nach oben

Erschienen in:

2024 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Inviting Sustainable Behavior Through the Power of Metaphors in Design

verfasst von : Siyuan Huang, Paul Hekkert, Hendrik N. J. Schifferstein, Monica Bordegoni

Erschienen in: For Nature/With Nature: New Sustainable Design Scenarios

Verlag: Springer Nature Switzerland

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Addressing sustainability challenges requires shifts in consumption patterns and lifestyles. Design for Sustainable Behavior (DfSB) aims to cultivate sustainable attitudes and behaviors through product-based interventions. However, there can be a disconnect between design strategy and its embodiment and sometimes conflicts between designers’ intent and users’ interpretation. This paper explores the role of metaphors in DfSB in terms of using metaphorical thinking during the design process and/or creating product metaphors in the final design. It begins by identifying barriers that prevent people from engaging in sustainable practices, such as human nature and ambiguity in design. It then examines the roles of metaphor in design and its key strengths in DfSB. Furthermore, the paper outlines three methods to generate metaphors in DfSB: (1) The source domain implies the target domain. (2) The source domain serves design goals and strategies. (3) Cross-domain mapping is based on embodied experience. In conclusion, the paper discusses potential issues surrounding its use in DfSB.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel Ettore Sottsass and the Eco-Thought

Nächstes Kapitel Eco-Energy of Subtle Design

Alves-Oliveira P, Lupetti ML, Luria M, Löffler D, Gamboa M, Albaugh L, Kamino WK, Ostrowski A, Puljiz D, Reynolds-Cuéllar P (2021) Collection of metaphors for human-robot interaction. In: DIS ’21 Designing Interactive Systems Conference 2021, pp 1366–1379. https://doi.org/10.1145/3461778.3462060

Aoki PM, Woodruff A (2005) Making space for stories: ambiguity in the design of personal communication systems. In: CHI ’05 Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Portland, Oregon, USA, pp 181–190. ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/1054972.1054998

Aunger R, Curtis V (2016) Behaviour centred design: towards an applied science of behaviour change. Health Psychol Rev 10(4):425–446. https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2016.1219673CrossRef

Camere S, Schifferstein HN, Bordegoni M (2018) From abstract to tangible: supporting the materialization of experiential visions with the experience map. Int J Des 12(2):51–73

Design Council (2019) The double diamond: a universally accepted depiction of the design process. https://www.designcouncil.org.uk/our-work/news-opinion/double-diamond-universally-accepted-depiction-design-process/. Last accessed 26 May 2023

Baron J (2000) Thinking and deciding. Cambridge University Press

Carroll JM, Mack RL, Kellogg WA (1988) Interface metaphors and user interface design. In: Helander M (ed) Handbook of human-computer interaction. Elsevier, pp 67–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/C2009-0-12113-X

Casakin HP (2006) Assessing the use of metaphors in the design process. Environ Plann B Plann Des 33(2):253–268. https://doi.org/10.1068/b3196CrossRef

Casasanto D, Gijssels T (2015) What makes a metaphor an embodied metaphor? Linguistics Vanguard 1(1):327–337. https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2014-1015CrossRef

Cila N (2013) Metaphors we design by: the use of metaphors in product design. Doctoral dissertation, Delft University of Technology. Repository.tudelft.nl

Clayton S, Devine-Wright P, Stern PC, Whitmarsh L, Carrico A, Steg L, Swim J, Bonnes M (2015) Psychological research and global climate change. Nat Clim Chang 5(7):640–646. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2622CrossRef

Collart AJ, Interis MG (2018) Consumer imperfect information in the market for expired and nearly expired foods and implications for reducing food waste. Sustainability 10(11):3835. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10113835CrossRef

Crilly N, Good D, Matravers D, Clarkson PJ (2008) Design as communication: exploring the validity and utility of relating intention to interpretation. Design Studies 29(5):425–457.

Desmet P, Hekkert P (2007) Framework of product experience. Int J Des 1(1):57–66

Diefenbach S, Ullrich D (2015) An experience perspective on intuitive interaction: Central components and the special effect of domain transfer distance. Interact Comput 27(3):210–234. https://doi.org/10.1093/iwc/iwv001CrossRef

GRACE Communications Foundation (2022) https://www.watercalculator.org/posts/shower-bath/. Last accessed 26 May 2023

Halford GS, Cowan N, Andrews G (2007) Separating cognitive capacity from knowledge: a new hypothesis. Trends Cogn Sci 11(6):236–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2007.04.001CrossRef

Hekkert P (2006) Design aesthetics: principles of pleasure in design. Psychology Science 48(2):157–172

Hekkert P, Cila N (2015) Handle with care! Why and how designers make use of product metaphors. Des Stud 40:196–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2015.06.007CrossRef

Hey JH, Agogino AM (2007) Metaphors in conceptual design. In: 19th International Conference on Design Theory and Methodology; 1st International Conference on Micro- and Nanosystems; and 9th International Conference on Advanced Vehicle Tire Technologies, September 4–7. ASME, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA, pp 125–134. https://doi.org/10.1115/DETC2007-34874

