Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
MTZ-Fachkongress

Antriebe und Energiesysteme von morgen


Austausch von Automobil- und Energiewirtschaft

Am 14./15. Mai geht es in Chemnitz um die Mobilitätswende durch Elektro- und Wasserstofffahrzeuge.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science
Erschienen in: Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 4/2022

18.01.2022 | Original Empirical Research

Digital selling: organizational and managerial influences for frontline readiness and effectiveness

verfasst von: Ryan Mullins, Raj Agnihotri

Erschienen in: Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science | Ausgabe 4/2022

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

To provide much-needed guidance for digital transformations in sales organizations, we draw from change readiness theory to propose a digital selling effectiveness framework. Based on a cross-industry sample of 225 salespeople across 69 sales organizations, findings reveal key organizational and managerial influence mechanisms that impact digital selling readiness, and consequently, effectiveness. We discover that digital selling psychological climate drives digital selling readiness; however, results also reveal the strong influence marketing has over this relationship. Marketing-sales joint rewards increase the influence of digital selling climate on readiness, whereas marketing-sales rivalry weakens such influence. On the managerial side, positive outcome framing, an apprising managerial influence tactic, positively impacts digital selling readiness. At the same time, sanction influence tactics negate the effect of positive outcome framing on readiness while consultation tactics yield little influence. Importantly, we demonstrate an association between digital selling readiness and effectiveness, illustrating a performance-based approach for successful digital transformation.
Vorheriger Artikel CEO narcissism, brand acquisition and disposal, and stock returns
Nächster Artikel How does power distance belief impact consumers’ responses to demotion in hierarchical loyalty programs? The dual processes of monetary and psychological losses

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Fußnoten
1
In comparison to a broad general theory, our middle-range theory approach (i.e., less abstract and more specific to an empirical context) (Merton, 1968) aims “to form a basis for more abstract general theories that are more diversified, inclusive, loose knit, and generalized across domains” (Setia et al., 2013, p. 566).
 
2
In their seminal work, Kipnis and Schmidt (1985) suggest that managerial influence tactics can be grouped into categories of hard, soft, and rational tactics. Hard tactics involve the use of authority/power, soft tactics involve the use of power-sharing, and apprising falls within the category of rational tactics, which rely on explanations and evidence (Lee et al., 2017, p. 213).
 
3
Given previous research has shown that rewards may reduce the impact of interfunctional conflict, there is potential for an interaction between marketing-sales rivalry and joint rewards. As a result, we tested the possibility of a three-way moderation between marketing-sales rivalry, marketing-sales joint-rewards, and digital selling climate. Results did not support this model however (γ = –.008, SE = .075, p > .40), providing empirical evidence for the specification of the proposed model.
 
