Skip to main content
Erschienen in: e+i Elektrotechnik und Informationstechnik 1/2024

Open Access 10.01.2024 | Originalarbeit

A modular and scalable system for electromagnetic compatibility testing of integrated circuits

verfasst von: Daniel Kircher, Simon Profanter, Bernd Deutschmann

Erschienen in: e+i Elektrotechnik und Informationstechnik | Ausgabe 1/2024

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

To bring automotive integrated circuits (ICs) to market, manufacturers must subject their products to numerous electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) tests such as electromagnetic immunity and emission tests, or electrostatic discharge (ESD) tests. These tests need EMC test boards that meet the requirements of the specific standards. However, the current need to increase the frequency range of EMC tests poses a challenge in designing standard-compliant test boards. In this paper, we address this issue by introducing a modular and reusable IC level EMC test system. We demonstrate the system’s effectiveness with an example of two frequently used and conducted EMC tests: the direct power injection (DPI) immunity test and the \(150\,\mathrm{\Omega}\) electromagnetic emission measurement. The two test setups are constructed and validated using the presented modules. It is shown how the frequency range can be expanded while minimizing costs and design efforts for the EMC test board design.
Hinweise
This work was funded by the Austrian Research Promotion Agency (FFG, Project No. 884573) and Infineon Technologies Austria AG.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

1 Introduction

In modern vehicles, electronic components are responsible for an increasing number of functions. From keyless entry systems to airbag deployment and anti-lock braking system. Electronic components are responsible for a safer and more pleasant driving experience and are nowadays installed in a wide range of electronic control modules in the smallest of installation spaces. However, with so many electronic control modules containing numerous ICs in close proximity often operating at ever-faster switching rates, the electromagnetic environment in the car poses significant challenges to the EMC for these components. Each IC emits electromagnetic emissions when active, which can interfere with other electronic components, resulting in malfunction or failure.
Especially for automotive ICs, the generic IC EMC Test Specification [11] specifies a series of EMC tests that an IC must pass to be used in a vehicle. Such tests range from conducted electromagnetic emission (EME) tests and radiated EME tests to electromagnetic immunity tests and transient tests such as ESD. This specification covers a wide range of characterizations necessary to release an IC for the automotive industry. At the moment, IC manufacturers usually build a special EMC test board for each of these tests, which must meet all the very specific requirements of the standards and the Generic IC EMC Test Specification. These test boards are then specially designed for the specified frequency range. For example, the frequency range for conducted EMC tests is \(150\,\text{k}\text{Hz}\) to \(1\,\text{G}\text{Hz}\). Designing a functional test board that meets all the requirements is already a not very easy and usually cost-intensive challenge, especially if it is to be designed for high load currents of the ICs. The construction of such test systems for each new product alone is a laborious and costly process with the traditional method. Since the trend in microelectronics is towards ever faster switching cycles and higher data transmission rates in communication systems, characterizing ICs just up to \(1\,\text{G}\text{Hz}\) will no longer be sufficient in the future. Therefore, it is becoming increasingly important to evaluate the electromagnetic emission and immunity of an IC also at higher frequencies in order to make statements about whether the IC itself or possible other ICs in the system are disturbed. There are already a number of publications describing an improvement and frequency range extension for the so-called DPI method, which is often used to characterize the electromagnetic immunity of ICs. A corresponding design approach with which the usable frequency range could be extended up to \(2\,\text{G}\text{Hz}\) was explained in [9] and [2], for example. An optimization of the DPI test bench for highly reflective low voltage devices was presented in [7]. A further proposal to extend the frequency range of the DPI method even further (up to \(20\,\text{G}\text{Hz}\)) is presented in [8]. The power transmitted to an IC in a SOIC8 package is thereby determined by offline calibration using short-open-load-thru (SOLT) or thru-reflect-line (TRL) using a corresponding printed circuit board (PCB) design. Another possibility of coupling interference signals into an IC by means of an off-board probe is presented in [1]. In this paper, the DPI investigation of a low-dropout regulator (LDO) is used to compare the conventional DPI method with direct RF power injection using a probe. The experimental results show a maximum deviation of the immunity level less than \(1\,\text{dB}\).
Another challenge with DPI testing is that during the test, the device under test (DUT) can be broken by the injected power level or a malfunction caused by it. In this case, the IC must be removed from the PCB. Due to the soldering and desoldering process, the PCB is often so damaged after a certain number of changes of the DUT that testing is no longer possible. In this case, the entire test board, including all components, must be replaced and renewed.
At present, all semiconductor manufacturers produce their own test boards. Although the standards specify what a test board should look like, it is up to the manufacturers themselves to ensure that the standards are met. On the other hand, at the system level, there are many individual components, such as coupling decoupling networks (CDNs), current clamps, etc., which are tested and certified and can also be used in combination according to individual specifications. Nothing like that exists at IC level yet. This reduces the comparability of the results as the measurements are highly dependent on the design of the test board.
To address these issues, a new modular approach has been developed to construct a cost-efficient and reusable test system that also allows the coupling of interfering signals over a higher frequency range. Such a modular system has already been developed and validated for ESD tests [10]. This system makes it possible to replace complex ESD evaluation boards with a kit of different modules in a more cost-effective, flexible, and reusable way.
This approach involves outsourcing various standard modules required for each test board to their PCBs and utilizing a separate PCB for the device under test.
By assembling the required measurement circuit using a kit principle and connecting the appropriate modules, the test board can be easily customized to meet the specific needs of the IC being tested. This approach not only reduces waste and costs but also allows for a more flexible and scalable testing process.
This paper is structured as follows: In Sect. 2 we describe a commonly used method to characterize the electromagnetic immunity and the electromagnetic emission of an IC where the modular system can be used, the DPI and the \(150\,\mathrm{\Omega}\) method. In Sect. 3 we briefly introduce the DUT, which is used as an example to demonstrate the modular test system. In Sect. 4 we give an overview of the key parameters of the modular system. In Sect. 5 we explain the different types of modules, which can be used to create the test system. Sects. 6 and 7 show examples of test setups for EMC characterization built with the presented modules and finally, in Sect. 8 we conclude the findings and give a short outlook.

