered in other countries and regions, settlement agreements or other relevant evidence, lacks legal standing.

Guimei Lang, Zeyu Chen
Xiamen Meiyou Co., Ltd. v. Beijing Kangzhilesi Network Technology Co., Ltd. and China National Intellectual Property Administration (NIPA)
(Administrative Dispute Over Request for Declaration of Invalidity of Trademark Rights: Whether the Trademark at Issue is a Mark that “Cannot be Used as a Trademark” is Within the Scope of the Review by the People’s Court’s on the Administrative Act of Trademark Authorization and Confirmation)

The marks listed in Article 10(1) of the Trademark Law shall not be used as trademarks. When the people’s court examines and decides whether the trademark in dispute constitutes the mark listed in Article 10(1) of the Trademark Law in the administrative case of trademark authorization and confirmation, it constitutes no violation of the provisions of the Trademark Law.

Zhihong Zhang
Xiao X v. Shenzhen Seno Light (HK) Limited
(Dispute Over the Infringement on Patent for Invention: The Effect of the Specification of the Technical Effect in Patent Claims on the Interpretation of the Claims and the Application of the Doctrine of Equivalence)

The determination of the scope of protection in patent infringement litigation shall commence with the patent claims, systematically and comprehensively understand the technical solutions protected by the patent, and make an accurate determination of the technical features recorded or specified in the patents claims, irrespective of whether the wording of patent claims is ex facie clear, as opposed to be determined by the meaning solely on the basis of claims per se.

Rong Wu, Ruijuan Zhou
Md-care (Tianjin) Technology Co., Ltd. v. Sunshine New Technology (Tianjin) Co., Ltd. and Wang X, Zhang X et al. (Defendants in the First Instance)
(Dispute Over Infringement of Trade Secrets Cases: How to Screen Whether a Client List Constitutes a Trade Secret)

The client list under the protection of trade secrets, shall, in addition to the information about the clients’ names, addresses and contact details, as well as the usual trading habits, intentions, details of transactions and other information, shall comprise specific client information that is different from the relevant public information, not all client lists can constitute trade secrets.

Yanfang Wang
Ningbo Beworth Textile Machinery Co., Ltd. v. Ningbo Cixing Co., Ltd.
(Dispute Over Licensing Contract for Trade Secrets: Handling of Interlocking Criminal and Civil Cases Involving Trade Secrets)

Pursuant to Rules of the Supreme People’s Court on Several Issues Concerning Suspected Economic Crimes in the Trial of Economic Dispute Cases, dispute over licensing contract for trade secrets in breach of confidentiality obligations and the related criminal cases are not based on the legal relationship generated by the facts containing the same legal elements, so the people’s court may continue to hear the dispute over licensing contract for trade secrets while transferring the clues of the suspected crimes for further investigation.

Zhuo Deng
VMI Holland B.V. and Cooper (Kunshan) Tire Co., Ltd. v. Safe-Run Huachen Machinery (Suzhou) Co., Ltd.
(Dispute Over Declaration of Non-infringement of Patent Rights: Prerequisites for Declaring Patent Non-infringement Suit)

When a patentee only files a request to the patent administrative agency to handle a patent infringement dispute against users of the alleged infringing products, which may make uncertain the businesses of the producers or the sellers of these products and disable the producers or the sellers to participate in administrative proceedings to safeguard their rights and interests, it is in the interests of all the parties and is also conducive to saving administrative and judicial resources to make a determination as soon as possible of whether the alleged infringing products fall within the protection of the relevant patent rights. Such request to handle patent infringement disputes can be deemed warnings of patent infringement issued by the patentee(s), and the party failing to participate in the administrative proceedings shall have the right to file a lawsuit for declaration of non-infringement of patent rights.

Zhuobin Xu
Alfa Laval Corporate AB v. China National Intellectual Property Administration and SWEP International AB (Third Party in the Original Trial)
(Administrative Disputes Over Invalidation of Invention Patent: Determination of Overbreadth of Patent Claims Amendments in an Invalidity Declaration Proceeding)

In the invalidity declaration proceeding, the modification, as a means, should be aimed at achieving the legislative purpose of the two legal standards of not exceeding the scope of the original specification and claim and not expanding the scope of protection of the original patent, while taking into account the efficiency of the administrative examination and the contribution of the fair protection of the patentee, rather than making too strict restrictions on the specific modification, otherwise this would make the restriction on modification a mere penalty for improper claim drafting by the patentee.