Literatur
Agnihotri, R., Dingus, R., Hu, M. Y., & Krush, M. T. (2016). Social media: Influencing customer satisfaction in B2B sales. Industrial Marketing Management, 53, 172–180.CrossRef
Agnihotri, R. (2020). Social media, customer engagement, and sales organizations: a research agenda. Industrial Marketing Management, 90(October), 291–299.CrossRef
Agnihotri, R. (2021). From sales force automation to digital transformation: how social media, social CRM, and artificial intelligence technologies are influencing the sales process. In A Research Agenda for Sales. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Ahearne, M., Jelinek, R., & Rapp, A. (2005). Moving beyond the direct effect of SFA adoption on salesperson performance: Training and support as key moderating factors. Industrial Marketing Management, 34(4), 379–388.CrossRef
Ahearne, M., Hughes, D. E., & Schillewaert, N. (2007). Why sales reps should welcome information technology: Measuring the impact of CRM-based IT on sales effectiveness. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 24(4), 336–349.CrossRef
Ahearne, M., & Rapp, A. (2010). The role of technology at the interface between salespeople and consumers. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 30(2), 111–120.CrossRef
Ahearne, M., Jones, E., Rapp, A., & Mathieu, J. (2008). High touch through high tech: The impact of salesperson technology usage on sales performance via mediating mechanisms. Management Science, 54(4), 671–685.CrossRef
Armenakis, A. A., Harris, S. G., & Mossholder, K. W. (1993). Creating readiness for organizational change. Human relations, 46(6), 681–703.CrossRef
Armenakis, A. A., Bernerth, J. B., Pitts, J. P., & Walker, H. J. (2007). Organizational change recipients' beliefs scale: Development of an assessment instrument. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 43(4), 481–505.CrossRef
Bartunek, J. M., Rousseau, D. M., Rudolph, J. W., & DePalma, J. A. (2006). On the receiving end: Sensemaking, emotion, and assessments of an organizational change initiated by others. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 42(2), 182–206.CrossRef
Bolander, W., Chaker, N. N., Pappas, A., & Bradbury, D. R. (2021). Operationalizing salesperson performance with secondary data: aligning practice, scholarship, and theory. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 1–20.
Bommer, W. H., Rich, G. A., & Rubin, R. S. (2005). Changing attitudes about change: Longitudinal effects of transformational leader behavior on employee cynicism about organizational change. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 26(7), 733–753.CrossRef
Bouckenooghe, D., Devos, G., & Van den Broeck, H. (2009). Organizational change questionnaire–climate of change, processes, and readiness: Development of a new instrument. The Journal of psychology, 143(6), 559–599.CrossRef
Bouckenooghe, D. (2010). Positioning change recipients’ attitudes toward change in the organizational change literature. The Journal of applied behavioral science, 46(4), 500–531.CrossRef
Bharadwaj, N., & Shipley, G. M. (2020). Salesperson communication effectiveness in a digital sales interaction. Industrial Marketing Management, 90, 106–112.CrossRef
Bill, F., Feurer, S., & Klarmann, M. (2020). Salesperson social media use in business-to-business relationships: An empirical test of an integrative framework linking antecedents and consequences. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 48, 734–752.CrossRef
Cable, D. M., & Judge, T. A. (2003). Managers' upward influence tactic strategies: The role of manager personality and supervisor leadership style. Journal of Organizational Behavior: the International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 24(2), 197–214.CrossRef
Chang, T. J., Yeh, S. P., & Yeh, I. J. (2007). The Effects of Joint Rewards System in New Product Development. International Journal of Manpower, 28, 276–297.CrossRef
Childs, D. R., Lee, N., Dewsnap, B., & Cadogan, J. W. (2019). A within-person theoretical perspective in sales research: outlining recommendations for adoption and consideration of boundary conditions. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 39(4), 386–399.CrossRef
Chonko, L. B., Jones, E., Roberts, J. A., & Dubinsky, A. J. (2002). The role of environmental turbulence, readiness for change, and salesperson learning in the success of sales force change. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 22(4), 227–245.
Churchill Jr., G. A. (1979). A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. Journal of Marketing Research, 16(1), 64–73.CrossRef
Clarke, S., & Ward, K. (2006). The role of leader influence tactics and safety climate in engaging employees' safety participation. Risk analysis, 26(5), 1175–1185.CrossRef
Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2013). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Routledge.CrossRef
Cron, W. L., & Baldauf, A. (2021). Practical insights for sales force digitalization success: the scholar’s perspective. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 41(2), 103–106.CrossRef
