Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
ATZ-Fachkongress

Chassis.tech plus 2024


4 Kongresse in einer Veranstaltung

Treffen Sie in München die Fachleute von Chassis, Lenkung, Bremsen sowie Reifen/Räder.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Information Systems and e-Business Management

26.03.2024 | Original Article

The impact of organizational capabilities on business analytics use: the moderating role of environmental dynamism

verfasst von: Thamir Alaskar

Erschienen in: Information Systems and e-Business Management

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Adopting the dynamic capabilities (DC) perspective, this study proposes a model to assess the impact of organizational capabilities on business analytics (BA) use and addresses the moderating role played by environmental dynamism (ED). Based on 457 surveys of BA experts at Saudi Arabian firms and a partial least squares analysis of the model, the results show that data-driven decision-making has a direct and significant influence on BA use. The findings also show that ED has a direct influence on BA use and positively moderates the link between the knowledge aspect and BA use, which indicates that knowledge is required in a volatile environment for successful BA use. Together, these findings extend the dynamic capability view and provide a theory-based perspective on the impacts of organizational aspects of BA use, building a better understanding of the DC of firms and providing guidance to align the necessary capabilities in dynamic environments.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
Afuah A (2001) Dynamic boundaries of the firm: Are firms better off being vertically integrated in the face of a technological change? Acad Manag J 44(6):1211–1228CrossRef
Akter S, Wamba SF, Gunasekaran A, Dubey R, Childe SJ (2016) How to improve firm performance using big data analytics capability and business strategy alignment? Int J Prod Econ 182:113–131CrossRef
Al-Ghattas H, Marjanovic O (2021) Business analytics capabilities for organisational resilience. In: Proceedings of the 54th Hawaii international conference on system sciences, p 228
Alaskar TH, Mezghani K, Alsadi AK (2021) Examining the adoption of Big data analytics in supply chain management under competitive pressure: evidence from Saudi Arabia. J Decis Syst 30(2–3):300–320
Alsadi AK, Alaskar TH, Mezghani K (2021) Adoption of big data analytics in supply chain management: combining organizational factors with supply chain connectivity. Int J Inform Syst Supply Chain Manag (IJISSCM) 14(2):88–107
Alexandre P, Duarte O, Raposo LB (2010) A PLS model to study brand preference: an application to the mobile phone market. In: Esposito Vinzi V, Chin W, Henseler J, Wang H (eds) Handbook of partial least squares. Springer, Berlin, pp 449–485
Alharthi A, Krotov V, Bowman M (2017) Addressing barriers to big data. Bus Horizons 60(3):285–292CrossRef
Ashrafi A, Ravasan AZ, Trkman P, Afshari S (2019) The role of business analytics capabilities in bolstering firms’ agility and performance. Int J Inf Manage 47:1–15CrossRef
Aydiner AS, Tatoglu E, Bayraktar E, Zaim S, Delen D (2019) Business analytics and firm performance: the mediating role of business process performance. J Bus Res 96:228–237CrossRef
Beroggi GEG, Wallace WA (2000) Multi-expert operational risk management. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern C Appl Rev 30(1):32–44CrossRef
Barton D, Court D (2012) Making advanced analytics work for you. Harvard Bus Rev 90(10):78–83
Cabrera-Sánchez JP, Villarejo-Ramos ÁF (2020) Acceptance and use of big data techniques in services companies. J Retail Consum Serv 52:101888CrossRef
Carillo KDA, Galy N, Guthrie C, Vanhems A (2019) How to turn managers into data-driven decision makers: measuring attitudes towards business analytics. Bus Process Manag J 25(3):553–578CrossRef
Cao G (2015) The affordances of business analytics for strategic decision-making and their impact on organisational performance. In: Pacific Asia conference on information systems, pp 1–17
Cao G, Duan Y (2014) A path model linking business analytics, data-driven culture, and competitive advantage. In: European conference on information systems, pp 1–17
Cao G, Duan Y, Li G (2015) Linking business analytics to decision making effectiveness: a path model analysis. IEEE Trans Eng Manag 62(3):384–395CrossRef
Chae B, Olson DL (2013) Business analytics for supply chain: a dynamic-capabilities framework. Int J Inf Technol Decis Mak 12(01):9–26CrossRef