2 EMC characterisation

The most important standards for electromagnetic compatibility testing at IC level are the IEC 62132 standard for electromagnetic immunity and the IEC 61967 standard for electromagnetic emission characterization. Two of the most important measurement methods for conducted immunity and emission tests are described in this chapter.

2.1 DPI-immunity testing

The DPI immunity test [4] is designed to determine the minimum level of disturbance power that is needed to disrupt the normal operation of the IC. The test is performed by coupling a radio frequency (RF) disturbance signal directly over a coupling capacitor into an IC pin while the chip is operating. The functionality of the IC is then monitored to see if it is affected by the disturbance signal. The signals to be monitored are usually filtered by a low pass filter before feeding them to a monitoring device, for example, an oscilloscope.
The DPI immunity test covers a broad frequency range, from 150 kHz to 1 GHz. To generate the DPI-characteristic, from which the electromagnetic immunity behavior of the IC can be read out, the injected disturbance signal is increased step by step in the frequency range starting from the start frequency. The signal power of the signal is thereby increased in small steps at each disturbance frequency until the IC fails or the maximum test limit is reached.

2.2 150 Ohm measurement

The \(150\,\mathrm{\Omega}\) measurement method is a way of characterizing the conducted electromagnetic emissions of a IC on a specific pin. This is a widely used method and is described in [3]. For this measurement, a \(150\,\mathrm{\Omega}\) coupling network is attached to the pin to be tested and the emissions are then measured using e.g. an EMI receiver. The \(150\,\mathrm{\Omega}\) coupling network simulates the standardized antenna impedance of an automotive wiring harness, allowing comparable measurements. The coupling network consists of a \(120\,\mathrm{\Omega}\) resistor which is connected in series with a \(6.8\,\text{n}\text{F}\) capacitor and a \(51\,\mathrm{\Omega}\) resistor across which the measurement is made. Together with the \(50\,\mathrm{\Omega}\) internal resistance of the EMI-receiver, an impedance of approx. \(150\,\mathrm{\Omega}\) is obtained, giving the measurement method its name. See [5] for more information on this method.

