nach oben

Erschienen in:

2024 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

3. Statistical Analysis

verfasst von : Federico Moretta, Giulia Bozzano

Erschienen in: Mathematical and Statistical Approaches for Anaerobic Digestion Feedstock Optimization

Verlag: Springer Nature Switzerland

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

It is important to discover the connections undergoing between data in order to asses complete and robust mathematical relations (Quinn et al. in Bioinformatics 34(16):2870–2878, 2018).

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel Database Introduction

Nächstes Kapitel Synergisms and Antagonisms of Biomasses

Quinn TP, Erb I, Richardson MF, Crowley TM (2018) Understanding sequencing data as compositions: an outlook and review. Bioinformatics 34(16):2870–2878. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bty175CrossRef

Ross SM (2021) Chapter 6: distributions of sampling statistics. In: Ross SM (ed) Introduction to probability and statistics for engineers and scientists (6th edn). Academic Press, New York, 221–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-824346-6.00015-6.

Yvonnet J, Monteiro E, He Q-C (2013) Computational homogenization method and reduced database model for hyperelastic heterogeneous structures. Int J Multiscale Comput Eng 11:3. https://doi.org/10.1615/IntJMultCompEng.2013005374CrossRef

Kiernan D (2023) Chapter 7: correlation and simple linear regression. https://milnepublishing.geneseo.edu/natural-resources-biometrics/chapter/chapter-7-correlation-and-simple-linear-regression/

Benesty J, Chen J, Huang Y, Cohen I (2009) Pearson correlation coefficient. In: Noise reduction in speech processing, in Springer topics in signal processing, vol 2. Springer, Berlin, pp 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-00296-0_5

Farebrother RW (2017) Linear least squares computations. Routledge, New York. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780203748923

Agawin NSR, Duarte CM, Agustí S (2000) Nutrient and temperature control of the contribution of picoplankton to phytoplankton biomass and production. Limnol Oceanogr 45(3):591–600. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2000.45.3.0591CrossRef

Tokuşoglu O, Unal MK (2003) Biomass nutrient profiles of three microalgae: spirulina platensis, chlorella vulgaris, and isochrisis galbana. J Food Sci 68(4):1144–1148. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.2003.tb09615.x

Michalik M, Wilczyńska-Michalik W (2012) Mineral and chemical composition of biomass ash. https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.4298.5603

10.

Gil A, Toledo M, Siles JA, Martín MA (2018) Multivariate analysis and biodegradability test to evaluate different organic wastes for biological treatments: anaerobic co-digestion and co-composting. Waste Manag 78:819–828. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2018.06.052CrossRef

11.

Myers L, Sirois MJ (2006) Spearman correlation coefficients, differences between. In: Encyclopedia of statistical sciences. Wiley, Amsterdam. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471667196.ess5050.pub2

12.

de Winter JCF, Gosling SD, Potter J (2016) Comparing the Pearson and Spearman correlation coefficients across distributions and sample sizes: a tutorial using simulations and empirical data. Psychol Methods 21(3):273–290. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000079CrossRef

13.

Atkinson CF, Jones DD, Gauthier JJ (1996) Biodegradability and microbial activities during composting of poultry litter. Poult Sci 75(5):608–617. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0750608CrossRef

14.

Ahmadi-Pirlou M, Ebrahimi-Nik M, Khojastehpour M, Ebrahimi SH (2017) Mesophilic co-digestion of municipal solid waste and sewage sludge: effect of mixing ratio, total solids, and alkaline pretreatment. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 125:97–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2017.09.004CrossRef

15.

Jain S, Jain S, Wolf IT, Lee J, Tong YW (2015) A comprehensive review on operating parameters and different pretreatment methodologies for anaerobic digestion of municipal solid waste. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 52:142–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.07.091CrossRef

16.