Chatterjee S, Chaudhuri R, Vrontis D (2021) Does data-driven culture impact innovation and performance of a firm? An empirical examination. Ann Oper Res 1–26
Chen H, Chiang RH, Storey VC (2012) Business intelligence and analytics: from big data to big impact. MIS Q 36(4):1165–1188CrossRef
Chen DQ, Preston DS, Swink M (2015) How the use of big data analytics affects value creation in supply chain management. J Manag Inf Syst 32(4):4–39CrossRef
Chin WW (1998) The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. In: Marcoulides GA (ed) Modern methods for business research. Lawrence Erlbaum, New Jersey, pp 295–336
Côrte-Real N, Ruivo P, Oliveira T (2014) The diffusion stages of business intelligence & analytics (BI&A): a systematic mapping study. Procedia Technol 16:172–179CrossRef
Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ
Davenport TH, Harris JG (2007) Competing on analytics: the new science of winning. Harvard Business Press, Boston
Davenport TH, Harris JG, De Long DW, Jacobson AL (2001) Data to knowledge to results: building an analytic capability. California Manag Rev 43(2):117–138CrossRef
Day GS (2011) Closing the marketing capabilities gap. J Mark 75(4):183–195CrossRef
Demirkan H, Delen D (2013) Leveraging the capabilities of service-oriented decision support systems: putting analytics and big data in cloud. Decis Support Syst 55(1):412–421CrossRef
Droge C, Jayaram J, Vickery SK (2004) The effects of internal versus external integration practices on time-based performance and overall firm performance. J Oper Manag 22:557–573CrossRef
Dubey R, Gunasekaran A, Childe SJ, Bryde DJ, Giannakis M, Foropon C, Roubaud D, Hazen BT (2020) Big data analytics and artificial intelligence pathway to operational performance under the effects of entrepreneurial orientation and environmental dynamism: a study of manufacturing organisations. Int J Prod Econ. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​ijpe.​2019.​107599CrossRef
Eisenhardt KM, Tabrizi BN (1995) Accelerating adaptive processes: product innovation in the global computer industry. Adm Sci Q 40:84–110CrossRef
Eisenhardt KM, Martin JA (2000) Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strateg Manag J 21(10–11):1105–1121CrossRef
Esposito Vinzi V, Trinchera L, Amato S (2010) PLS path modeling: recent developments and open issues for model assessment and improvement. In: EspositoVinzi V, Chin W, Henseler J, Wang H (eds) Handbook partial least squares: concepts, methods and applications, computational statistics handbook series, vol II. Springer-Verlag, BerlinCrossRef
Falk RF, Miller NB (1992) A primer for soft modeling. University of Akron Press, Akron
Fornell C, Larcker DF (1981) Evaluating structural models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J Mark Res 28(February):39–50CrossRef
Gangwar H (2018) Understanding the determinants of big data adoption in India: an analysis of the manufacturing and services sectors. Inf Resour Manag J (IRMJ) 31(4):1–22CrossRef
Hair JF, Hult GTM, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M (2013) A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks
Hair J, Hollingsworth CL, Randolph AB, Chong AYL (2017) An updated and expanded assessment of PLS-SEM in information systems research. Ind Manag Data Syst 117(3):442–458CrossRef
Harding W (2003) BI crucial to making the right decision: business intelligence is all about collecting useful information from multiple sources and then presenting it in an easy to understand format (Special Report: Business Intelligence). Financ Exec 19(2):49–51
Helfat CE, Winter SG (2011) Untangling dynamic and operational capabilities: strategy for the (n)everchanging world. Strateg Manag J 32(11):1243–1250CrossRef
Henseler J, Ringle CM, Sinkovics RR (2009) The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. New challenges to international marketing. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Leeds
Hindle GA, Vidgen R (2018) Developing a business analytics methodology: a case study in the foodbank sector. Eur J Oper Res 268(3):836–851CrossRef
Hsu PF, Ray S, Li-Hsieh YY (2014) Examining cloud computing adoption intention, pricing mechanism, and deployment model. Int J Inf Manag 34(4):474–488CrossRef
Isik O, Jones MC, Sidorova A (2013) Business intelligence success: the roles of BI capabilities and decision environments. Inf Manag 50(1):13–23CrossRef