Lei Fu
Shimano, Inc. v. Guangdong Shunde Sensah Smart Sports Equipment Co., Ltd.
(Dispute Over Infringement of Patent Rights for Invention: Determination of the Scope of Protection of Functional Features)

In determining the scope of protection of a functional feature, where there is only one embodiment of the functional feature in the patent specification, and no other alternatives are stated or implied to make it feasible, the functional description cannot be made to cover other ways of achieving the function, otherwise the scope of protection will not match the technical contribution. Where the components and their relationship to the function disclosed in the embodiment are an organic system that is inextricably interwoven, each of the aforementioned components shall be deemed to be essential to the fulfilment of the function in the absence of evidence or sufficient explanation by the patentee as to which components or the relationship between components are not essential to the fulfilment of the function.

Lingling Zhang
Shenzhen Jiedian Technology Co., Ltd. v. Shenzhen Laidian Technology Co., Ltd and Anker Innovations Co., Ltd.
(Dispute Over the Infringement upon Utility Patent: Delineation of Technical Features of Patent Claims and Identification Standards)

When dividing the technical features of the claims, the technical unit that can achieve a relatively independent technical function should generally be treated as a technical feature, and it is inappropriate to classify multiple technical units that achieve different technical functions as a technical feature.

Yuanming Qin, Zhi Zeng
Wartsila Finland Oy, Spliethoff’s Bevrachtingskantoor B.V. v. Rongcheng Xixiakou Shipbuilding Co., Ltd., Yingqin Engine (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.
(Tort Dispute Over the Sale of Marine Equipment: Mere Interest in the Performance of a Contract Does not in Principle Fall Within the Scope of Application of the Tort Law)

One party to a contract cannot sue the other party for tort liability solely for breach of contract unless the other party acts both in violation of the contract and in infringement of the civil rights and interests protected by the tort law, i.e., concurrence of breach of contract and tortious infringement.

Xiaohan Yu
Ministry of Transport Shanghai Salvage Bureau v. Provence Shipowners 2008–1 Ltd., CMA CGM S.A., et al.
(Dispute Over Liability for Salvage and Ship Pollution Damage: Distinction Between Costs of Preventive Measures and Salvage Measures, Identification of the Party Who Denies Liability for Ship Collision and Oil Pollution, and Identification of Restricted and Nonrestricted Maritime Claims)

Whether a maritime emergency operation is salvage or pollution prevention and pollutant clearing should be determined through analysis in light of such facts as the initial purpose of the operation, risks encountered by the ship, and the specific actions performed during the operation.

Xiaohan Yu
Bank of China Limited Henan Branch v. Union de Banques Arabes et Françaises (Hong Kong) Ltd.
(Dispute Over Independent Letter of Guarantee: Determination of Independent Guarantee Fraud Constituted by Apparently Complying Demand that Abuses the Right to Claim Payment)

While fraudulent demands under a counter-guarantee may create issues between those parties, they do not override or invalidate the separate original guarantee or necessarily prevent the original guarantor from making payment if properly demanded by the original guarantee beneficiary.

Yan Shang
Evergreen Marine (Singapore) Pte. Ltd. v. First Insurance Co., Ltd. & Evergreen Marine Pte. Ltd. (the Defendant in the First Instance)
(Dispute Over Contract for Goods by International Multimodal Transport: Multimodal Transport Operator’s Liability and Limitation Thereof are Governed by the Law Regulating the Section of Mode of Transport in Which Loss of or Damage to Goods Occurs)

While implementing a “network liability system” for multimodal transport operators has merits, China’s Maritime Law explicitly limits its scope (liability and limitation thereof) under Article 105. It would be inappropriate to extend interpreting the “network liability system” to make it applicable to the limitation of actions when adjudicating cases.

Xiaohan Yu
Shandong Xianglong Group Co., Ltd. v. NCS Co., Limited & Jinyuan Marine Inc.
(Dispute Over Contract of Carriage of Goods by Sea: A Time Charterer Should Generally be Treated as a Carrier When the Captain Issued a Bill of Lading Under the Time Charterparty Without Specifying the Carrier’s Name)

A time charterparty usually provides the charterer solicits freight business and contracts carriage, while the lessor ensures safe navigation but does not sign contracts of carriage with cargo owner. Accordingly, the lessor (like a ship owner or bareboat charterer) agrees the charterer issues bills of lading.