3 Specifications of the used device under test

The modular test system is demonstrated for an automotive smart power high-side switch. A block diagram of this IC can be seen in Fig. 1. Automotive smart power high-side switches are commonly used in vehicles to switch electrical loads such as headlights. The integrated DMOS power transistor performs the switch function with a minimal on-resistance of \(R_{\text{ON}}\approx 4\,\text{m}\mathrm{\Omega}\) and a nominal load current of \(20\,\text{A}\). In addition to the DMOS, the IC has a number of protective functions such as overtemperature and overload protection as well as several diagnostic functions including current measurement and indication of failure states such as overheating. The IC’s diagnose output provides current measurement during rated operation and an indication of fault conditions. Because of these additional functions, the power switch is considered a smart power switch. Such switches are usually located in the vehicle’s control unit and are connected by a wiring harness to the battery and the switched load. The cable harnesses can act as antennas for electromagnetic interference that may interfere with the operation of the IC.

4 Overview of the modular system

This section provides an overview of the modular test system by presenting its general parameters. The test system comprises a base module, which is a large metal plate including numerous screw holes used to secure and interconnect different modules using screws. On top of the metal plate, a gold plated PCB topper is placed, to ensure a reliable grounding of the screwed-on modules [10]. The modules are classified into standard modules, such as coupling modules, CDN modules, inductor modules, and the DUT module. The DUT module includes all the necessary components for operating the DUT.
One of the key benefits of the modular approach is its reusability. Standard modules can be employed for future tests, leading to cost savings. Separating the modules into DUT and standard modules is also cost-effective. In conventional boards, when the DUT breaks during immunity tests, the only option is to desolder and replace it, which can be done only a few times before the entire PCB with all components must be replaced. In contrast, the modular system only requires replacing a broken DUT module, allowing the use of higher-quality components in the standard modules, that can extend the frequency range of the test system and conduct tests in the higher frequency range in which many of today’s disturbance signals are present.
The modules are manufactured using a 4-layer FR4 PCB. The first layer contains all RF and signal lines. The impedance-controlled RF traces are designed as grounded coplanar waveguides and allow a \(50\,\mathrm{\Omega}\) system from the interference source to the IC pin. This impedance-controlled system minimizes reflections and losses in the coupling path and increases the possible frequency range in which the test system can be used. The second layer is a solid ground layer that serves as a current return path for the RF currents. Layer three is used for signal traces that cannot be routed on the top layer, while the bottom layer is a blank solid ground plane. By screwing the modules onto the large metal plate, the bottom plates of the modules are pressed against the large metal plate, establishing a solid ground connection. The PCB stackup including the mounting plate, where the modules are screwed on is illustrated in Fig. 2.
To exhibit the system’s modularity, Fig. 3 shows a demonstrative circuit that concurrently merges three distinct EMC test setups. T1: DPI for local pins connected to a component on the same PCB. Additionally, DPI for global pins connected to a cable harness is measured at T2. The \(150\,\mathrm{\Omega}\) emission measurement is indicated as T3. The individual modules in the setup are discussed in the following section.

5 Types of modules

The testing system comprises numerous standard modules designed for various testing methods. In this section we introduce all the standard modules, it takes to build two standard IC level EMC tests. The DPI setup for immunity tests and the \(150\,\mathrm{\Omega}\) setup for emission measurements. In the Sects. 6 and 7, these modules are combined to the mentioned test setups and evaluated.

5.1 Device under test module

The DUT module comprises the DUT and all necessary components for its operation, as well as various filter structures and connectors for monitoring its performance.
The key to extending the frequency range of the entire test system is to optimize the coupling path for the injected disturbance signals. The DUT is an automotive smart power high-side switch and has a nominal current of approximately \(20\,\text{A}\). The trace thickness required on a PCB for this current is substantial. However, large PCB traces have a significant stray capacitance to the environment. This capacitance limits the frequency range of the DPI test because the \(-3\,\text{dB}\) attenuation of the disturbance signal happens already at several MHz. Therefore, it is essential to reduce the stray capacity of the traces as much as possible by keeping the large supply traces as short as possible.
In order to characterize ICs with high nominal currents, it is necessary to utilize large decoupling modules. To overcome space limitations due to the large form factor of the inductors, the inductor modules are mounted underneath the test setup. Two different mounting plates are used to create a gap underneath the DUT for connecting the inductor modules directly onto the IC pin. The bottom layers of the modules provide a good connection between the two mounting plates. The DUT module is marked in Fig. 3 as module A.