Hurtienne J, Israel JH (2007) Image schemas and their metaphorical extensions: intuitive patterns for tangible interaction. In: TEI ’07 Proceedings of the 1st international conference on Tangible and embedded interaction. ACM, pp 127–134. https://doi.org/10.1145/1226969.1226996

Jager W (2003) Breaking bad habits: a dynamical perspective on habit formation and change. In: Jager W, Hendrickx L, Steg L (eds) Human decision-making and environmental perception. Understanding and assisting human decision-making in real life settings. University of Groningen

Kahneman D (2012) Thinking, fast and slow. Penguin

Karjalainen TM (2001) When is a car like a drink? Metaphor as a means to distilling brand and product identity. Design Management Journal (former Series) 12(1):66–71. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1948-7169.2001.tb00536.xCrossRef

Kim J, Maher ML (2020) Conceptual metaphors for designing smart environments: device, robot, and friend. Front Psychol 11:198. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00198CrossRef

Kim J, Ryu H (2014) A design thinking rationality framework: framing and solving design problems in early concept generation. Hum-Comput Interact 29(5–6):516–553. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370024.2014.896706CrossRef

Krippendorff K, Butter R (1984) Product semantics: exploring the symbolic qualities of form in innovation. J Ind Des Soc Am 3(2):4–9

Lakoff G, Johnson M (2008) Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press

Larson B (2011) Metaphors for environmental sustainability: redefining our relationship with nature. Yale University Press

Leifer LJ, Steinert M (2011) Dancing with ambiguity: causality behavior, design thinking, and triple-loop-learning. Inf Knowl Syst Manag 10(1–4):151–173. https://doi.org/10.3233/IKS-2012-0191CrossRef

Liedtka J (2015) Perspective: linking design thinking with innovation outcomes through cognitive bias reduction. J Prod Innov Manag 32(6):925–938. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12163CrossRef

Linder N, Giusti M, Samuelsson K, Barthel S (2022) Pro-environmental habits: an underexplored research agenda in sustainability science. Ambio 51:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-021-01619-6CrossRef

Linse, C (2017) Ambiguity at the heart of design work: sensing and negotiating ambiguity in knowledge-creation work. Doctoral dissertation, KTH Royal Institute of Technology. diva-portal.org

Löffler D, Schmidt N, Tscharn R (2018) Multimodal expression of artificial emotion in social robots using color, motion and sound. In: HRI ’18 Chicago, IL, USA, pp 334–343. https://doi.org/10.1145/3171221.3171261

Murray-Rust D, Nicenboim I, Lockton D (2022) Metaphors for designers working with AI. In: Lockton D, Lenzi S, Hekkert P, Oak A, Sádaba J, Lloyd P (eds) DRS2022 Bilbao, Spain. https://doi.org/10.21606/drs.2022.667

Patton JR (2003) Intuition in decisions. Management Decision 41(10):989–996. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251740310509517CrossRef

Rapoport A, Kantor RE (2007) Complexity and ambiguity in environmental design. J Am Inst Plann 33(4):210–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944366708977922CrossRef

Rasmussen MK, Troiano GM, Petersen MG, Simonsen JG, Hornbæk K (2016) Sketching shape-changing interfaces: exploring vocabulary, metaphors use, and affordances. In: CHI ’16. ACM, San Jose, CA, USA, pp 2740–2751. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858183

RTS—Recycle Track Systems (2021) https://www.rts.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/RTS_Food_Waste_Guide_2021.pdf. Last accessed 26 May 2023

Schifferstein HN, Hekkert P (eds) (2011) Product experience. Elsevier

Schön DA (1979) Generative metaphor: a perspective on problem-setting in social policy. In Ortony A (ed) Metaphor and thought, vol 2. Cambridge University Press, pp 137–163. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173865.011

Steen GJ, Gibbs Jr R W (1999) Metaphor in cognitive linguistics. John Benjamins Publishing Company

Stock O (1998) Spatial and temporal reasoning. Springer Science & Business Media

Strömberg H, Pettersson I, Ju W (2020) Enacting metaphors to explore relations and interactions with automated driving systems. Des Stud 67:77–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2019.12.001CrossRef

Thaler RH, Sunstein CR (2009) Nudge: improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. Penguin

Toh CA, Miller SR (2016) Choosing creativity: the role of individual risk and ambiguity aversion on creative concept selection in engineering design. Res Eng Design 27(3):195–219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00163-015-0212-1CrossRef

Tromp N, Hekkert P, Verbeek PP (2011) Design for socially responsible behavior: a classification of influence based on intended user experience. Des Issues 27(3):3–19. https://doi.org/10.1162/DESI_a_00087CrossRef

Titel: Inviting Sustainable Behavior Through the Power of Metaphors in Design
verfasst von: Siyuan Huang
Paul Hekkert
Hendrik N. J. Schifferstein
Monica Bordegoni
Verlag: Springer Nature Switzerland
Buch: For Nature/With Nature: New Sustainable Design Scenarios
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-53121-7

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-031-53122-4

Copyright-Jahr: 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-53122-4_7

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Premium Partner