Xiaohan Yu
Ma X v. Guyuan People’s Government of Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region, and Guyuan Housing and Urban-Rural Development Bureau of Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region
(Dispute Over Administrative Approval and Administrative Ruling on House Demolition and Relocation: Whether Two or More Administrative Acts in the Same Administrative Case Listed as the Disputed Administrative Acts Meets the Legal Conditions for Prosecution)

In an administrative case, the disputed administrative act generally refers to only one administrative act made by one administrative agency, or the same administrative act made by two or more administrative agencies.

Weihua Li, Wang Yi
Hu X (A) v. People’s Government of Jinyun County, Zhejiang Province, People’s Government of Huzhen Town, Jinyun County
(Dispute Over Resettlement Compensation: Whether Women Married out of Town Should be Resettled and Compensated Separately)

The registration of separate households is only a measure taken for registered residence management, and does not involve the issue of compensation and resettlement..

Shaohua Li, Minjuan Tan
Qi X v. People’s Government of Jiagedaqi District, Daxinganling Prefecture, Heilongjiang Province
(Dispute Over Housing Expropriation Compensation Agreement: Failure to Stipulate in the Administrative Agreement that the Overdue Performance of the Liability for Breach of Contract Cannot be Reasons for the Administrative Agency Not to Bear the Liability for Breach of Contract)

After signing an administrative agreement with a counterparty, the administrative agency shall follow the principle of good faith and fully perform its obligations in accordance with the agreement.

Fengyun Liang, Mo Chen
Ma X v. The People’s Government of Dongxiang Autonomous County, Gansu Province and Bureau of Land and Resources of the Dongxiang Autonomous County, Gansu Province
(Dispute Over Administrative Land Expropriation and Indemnification: The Court’s Right to Review the Plaintiff’s Eligibility in Land Administrative Cases May not Overstep the First Right of Disposition by the Administrative Agency)

Legal substantive hearing of a case concerning sued land expropriation and occupation should proceed on the premise that there is no dispute over the ownership of the disputed land and the plaintiff is clearly eligible.

Ping Liu
Tian X v. Zhejiang Office of China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission and China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission
(Dispute Over Administrative Reconsideration: Determination of Regulatory Duties of the Banking and Insurance Regulatory Office in Places Where the Trust Company’s Non-local Business is Operated)

As the provincial-level offices of the banking regulatory authority under the State Council, the provincial Offices of China Banking Regulatory Commission are responsible for overseeing non-banking financial institutions such as trust and investment companies outside the direct supervision of the Banking Regulatory Commission.

Yan Wang, Zhen Du
Wang X, Wuhan Tianjiu Industry & Trade Development Co., Ltd. v. Ministry of Commerce of the People’s Republic of China
(Dispute Over Administrative Licensing Decisions: The Effect of Invalid Civil Contracts on the Validity of Administrative Licenses and the Weighing of Benefits)

When the equity transfer agreement provided by foreign investors during examination in the administrative license process for mergers and acquisitions of domestic enterprises is determined to be invalid by the legally effective decision, whether the license obtained thereof is bound to be revoked.

Kexiong Yang, Yanjia Niu
Li X and Zhang X v. The People’s Government of Huimin County, Shandong Province
(Dispute Over Administrative Enforcement and Administrative Compensation: Determination of the Proper Defendant in Cases of Forced Demolition Without the Responsible Legal Subject)

The eligible defendant in administrative proceedings should be determined based on the principle “one who conducts the act shall be the defendant; one who conducts the act shall be punished”. Generally, the subject of an administrative act has been determined the moment when the act is made. But in some special circumstances where it is difficult to determine the eligible subject of an administrative act at the time of proceeding, we can only make the judgment through trial and the rules of burden of proof.

Hong Yu
Xiao X v. The People’s Government of Liaoyang City, Liaoning Province
(Dispute Over the Decision of Administrative Reconsideration: The Principle of Prohibiting Adverse Changes is not Applicable When Both Parties with Opposite Interests Raise Objections in Administrative Reconsideration)

In cases where two parties hold opposing interests (such as the aggrieved party and the punished party), if one party applies for administrative reconsideration, and the other party with opposing interests, though not applying for reconsideration, raises an objection to the administrative act in the administrative reconsideration procedure as a third party, then the principle of prohibition of unfavorable changes shall not be applied to such situations.

Yan Zhang
Metadaten
Titel
Selected Cases from the Supreme People’s Court of the People’s Republic of China
herausgegeben von
China Applied Jurisprudence Institute
Copyright-Jahr
2023
Verlag
Springer Nature Singapore
Electronic ISBN
978-981-9963-64-5
Print ISBN
978-981-9963-63-8
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-6364-5

Premium Partner