5.2 Coupling modules for DPI

The coupling module consists of an SMA connector, a coupling capacitor, and an impedance-controlled \(50\,\mathrm{\Omega}\) trace to connect the components. For the best RF properties, the SMA connector is a \(45^{\circ}\) connector to reduce the reflections on the PCB interface. In contrast to the typically used \(6.8\,\text{n}\text{F}\) multi-layer ceramic coupling capacitor, the capacitor used for this kind of coupling module is a silicon chip capacitor. It maintains its capacitance of \(10\,\text{n}\text{F}\) up to \(60\,\text{G}\text{Hz}\). The coupling module is marked in Fig. 3 as module B, is presented in two varying form factors, where both have identical construction and components. However, one is broader to ensure the bridging of an air gap between the two mounting plates.

5.3 Coupling decoupling network (CDN) module

The standard also specifies that different CDNs can be used during a DPI test. In this case, an automotive IC undergoes testing, so a broadband artificial network (BAN) is employed as the CDN. The modularity of the system allows for interchangeable CDNs. The CDN, especially the decoupling part, must be selected based on the load current, and this is implemented as a separate module, as explained in section Sect. 5.6. For automotive testing, a BAN network is necessary to test global IC pins, which connect to the cable harness in the final application. The BAN simulates the antenna impedance of an automotive cable harness with \(150\,\mathrm{\Omega}\). It comprises \(50\,\mathrm{\Omega}\) impedance-controlled traces and a \(6.8\,\text{n}\text{F}\) capacitor in series with a \(150\,\mathrm{\Omega}\) resistor connected to ground. The BAN module is marked as module C in Fig. 3.

5.4 150 Ohm module

The \(150\,\mathrm{\Omega}\) network is needed for electromagnetic emission measurements. The corresponding module simulates the impedance of the cable harness in the vehicle and consists of a \(120\,\mathrm{\Omega}\) resistor in series with a \(6.8\,\text{n}\text{F}\) capacitor followed by a \(51\,\mathrm{\Omega}\) resistor to ground, over which the emission is measured. Together with the input impedance of the EMI receiver, it forms an impedance of approximately \(150\,\mathrm{\Omega}\). The \(150\,\mathrm{\Omega}\) module is marked as module D in Fig. 3. The IEC 61967‑4 standard defines an input attenuation of the \(150\,\mathrm{\Omega}\) network of \(11.75\,\text{dB}\pm 2\,\text{dB}\). Fig. 4 shows the \(S_{\text{21}}\) parameter of the \(150\,\mathrm{\Omega}\) module. According to this measurement, the module is standard-compliant up to \(2.9\,\text{G}\text{Hz}\).

5.5 Board to board connection modules

The board-to-board connection is established by connection modules, which have a blank PCB trace mounted upside down on the junction of the different modules. This electric press connection is highly reusable and provides a good RF-connection. The board-to-board connection is marked as module E in Fig. 3.

5.6 Decoupling module

The decoupling modules prevent the injected disturbance signals from being bypassed over e.g. the power supply or the load. Depending on their electrical parameters such as the load current and the desired test frequency range, different decoupling modules are needed for different DUTs. Therefore, it is very convenient to have a variety of different decoupling modules, which can be combined and replaced with minimal effort for the specific test application. An example of the decoupling modules mounted at the bottom side of the DUT module is shown in Fig. 5.
To prevent the influence of high-frequency propagation effects, the distance \(l_{\text{Injection}}\) between the AC-block and the injection path must be less than \(\frac{\lambda}{20}\) of the highest injection frequency \(f\). The relation between \(f\) and \(l_{\text{Injection}}\) is noted in Eq. (1). The standard defines a frequency range up to \(1\,\text{G}\text{Hz}\). To cover the frequency, the distance \(l_{\text{Injection}}\) must be less than \(15\,\text{m}\text{m}\). To reduce the injection path distance as much as possible and therefore extend the possible frequency range, the decoupling module is mounted underneath the DUT. Therefore, it is possible to reduce \(l_{\text{injection}}\) to less than \(5\,\text{m}\text{m}\). This makes a valid design possible up to \(3\,\text{G}\text{Hz}\).
$$l_{\text{Injection}}\leq\frac{\lambda}{20}=\frac{v_{p}}{f\cdot 20}=\frac{c}{\sqrt{\epsilon_{r}}\cdot f\cdot 20}$$
(1)