Batstone DJ et al (2002) The IWA anaerobic digestion model No 1 (ADM1). Water Sci Technol 45(10):65–73. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2002.0292CrossRef

17.

Liu J, Smith SR (2022) The link between organic matter composition and the biogas yield of full-scale sewage sludge anaerobic digestion. Water Sci Technol 85(5):1658–1672. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2022.058CrossRef

18.

Siddique MNI, Wahid ZA (2018) Achievements and perspectives of anaerobic co-digestion: a review. J Clean Prod 194(1):359–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.155CrossRef

19.

Wang X, Yang G, Feng Y, Ren G, Han X (2012) Optimizing feeding composition and carbon-nitrogen ratios for improved methane yield during anaerobic co-digestion of dairy, chicken manure and wheat straw. Bioresour Technol 120:78–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2012.06.058CrossRef

20.

Benner R, Maccubbin AE, Hodson RE (1984) Anaerobic biodegradation of the lignin and polysaccharide components of lignocellulose and synthetic lignin by sediment microflora. Appl Environ Microbiol 47(5):998–1004CrossRef

21.

Wang M, Li W, Li P, Yan S, Zhang Y (2017) An alternative parameter to characterize biogas materials: available carbon-nitrogen ratio. Waste Manag 62:76–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2017.02.025CrossRef

22.

Turner BL (2010) Variation in pH optima of hydrolytic enzyme activities in tropical rain forest soils. Appl Environ Microbiol 76(19):6485–6493. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00560-10CrossRef

23.

Sutton A et al (2006) Manipulation of animal diets to affect manure production, composition and odors: state of the science. In: Animal agriculture and the environment, national center for manure and animal waste management white papers. ASABE, St. Joseph. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.20259

24.

Tang J, Wang XC, Hu Y, Zhang Y, Li Y (2017) Effect of pH on lactic acid production from acidogenic fermentation of food waste with different types of inocula. Bioresour Technol 224:544–552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.11.111CrossRef

25.

Cheah Y-K, Vidal-Antich C, Dosta J, Mata-Álvarez J (2019) Volatile fatty acid production from mesophilic acidogenic fermentation of organic fraction of municipal solid waste and food waste under acidic and alkaline pH. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(35):35509–35522. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-05394-6CrossRef

26.

Li Y, Jin Y, Borrion A, Li H, Li J (2017) Effects of organic composition on the anaerobic biodegradability of food waste. Bioresour Technol 243:836–845. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.07.028CrossRef

27.

Hanum F et al (2023) Treatment of sewage sludge using anaerobic digestion in Malaysia: current state and challenges. Front Energy Res 7:7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2019.00019CrossRef

28.

Labatut RA, Pronto JL (2018) Chapter 4—sustainable waste-to-energy technologies: anaerobic digestion. In: Trabold TA, Babbitt CW (eds) Sustainable food waste-to-energy systems. Academic Press, New York, pp 47–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-811157-4.00004-8

29.

Li D et al (2015) Effects of feedstock ratio and organic loading rate on the anaerobic mesophilic co-digestion of rice straw and cow manure. Bioresour Technol 189:319–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2015.04.033CrossRef

30.

Jabeen M, Zeshan S, Yousaf S, Haider MR, Malik RN (2015) High-solids anaerobic co-digestion of food waste and rice husk at different organic loading rates. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 102:149–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2015.03.023CrossRef

31.

Dewil R, Baeyens J, Roels J, Steene BVD (2008) Distribution of Sulphur Compounds in Sewage Sludge Treatment. Environ Eng Sci 25(6):879–886. https://doi.org/10.1089/ees.2007.0143CrossRef

Titel: Statistical Analysis
verfasst von: Federico Moretta
Giulia Bozzano
Verlag: Springer Nature Switzerland
Buch: Mathematical and Statistical Approaches for Anaerobic Digestion Feedstock Optimization
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-56459-8

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-031-56460-4

Copyright-Jahr: 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-56460-4_3

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"