Dewsnap, B., & Jobber, D. (2000). The sales–marketing interface in consumer packaged-goods companies: a conceptual framework. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 20(2), 109–119.
Evans, K. R., Landry, T. D., Li, P. C., & Zou, S. (2007). How sales controls affect job-related outcomes: the role of organizational sales-related psychological climate perceptions. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 35(3), 445–459.CrossRef
Falbe, C. M., & Yukl, G. (1992). Consequences for managers of using single influence tactics and combinations of tactics. Academy of Management Journal, 35(3), 638–652.CrossRef
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of marketing research, 18(1), 39–50.CrossRef
Furst, S. A., & Cable, D. M. (2008). Employee resistance to organizational change: Managerial influence tactics and leader-member exchange. Journal of Applied psychology, 93(2), 453.CrossRef
Gist, M. E., & Mitchell, T. R. (1992). Self-efficacy: A theoretical analysis of its determinants and malleability. Academy of Management Review, 17(2), 183–211.CrossRef
Grégoire, Y., & Fisher, R. J. (2008). Customer betrayal and retaliation: when your best customers become your worst enemies. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36(2), 247–261.CrossRef
Guenzi, P., & Habel, J. (2020). Mastering the digital transformation of sales. California Management Review, 62(4), 57–85.CrossRef
Guenzi, P., & Nijssen, E. J. (2021). The impact of digital transformation on salespeople: an empirical investigation using the JD-R model. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 41(2), 130.CrossRef
Hair, J. F. (2009). Multivariate data analysis.
Herold, D. M., Fedor, D. B., & Caldwell, S. D. (2007). Beyond change management: A multilevel investigation of contextual and personal influences on employees' commitment to change. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(4), 942.CrossRef
Hochstein, B., Bolander, W., Goldsmith, R., & Plouffe, C. R. (2019). Adapting influence approaches to informed consumers in high-involvement purchases: are salespeople really doomed? Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 47(1), 118–137.CrossRef
Hoskisson, R. E., Eden, L., Lau, C. M., & Wright, M. (2000). Strategy in emerging economies. Academy of Management Journal, 43(3), 249–267.CrossRef
Hunter, G. K., & Perreault Jr., W. D. (2007). Making sales technology effective. Journal of Marketing, 71(1), 16–34.CrossRef
Hunter, G. K., & Panagopoulos, N. G. (2015). Commitment to technological change, sales force intelligence norms, and salesperson key outcomes. Industrial Marketing Management, 50, 162–179.CrossRef
Hulland, J., Nenkov, G. Y., & Barclay, D. W. (2012). Perceived marketing–sales relationship effectiveness: a matter of justice. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40(3), 450–467.CrossRef
Hulland, J., Baumgartner, H., & Smith, K. M. (2018). Marketing survey research best practices: evidence and recommendations from a review of JAMS articles. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 46(1), 92–108.CrossRef
Itani, O. S., Agnihotri, R., & Dingus, R. (2017). Social media use in B2b sales and its impact on competitive intelligence collection and adaptive selling: Examining the role of learning orientation as an enabler. Industrial Marketing Management, 66, 64–79.CrossRef
Itani, O. S., Krush, M. T., Agnihotri, R., & Trainor, K. J. (2020). Social media and customer relationship management technologies: Influencing buyer-seller information exchanges. Industrial Marketing Management, 90, 264–275.CrossRef
Jaworski, B. J., & Kohli, A. K. (1993). Market orientation: antecedents and consequences. Journal of Marketing, 57(3), 53–70.CrossRef
Johnson, D. S., & Bharadwaj, S. (2005). Digitization of selling activity and sales force performance: An empirical investigation. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 33(1), 3–18.CrossRef
Kipnis, D., & Schmidt, S. (1985). The language of persuasion. Psychology Today, 4, 40–46.
Kirrane, M., Lennon, M., O’Connor, C., & Fu, N. (2017). Linking perceived management support with employees’ readiness for change: the mediating role of psychological capital. Journal of Change Management, 17(1), 47–66.CrossRef
Kim, T. G., Hornung, S., & Rousseau, D. M. (2011). Change-supportive employee behavior: Antecedents and the moderating role of time. Journal of Management, 37(6), 1664–1693.CrossRef
Klein, K. J., & Sorra, J. S. (1996). The challenge of innovation implementation. Academy of Management Review, 21, 1055–1080.CrossRef
Kotler, P., Rackham, N., & Krishnaswamy, S. (2006). Ending the war between sales and marketing. Harvard Business Review, 84(7/8), 68.
Kumar, B., Sharma, A., Vatavwala, S., & Kumar, P. (2020). Digital mediation in business-to-business marketing: A bibliometric analysis. Industrial Marketing Management, 85, 126–140.CrossRef
Le Meunier-FitzHugh, K., Massey, G. R., & Piercy, N. F. (2011). The impact of aligned rewards and senior manager attitudes on conflict and collaboration between sales and marketing. Industrial Marketing Management, 40(7), 1161–1171.
LeBreton, J. M., & Senter, J. L. (2008). Answers to 20 questions about interrater reliability and interrater agreement. Organizational research methods, 11(4), 815–852.CrossRef