6 Configuration for a conducted immunity test

6.1 DPI test setup

In this section, we show an example of a test setup created with the modular system. A smart power high-side switch for automotive applications is used as a DUT, with a disturbance signal injected into the supply, output, and input pins and its functions monitored to test its electromagnetic immunity. The supply (\(V_{\text{BAT}}\)) and output (OUT) pins are global pins, which means they are connected to a cable harness in the final application. So both are connected to a decoupling module and a BAN module. The decoupling modules are mounted underneath the DUT module to optimize space usage and disturbance injection. All three test pins are connected to a coupling module. The board-to-board connectors connect all modules.
The block diagram in Fig. 6 shows the basic structure of the test setup. An RF-generator and RF-amplifier is used to generate the disturbance signal. The output of the amplifier is connected to one of the coupling modules of the test system over which the disturbance signal is coupled into the IC pin. For each pin, the electromagnetic immunity characteristic is determined.
Fig. 7 shows the attenuation from the SMA-connector to the input channel of the IC. The \(-3\,\text{dB}\)-attenuation limit is reached at \(2.4\,\text{G}\text{Hz}\). Fig. 9 shows the coupling path to the battery pin and Fig. 8 the coupling path to the output pin. Since the IC can handle a continuous current of \(20\,\text{A}\), the geometry of the supply and output pins do not match the \(50\,\mathrm{\Omega}\) structure of the injection traces. Therefore, realizing a valid design is tricky. But the injection paths to the supply pin and the output pin are valid up to \(1\,\text{G}\text{Hz}\).
An example is shown in Fig. 10. This is the result of the DPI test at the supply pin \(V_{\text{BAT}}\) of the IC.

7 Configuaration for a conducted emission test

7.1 150 Ohm test setup

In this section, we show an example of a conducted emission measurement setup for IC level electromagnetic emission measurements according to the \(150\,\mathrm{\Omega}\) measurement technique. To arrange this measurement setup, we used the DUT module and the \(150\,\mathrm{\Omega}\) module. Both modules are connected via a connector module. The setup for the conducted electromagnetic emission measurement of the output pin of the IC is illustrated in Fig. 11 using the modules A, D, and F. The two decouple modules are connected to the battery and the output pin of the device, to decouple the device from the supply and the load. So only the emissions produced by the IC are measured. The emissions are measured with the use of an EMI receiver. The physical setup is shown in Fig. 3 and marked as T3.

7.2 Measurement results

Fig. 12 shows the result of the electromagnetic emission of the output of the IC. The IC is again the device discussed in Sect. 3. The device is operated in PWM mode. The Generic IC EMC test specification defines that the device should switch at the maximum switching frequency specified in the datasheet, but the switching time should be less than 1% of the switching period. The nominal switching time of the DUT is approximately \(100\,\upmu\text{s}\). So the DUT switches with a frequency of \(f=100\,\text{Hz}\) and a duty cycle of \(d={50}{\%}\). This device fulfills the class I according to the limits stated in the Generic IC EMC Test Specification [11].

8 Conclusion

A novel modular approach of a test system for the conducted EMC characterization of ICs was introduced. Conducted EMC tests were performed on an automotive smart power high side switch in order to investigate the advantages, such as the modularity and the increased frequency range of the proposed system. Using the different modules, a DPI testing setup and a \(150\,\mathrm{\Omega}\) measurement setup were assembled. In conclusion, the use of a modular test board for immunity and emission testing offers several advantages over the traditional approach of designing an EMC test board such as reduced design efforts, costs, and a significant increase in the injected signals frequency. Implementing standardized modules could potentially reduce the impact of test board designs on the measurement results. As with system-level testing, where standardized and certified components are utilized to ensure comparative and accurate measurement, standardized and certified modules could be implemented at the IC level to enhance the comparability of individual measurements and facilitate more straightforward test setup design for manufacturers, furthermore, the design costs and waste can be reduced because of the reusable design of the modular system. The system can easily be extended by other modules which are needed for other test setups. The next modules that are planned are symmetrical coupling modules which are needed for characterizing CAN bus IC pins.