Jaklic J, Grublješič T, Popovič A (2018) The role of compatibility in predicting business intelligence and analytics use intentions. Int J Inf Manag 43:305–318CrossRef
Jansen JJ, Van Den Bosch FA, Volberda HW (2006) Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, and performance: effects of organizational antecedents and environmental moderators. Manag Sci 52(11):1661–1674CrossRef
Kiron D, Prentice PK, Ferguson RB (2012) Innovating with analytics. MIT Sloan Manag Rev 54(1):47–52
Kiron D, Shockley R (2011) Creating business value with analytics. MIT Sloan Manag Rev 53:57–63
Kristoffersen E, Mikalef P, Blomsma F, Li J (2021) Towards a business analytics capability for the circular economy. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 171:120957CrossRef
Klatt T, Schlaefke M, Moeller K (2011) Integrating business analytics into strategic planning for better performance. J Bus Strat 32(6):30–39CrossRef
Kumar A, Krishnamoorthy B (2020) Business analytics adoption in firms: a qualitative study elaborating TOE framework in India. Int J Global Bus Compet 15(2):80–93CrossRef
Lane M, Lum WH (2010) Examining client perception of partnership quality and its dimension in an IT outsourcing relationship. Australas J Inf Syst 17(1)
Lavalle S, Lesser E, Shockley R, Hopkins MS, Kruschwitz N (2011) Big data, analytics and the path from insights to value. MIT Sloan Manag Rev 52(2):21–32
Lee I (2017) Big data: dimensions, evolution, impacts, and challenges. Bus Horiz 60:293–303CrossRef
Lee OD, Sambamurthy V, Lim KH, Wei KK (2015) How does IT ambidexterity impact organizational agility. Inf Syst Res 26(2):398–417CrossRef
Levinthal D, Myatt J (1994) Co-evolution of capabilities and industry: the evolution of mutual fund processing. Strateg Manag J 15(S1):45–62CrossRef
Maklan S, Knox S (2009) Dynamic capabilities: the missing link in CRM investments. Eur J Mark 43(11/12):1392–1410CrossRef
Malomo F, Sena V (2017) Data intelligence for local government? Assessing the benefits and barriers to use of big data in the public sector. Policy Internet 9(1):7–27CrossRef
Meyer AD, Gaba V, Colwell KA (2005) Organizing far from equilibrium: nonlinear change in organizational fields. Organ Sci 16(5):456–473CrossRef
Mikalef P, Pappas I, Krogstie J, Pavlou PA (eds) (2020) Big data and business analytics: a research agenda for realizing business value. Elsevier, Amsterdam
Miller D, Friesen PH (1983) Strategy-making and environment: the third link. Strateg Manag J 4(3):221–235CrossRef
Min H, Joo HY, Choi SB (2021) Success factors affecting the intention to use business analytics: an empirical study. J Bus Anal 4(2):77–90
Mora M, Marx-Gomez J, Wang F, Diaz O (2021) Agile it service management frameworks and standards: a review. In: Arabnia HR, Deligiannidis L, Tinetti FG, Tran QN (eds) Advances in software engineering, education, and e-learning. Springer, Cham, pp 921–936CrossRef
Mora M, Marx Gomez J, Reyes-Delgado PY, Adelakun O (2022) An integrative agile ITSM framework of tenets and practices–its design and exploratory utilization. J Organ Comput Electron Commerce 32(2):99–129CrossRef
Müller SD, Jensen P (2017) Big data in the Danish industry: application and value creation. Bus Process Manag J 23(3):645–670CrossRef
Nam D, Lee J, Lee H (2019a) Business analytics adoption process: an innovation diffusion perspective. Int J Inf Manag 49:411–423CrossRef
Nam D, Lee J, Lee H (2019b) Business analytics use in CRM: a nomological net from it competence to CRM performance. Int J Inf Manag 45:233–245CrossRef
Neill M, Brabazon A (2019) Business analytics capability, organisational value and competitive advantage. J Bus Anal 2(2):160–173CrossRef
Nguyen T, Li ZHOU, Spiegler V, Ieromonachou P, Lin Y (2018) Big data analytics in supply chain management: a state-of-the-art literature review. Comput Oper Res 98:254–264CrossRef
Oesterreich TD, Anton E, Teuteberg F (2022) What translates big data into business value? A meta-analysis of the impacts of business analytics on firm performance. Inf Manag 59:103685CrossRef
Park Y, El Sawy OA, Fiss P (2017) The role of business intelligence and communication technologies in organizational agility: a configurational approach. J Assoc Inf Syst 18(9):1
Pavlou PA, El Sawy OA (2006) From IT leveraging competence to competitive advantage in turbulent environments: the case of new product development. Inf Syst Res 17(3):198–227CrossRef
Protogerou Y, Caloghirou A, Lioukas S (2011) Dynamic capabilities and their indirect impact on firm performance. Ind Corp Chang 21(3):615–647CrossRef