Lee, S., Han, S., Cheong, M., Kim, S. L., & Yun, S. (2017). How do I get my way? A meta-analytic review of research on influence tactics. The Leadership Quarterly, 28(1), 210–228.CrossRef
Leonard-Barton, D., & Deschamps, I. (1988). Managerial influence in the implementation of new technology. Management Science, 34(10), 1252–1265.CrossRef
Li, F., Larimo, J., & Leonidou, L. C. (2020). Social media marketing strategy: definition, conceptualization, taxonomy, validation, and future agenda. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 1–20.
Lokuge, S., Sedera, D., Grover, V., & Dongming, X. (2019). Organizational readiness for digital innovation: Development and empirical calibration of a construct. Information & Management, 56(3), 445–461.CrossRef
McFarland, R. G., Challagalla, G. N., & Shervani, T. A. (2006). Influence tactics for effective adaptive selling. Journal of Marketing, 70(4), 103–117.CrossRef
McFarland, R. G., & Dixon, A. L. (2019). An updated taxonomy of salesperson influence tactics. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 39(3), 238–253.CrossRef
Maltz, E., & Kohli, A. K. (1996). Market intelligence dissemination across functional boundaries. Journal of marketing Research, 33(1), 47–61.CrossRef
Mathieu, J., Ahearne, M., & Taylor, S. R. (2007). A longitudinal cross-level model of leader and salesperson influences on sales force technology use and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(2), 528–537.CrossRef
Mattila, M., Yrjölä, M., & Hautamäki, P. (2021). Digital transformation of business-to-business sales: what needs to be unlearned? Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 1–17.
Menguc, B., & Auh, S. (2006). Creating a firm-level dynamic capability through capitalizing on market orientation and innovativeness. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34(1), 63–73.CrossRef
Menon, A., Bharadwaj, S. G., & Howell, R. (1996). The quality and effectiveness of marketing strategy: Effects of functional and dysfunctional conflict in intraorganizational relationships. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 24(4), 299.CrossRef
Merton, R. K. (1968). On the sociological Theories of the Middle Range, in Social Theory and Social Structure. The Free Press.
Mirvis, P. H., Sales, A. L., & Hackett, E. J. (1991). The implementation and adoption of new technology in organizations: the impact on work, people, and culture. Human Resource Management, 30(1), 113–139.CrossRef
Mittal, V., & Ross Jr., W. T. (1998). The impact of positive and negative affect and issue framing on issue interpretation and risk taking. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 76(3), 298–324.CrossRef
Morgan, A. J., & Inks, S. A. (2001). Technology and the sales force: Increasing acceptance of sales force automation. Industrial Marketing Management, 30(5), 463–472.CrossRef
Mulki, J. P., Jaramillo, F., Malhotra, S., & Locander, W. B. (2012). Reluctant employees and felt stress: The moderating impact of manager decisiveness. Journal of Business Research, 65(1), 77–83.CrossRef
Ogilvie, J., Rapp, A., Bachrach, D. G., Mullins, R., & Harvey, J. (2017). Do sales and service compete? The impact of multiple psychological climates on frontline employee performance. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 37(1), 11–26.CrossRef
Plouffe, C. R., Bolander, W., Cote, J. A., & Hochstein, B. (2016). Does the customer matter most? Exploring strategic frontline employees’ influence of customers, the internal business team, and external business partners. Journal of Marketing, 80(1), 106–123.CrossRef
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of applied psychology, 88(5), 879.CrossRef
Preacher, K. J., Zyphur, M. J., & Zhang, Z. (2010). A general multilevel SEM framework for assessing multilevel mediation. Psychological Methods, 15(3), 209–233.CrossRef
Preacher, K. J., Zhang, Z., & Zyphur, M. J. (2016). Multilevel structural equation models for assessing moderation within and across levels of analysis. Psychological methods, 21(2), 189.CrossRef
Rabe-Hesketh, S., Skrondal, A., & Pickles, A. (2004). Generalized multilevel structural equation modeling. Psychometrika, 69(2), 167–190.CrossRef
Rafferty, A. E., Jimmieson, N. L., & Armenakis, A. A. (2013). Change readiness: A multilevel review. Journal of Management, 39(1), 110–135.CrossRef
Ramaswamy, V., & Ozcan, K. (2018). Offerings as digitalized interactive platforms: A conceptual framework and implications. Journal of Marketing, 82(4), 19–31.CrossRef
Rapp, A., Agnihotri, R., & Forbes, L. P. (2008). The sales force technology–performance chain: The role of adaptive selling and effort. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 28(4), 335–350.CrossRef
Román, S., & Rodríguez, R. (2015). The influence of sales force technology use on outcome performance. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 30(6), 771–783.CrossRef
Rouziès, D., & Hulland, J. (2014). Does marketing and sales integration always pay off? Evidence from a social capital perspective. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 42(5), 511–527.CrossRef