Acknowledgements

This paper is an extended version of [6]. Supported by TU Graz Open Access Publishing Fund.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​4.​0/​.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Cao GW, Chang YT, Tiong KK et al (2015) Investigation of off-board dpi method. In: 2015 Asia-Pacific Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility (APEMC). IEEE, pp 643–646CrossRef Cao GW, Chang YT, Tiong KK et al (2015) Investigation of off-board dpi method. In: 2015 Asia-Pacific Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility (APEMC). IEEE, pp 643–646CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Catrysse J, Pissoort D, Vanhee F (2011) Expanding the frequeny range for dpi testing of ic’s above 1 ghz: An alternative proposal. In: 10th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility. IEEE, pp 400–404 Catrysse J, Pissoort D, Vanhee F (2011) Expanding the frequeny range for dpi testing of ic’s above 1 ghz: An alternative proposal. In: 10th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility. IEEE, pp 400–404
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Commission IE (2005) Integrated circuits – measurement of electromagnetic emissions, 150 khz to 1 ghz – part 4: measurement of conducted emissions – direct coupling method. Technical report, vol 61967‑4. IEC, Geneva Commission IE (2005) Integrated circuits – measurement of electromagnetic emissions, 150 khz to 1 ghz – part 4: measurement of conducted emissions – direct coupling method. Technical report, vol 61967‑4. IEC, Geneva
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Commission IE (2007) Integrated circuits – measurement of electromagnetic immunity – part 4: direct rf power injection method. Technical report, vol 62132‑4. International Electrotechnical Commission, Geneva Commission IE (2007) Integrated circuits – measurement of electromagnetic immunity – part 4: direct rf power injection method. Technical report, vol 62132‑4. International Electrotechnical Commission, Geneva
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Deutschmann B, Winkler G, Jungreithmair R (2002) Characterization of integrated circuits electromagnetic emission with IEC 61967‑4. In: Proc. of the International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility. Citeseer, Deutschmann B, Winkler G, Jungreithmair R (2002) Characterization of integrated circuits electromagnetic emission with IEC 61967‑4. In: Proc. of the International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility. Citeseer,
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Kircher D, Deutschmann B, Profanter S (2023) A modular approach of an electromagnetic compatibility test system for integrated circuits. In: 2023 Austrochip Workshop on Microelectronics (Austrochip), Graz, Austria Kircher D, Deutschmann B, Profanter S (2023) A modular approach of an electromagnetic compatibility test system for integrated circuits. In: 2023 Austrochip Workshop on Microelectronics (Austrochip), Graz, Austria
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Op’t Land S, Perdriau R, Ramdani M et al (2012) Design of a 20 ghz dpi method for soic8. In: International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility-EMC EUROPE. IEEE, pp 1–6 Op’t Land S, Perdriau R, Ramdani M et al (2012) Design of a 20 ghz dpi method for soic8. In: International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility-EMC EUROPE. IEEE, pp 1–6
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Pues H, Pissoort D (2012) Design of iec 62132‑4 compliant dpi test boards that work up to 2 ghz. In: International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility-EMC EUROPE. IEEE, pp 1–4 Pues H, Pissoort D (2012) Design of iec 62132‑4 compliant dpi test boards that work up to 2 ghz. In: International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility-EMC EUROPE. IEEE, pp 1–4
Metadaten
Titel
A modular and scalable system for electromagnetic compatibility testing of integrated circuits
verfasst von
Daniel Kircher
Simon Profanter
Bernd Deutschmann
Publikationsdatum
10.01.2024
Verlag
Springer Vienna
Erschienen in
e+i Elektrotechnik und Informationstechnik / Ausgabe 1/2024
Print ISSN: 0932-383X
Elektronische ISSN: 1613-7620
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00502-023-01199-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2024

e+i Elektrotechnik und Informationstechnik 1/2024 Zur Ausgabe

Neuer Inhalt