Provost F, Fawcett T (2013) Data science and its relationship to big data and datadriven decision making. Big Data 1(1):51–59CrossRef
Robinson A, Levis J, Bennett G (2010) INFORMS to officially join analytics movement. OR/MS Today 37(5):59
Schilke O (2014) Second-order dynamic capabilities: How do they matter? Acad Manag Perspect 28(4):368–380CrossRef
Sirmon DG, Hitt MA, Ireland RD (2007) Managing firm resources in dynamic environments to create value: looking inside the black box. Acad Manag Rev 32(1):273–292CrossRef
Sirmon DG, Hitt MA (2009) Contingencies within dynamic managerial capabilities: interdependent effects of resource investment and deployment on firm performance. Strateg Manag J 30(13):1375–1394CrossRef
Tallon PP, Pinsonneault A (2011) Competing perspectives on the link between strategic information technology alignment and organizational agility: insights from a mediating model. MIS Q 35(2):463–486CrossRef
Teece DJ, Pisano G, Shuen A (1997) Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strateg Manag J 18(7):509–533CrossRef
Teece DJ, Peteraf M, Leih S (2016) Dynamic capabilities and organizational agility: risk, uncertainty, and strategy in the innovation economy. Calif Manag Rev 58(4):13–35CrossRef
Tenenhaus M, Vinzi VE, Chatelin YM, Lauro C (2005) PLS path modeling. Comput Stat Data Anal 48(1):159–205CrossRef
Tippins MJ, Sohi RS (2003) IT competency and firm performance: is organizational learning a missing link? Strategic management journal 24(8):745–761CrossRef
Tornatzky LG, Fleischer M, Chakrabarti AK (1990) Processes of technological innovation. Lexington books, Lanham
Verlaine B (2017) Toward an agile IT service management framework. Serv Sci 9(4):263–274CrossRef
Verma S, Chaurasia S (2019) Understanding the determinants of big data analytics adoption. Inf Resour Manag J (IRMJ) 32(3):1–26CrossRef
Wamba SF, Gunasekaran A, Akter S, Ren SJF, Dubey R, Childe SJ (2017) Big data analytics and firm performance: effects of dynamic capabilities. J Bus Res 70:356–365CrossRef
Wamba SF, Dubey R, Gunasekaran A, Akter S (2020) The performance effects of big data analytics and supply chain ambidexterity: the moderating effect of environmental dynamism. Int J Prod Econ 222:107498CrossRef
Wang S, Yeoh W, Richards G, Wong SF, Chang Y (2019) Harnessing business analytics value through organizational absorptive capacity. Inf Manag 56(7):103152CrossRef
Wang Y, Byrd TA (2017) Business analytics-enabled decision-making effectiveness through knowledge absorptive capacity in health care. J Knowl Manag 21(3):517–539CrossRef
Wang Z, Wang N, Su X, Ge S (2020) An empirical study on business analytics affordances enhancing the management of cloud computing data security. Int J Inf Manag 50:387–394CrossRef
Wanasida AS, Bernarto I, Sudibjo N, Purwanto A (2021) The role of business capabilities in supporting organization agility and performance during the COVID-19 pandemic: an empirical study in Indonesia. J Asian Finance Econ Bus 8(5):897–911
Wetzels M, Odekerken-Schröder G, Van Oppen C (2009) Using PLS path modeling for assessing hierarchical construct models: guidelines and empirical illustration. MIS Q 33:177–195CrossRef
Wiggins RR, Ruefli TW (2005) Schumpeter’s ghost: Is hyper competition making the best of times shorter? Strateg Manag J 26(10):887–911CrossRef
Wilhelm H, Schlömer M, Maurer I (2015) How dynamic capabilities affect the effectiveness and efficiency of operating routines under high and low levels of environmental dynamism. Br J Manag 26(2):327–345CrossRef
Williams S, Williams N (2007) The profit impact of business intelligence. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, CA
Zahra SA, Sapienza HJ, Davidsson P (2006) Entrepreneurship and dynamic capabilities: a review, model and research agenda. J Manag Stud 43(4):917–955CrossRef
Zhu K, Dong S, Xu SX, Kraemer KL (2006) Innovation diffusion in global contexts: determinants of post-adoption digital transformation of European companies. Eur J Inf Syst 15(6):601–616CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
The impact of organizational capabilities on business analytics use: the moderating role of environmental dynamism
verfasst von
Thamir Alaskar
Publikationsdatum
26.03.2024
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Information Systems and e-Business Management
Print ISSN: 1617-9846
Elektronische ISSN: 1617-9854
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10257-024-00670-6

Premium Partner

    Bildnachweise