Ruta, C. D. (2005). The application of change management theory to HR portal implementation in subsidiaries of multinational corporations. Human Resource Management, 44(1), 35–53.CrossRef
Sarin, S., Challagalla, G., & Kohli, A. K. (2012). Implementing changes in marketing strategy: The role of perceived outcome-and process-oriented supervisory actions. Journal of Marketing Research, 49(4), 564–580.CrossRef
Saxe, R., & Weitz, B. A. (1982). The SOCO scale: A measure of the customer orientation of salespeople. Journal of Marketing Research, 19(3), 343–351.CrossRef
Schrock, W. A., Hughes, D. E., Fu, F. Q., Richards, K. A., & Jones, E. (2016). Better together: Trait competitiveness and competitive psychological climate as antecedents of salesperson organizational commitment and sales performance. Marketing Letters, 27(2), 351–360.CrossRef
Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 580-607.
Setia, P., Venkatesh, V., & Joglekar, S. (2013). Leveraging digital technologies: How information quality leads to localized capabilities and customer service performance. MIS Quarterly, 565–590.
Seo, M., Putnam, L. L., & Bartunek, J. M. (2004). Dualities and tensions of planned organizational change. Handbook of organizational change and innovation, 73–107.
Siemsen, E., Roth, A., & Oliveira, P. (2010). Common method bias in regression models with linear, quadratic, and interaction effects. Organizational research methods, 13(3), 456–476.CrossRef
Singh, J., Flaherty, K., Sohi, R. S., Deeter-Schmelz, D., Habel, J., Le Meunier-FitzHugh, K., Malshe, A., Mullins, R., & Onyemah, V. (2019). Sales profession and professionals in the age of digitization and artificial intelligence technologies: concepts, priorities, and questions. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 39(1), 2–22.CrossRef
Sleep, S., Lam, S. K., & Hulland, J. (2018). The sales–marketing integration gap: a social identity approach. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 38(4), 371–390.CrossRef
Sonenshein, S., & Dholakia, U. (2012). Explaining employee engagement with strategic change implementation: A meaning-making approach. Organization Science, 23(1), 1–23.CrossRef
Steenburgh, T., & Ahearne, M. (2012). Motivating salespeople: What really works. Harvard Business Review, (July-August).
Sujan, H., Weitz, B. A., & Kumar, N. (1994). Learning orientation, working smart, and effective selling. Journal of Marketing, 58(3), 39–52.CrossRef
Sundaram, S., Schwarz, A., Jones, E., & Chin, W. W. (2007). Technology use on the front line: how information technology enhances individual performance. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 35(1), 101–112.CrossRef
Venkatesh, R., Kohli, A. K., & Zaltman, G. (1995). Influence strategies in buying centers. Journal of Marketing, 59(4), 71–82.CrossRef
Vieira, V. A., de Almeida, M. I. S., Agnihotri, R., da Silva, N. S. D. A. C., & Arunachalam, S. (2019). In pursuit of an effective B2B digital marketing strategy in an emerging market. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 47(6), 1085–1108.CrossRef
Weiner, B. J. (2009). A theory of organizational readiness for change. Implementation Science, 4, 67–75.CrossRef
Weiner, B. J., Belden, C. M., Bergmire, D. M., & Johnston, M. (2011). The meaning and measurement of implementation climate. Implementation Science, 6(1), 78.CrossRef
Weinstein, L., & Mullins, R. (2012). Technology usage and sales teams: A multilevel analysis of the antecedents of usage. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 32(2), 245–259.CrossRef
Ye, J., Marinova, D., & Singh, J. (2007). Strategic change implementation and performance loss in the front lines. Journal of Marketing, 71(4), 156–171.CrossRef
Yukl, G., & Chavez, C. (2002). Influence tactics and leader effectiveness. Leadership, 139–165.
Zoltners, A., Sinha, P., Sahay, D., Shastri, A., & Lorimer, S. E. (2021). Practical insights to ensure sales force digitalization success. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 41(2), 87–102.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Digital selling: organizational and managerial influences for frontline readiness and effectiveness
verfasst von
Ryan Mullins
Raj Agnihotri
Publikationsdatum
18.01.2022
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science / Ausgabe 4/2022
Print ISSN: 0092-0703
Elektronische ISSN: 1552-7824
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-021-00836-5

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2022

Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 4/2022 Zur Ausgabe

Original Empirical Research

Augmented reality-delivered product information at the point of sale: when information controllability backfires

Original Empirical Research

Customer-oriented salespeople’s value creation and claiming in price negotiations

Review Paper

Brand actions and financial consequences: a review of key findings and directions for future research

Original Empirical Research

Critics’ conformity to consumers in movie evaluation

Correction

Correction to: Collect them all! Increasing product category cross-selling using the incompleteness effect

Original Empirical Research

CEO narcissism, brand acquisition and disposal, and stock returns